Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
1 The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California’s Implementation of No Child Left Behind Coachella Valley Unified School District Dr. Paul Grafton.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
LCAP Butte County Office of Education. STATE FUNDING $ per ADA Revenue Limit $ Categorical Programs $ K-3 CSR $
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Performance Indicators Presentation September 2011.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Ross Valley School District STAR, API and AYP Summary Toni Beal, Director of Student Services September 27, 2011.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Student Achievement and School Support Division
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Michigan School Report Card Update
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Presentation transcript:

Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District

California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Name of TestTo whom givenGoal California Standards Test (CST) Students in grades 2-11 in language arts, math, science, and social studies Score Proficient or Advanced (other outcomes are Far Below Basic, Below Basic, and Basic) California Modified Assessment (CMA) Special Education students who cannot take the CST N/A California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Special Education students who cannot take the CST or CMA N/A California English Language Development Test (CELDT) English Learners in grades K-12 Score Proficient in English California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Students in grades 10-12Score 350 or higher; 380 for AYP proficiency

 Academic Performance Index (API) (state)  Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) (federal) Subgroups: Ethnicity Socio-Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities  Title III Accountability (AMAOs) (federal) English Learners

Academic Performance Index (API)  California Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) of 1999  Compensatory Model  Growth-Based Yearly Target Adjusted Each Year  Report=composite score both school wide and for subgroups Annual Yearly Progress (AYP)  Federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Legislation  Non-Compensatory Model  100% of Target in 12 years w/ yearly subtargets  Report=% proficient or above in language arts and math—school-wide and for four subgroups

 Numerically significant —100+ students or students representing 15% of population  Ethnicity— Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or more races

 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged --student neither of whose parents have received a high school diploma or -- students eligible for free or reduced lunch  English Learner --students identified as EL based on CELDT --reclassified EL not scoring proficient in ELA 3 times after being reclassified  Students with Disabilities --students receiving special education services --students previously in special education during 2-year follow up

School or Subgroup 2009 Base API Growth Targets percent of the difference between the Base API and the statewide performance target of 800 Ex. If Base Score = = x 5% = 30 Growth Target = Gain of 5 points Increase to 800 or above 800 or moreMust maintain an API of at least 800

Program Improvement and Its Consequences YearDistrict/LEASchool 1Technical Assistance to school (TA), Parental Notification Revise School Plan Use 10% of funding for training 2Technical Assistance and Training, School Choice, Supplemental Education Services (SES) = Tutoring More training Implement school plan 3TA, Training, Parent Notification, School Choice, SES Corrective Action– 1 of following: replace staff, new curriculum, outside expert, extend school year or day, restructure 4TA, Training, Parent Notification, School Choice, SES Plan for alternative governance-1 of following: reopen as charter, replace most staff and principal, outside manager, state takeover, any other major restructuring 5TA, Training, Parent Notification, School Choice, SES Implement plan developed in Year 4

Proficient Not Proficient 2. Make Safe Harbor1. Meet the Goal  Decrease NOT proficient by 10%

 California English Language Development Test (CELDT) measure Measures English proficiency on a 5-point scale for listening, speaking, reading, and writing to develop a composite score: 1= Beginning 2=Early Intermediate 3=Intermediate 4=Early Advanced 5=Advanced

NameMeasuresCalifornia Goal AMAO I Making progress in learning English One proficiency level increase on the CELDT per year AMAO II Attaining English proficiency EL less than 5 years EL 5+ years called Long Term English Learners (LTELs) Score Early Advanced or Advanced on CELDT overall and at least Intermediate in listening, speaking, reading, and writing AMAO III Meet AYP participation rate and proficient targets for EL subgroup Achieve proficient or advanced on CST

Most Recent Overall CELDT scoreGoal BeginningEarly Intermediate Intermediate Early Advanced Early Advanced or Advanced but not yet proficient Achieve English proficiency (Overall proficiency at EA or A with no category below Intermediate) Early or Advanced and proficient in English Maintain English Proficient status

 Is used for 10 th -12 th graders  Requires a scaled score of 350 or higher in order to graduate from high school  Requires a scaled score of 380 or higher in order to be classified as Proficient for AYP purposes

Research your school’s status vis a vis state and federal testing requirements: API 1. Did your school site meet its API growth targets? By how much? AYP—by school and subgroups 1. Did your school site meet its AYP targets-- schoolwide and by subgroups for language arts and math? Identify strengths and weaknesses. EL 1. Did your school site meet its AMAO targets I, II, and III for English Learners?

 DataQuest—CST, CELDT, API, AYP, AMAOs  School Accountability Report Cards  School Web Site  District Web Site  District Trimester Assessments  Interview the Principal  Talk to Teachers  Report Cards  Progress Reports  Your own after school data