Forensic Victimology 2nd Edition

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16 Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification.
Advertisements

Class Name, Instructor Name Date, Semester Criminal Justice 2011 Chapter 5: Interviews and Interrogations.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Consent.
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Chapter Five Interrogation & Identification Procedures All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
Chapter Eleven – Confessions and Admissions: Miranda v. Arizona Rolando V. del Carmen.
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Supreme Court Cases Use your knowledge of the Bill of Rights to determine how the Supreme Court should rule for each case.
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,
1 Book Cover Here Chapter 10 INTERROGATION OF SUSPECTS AND HOSTILE WITNESSES Guidelines and Procedures Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing.
1 Confessions Chapter 11. Smart Talk: Contemporary Interviewing and Interrogation By Denise Kindschi Gosselin PRENTICE HALL ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc.
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
What is the third degree? What is it?  Using coercive tactics or torture to extract confessions from suspects  Also involved illegal detention and.
Arrest An arrest takes place when a person suspected of a crime is taken into custody. Seizure under the 4 th Amendment. Two types of arrests, with a.
Criminal Justice 2011 Chapter 6: Interviews and Interrogations Criminal Investigation The Art and the Science by Michael D. Lyman Copyright 2011.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Seven: Confessions and the 5 th Amendment This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
The Courts and the Constitution
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Journal 1.Can a police officer “stop and frisk” you? 2.True or False - The 4th amendment protects us against all searches and seizures 3.Do the police.
Promptbook  During our last class, we discussed Marbury v. Madison and the idea of judicial review. This will be the topic of your essay assignment. 1.In.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Arrest and Detention. Questioning the Accused Police can not force a suspect to answer questions Police can not force a suspect to answer questions Section.
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
Chapter 20 Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Investigative Constitutional Law Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Investigative Constitutional Law.
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 6 (Chapter 8 – Admissions & Confessions)
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
The Investigation Phase. An arrest takes place when a person is suspected of crime and taken into custody.
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
Research 1 Mini Research Presentation: Police Interrogations and False Confessions Brandy Williams PSY610: Applied Social Psychology Instructor: Patricia.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Interrogation Class 15. Confession and Immaturity Haley v Ohio –15 year old “lad” interrogated starting at midnight, denied him access to counsel, confronted.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Arrest power and interrogation techniques
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Pre-trial arrest and custody
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent
Interrogations and Confessions
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Vocabulary Activity Interrogate Self Incrimination
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Presentation transcript:

Forensic Victimology 2nd Edition Chapter Ten: False Confessions

False Confessions A false confession is an involuntary statement of guilt made under duress, or as the result of coercion. False confessions are far from rare. Those most at risk for a false confession share one characteristic: they are naive to police procedure. This can be due to chronological age, mental age or life experience.

False Confessions Anyone can be induced to give a false confession under the right circumstances. One of the most obvious ways to document, if not prevent, a false confession is to videotape all suspect interrogations in their entirety.

Confession Law Confessions are expected to be free of “compulsion or inducement”. The use in a state criminal trial of a defendant’s confession obtained by coercion is forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown v. Mississippi (1936) held that convicted resulting solely from confessions obtained through “brutality and violence” violated due process. However, psychological coercion was not deemed unconstitutional. The legal onus was on the defendant to be able to provide the confession was extracted through violence.

Confession Law In 1966 the Miranda Warning was introduced. This required police to advise a subject in police custody that they had a right to an attorney and that they did not have to answer questions and, further, that they had the right not to incriminate themselves.

Types of False Confessions Voluntary false confession A confession to a crime given by an individual who either knows they did not commit the crime, but nonetheless has made a decision to confess, or through no pressure from police has come to believe they committed the crime they are confessing to. Coerced-Compliant confession: A confession to a crime given by an individual who knows he or she is innocent, but due to conditions of the interrogation, says what they believe is necessary to placate the interrogator and end the situation.

Types of False Confessions Coerced-Internalized confession: A confession to a crime given by an individual who comes to actually believe they may have committed the crime.

Interviewing and Interrogation Many styles of questioning are either directly from, or based to a significant degree, on the Reid technique, a nine-step technique of interviewing and interrogation that is outlined in the fifth edition of Criminal Interrogations and Confessions (Inbau, etal, 2013). The authors of the Reid Technique purport to present a system of interrogations that would minimize false confessions, when it is designed only to get confessions. This chapter identifies several issues with this technique.