1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

RHODE ISLANDS RACE TO THE TOP ROUND TWO RI Science and Technology Advisory Council May 6, 2010.
An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia P-16 Initiatives Jan Kettlewell July 13, 2007
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.
Arizona’s Race to the Top State Finalist Presentation Washington, DC August 11, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
Regional Update Presentation November 2014 Friday Institute, NC State University.
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
Reviewing National High School Improvement Strategies, Models, Characteristics and Potential Monica Martinez KnowledgeWorks Foundation (formerly of the.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
1 Race to the Top: Louisiana’s Blueprint for Education Reform … More Than an Application 1 …BECAUSE OUR CHILDREN CAN’T WAIT.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Jeni Corn, Ph.D., Trip Stallings, Ph.D., Friday Institute, NC State University.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Southern Regional Education Board A New Mission for the Middle Grades: Preparing Students for A Changing World The Report of the SREB Middle Grades Commission.
Frameworks Overall Facts and Presentations Hubbard High School Model Lakeview Career Readiness Certificates Grand Rapids Model.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
CONSORTIUM FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION – NORTH CAROLINA The NC Race to the Top Evaluation Plan: An Introduction October 10, 2011 Gary T. Henry,
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
National Governors Association Policy Academy Building a Foundation for Student Success: State Strategies to Improve Learning Outcomes from Early Childhood.
A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education.
RHODE ISLAND’S RACE TO THE TOP PRESENTATION TO THE RACE TO THE TOP REVIEW PANEL MARCH 17, 2010 Honorable Donald L. Carcieri, Governor Deborah A. Gist,
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Transformation In Progress Rhode Island’s Phase II Race to the Top August 10, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Region 6 Fall Meeting Concord, North Carolina November 24, 2014.
Presentation by Robert L. King, CPE President SHEEO Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO July 13, 2011.
North Carolina’s Race to the Top Proposal. Why RTTT? Teacher Incentive Grant School Improvement Grant Innovation Grant ESEA IDEA SFSF …….
North Carolina eLearning Commission SREB Legislative Work Conference June 26, 2011 Glenn Kleiman Executive Director Friday Institute for Educational Innovation.
Melissa Cropper Teacher and President Georgetown Federation of Teachers Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
Turning Around Lowest-Achieving Schools (TALAS)
North Carolina 1:1 Learning Technology Initiative (NCLTI) Verna Lalbeharie & Emmy Coleman The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
Public School Forum August 2015 Board Meeting Jeni Corn Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, NC State University Prepared for the NC State Board.
NYC Leadership Academy Defining the Foundational Skills of a Principal Supervisor May 13, Mary Rice-Boothe, NYCLA Diana Joyce, NYCLA.
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Presentation transcript:

1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d

2 The North Carolina Team Beverly Perdue Governor June Atkinson Chairman, State Board of Education Bill Harrison Glenn Kleiman Bill McNeal Executive Director Friday Institute for Educational Innovation and Professor, College of Education, NC State University State Superintendent of Public Instruction Executive Director NC Association of School Administrators

3 Governor Beverly Perdue Education Reform in North Carolina: Action and Achievement North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal “Every student – no matter where he or she lives in NC – must graduate from high school with what it really takes to succeed in a career, in a two or four year college, or in technical training” - Governor Perdue, January 2010

4 A Coherent Plan for Statewide Impact

5 A Great Teacher for Every Student A Great Leader for Every School Performance incentives for lowest-achieving schools Research-supported university preparation programs Research- and data-based recruitment and licensure programs: o Teach for America expansion o NC Teacher Corps o Regional Leadership Academies Strategic staffing initiatives Expansion of virtual and blended teaching Statewide professional development system Successful innovations in identifying, developing, and supporting effective leaders Statewide teacher and principal evaluation systems

6 Common Core Standards adoption Governing member of the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium Alignment of standards across PK-20 Experience in - and a plan for - successful implementation of comprehensive, balanced assessment system Statewide Standards and Assessments

7 Data-Driven Decisions at All Levels State Longitudinal Data System Instructional Improvement System Centrally-provided, Statewide Technology Infrastructure Statewide Student Information System Increasing use of data for decision-making at all levels:

8 Longitudinal data system Data access for all stakeholders Statewide instructional improvement system o Daily embedded assessments o Diagnostic assessments o Curriculum monitoring o Summative assessments o Growth models Data-Driven Decisions at All Levels

9 Turnaround of Lowest-Achieving Schools A great teacher for every student, a great leader for every school, a great school for every community A focus on local capacity-building Customized approaches to local setting and needs Evidence of prior success in rural and urban settings o 34 schools moved out of low-achieving o 85% of schools in 5 low-achieving districts raised student achievement Other innovative public and charter school models

10 Turnaround of Lowest-Achieving Schools Evidence of prior success in rural and urban settings o 34 schools moved out of low-achieving o 85% of schools in 5 low-achieving districts raised student achievement

11 Building Capacity in Rural Schools By ensuring… Effective teachers and principals Statewide technology infrastructure and resources Virtual learning opportunities for students Engaged communities

12 Innovative, Transformational Schools: An Array of Choices Early College high schools Redesigned schools Charter schools NC School of Science and Mathematics District-level magnet schools STEM-themed high schools

13 Expanding STEM Opportunities Rigorous standards STEM teacher initiatives Virtual and blended STEM courses Networking of STEM-themed high schools Strong support from NC businesses and foundations

14 Enhancing All Initiatives Through Technology Technology to enhance all reform areas Building upon technology-enabled education initiatives Proposed next generation technology infrastructure o PK-20 Education Network o Cloud computing & Statewide Services Initiative

15 Statewide Capacity and Commitment Lessons learned Statewide infrastructure Strong, collaborative leadership Reform & innovation

16 Engagement and Collaboration State and local leadership Professional associations Public and private colleges and universities NC Network of Grantmakers NC education organizations National organizations Parents & communities

17 Why North Carolina? Strong, collaborative leadership Capacity to scale initiatives and ensure statewide implementation Overall capacity to implement and sustain initiatives Building upon lessons from past reform efforts Support from all stakeholders History of implementing reform efforts statewide

18 Why North Carolina? Existing RttT-related programs Ready to move forward quickly Ensures reliable statewide access at a lower cost Model for other states Unparalleled technology infrastructure Diverse rural and urban population, innovative schools, technology use, STEM focus

19 A Coherent Plan for Statewide Impact Great Teachers & Principals Turnaround of Lowest-Achieving Schools Data Systems to Improve Instruction Build District & School Transformation Capacity Support STEM Thematic Schools Network Adopt Common Core Standards Transition to New Standards and Assessments Enhance Statewide Longitudinal Data System Develop Statewide Instructional Improvement System Improve Teacher and Principal Evaluation Processes Institute Regional Leadership Academies Expand Teacher Recruitment and Licensure Programs Initiate Strategic Staffing Deliver Virtual & Blended Classes Initiate Statewide Professional Development Quality Standards and Assessment