The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIDAs Aid Effectiveness Agenda October Canadian aid program CIDA is the lead agency for development assistance The International Assistance Envelope.
Advertisements

ENHANCING AID EFFECTIVENESS
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Capacity Development for Cooperation Effectiveness in Latin America and the Caribbean OAS Subregional Workshop for Cooperation Effectiveness: Caribbean.
Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.
Partnerships for Prosperity (P4P) An overview PPD Workshop, March 2014.
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
Ongoing Work of the Joint Venture on Managing for Development Results (JV MfDR) Stefan Schmitz, Senior Policy Advisor Aid Effectiveness OECD Development.
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
1 Development Cooperation Policies Trade Union Development Cooperation Network February 2009.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
Elaine Ireland Policy Adviser: Global Health Global Health Policy Forum 9 th September 2010 Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector: A civil society perspective.
The Current Debate on the Post-2015 Development Agenda Assistant Secretary-General Thomas Gass December 2014.
After Busan, the Emerging Development Agendas Hubert de MILLY, Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD.
Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.
About the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness
AN INTRODUCTION Country Systems. Outline 1. What are Country Systems? 2. What does it mean to use country systems? 3. Why does the ‘use of country systems’
EIP Session. Current Proposals under EIP CHANGE MANAGMT AND MRH INDICATORS USE OF COUNTRY SYSTEMS ACCOUNTABLE & INCLUSIVE INSTITUTIONS OTHER AREAS DFID,
The International Framework of Aid and Development Effectiveness Karin Fällman, Sida 13 February 2014.
1 Donor coordination and effectiveness of aid to agriculture Effectiveness in Aid to Agriculture Czech action to strengthen food security Glopolis / FoRS.
Global Partnership and Aid Lee, Kye Woo KDI School of Public Policy and Management.
Shaida Badiee, Director Development Data Group The World Bank International Forum on Monitoring Economic Development Beijing, China Sept 28, 2011.
Gender and Development Effectiveness. Entry points for Tanzania? DPG Main, 8 May 2012 Anna Collins-Falk, Representative, UN Women on behalf of DPG Gender.
Health Partnership Group Retreat Saturday 18 April, 2015.
Development Cooperation and Partnerships Strategy ( ) October 2014 KIM Lumang Bopata Policy Department.
Overview Outcomes from Busan HLF 4 Faye Lee, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Cooperation.
Ownership, Results & Accountability
Findings from the gender equality module of the 2011 Paris Declaration Survey: Towards HLF-4 Jenny Hedman DAC Network on Gender Equality 28 July 2011.
CSO Development Effectiveness and Promotion of an Enabling Environment
Statistics and cooperation: Rome, 24 November 2005 Statistics to Inform Development Policy: the Role of PARIS21 Presentation by Antoine Simonpietri, PARIS21.
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
IHP+: introduction and ministerial review Action for Global Health Conference Strengthening Accountability to Achieve the Health MDGs Madrid, 7 th June.
1 S trengthening accountability for gender equality To learn more visit
1 Collaboration and partnerships for increased impact and effectiveness Kanayo F. Nwanze Vice-President of IFAD October th Replenishment.
Increased and Strengthened Results-Oriented Development Practices In Africa
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
Grant Cameron World Bank Eric Bensel Paris21 Roundtable discussion at the 18 th session of the CCSA Luxembourg, Sept 7-9, 2011.
International Development on Aid Effectiveness Presenter Said Muhammed Jama Aid Coordination Expert Ministry of National Planning and Development.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
WEBINAR 3 rd UN DCF Survey on Global Accountability Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UNDESA.
Country Results and Accountability Agreements EU experts meeting on results Brussels 16 November 2011.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Aid Coordination Roundtable Meeting 09 July 2009 Accra Agenda of Action and The Paris Declaration.
Localizing the Paris Declaration and Improving Aid Coordination and Effectiveness in Papua New Guinea – Our Experience Presentation to the Regional Aid.
Statistics for Transparency, Accountability, and Results: The Busan Action Plan for Statistics PARIS21 & The World BankMeeting on the Busan Action Plan.
Embracing the Paris Principles and AAA to Curb Corruption and Enhance Development Performance Mitchell O’Brien Governance Specialist Team Lead – Parliament.
PARIS21 Involvement at HLF4 on Aid Effectiveness Board meeting OECD Conference Centre 27 April 2011.
“AID EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH Challenges and opportunities Marielle Hart Action for Global Health.
Harnessing the data revolution for sustainable development in the global statistical system Meeting of Directors of National Statistics Offices on the.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
The Busan Action Plan for Statistics: An Update on the Implementation Shaida Badiee, Director, Development Economics Data Group, World Bank Committee for.
Overview and Strategic Direction Presenter: April Golden February 24, 2016.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.
Viet Nam Partnership Document (VPD) Hanoi, November 7, 2012 MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT CAO MANH CUONG DGG- FERD/MPI AEF NATIONAL COORDINATOR.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
SWA’s Role in Improving Aid Effectiveness in the WASH sector SWA Country Processes Task Team Geneva, November 2013.
Effective development cooperation principles and quality of partnerships in the post-2015 and Financing for Development context ---Bangladesh perspective.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
Coordination and Partnerships of SDG4-Education 2030 Le Thu Huong Section of Partnerships, Cooperation and Research, UNESCO Paris.
The Global Partnership
Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Vincent Grimaud, Head of Unit
IHP+ First Steering Committee Meeting 15 January 2014
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Co Chair, BetterAid Open Platform for Development Effectiveness
HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS
Presentation transcript:

The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD

HLF-4, 2011 (Busan) a turning point for international development co-operation HLF-3, 2008 (Accra) HLF-2, 2005 (Paris) HLF-1, 2003 (Rome)

Busan: a successful forum Lead role by developing countries in setting the development agenda Evidence-based process confirming the broad relevance of the Paris principles and supporting international accountability Whole-of-government forum ensuring high-level commitment for a global and forward-looking agenda An inclusive agreement underpinned by transparent negotiations Complementary, voluntary initiatives to reach common goals

The outcomes of the HLF-4 A new global partnership: the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation – A wide-range of development actors – Combining forces from all development partners – Reaffirmation of the commitment to Paris/Accra principles – Shared principles, differentiated commitments

FUNCTIONS 4 – GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP FOR EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION Accounta- bility at political level Review of progress Knowledge exchange Open platform Defined by the WP-EFF Supported by OECD and UNDP

New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States New Consensus on More Effective Institutions for Development Elements of the Results and Accountabilit y building block Elements of the Climate Change Finance and Development Effectivenes s building block Agreement on Expanding and Enhancing Public and Private Co- operation for Broad-based, Inclusive and Sustainable Growth Elements of the Transparenc y building block Follow-up initiative on Managing Diversity and Reducing Fragmentatio n Elements of the South- South and Triangular Co-operation building block Busan Action Plan for Statistics Busan Joint Action Plan on Gender Equality and Development HLF4 Outcome Document Stakeholder-specific efforts to support implementation / deepen commitments Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (includes reaffirmation of commitments contained in the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action) Key commitments

The HLF-4 in relation to results and statistical development – what does the evidence tell? Significant progress in: – adopting results-oriented frameworks – designing/implementing National Strategies for the Development of Statistics But progress still lagging behind – Managing for development results should be further targeted and treated as a set of supporting techniques rather than a separate principle in itself – Limited evidence on the extent to which donors are using countries’ own M&E systems for their own reporting needs

The HLF-4 in relation to results and statistical development – outcomes Increased focus on development results through: – Joint risk management frameworks – Country-led and country-level results frameworks with performance indicators consistent with national development strategies – A global Action Plan to enhance capacity for statistics to monitor progress, evaluate impact ensure sound, results-focused public sector management – Mutual assessment reviews, with the active participation of all development actors Strengthening country systems remain central to efforts to build effective institutions: – Use country systems as the default approach – Assess jointly country systems using mutually agreed diagnostic tools

The HLF-4 in relation to results and statistical development – complementary initiatives The Busan Action Plan for Statistics A New Consensus on Effective Institutions and Policies Results Building Block: agreement between developing countries and development co-operation providers to work together to strengthen their cooperation and structures to track results and deepen accountability through country results and accountability agreements: – frameworks that measure the performance of both the developing country and the development cooperation provider, with a limited number of sustainable outcome/output results to be achieved, – use existing structures and frameworks and Strengthen and use Developing Country Systems: e.g. the strengthening of statistical, monitoring, evaluation systems and evidence- based decision making

Busan Action Plan for Statistics – Three Goals I.Fully integrate statistics in decision making. Improve policy makers ability to use statistics Involve statistical producers in planning, budgeting, and M&E discussions II.Promote open access to statistics Within government and to the public III.Increase resources for statistical systems

Busan Action Plan for Statistics – Five Actions 1.Implement statistical strategies according to national priorities 2.Facilitate public access to data through standards and new technologies 3.Increase knowledge and skills needed to use statistics effectively 4.Global summits to recognize the need for national statistical capacity 5.Ensure financing is robust and funding mechanisms responsive Implementation arrangements to be discussed at February 2012 UNSC and March 2012 PARIS21 Annual Meetings