Calibration Munich group version Checks. SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 2 Idea Calibration runs: same number of photons in all PMs Flat fielding:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 3rd, 2006 CALICE-UK, Manchester - A.-M. Magnan - 1 Noise studies DESY + CERN TB overview Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London.
Advertisements

M. Dracos LNGS, 03 August Target Tracker. M. Dracos LNGS, 03 August Rate tests SM1 Sensor (1,3,4) no signal Plane 6 absent Sensor (1,2,7)
Photodetector Timing Resolution Burle Micro-Channel Plate Photo Multiplier Tubes (MCP-PMTs) H. Wells Wulsin SLAC Group B Winter 2005.
19. April, 2004, Udine WorkshopKeiichi Mase Results from an Analysis of Muon Rings Keiichi Mase.
Some answers to the questions/comments at the Heavy/Light presentation of March 17, Outline : 1) Addition of the id quadrant cut (slides 2-3); 2)
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
Beam File Analysis Carl Goodrich 10/9/07. Beam File Data.
1 Fast conversion factor measurement of a CCD using Images with vertical gradient Charge Transfer Efficiency based on The variance of the signal in flat.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Meeting – Feb 12, 2003 W. Focke 1 EM timing analysis Warren Focke February 12, 2004.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
Cosmic Ray Test Stand with Scintillating Cells for Digital Hadron Calorimeter As of 9am 05/28/2003.
Can people meet from 2:40 to 3:30 on Tuesday, September 5?
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
1 Performance of multi-anode PMT employing an ultra bi-alkali photo-cathode and rugged dynodes Takahiro Toizumi Tokyo Institute of Technology S. Inagwa.
8-4 Factoring ax2 + bx + c Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Holt Algebra Factoring x 2 + bx + c Factor quadratic trinomials of the form x 2 + bx + c. Objective.
Chapter 7 Section 3 and 4 Factoring. Objectives  Factor quadratic trinomials of the form x 2 + bx + c. Factor quadratic trinomials of the form ax 2 +
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
Analysis chain for MAGIC Telescope data Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München D.Mazin, N.Tonello MPI for Physics, Munich.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
MPPC Measurements at LSU Brandon Hartfiel LSU Hardware Group Thomas Kutter, Jessica Brinson, Jason Goon, Jinmeng Liu, Jaroslaw Nowak Sam Reid January 2009.
ScECAL BeamTest Analysis Asian ScECAL Meeting Jan 14 th, 2010 Adil, Satoru Uozumi, DongHee Kim.
On behalf of joint ITEP / IHEP team: A. Arefiev, N. Filimonov, T. Kvaratskheliya, I. Machikhiliyan, P. Shatalov, T. Zakoryuchkina, A. Zhokhov, S. Zvyagintsev.
Status Report for KEK-PS E391a KEK IPNS G.Y.Lim 14 April 2003.
The islands method in the image analysis of atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes data Nadia Tonello and Keiichi Mase Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München.
PID. The proportional term produces an output value that is proportional to the current error value. Kp, called the proportional gain constant.
PSROC, February 2, 2005 Sun Yat-San University Ching-Cheng Hsu National Taiwan University On behalf of NuTel Group Outline :  Overview of NuTel Experiment.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters(MPPC) Makoto Taguchi Kyoto University.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Nov 2002T. Ljubicic DAQ100 Calibration Needs 10 to 8 bit (and back!) conversion table Gain correction per pad T0 correction per pad.
E.Guschin (INR,Moscow) 3 May 2006Calorimeter commissioning meeting Status of PRS/SPD detector Cosmic test results Installation/tuning of monitoring system.
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland.
PMT Calibration R.Sawada 7/Jan/2007. Time calibration Method was talked at the previous meeting. The problems which was shown before were because I used.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
Page 1 NHSC PACS Web Tutorial PACS 301 nhsc.ipac.caltech.edu/helpdesk NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running the PACS Spectrometer pipeline for CHOP/NOD Mode.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Status Update on the Monte Carlo Simulation Vlasios Vasileiou April 20-21, 2007 Milagro Collaboration Meeting.
Summary of IFAE analysis of Crab and Mrk421 for February & March 2004Udine bootcamp, 19th-22nd April STATUS OF DATA ANALYSIS Javier Rico for the IFAE group.
Bad pixels treatment Previous and existing tools Examples and problems.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad for HO group India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
Multiply two binomials using FOIL method
SiPM linearization status update
SHMS Aerogel Detector Construction is complete
Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München
Pre-calibration of PM gain by photo-statistics
Light mixer proposal Arjan Heering, Anton Karneyeu
Solving pedestal problem
The Standard Analysis chain
Ioannis Manthos Laboratory of Nuclear & Particle Physics
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
Signal studies OUTLINE 1- Signal extraction
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
3E7_05151 wafer 11 IV curve Noise ~122e Source scans bad and
Status of the Calibration
Presentation transcript:

Calibration Munich group version Checks

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 2 Idea Calibration runs: same number of photons in all PMs Flat fielding: same pixels output from calibration runs Calibration methods: Ffactor method (relative calibration) Blind-pixel method (absolute calibration) We did consistency checks

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 3 Jan – Feb 2004 Which method for calibration? 1. Blind pixel had (hardware?) problems: -many bad runs no calibration constants 2. Ffactor method: - reasonable results pedphotcalc.C - simple to check new independent class to compare the resulting conversion factors

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 4 How we calibrate... How we calibrate... Same scheme as calibcalcphotons.C 1. Extraction of Pedestals from pedestal runs in FADCcounts using MPedCalcPedRun

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 5 How we calibrate Calculation of calibration factors using signal estracted from calibration runs by MCalibrationChargeCalc etc. ~23 photoelectrons for inner pixel area

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 6 How we calibrate NEW: Flat fielding of the number of photons in the calibration-run. ~135 photons for inner pixel area

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 7 How we calibrate... NEW calibration factors: multiply the previously calculated with the correction factor for flat fielding. ~ 0.8 photons/ FADC count ~ 3.5 photons/ FADC count

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 8 How we calibrate... 4.Calibration of data and pedestals using MCalibrate Data

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 9 How we checked it: How we checked it: New Class to calculate the conversion factors with the Ffactor method (used instead of MCalibrationChargeCalc etc.) Q in Mean charge for the inner pixels excluding cosmics and bad pixels c i Correction factor to flat field the charges  Qm distribution obtained summing all the charge distributions of the pixels after flat fielding  red f rom the mean corrected pedestal RMS

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 10 How we checked it: Q in Mean charge for the inner pixels excluding cosmics and bad pixels ~160 FADC counts channel

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 11 How we checked it: c i Correction factor to flat field the charges ~160 FADC counts channel

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 12 How we checked it:  Qm distribution obtained summing all the charge distributions of the pixels after flat fielding  Qm ~43 counts

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 13 Mean number of photoelectrons N phel = (Q in 2 /  2 red ) F 2 where F 2 = (as in MCalibrationChargeCalc) Conversion factors: (Ph/FADCcount) i = N phel c i / Q in /phxpe where phxpe = 0.18 (as in MCalibrationChargeCalc)

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 14 Result: Calibration factors in agreement ~ 0.8 photons/ FADC count ~ 3.5 photons/ FADC count

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 15 Check inner-outer pixels: pe Inner pixels: 23 pe/area Outer pixels: 13 pe/area n peI = 1.8 n peO n pe = 0.18 n  n  I n peI = 5.6= n  O n peO = = 10 n  I = 0.25 n  O

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 16 Check inner-outer pixels: F 2 /QE n peI =23 n peO =13 · 4 = 52 nOnInOnI n peO n peI = 2.22 n peO n peI = FI2FO2FI2FO2 n n peO n peI = n n peO QE O QE I n peI = QE I QE O FO2FI2FO2FI2 n peO n peI = 4 F 2 O QE O = 1.8 F 2 I QE I real Calculated Considering the same Ffactor I,O

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 17 Check inner-outer pixels: conversion factors Inner pixels: 165 FADCcounts Outer pixels: 150 FADCcounts n  I n peI = n  I n ADCI n peI n ADCI = 0.78 n  O n ADCO = n  O n peO n ADCO = 3.46 ~ 3.5 photons/ FADC count ~ 0.8 photons/ FADC count

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 18 Check inner-outer pixels: pedestal RMS Inner pixels: 7 FADCcounts per slice Outer pixels: 5 FADCcounts per slice n  I = 7 = 5.5 n  O n ADCO n  O = 5 = 17.3 ~ 17 photons/ FADC slice ~ 6 photons/ FADC slice n  I n ADCI

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 19 Conclusions In Munich we calibrate using the Ffactor method and flat fielding Our checks pointed out that the results are consistent

SWM UD, April 2004Nadia Tonello, MPI 20 How we checked it: Q in Mean charge for the inner pixels excluding cosmics and bad pixels ~160 FADC counts channel Hardware problems?