The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Division I Institutional Performance Program Andy Louthain Steve Clar.
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
Principle 3 AD Management. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full-time administrator that takes responsibility for the.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
Leadership Development Programme for Professional Service Managers Planning Workshop 4th March 2011.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
NADIIIAA Summer Forum June 6, 2006 Integration – Education & Athletics, A Model for Success Debbie Lazorik Bob Malekoff Ronda Seagraves Integration, the.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Principle 14 Finances and Sports Sponsorship. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be administered with prudent management and fiscal.
Principle 10 Diversity and Inclusion. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the principle of diversity and inclusion.
Principle 16 Life Skills. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the total development of a student-athlete’s life.
Principle 20 Strategic Plan for Intercollegiate Athletics.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.
Co-op Development Training Program Starting September, 2011 Information Session July 8, 2011.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 15 Continuing Education and Professional Development.
Evaluation and Assessment Future Financial and Human Resource Administrative Systems Evaluation of options, costs, and campus readiness for transforming.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
September The Division of Student Affairs provides student learning and leadership opportunities that enhance overall academic, professional and.
Institutional Advancement As of December 7, 2009.
Creating Comprehensive Departmental Learning Outcomes with Critical Thinking as a Frame Natasha L. Ramsey, M.Ed. And Pamela N. Curtis, M.Ed. Office of.
Maximizing Board Performance: Assessing What We Do Justin Pollock Managing Director This program supports implementation of the Standards for Excellence®
~ Clark Lee, Assistant Director for Training and Professional Development, University of South Carolina ~ Denise Wellman, Director of Visitor Center, University.
Creating a Culture of Student Affairs Assessment Katie Busby, Ph.D. Jessica Simmons Office of Student Affairs Assessment & Planning University of Alabama.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
Search Advocates Working to Undo Bias in the Hiring Process in Higher Education – A Model from OSU.
Our Mission Intercollegiate Athletics at CU Boulder provides student-athletes a rewarding academic and athletic opportunity while embracing the principles.
CHAPTER PRESIDENTS CALL Tuesday, February 9, 2010.
Principle 1 Integration and Institutional Control.
Dr. Jennifer Bueche, FAR Associate Professor Department of Human Ecology Athletics.
Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation.
Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.
STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Principle 7 SAAC Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
Principle 5 SWA Involvement or Fifth Representative to the Governance Structure.
Club Counselor Together Achieving Growth Serving the Children of the World ®
Kellianne Milliner, Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance, Academic and Student Services Terry Beattie, Associate Athletics Director for Facilities.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
IEEE Member and Geographic Activities Joe Lillie, IEEE Vice President Cecelia Jankowski, Managing Director Member and Geographic Activities (MGA) Region.
PROGRAM REVIEW ORIENTATION LAUNCH MEETING August 28, a.m. -12 p.m. Department Orientation for Program Review Office of Academic Assessment & Program.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
CSUSM Softball Digs Community Service. Topics Goal 1  Graduating Our Student- Athletes NCAA Eligibility Requirements NCAA Progress toward Degree Academic.
Be a Vibrant Club Your Club Leadership Plan. Purpose Ensures club are regularly evaluating current practices and implementing new ideas to increase their.
Lynn Holzman Director of Academic and Membership Affairs, NCAA.
Principle 11 Compliance. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full- time compliance coordinator whose primary responsibility.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns and ideas of the institution’s student-athletes.
THE NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB District Director Club Representative Orientation.
Lack of African-American Head Football Coaches in Div. I Institutions Ryan Dunham & Guy Phillips.
Principle 19 Communication/ Campus Relationships.
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace
Division II Strategic Plan
Institutional Committee Recommendations
IT Governance Planning Overview
Principle 2: CEO Oversight
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
Division II Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I

Division II Athletics Directors Association Officers David Williams – President University of Wisconsin, Parkside Jon Carey – Immediate Past President Western Oregon University Ed Matejkovic – First Vice President West Chester University Greg Waggoner –Second Vice President/Treasurer Western State College of Colorado Anita Barker –Third Vice President/Secretary California State University, Chico

Presentation Agenda Goals of the Implementation Plan Overview of the Implementation Plan Brief Description of Phase I & II Phase I Guiding Principles Best Practices

Research the needs and challenges with each principle on DII campuses Research best practices already discovered and proven to be effective on DII campuses Take research and develop examples of new and exciting strategies that may be useful to ALL the membership Provide Tool Kit as options to make changes Goals of the Implementation Plan

Coordinate with the new Division II Strategic-Positioning Platform Utilize as an evaluation tool for Division II new member process “Strategic Plan should be organized to meet this model” These are viewed as best practices at specific institutions, and may not work at all institutions Overall, everyone gathers a new strategy or a way to “tweak” what you do Goals of the Implementation Plan

Overview of the Implementation Plan The implementation of the 21 guiding principles will be completed in two phases In , Phase I will include 10 guiding principles describing the “Who” Phase II, in will include remaining 11 principles describing the “What”

Overview of the Implementation Plan Presentation of each phase at NCAA and NACDA Conventions each year An on-line presentation with accompanying materials will be provided at the end of each phase Implementation of new best practices will be on-going process We welcome your strategies!

Phase I Guiding Principles “Who” 1. Integration and Institutional Control 2. CEO Oversight 3. AD Management 4. FAR Involvement 5. SWA Involvement 6. Coach’s Role 7. SAAC Involvement 8. Athletic Trainers 11. Compliance 13. Citizenship, Leadership & Sportsmanship

Phase II Guiding Principles “What” 9. Academic Success 10. Diversity 12. Institutional Self-Study 14. Finances & Sponsorship 15. Continuing Education & Professional Development 16. CHAMPS/Life Skills 17. Assessment 18. Promotions & Media Relations 19. Communication/ Campus Relationships 20. Strategic Plan for Intercollegiate Athletics 21. Fundraising

How Data were Compiled? Began by attending several meetings to introduce the plan Developed a few questions for each principle Sent approximately 100 surveys Conducted over 70 personal interviews Additional meetings Thank You for Your Assistance!!