Initial Compliance Reviews (ICRs) Didi Garcia Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Newport News Public Schools First Step Preschool Program
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
2013 EL Coordinators Meeting Title III Budget. Topics O Title III Subgrant Allocation Timeline O Supplement, not Supplant O Title III 2% Administrative.
Reconstitution Planning and Guidance Overview
1 Semi-Annual & Time and Effort Logs Maintaining Compliant Documentation for Federally Funded Programs.
Test Security. Texas Education Code (TEC) Sec SECURITY IN ADMINISTRATION OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The commissioner: (1) shall establish.
1. EPISD envisions a time when- –Its parents will serve as equal partners in the educational enterprise –Its parents will achieve adult literacy and receive.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Parent Summit 02/21/2014 SAISD Federal Programs Dept. Barbara.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
NCLB Title I, Part A Campus Responsibilities1 The purpose of Title I, Part A is to provide financial assistance to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and.
Speed Bumps on the Fiduciary Road Title I Administrative Meeting Timonium Maryland April 14, 2010 Cvieta Jovanovich.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Title IA Annual Parent Meeting  Date: September 14, 2015  Gainesville ISD  School: Edison Elementary  Time: 6:00 p.m.  I. Discussion of.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
BOCES Data Collection & Reporting October 10, 2013 Lisa Pullaro Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Title II, Part A Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
New Title I Designee Training September 17,
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
SPECIAL EDUCATION A REVIEW OF:  CHILD FIND/ SPED PROCESS  FERPA AND CONFIDENTIALITY  LENGTH OF SCHOOL DAY.
Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
PARENT & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GRACIELA AVILA DIVISION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT OFFICE OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
NCLB Title I, Part A Campus Responsibilities1 The purpose of Title I, Part A is to provide financial assistance to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
EFFORT CERTIFICATION AND THE PERSONNEL ACTIVITY REPORT WHY AND HOW.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
What is Title I? Title I is a federally funded program to help children get a quality education and meet academic standards.
 The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires equitable services to be provided to private schools.  Why? Federal programs are supported.
Ellie Gearhart August Campus Improvement Plan Revise plan Parents School staff LEA Outside experts.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting & The Value and Utility of Parents
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Parental Involvement Staff Training
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Information for Parents
Title I A Comparability Report
Fun With Federal Programs SAISD Parent & Family Liaison Training
Title III Requirements
Title I, Part A Parental Involvement
Saginaw Elementary TITLE I
US Department of Education
Campus Improvement Planning
Effective Implementation: WIDA ELD Standards
Schoolwide Programs.
ICRs.
Overview of School Plan Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Initial Compliance Reviews (ICRs) Didi Garcia Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy

Release of ICR Reports Reports released on NCLB Reports week of October 13 If staging released on ISAM only the reports for staged districts due to ICRs will be available

ICR Results ICR Intervention Stage Number of Districts Not Staged for ICRs918 Watch List – Not Staged for ICRs255 Staged for ICRs37 Staged for ICRs due to missing 2 or more of same indicators as in Total1218

ICR Highest Did Not Meet Standard ICRProgram % Did Not Meet Standard 9 - Did the LEA and its Title I, Part A campuses educate teachers, pupil services personnel, principals, and other staff members, with the assistance of parents, in the value and utility of the contributions of parents? [P.L , Section 1118(e)(3)] Title I, Part A10.02% 18 - Did the district ensure that the campus highly qualified teacher plan included strategies to ensure teachers, who are not highly qualified in all core academic subject areas taught, become highly qualified in a reasonable timeframe? [P.L , Section 2122 (b)(10)] Title I, Part A7.39% 48 - Did the LEA adhere to the statutory 2% limitation on administrative costs related to the implementation of the Title III, Part A—LEP program? [P.L , Section 3115(b)] Title III, Part A8.13%

ICR Highest Did Not Meet Standard ICRProgram % Did Not Meet Standard 49 - Did the LEA ensure that all appropriate administrative costs for the Title III, Part A—LEP program, including both indirect costs and direct costs such as administrative salaries, were included with calculating administrative costs? [P.L , Section 9201; and 34 CFR 80.3] Title III, Part A12.56% 51 - Did the LEA ensure that appropriate time and effort records were maintained for staff who are split-funded with Title III, Part A—LEP and other funds? [OMB Circular A-87] Title III, Part A7.39%

Process used in Manually verified all Yes answers Manually verified all NA answers Impact on results

Plans for Collaborating with management Reassessing ICRs and effectiveness Random Validations Develop a plan to share with management Process may change but not the accountability Currently reviewing compliance reports for any potential changes

Questions?

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.