1. The International Framework of Aid and Development Effectiveness Karin Fällman, Sida 13 February 2014

2. Presentation The Aid and Development Affectiveness Agenda ▫Brief history ▫The Busan Process and the Busan Partnership Document/GPEDC The Implementation of GPEDC ▫Framework ▫Review of progress

3. The Declarations HLF-1: Rome 2003 HLF-2: Paris 2005 HLF-3: Accra 2008 ▫CSO EE ▫CSO DEFF HLF-4: Busan 2011

4. Preps for HLF-4 Busan Task Team on CSO Development Effectiveness and Enabling Environment ▫Review of Evidence of Progress ▫Key Messages ▫Communication Strategy – inclusion into HLF-4 and BpD CSOs via OF/BA ▫Reports of Progress ▫CSO Messages ▫Communication Strategy – inclusion into HLF-4 and BpD CSO Sherpa for Busan – a seat at the negotiation table

5. CSO Enabling Environment Multi-dimensional notion incl. various elements of a country’s governance Task Team’s definition (UNSR, ICNL et.al.): ▫Legal Framework: Keeping with existing international HR commitments ▫Policy and Practice: Systematic and inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogue fora ▫Aid Effective Donor CSO Support

6. The Busan Partnership Document TT and CSO messages reflected primarily in §22 on the role of CSOs and §11 and §12 on democratic ownership: 1.Recognition of CSOs as independent development actors 2.Provision of an enabling environment for CSOs 3.Recognition of CSOs’ efforts to enhance their dev. eff. 4.Importance of MSD (also at the core of BpD’s proposal for a “new, inclusive and representative Global Partnership for Effective Development co- operation...that embraces diversity”)

7. Concerns regarding BpD’s clarity and consistency with regard to “democratic ownership” BpD paragraph examples: §11: “Partnerships for development can only succeed if they are led by developing countries…” § 18: “transparent, country-led and country-level results frameworks and platforms will be adopted as a common tool among all concerned actors” Risks: Requirement for all non-state actors to align with one set of national development plans or results frameworks A “one results framework” approach could stifle the right of initiative of non-state actors

8. GPEDC Structure: ▫Three Co-chairs ▫Steering Committee incl. CSO-rep. ▫OEDC/DAC – UNDP support secretariat; Monitoring framework with 10 indicators, incl. CSO EE ▫Uneven progress Four SC meetings; first HLM in Mexico (April 2014) ▫Progress on implementing the Busan commitments ▫Tax and domestic resource mobilisation ▫MICs and effective development co-operation ▫Knowledge sharing, South-South and triangular co- operation ▫The private sector and effective development co- operation

9. Task Team’s Review of Evidence on implementation of BpD 1(2) Democratic ownership and inclusive development partnerships ▫MSD effective and on the rise ▫Ownership seen as alignment with governments’ plans ▫Inclusive partnerships are seen to exist when CSOs act as co-implementers of government programs Enabling environment for civil society ▫Continuous trend towards shrinking space incl. growing restrictions on access to funding and limitations on peaceful assembly

10. Task Team’s Review of Evidence on implementation of BpD 1(2) Donor support to and engagement with civil society ▫Policies in place and a few good examples (CoP) ▫Gap between policies and practice and disrespect for RoI/limited support to CSOs as dev. actors in their own right CSOs’ development effectiveness ▫Istanbul Principles and its framework; CPDE ▫Challenges include CSOs’ internal management and governance; coordination and information sharing across CSOs and with governments; results monitoring and reporting; and ensuring demand-driven programming.

11. What’s the focus? THEMATIC FOCUSMAINSTREAMED 1. Democratic Ownership and Inclusive Development Partnerships Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue, and CSO Independence 2. Donor CSO SupportMulti-Stakeholder Dialogue,and CSO Independence 3. CSO Enabling EnvironmentMulti-Stakeholder Dialogue, and CSO Independence 4. CSO Development Effectiveness

12. For the next session…. ▫ Focus on what works in the implementation of CSO related commitments, and ▫ Sweden’s track record

13. Thank you!