R. MUNYARADZI FOURTH AFCOP ANNUAL MEETING 23-25 MAY 2011 – NAIROBI, KENYA HOW CAN WE OVERCOME CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leveraging inter-sectoral action to address the social determinants of health: view from the health system Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town; London.
Advertisements

WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Improving Budgetary Outcomes
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
ZIMBABWEAN EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING RBM
Challenging the Budget Creating Incentives for Results Rwandas Experience Elias Baingana - Budget Director.
South Africas MTEF Effective expenditure for development Malawi Poverty Monitoring System Workshop July 2002.
High Level Regional Consultation for Policy Makers to Enhance Leadership in Planning the National HIV & AIDS Response S P Aligning AIDS & Development Planning.
MerSETA Strategic Plan Derrick Peo General Manager : Innovation, Research & Development.
Information & Communication Technology for Development in Arab Region e-government in the Arab Region Najat Rochdi Regional Coordinator
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Feedback Mechanisms in Malawi Key challenges and way forward Ministry of Finance and Development Planning MALAWI.
SEM Planning Model.
Audit outcomes - Briefing to the Chairperson of the Department of Mineral Resources Portfolio Committee Presenters: Jan van Schalkwyk Corporate Executive.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
1 Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs Compliance monitoring in the Department of Home Affairs 30 April 2013.
UK Government experience in Performance Framework Reform
Developing a Strategy: Managing the process Neil Fantom Development Data Group.
IDP Conference 2004 “Developmental Governance in Action” SESSION 7: Integrated Governance: > Provincial-Municipal Engagement - A Provincial Perspective.
Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Capacity Development for Improved Performance Public Sector Organizations Cedric Saldanha Melbourne, Australia
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Capacity Building for Better Agricultural Statistics Misha Belkindas and Graham Eele Development Data Group, World Bank.
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT IN TANZANIA. STAGE 1 Service Delivery Survey - MDAs have to undertake these surveys which focus on external customers and are.
1. Development Planning and Administration MPA – 403 Lecture 17 FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood Bagram.
ICD and PRSPs BCO PRSP Learning Day, July 28 th 2005.
Gender Responsive Budgeting An introduction Catharina Schmitz.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
The Role of Parliament in the budget process. Overview Actors in the budget process Stages in the budget process Budgeting for the medium term.
The Budget Process A simplified and generalized summary of budgeting in the public sector. Political Dynamics Actors in the budget process Stages in the.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
BEYOND MKUKUTA FRAMEWORK: Monitoring and Evaluation, Communication and Implementation Guide Presentation to the DPG Meeting 18 th January, 2011.
October 8 & 9 th, 2008 Conference on the Economy (COTE) University of the West Indies Programme Management Office Ministry of Planning, Housing and the.
Trade SWAp : The “Integrating” Framework (When can a SWAp do to increase mainstreaming and coordination) EIF Regional Asian Workshop Kathmandu, June 20.
Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Sequenced Information Strategy –incorporating short-term programme proposal Paris21 Consortium meeting : June 2000 Tony Williams UK Department.
1 Planning and Programming for Effective Use of External Audit Resources Victor Rezendes Managing Director Strategic Issues U.S. General Accounting Office.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
THE SECURITY SECTOR REVIEW PROCESS. ISSUES Understanding: -Scope: What are the elements of a SS Review? -Need: Why review the Security Sector? -Process:
Policy, Budgeting and Oversight: The Role of the Legislature in Uganda Ishmael M Magona Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
PUENTE IN THE CARIBBEAN PROGRAMME PHASE 2: Internship on Social Protection Strategies. October 26 November 3, 2009 Santiago, Chile. Presentation: Progress.
Walker Review How should PE firms respond? Changing the Business Landscape.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
SESSION 2 ISSAT Governing Board Core Group Meeting 2013 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
FORMULATING EXTENSION POLICY, KENYA’S EXPERIENCE BY MARY KAMAU DIRECTOR, EXTENSION & TRAINING MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE KENYA DURING THE EXTENSION WORKSHOP,
Presenter:- Mrs. Josette Maxwell-Dalsou Chief Economist Economic Planning Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and National Development.
1 Highlights of Gaps in the Preparation of MTBF/MTFF/MTEF Governments in Africa introduced: The Medium Term Budget/Fiscal/Expenditure Frameworks (MTBF,
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
strengthening the elements of governance in Tajikistan
4/29/2018 NDA STRATEGIC PLAN AND ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 3 MAY 2017 MRS THAMO MZOBE CHIEF.
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
Derick W. Brinkerhoff RTI International
BPRC Report to the PC 16/04/2013.
Budgeting systems : Monitoring and Evaluation
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
Implementing Budget Reforms
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee - Labour
Director-General: Mr. E Africa
Strategic Management and
Strategic Management and
Presentation transcript:

R. MUNYARADZI FOURTH AFCOP ANNUAL MEETING MAY 2011 – NAIROBI, KENYA HOW CAN WE OVERCOME CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES?

DEFINITION OF OUTCOMES Consequences of specific policies, programs, outputs and initiatives undertaken by entities. Well ‐ being outcomes Process outcomes

DEFINITION OF OUTCOMES Intended and unintended results and consequences of activities and outputs. Tend to be categorised into short-, medium- and longer-term results/changes in : Skills Attitudes Knowledge, Behaviors, Status, or Life conditions

WHAT IS PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES? The use of client needs and desired results (outcomes) as the foundation for determining appropriate policies, interventions and programs.

BENEFITS OF PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES In Zimbabwe, planning for outcomes was introduced in 2005 under the Results Based Management system: Focuses on results rather than inputs, activities and strategies Leads to better utilization of scarce resources Satisfies requirements of organisations to plan and measure progress Provides greater transparency and accountability Ends in pre-determined results being achieved Fosters teamwork resulting in better planning, implementation, accountability and overall performance Strengthened Parliamentary oversight role

CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES Zimbabwe has experienced the following challenges Identifying which problems/issues warrant attention Linkages between departmental and institutional levels of an organisation Identifying and filling gaps in plans Identifying indicators to measure performance Identifying targets Measuring all of the indicators Limited resources to move initiative forward – especially in the period before hyperinflation Involving politicians in budgeting for developmental outcomes – short time horizons- problem of the ‘tragedy of the commons’ Political polarisation leading to short term political benefits other than long term developmental focus Dealing with resistance to change – some Permanent Secretaries have not seriously embraced RBM and still stuck in the managing for activities and expenditure mode

OVERCOMING CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES THE CASE OF ZIMBABWE Developing a widely shared National Vision – Zimbabwe National Vision 2020 being revised and publicised to guide the implementation of RBM A Results Based Five-Year Medium Term Plan is being developed to guide the budgeting process starting year 2012 Developing sectoral, organisational and departmental visions to guide inter-ministerial programmes and projects Developing organisational and departmental missions and Results Based Strategic Plans to focus Ministries and Departments on outcomes Training of Ministers and Parliamentarians in RBM and benefits of focusing on outcomes

OVERCOMING CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES THE CASE OF ZIMBABWE Implementing organisational and departmental plans – with KRAs, Goals, Objectives, Strategies, Client Needs, Stakeholders, Assumptions and Risks Develop outcome based work and performance monitoring plans Clearly defined results to be achieved – outputs and outcomes Introduced Performance Contracts for Permanent Secretaries Re-introduced client service charters Engagement of general public, civic organisations, private sector, donors and development through budget consultations and the Zimbabwe Community of Practice on MfDR

OVERCOMING CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES THE CASE OF ZIMBABWE Whose outcomes? Conduct clients’ needs/problem analysis Conduct stakeholder analysis Staff should focus on the clients’ views not their own Use beneficiaries/participants to identify outcomes Group outcomes into – economic, social/political and environmental Develop specific indicators for each outcome

OVERCOMING CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES THE CASE OF ZIMBABWE Implementing Results Based Budgeting- Performance Agreements being signed with the Ministry of Finance for Budgetary Accountability Informed by the 3- Year Budget Framework Allocate financial resources for specific outcomes Develop output implementation plans that will contribute to the achievement of outcomes Implement program based budgeting

USE LOGIC MODELS Resource s/ inputs Activitie s OutputsShort term outcomes Medium term outcomes Impacts Your planned workYour intended results Performance Management National indicators and local indicators Plausible = it is reasonable to expect that outputs will lead to short term outcomes, short term outcomes will lead to medium term outcomes and so on Doable = you have the sufficient resources to enable you to achieve the outcomes

DEVELOP HUMAN CAPACITY AND IMPLEMENT PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS Train political leadership and all levels of civil servants in planning for outcomes Manage change Capacitate top management and staff to plan and manage for outcomes Implement Performance Contracts for all levels of implementers for accountability for results Develop a managing for outcomes culture Provide incentives to improve performance Create champions and foster leadership for results at all levels In the case of Zimbabwe, the Chief Secretary to the President and Cabinet is leading the RBM initiative

MONITOR, EVALUATE AND COMMUNICATE RESULTS Zimbabwe Government has developed an in-built results based monitoring and evaluation system Captures and monitors outcome achievement on an annual basis Communicate results achievement and non- achievement to clients and stakeholders Use of dashboards for reporting performance

LESSONS LEARNED AND WAY FORWARD e-Government has been introduced in the Government of Zimbabwe and seeks to: Embrace the use of ICTs to enhance faster, cheaper and seamless delivery of services - Use ICTs as media of communication as well as stakeholder and client participation All Ministries have developed interactive websites wherein they publish their Performance Agreements, Performance Contracts, Performance Results and Client Service Charters It is expected that this will attract public scrutiny for greater accountability

LESSONS LEARNED AND WAY FORWARD Comprehensive planning – identify high level goals that are basic, generic to be contained in the Medium Term Plan Use develop indicators and benchmarks – Human Development Index, Governance, Mo Ibrahim etc... in planning for outcomes Identify strategies and indicators early in program implementation- determine specific solutions Suit solutions to addressing clients’ needs and problems Not taking too much at once – implement quick wins Dedicate resources, for planning and monitoring for outcomes Deepen the involvement of Cabinet, Parliament and Civil Society in the budget process Deepen implementation of Performance Contracts to include all State Enterprises and Parastatals and Local Authorities Continue training and learning from what works and what does not