1 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014.  To help you to take control of the planning for the next cycle of appraisal.  To consider ten key issues to which.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Managing SEN: Monitoring and Evaluation – Gathering Evidence: Making Judgements Day 1.
© 2006 TDA Development Draft and subject to amendments from consultation Performance Management Challenge for Schools PM workshops 23 October 2006.
Head teacher Performance Management
Providing Inspection Services for Department of Education Department for Employment and Learning Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure An evaluation.
Performance management guidance
Performance management guidance. Performance management Part C: Appraisers An introduction to the revised Performance Management Regulations January 2011.
Performance management guidance
David Taylor Formerly Director of Inspection, Ofsted
Working with HLTAs/TAs Dr John Woollard SEND Day 2015.
NEW STATUTORY REGULATIONS FOR TEACHER APPRAISAL AND CAPABILITY 2012 Mary Higgins, Advisor.
National Literacy & Numeracy Framework An overview of the LNF for Parents / Carers Cwmafan Junior School 2014.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: ADVICE AND GUIDANCE FOR LINE MANAGERS Monday 1st September C am.
TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT/APPRAISAL 1 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014.
© NACE 2012 Aspiration Ability & Achievement Dyhead, Dawn a Chyrhaeddiad Leading and Managing for More Able and Talented Pupils.
School Development Planning Initiative
Performance management guidance
Teachers’ Appraisal and Pay Pete Gaskin Julie Chow Alison Trehearn Paula Shaw 1 12 July 2013.
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
Appraisal and performance management
1. RECENT PERFORMANCE AND CAPACITY TO DRIVE PROGRESS Recent data Areas to considerExample questions Red Green Is the school on trajectory? Is attendance.
THE NEW SEND FRAMEWORK Brian Lamb OBE. From this…..? Welcome to Special Educational Needs and Disability Maze School Action School Action Plus Statements.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Appraisal Process & Paperwork Update Workshop Jackie Skeel 13 March 2014.
Teacher Appraisers receive copy of new PDP and policy ‘quiz’ for completion by Weds 17 Sept (Twilight) Weds 10 Sep Introduction Training Appraisers Create.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Meeting the Needs of Individuals
Learning projects An overview. Learning projects A learning project allows a learner to design and undertake an independent and unique short program of.
August 23, 2015 Education Bradford Curricular Targets Georgina Graham and Jonathan Nixon ISP Consultants, Education Bradford.
Strategic Plan 2012 Quality First Teaching 90% Good + Attendance 96% Science SC1 standards closer to age related in all year groups Progress of Vunerable.
The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
Performance Management - Briefing for Schools. Version 2.0 Where are we? Appraisal regulations were first introduced in 1991, following the 1986 Education.
Seevic Performance Appraisal
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
1. Title: Performance Management Date: August 2013 Presenters : 2 Louise Prior & Roger Thomas.
Where next for you? 16 & This session aims to ………. Give time to reflect on your first year in teaching To know about performance management.
What Ofsted does to reach a judgement about teaching and what can be learned from this by academies?
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: ADVICE AND GUIDANCE FOR LINE MANAGERS.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
The Performance Management And Appraisal System (PMAS) Principal Performance Appraisal.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
South West and Mid Wales Consortium Consortiwm De-orllewin a Chanolbarth Cymru Performance Management Training for Governors.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Profiles Key Principles. What is a profile? A profile is a snapshot of a child or young person’s best achievements at a given point in time. It is one.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Leading Effective Intervention Objectives To give subject leaders an overview of the Strategy’s plans to refresh and develop intervention and targeted.
Andy Wilson – Team Manager HR Education (School Teacher Appraisal) (England) Regulations 2012 A briefing for Heads and Governors.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Performance Management. Common Misconceptions Appraisal Performance-Related Pay Targets and Objectives Motivation and Discipline.
1 2 Assessing Pupils’ Progress Spring term 2009.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Esther Bushell – School Governance and Workforce Adviser
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Governor Visits to School
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Jane Sinson Educational Psychologist
New SEN Code of Practice
Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA)
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Governor Visits to School
Presentation transcript:

1 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 To help you to take control of the planning for the next cycle of appraisal.  To consider ten key issues to which you should be alert during planning for the next cycle. 2 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Objectives represent a key means by which teachers’ performance is evaluated during appraisal.  Objectives should also be regarded as a key way in which your pay, pension, career and professional aspirations can be advanced.  It is therefore essential that you avoid agreeing to objectives that will set you up to fail – the adverse consequences can be significant.  Using ‘cut and paste’ objectives is inappropriate: -every teacher is unique and every teacher’s circumstances are unique - objectives should therefore be tailored to the needs of each individual, even if they are whole-school or departmental/team objectives.  Objectives should be set in the context of your role, responsibilities and job description. 3 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 The NASUWT’s action instructions specify that there should be no more than three objectives per cycle.  This limit allows you, your appraiser and all other colleagues involved in supporting you, to focus effectively on priorities for your professional practice - an excessive number of objectives dilutes this focus and undermines the process.  You should not agree to objectives that are broken down into multiple subsections. 4 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Objectives should be: - realistic; - clear; - concise; - achievable; - specific; and - fair.  Remember that a principle for objective-setting is to make sure that there will be clarity about what success will look like at the end of the cycle.  Drafting objectives is a joint responsibility.  This responsibility should not be delegated to the appraiser.  It is poor practice for the appraiser to seek to impose predetermined individual objectives, as the purpose of the meeting is to support a professional dialogue. 5 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 A key purpose of performance management is to allow you to develop your professional practice.  If an objective does not relate to your professional duties, your role and responsibilities or your job description, it cannot meet this purpose as it is outside your direct influence or control.  Examples of inappropriate objectives of this nature include: inclusion of a target for pupil attendance – you can’t control the extent to which pupils attend school; securing particular levels of parental engagement – you can provide opportunities for parents to engage but you can’t control whether they engage or not; for line managers, objectives based on data indicators of the performance of your team – you can provide an environment that allows team members to perform to the best of their ability, but you can’t control their performance directly. 6 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Again, remember that factors relating to your pupils and to your wider working environment over which you have no control or influence can have a significant effect on what happens in your classroom - you cannot be held accountable for these factors. 7 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 In almost all circumstances, objectives are designed to be completed during the course of the appraisal cycle.  Think carefully about your objectives being achievable within the appraisal cycle.  Where the timescale is shorter than the appraisal cycle, this does not mean that a new or additional objective can be set.  The timescale for completing an objective may be longer than the appraisal cycle, but the objectives should make clear what progress will be expected by the next planning and review meeting. 8 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Remember, if workload is an issue in your school, the NASUWT’s action instructions are there to protect you. Objectives must not add to your workload.  In particular, they should not require: gathering portfolios of evidence; working at weekends, evenings or during the holidays.  You are, however, required to keep a practice, review and development (PRD) record. 9 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 It is not legitimate for teachers to be set individual objectives, including targets based on data.  Data can be used to inform discussion about objectives and to set targets for pupils (e.g in Assessment for Learning (AfL)).  Pupils’ attainment in the assessments used to generate such data can be influenced by a range of factors outside of teachers’ direct control.  Note that the producers of the value-added systems (e.g. FFT) used by some schools in objective-setting confirm that their systems do not generate hard and fast targets, merely estimates.  For example, an objective that states, ‘Over X% of pupils in class Y (i.e. your class) will be assessed as achieving Level Z in writing by the end of the year’, is unacceptable. 10 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 However, an objective that states, ‘I will contribute to the achievement of (whole-school/team/departmental/class target x) by (e.g. adopting a particular teaching strategy, deployment of teaching assistants, adopting new approach to the use of resources, accessing continuing professional development (CPD))’ is more acceptable.  Remember - targets are for pupils, not for teachers.  Make sure that the numerical targets are not included in success criteria.  Success criteria should reflect the professional practice agreed to in the objective, not pupil performance data, e.g.: Teaching assistants were deployed appropriately to meet the needs of learners, evident through the outcomes of lesson observation; Implementation of literacy and numeracy framework is evident in pupils’ books. 11 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

Alert 6: Assessing teacher performance against ‘Estyn grades’  It is not appropriate for objectives to include reference to the achievement of Estyn grades following classroom observations.  The Estyn criteria for teaching and learning in the inspection framework are designed to be applied across a whole school, not to individual lessons. 12 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Decide whether classroom observation is appropriate as a means of gathering evidence of your performance.  If so, you should not agree to more than three observations for a total of no more than three hours.  Use the advice set out in the NASUWT’s practical guide to appraisal.  The lesson observations should have a clear focus linked to your agreed objectives.  Drop-ins and learning walks are observations by another name. 13 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Objectives have to be considered in terms of the conditions and environment within which teachers work.  This may require access to information, advice, training and CPD.  It may also require the provision of additional resources including staffing, equipment and time.  Participation in professional development might be an objective in itself.  You should not agree to access professional development and related activities in your own time.  You are required to keep an up-to-date record of: your own assessment against your objectives; any professional development activities; any factors affecting your performance against your objectives. 14 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Professional development includes, but is certainly not restricted to, participation in courses or attendance at events – examples of alternatives include working with colleagues, participating in professional networks or research and investigation.  Remember that the appraisal process can also be used to seek professional development and training that is not related directly to the achievement of your objectives.  These might include opportunities to help you develop your wider skills and experience, or training that would support your career progression. 15 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Given the focus of appraisal on your professional duties, roles and responsibilities, and areas covered within your job description, it is not appropriate for objectives to relate to any voluntary or extra-curricular activities you may undertake.  Such objectives may also be discriminatory – some teachers may not be able to participate in voluntary activities due to personal or family circumstances.  Under no circumstances should you accept any objectives of this nature.  This advice does not prevent voluntary participation by teachers in extra- curricular activities. 16 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 If you work part-time, your objectives should take this into account - although you may still be set three objectives, these should reflect the hours you are contracted to work.  If you have a disability or some other medical need, it is important (and a legal obligation on your employer) that your objectives reflect this, as well as any reasonable adjustments that have been made to support your employment.  Account should also be taken of whether your school knows that you will be absent from work for a significant period of time, e.g. through maternity leave, or are due to have medical treatment that may require absence from work.  This underlines the importance of avoiding data-related targets. 17 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014

 Schools should have a standard recording format, including sections for objectives, classroom observation (where appropriate), training and development, timescales and success criteria.  These points should be recorded where practical during the meeting by the appraiser.  The appraisee may request changes.  Seek to resolve any disagreement by discussion in the meeting.  If agreement is reached, sign the statement.  If agreement cannot be reached, seek to have your concerns and disagreement recorded and do not sign the statement.  Make sure you are given a written copy of the statement.  Seek advice from the NASUWT if necessary. 18 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014