© 2006. Not to be reproduced or distributed without the express permission of the author. Richard Chait Harvard University California Association of Independent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Good Governance: The Context for Innovative Board Leadership
Advertisements

State of New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services Division of Personnel Workforce Development Strategic Plan.
Supervision in Organizations
Integrating Ethics Into Your Compliance Program John A. Gallagher, Ph.D Center for Ethics in Health Care Atlanta, GA.
Basic Concepts of Strategic Management
CAIS Concurrent Session Implementing Governance as Leadership Richard Chait Harvard University January 27, 2007.
Governance as Innovation & Teamwork
1 Board Self Assessment and Calendar Tools for Increasing the Association Board’s Capacity for Governance Workshop for the YWCA Great Lakes Alliance Region.
A View from the Other Side: Working Effectively with Elected Officials Vaughn Upshaw
Promoting a Positive Organizational Culture Prof. Brian Blume, Ph.D University of Michigan, Flint School of Management.
©2014 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Continuous learning in action NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION BOARD GOVERNANCE TRAINING John T. Fisher, CPA, CGFM, Principal.
Strategic Planning and the Marketing Management Process
Planning and Strategic Management
IT Governance and Management
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Elements of Planning and Decision-Making
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Essentials of Management Chapter 4
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
HRD MANAGER: ROLES AND COMPETENCIES Jayendra Rimal.
Governance Fundamentals Roles, Responsibilities and Expectation Setting for Stronger Staff and Board Partnerships 1 Local Government Commission November.
The Governance Futures Project William P. Ryan AJFCA/IAJVS Annual Conference New York City April 15, 2007.
2008 Indiana State Personnel Department Conference Presented by Krista F. Skidmore, Esq., SPHR, President Strategic Doing—A Model to Align and Execute.
Strategic Management the art and science of formulating, implementing and evaluating crossfunctional decisions that enable an organization to meet its.
Presented by: BoardSource Building Effective Nonprofit Boards.
Adapting Boards for a New Day
GOVERNANCE: A New Perspective on Being a Governor Keith Seel, PhD
1-1 Strategic Planning and the Marketing Management Process Chapter 1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
2- Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 11 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
Stakeholders and Ethics Organizational Stakeholders Stakeholders: people who have an interest, claim, or stake in an organization  Inside stakeholders.
Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies All Rights ReservedMcGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 1 Strategic Planning and the Marketing Management Process.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Part 3 Staffing Activities: Recruitment
Copyright 2004 Prentice Hall1 Inside Stakeholders  Shareholders – the owners of the organization  Managers – the employees who are responsible for coordinating.
A role is a set of behaviours associated with a particular job.
Managing and Developing Talent ‘Every small thing we do habitually is an expression of who we are’
William Brown Associate Professor & Director Nonprofit Management Program George Bush School of Government & Public Service Texas A&M University.
Planning, Strategy, and Competitive Advantage
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
Organizational Structure and Controls Organizational structure specifies: –The firm’s formal reporting relationships, procedures, controls, and authority.
Policy Governance Round Table 2: Board Leadership Cullen Coates & Neel Lane Episcopal Community Services in America Round Table 2011 April 28, 2011.
Professional Accountability : Two Important Pillars – Leadership and Governance.
1 Organizational Structure Organizational structure specifies: – The firm’s formal reporting relationships, procedures, controls, and authority and decision-
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) As a Curriculum Model
Strategic Direction Janice Melnychuk Russ Dahms If you don’t know where you are going Any path will get you there.
FIDUCIARYSTRATEGICGENERATIVE Board’s PurposeStewardship of tangible* assets Strategic Partnership with management Source of additional leadership Chief.
AFSA Chapter Officer Training Module 1 Officer Roles and Responsibilities.
Chapter 6 Coordination of Resources, Programs, and Services.
Re-Thinking Board Meetings: How to Design and Execute Better Credit Union Board Meetings Facilitator: Michael Daigneault – CEO.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Strategic and Generative Conversations: Becoming a Leadership Board November 27 | 2015.
Implementing Strategies: Management and Operations Issues
Essentials of Planning © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website,
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Board Roles & Responsibilities
CHAPTER 4 THE EVOLVING/ STRATEGIC ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Pennsylvania System of Care Partnership
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
2017 Governance & Leadership Conference March 7, 2017
Paradoxes, watchdogs and sounding boards Mark Benton October 2017
Strategy and Human Resources Planning
Articulate how the practice of management has evolved
PLANNING.
Governance: Roles and Responsibilities
As we grow, what should our business look like?
Presentation transcript:

© Not to be reproduced or distributed without the express permission of the author. Richard Chait Harvard University California Association of Independent Schools 1/27/07 © Not to be reproduced or distributed without the express permission of the author.

2 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Effective boards…  Offer a strategic asset and comparative advantage.  Add value/derive value from meaningful participation in consequential discussions and decisions.  Macrogovern more than micromanage.  Model behaviors trustees expect school to exhibit.  Harness individual talent to collective effort.  Provide leadership as well as stewardship.  Ensure intergenerational equity.

3 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP What’s the Problem? Classical DiagnosisProblem of performance ResponseCodify board’s role, clarify tasks. ObjectiveDo the work better. Reframed DiagnosisProblem of purpose ResponseEnrich the job, engage the board. ObjectiveDo better work.

4 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP  Emphasize modes, not tasks, of governance.  Think and work in three different modes.  All three serve important purposes.  Value added increases as board:  Becomes more proficient in more modes;  Does more work in third mode;  Chooses appropriate mode(s) of work. Core Concepts

5 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Fiduciary: Type I Strategic: Type II Generative: Type III Governance as Leadership

6 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Type I: Fiduciary Mode  Board’s central purpose:  Stewardship of tangible assets  Board’s principal role:  Sentinel  Board’s core work:  Ensure efficient & appropriate use of resources  Ensure legal compliance & fiscal accountability  Ensure accountability  Oversee operations  Select & evaluate CEO

7 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Type II: Strategic Mode  Board’s central purpose :  Strategic partnership with senior management  Board’s principal role:  Strategist  Board’s core work:  Scan internal and external environment  Resolve priorities  Review and modify strategic plan  Monitor performance

8 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP What Is Generative Thinking?  Makes sense of circumstances.  Invites prior questions and alternative hypotheses.  Places perceived problems/opportunities in new light.  Finds and frames new problems and opportunities.  Concerns values, beliefs, and assumptions.  Spawns policy, strategy, and decisions.

9 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Opportunity to influence generative work declines as issues are framed and converted into strategies, plans, and tactics. Opportunity for Generative Work Plans, Tactics, Execution Strategies, Policies Where Does Generative Thinking Occur? THE GENERATIVE CURVE Sense-making Problem-framing Time

10 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Generative Fiduciary Strategic Align rewards with priorities Understand assumptions of new generation Modify pay plan & hours The Generative Curve Opportunity for Generative Work Time

11 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Generative Fiduciary Strategic Compete on amenities Reconcile social purpose and business model Approve new fitness center The Generative Curve Opportunity for Generative Work Time

12 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Generative Curves Opportunity for Generative Work Time

13 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Trustee involvement lowest where generative opportunity greatest; trustee involvement increases as generative opportunity decreases. Typical Board Involvement Curve Generative Curve Opportunity for Generative Work Time The Generative Dilemma

14 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP GenerativeStrategicFiduciary Board’s purpose Source of leadership for organization Strategic partnership w/ management Stewardship of tangible assets Chief role Sense makerStrategistSteward Core work Find and frame challenges, reconcile values and choices Scan environment, shape strategy, create comparative advantage Set mission, oversee operations, deploy resources, ensure compliance Conducive process Inclusive conversations Task forces, ad hoc work groups Standing committees Power base Ideas, insightsTechnical expertiseLegal authority

15 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP GenerativeStrategicFiduciary Board’s purpose Source of leadership for organization Strategic partnership w/ management Stewardship of tangible assets Chief role Sense makerStrategistSteward Core work Find and frame challenges, reconcile values and choices Scan environment, shape strategy, create comparative advantage Set mission, oversee operations, deploy resources, ensure compliance Conducive process Inclusive conversations Task forces, ad hoc work groups Standing committees Power base Ideas, insightsTechnical expertiseLegal authority

16 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Values Mission Beliefs Markets SWOT Image Cost Space Legality Generative Fiduciary Strategic

17 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Separate Perspectives

18 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Comparative Perspectives

19 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Integrated Perspectives Generative Strategic Fiduciary

20 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP State of Readiness  Wear “tri-focals.”  Be on the lookout for generative landmarks.  Situate propositions on the generative curve.  Do business “a la mode.”

21 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Look upstream. Look downstream.  Decide what to decide  Engage in sense-making  Frame problem/opportunity  Suggest what staff should ponder  Decide what to do  Engage in decision-making  Solve problem/opportunity  Ponder what staff suggests Generative Strategic Fiduciary

22 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Look backward. Look forward.  Make meaning of the past  Review actions to uncover goals  Discover emergent strategies  Shape organizational saga  Learn lessons  Make policies for the future  Set goals to guide actions  Design deliberate strategies  Leverage organizational saga  Apply lessons Generative Strategic Fiduciary

23 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Looking Backward  What best explains recent successes or setbacks?  If we are what we do, then who are we?  How have we reconciled tradition and innovation?  What’s been this organization’s theory of change?  Where has there been resistance and why?  What’s the storyline that drives the product line?  How are we smarter as board & organization than a year ago?

24 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Catalyze. Analyze.  Raise introspective questions  Consider hypotheticals  Encourage collegiality  Promote robust discourse  Raise operational questions  Consider realities  Encourage congeniality  Follow parliamentary procedure Generative Strategic Fiduciary

25 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Catalytic Questions  What should we worry about?  What keeps Head awake at night?  What keeps trustees awake at night?  Whom would we serve in what ways if money did not matter?  What do we do peers would not and why? Vice versa?  What’s good for mission, bad for business? Vice versa?  What would we do differently as a for-profit?  On what list, yet to be devised, would we want to rank #1?  What will be this board’s legacy?

26 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Organize to discern. Organize to decide.  Facilitate learning community  Tap collective wisdom  Plenaries drive committees  Craft the question  Sustain standing committees  Tap individual expertise  Committees drive plenaries  Call the question Generative Strategic Fiduciary

27 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP Rules of Engagement  Macro-governance  Partial control of complete perspective  First guess upstream  Fusion of thinking  Micro-management  Complete control of partial perspective  Second guess downstream  Division of territory NEWOLD

28 GOVERNANCE AS LEADERSHIP  Empowers the board.  Engages the collective mind.  Exploits board’s assets.  Enriches board’s work.  Enhances board’s performance. Governance as Leadership The Payoff