SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP 22-14 (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety May 4, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCHRP 350 Crash Test Program NCHRP 350 CRASH TESTING OF WORK ZONE DEVICES 1997 FHWA started requiring work zone devices to be crashworthy. New purchases.
Advertisements

Draft Temporary Pedestrian Access Route (TPAR) Guidance
Roadside Barriers RDG Chapter 5.
1 V2V Safety Research for Heavy Commercial Vehicles 2013 ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting Arlington, VA September 24, 2013 Alrik L. Svenson National.
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
M.A.S.H.: The New Safety Hardware Crash Testing Criteria
“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…
Status of the Roadside Design Guide Update AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July Indianapolis, Indiana Keith A. Cota, New Hampshire Department.
Florida Department of Transportation T EMPORARY C RASH C USHIONS FDOT Contacts: District One Construction Marshall Douberley marshall.douberley.
Ken Kochevar FHWA Division Office Safety and Design Team Leader Ph: (916) The Safety Edge What is it? How does it work? What are the benefits?
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Vehicle Use Safety Procedures Presentation to MSCSA.
Oklahoma’s Experience with Wire Rope Safety Fence.
Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
UPDATE OF THE U.S. CRASH TEST PROCEDURES UPDATE OF THE U.S. CRASH TEST PROCEDURES Revision of NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Work Zone Safety It Starts With YOU!!. 2 BOOK 7 What is NEW??? IMSA TECHNICAL EXPO October, 2014 Dave Edwards.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Spring 2013 Section Engineers Conference March 5, 2013 Guardrail Items Terry Chism, Div of Const.
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Load Rating Dan Walsh.
Florida Department of Transportation T EMPORARY B ARRIERS AND C RASH C USHIONS 1.
Tender Packages (Consistency with Current Design Bulletins) Basic Knowledge for Roadway and Bridge Projects Seminar for CEA Members Edmonton February 12,
2002 AASHTO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE A CONCISE OVERVIEW.
Temporary Traffic Control Standards Update. Why? Came into this position soon after TC details became TTC standards about 1.5 years ago (2/13/2013) As.
Development of Verification and Validation Procedures for Computer Simulation use in Roadside Safety Applications NCHRP FUTURE WORK FOR TASK 8 Worcester.
Wisconsin Contractor-Engineer Conference January 22, 2009 Safety Apparel, FHWA Work Zone Safety Subpart K Rule & Permanent Concrete Barriers Bill Bremer,
Fall 2014 Most of the Material taken from: Roadside Design Guide (2011) published by AAHSTO.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David S. Rayburn.
WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Transportation Planning Conference WVDOT Traffic Data Collection, Processing and Analysis Handbook Presented to September 16, 2015 Presented.
Matthew Udenenwu Waste Permits Division 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study FUTURE DIRECTION Annual TAC Meeting,2007 Roya Amjadi FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center.
Horizontal Alignment CE 453 Lecture 16.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
NCHRP AASHTO’s Research Program State DOTs Funds (5.5% of SP&R given voluntarily) Problems Applied research focus National issues Shared issues Contract.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
NCHRP 350 UPDATED. NCHRP 350 Historical Review Document Source Year Issued Number of Pages Test Vehicle & Weight HRB # lb. car NCHRP #115.
FHWA Data Mining Efforts to Develop Better Insights on Causes and Outcomes of Rollover Crashes Ana Maria Eigen Kenneth S. Opiela Federal Highway Administration.
Pre kick off meeting 1 1 NCHRP_22_24 January Time Frame CM/E finalised the vehicle and test object modelling documents (Parts 2&3) –These documents.
Test Documentation and Reporting AASHTO Task Force 13 Subcommittee 7 Laboratory Accreditation Spring 2006 Meeting Lido Beach, Florida May 11-12, 2006 Subcommittee.
PPT Presentation of Planned Website Prepared for the Task Force 13 Meeting September 20, 2009 Rehoboth, Delaware.
Two Test Level 4 Bridge Railing and Transition Systems For Transverse Timber Deck Bridges by Ronald K. Faller, Ph.D., P.E. Michael A. Ritter, P.E. Barry.
Understanding Work Zones
Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC) Everything you wanted to know about MMUCC.
NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 20-07: Research for AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways.
Highway Infrastructure and Operations Safety Research Needs (NCHRP 17-48) Prime Contractor: UNC Highway Safety Research Center Subcontractors: VHB Jim.
Motorcycle Safety FHWAFHWA –Motorcycle Crash Causation Study –Evaluation Design for Motorcycle Safety Countermeasures –International Scan: Successful Infrastructure.
Ezzeldin Benghuzzi, P.E UPDATE TRAINING Contact Information: Ezzeldin Benghuzzi, P.E ezzeldin. Contact Information:
Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy ITS Joint Program Office, USDOT April 10, 2013 Inputs to USDOT’s ITS Strategic Research Plan,
Design Standards 1 Marshall Douberley 2012 UPDATE TRAINING Contact Information: Marshall Douberley Earl.
2011 Road School Work Zone Traffic Control Handbook.
April 4, 2011 ITE Technical Conference Lake Buena Vista, Fl Implementation of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Update from the.
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Crash Cushion and Guardrail Approach Terminal In-Service Performance Evaluation.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
April 14, – 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE.
MASH implementation Welcome April 2016 SCOHTS Meeting.
NHTSA's Crash Investigation Sampling System
First International Roadside Safety Conference June 12, 2017
First International Roadside Safety Conference June 12, 2017
Review of Revised SP 150 – Traffic Control Dated February 01, 2017
Implementation of MASH
Roadside Safety Design
Bumper Trajectories During High-Speed Impacts with 6-in. Curbs
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
UW-Madison Pyle Center February 3-4, 2003
Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices
Georgia ATSSA Chapter Meeting: MASH Implementation
Presentation transcript:

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety May 4, 2007

BACKGROUND Circular 482 – (1962) – First full scale crash test procedures Circular 482 – (1962) – First full scale crash test procedures Circular 191 – (1978) Circular 191 – (1978) NCHRP Report 230 – (1980) NCHRP Report 230 – (1980) NCHRP Report 350 – (1993) NCHRP Report 350 – (1993) NCHRP 22-14(02) – Adoption 2007/08 ? NCHRP 22-14(02) – Adoption 2007/08 ?

350 Category Changes Test matrices and conditions. Test installation. Test vehicle specifications. Evaluation criteria. Test documentation. In-service performance evaluation.

TEST MATRICES AND CONDITIONS Small car impact angle (20 degree to 25 degree). Impact speed for single unit truck test (80 km/h to 100 km/h). Occupant risk for length-of-need tests. Impact angle for terminals and crash cushions (20 degree to 25 degrees). Gating terminal/crash cushion (Reduce angle from 15 degrees to 5 degrees). Mid-size car test (Add 1500A test vehicle for staged impact attenuation devices).

TEST MATRICES AND CONDITIONS (Cont’d) Barrier testing heights (Establish max. for small vehicle and min. height for pickup test). CIP’s for terminals and redirective crash cushions (Test CIP at barrier change from redirective to gating or capture point). CIPs for reverse direction impacts. TMA optional tests to mandatory (Define max/min truck weight, control ballast shifting and vehicle braking). Variable message sign and arrow board trailers (Require same test criteria as TMA’s).

TEST MATRICES AND CONDITIONS (Cont’d) Support structures and work zone traffic control devices (Add light truck test in addition to the small vehicle testing criteria). Longitudinal channelizing barricades (Add new category and recommended test matrix). EDR data collection (Provide data on impact conditions and accelerations from vehicle). EDR data collection (Provide data on impact conditions and accelerations from vehicle).

TEST INSTALLATION Soil Condition (soil type, gradation, compaction and density). Soil Condition (soil type, gradation, compaction and density). Embedment of Posts (not necessary with reporting of soil conditions) Embedment of Posts (not necessary with reporting of soil conditions) Components (provide documentation of components used). Components (provide documentation of components used). Installation Lengths (document length of test installation). Installation Lengths (document length of test installation).

TEST VEHICLES Test vehicles (change small vehicle and pickup). Test vehicles (change small vehicle and pickup). Single unit truck mass (from 8000 to kg). Single unit truck mass (from 8000 to kg). Light truck test vehicle (Minimum c.g. height of 28 inches) Light truck test vehicle (Minimum c.g. height of 28 inches) Vehicle age (six years older or less). Vehicle age (six years older or less). Truck box attachment (limit detachment, reduce inconclusive testing results). Truck box attachment (limit detachment, reduce inconclusive testing results). Vehicle damage (document external vehicle crush damage using NASS procedures). Vehicle damage (document external vehicle crush damage using NASS procedures). Crushable nose characteristics (develop updated surrogate vehicle testing from 1981 Volkswagen Rabbit). Crushable nose characteristics (develop updated surrogate vehicle testing from 1981 Volkswagen Rabbit). TMA support vehicle (Report maximum weight of support vehicle). TMA support vehicle (Report maximum weight of support vehicle).

EVALUATION CRITERIA Occupant risk (Modify calculations for Occupancy Impact Velocity and Ridedown Acceleration with vehicle yawing). Occupant risk (Modify calculations for Occupancy Impact Velocity and Ridedown Acceleration with vehicle yawing). Windshield damage (Provides more quantitative criteria; apply criteria to structural support devices the same for work zone devices). Windshield damage (Provides more quantitative criteria; apply criteria to structural support devices the same for work zone devices). Occupant compartment damage (Set objective criteria). Occupant compartment damage (Set objective criteria). Marginal pass (Strictly pass or fail criteria results). Marginal pass (Strictly pass or fail criteria results). Maximum roll angle (Roll and pitch angle at 75 degrees). Maximum roll angle (Roll and pitch angle at 75 degrees). Exit conditions (Report lane intrusions and exit angle with exit box criteria). Exit conditions (Report lane intrusions and exit angle with exit box criteria). Vehicle rebound for crash cushions (reporting criteria). Vehicle rebound for crash cushions (reporting criteria).

TEST DOCUMENTATION CAD drawings (AutoCAD or Micro Station drawing files) CAD drawings (AutoCAD or Micro Station drawing files) Test report (More detailed documentation on conducted of the test and the test results). Test report (More detailed documentation on conducted of the test and the test results).

IN-SERVICE EVALUATION Encourage in-service evaluation to demonstrate satisfactory field performance. Encourage in-service evaluation to demonstrate satisfactory field performance. Pool resources (partnering) between State proprietary device manufacturers. Pool resources (partnering) between State proprietary device manufacturers. Disseminate information through resource channels like National Technical Information Services (NTIS), FHWA regional resource centers and State pooled fund consortiums. Disseminate information through resource channels like National Technical Information Services (NTIS), FHWA regional resource centers and State pooled fund consortiums. Consider the establishment of new national center on in-service evaluation. Consider the establishment of new national center on in-service evaluation.

NCHRP 22-14(02) Full Scale Crash Tests Strong Post Double Beam System (with 5000 # pickup truck) – passed TL-3 test criteria Strong Post Double Beam System (with 5000 # pickup truck) – passed TL-3 test criteria Midwest Guardrail System (with 5000 # pickup truck & 2400 # small vehicle) – passed TL-3 test criteria Midwest Guardrail System (with 5000 # pickup truck & 2400 # small vehicle) – passed TL-3 test criteria New Jersey Shaped Concrete Barrier (with 2400 # small vehicle) – passed TL-3 test criteria New Jersey Shaped Concrete Barrier (with 2400 # small vehicle) – passed TL-3 test criteria F-Shape temp. concrete barrier with 3-loop connection (with 5000 # pickup truck) – passed TL-3 criteria F-Shape temp. concrete barrier with 3-loop connection (with 5000 # pickup truck) – passed TL-3 criteria

NCHRP 22-14(02) Full Scale Crash Tests, Con’t Iowa Transition (with 5000 # pickup truck) – passed TL-3 criteria Iowa Transition (with 5000 # pickup truck) – passed TL-3 criteria Tangent Guardrail terminal (with 2400 # sedan) – passed TL-3 criteria Tangent Guardrail terminal (with 2400 # sedan) – passed TL-3 criteria New Jersey Shaped Concrete Barrier (32 inches) (with 10,000 kg single unit truck) – did not pass TL-4 criteria New Jersey Shaped Concrete Barrier (32 inches) (with 10,000 kg single unit truck) – did not pass TL-4 criteria

AASHTO/FHWA IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DRAFT UNDER REVIEW BY TCRS

AASHTO/FHWA Implementation Plan (Draft)  All hardware and devices passed under NCHRP 350 may remain in place, continue to be manufactured, and installed.  Upon adoption of the new evaluation procedures by AASHTO, any new hardware or device not previously evaluated shall utilize the new procedures for evaluation and testing.

Implementation Plan, Con’t  Any hardware or devices accepted under testing procedures prior to 350 and in place are encouraged to be replaced during major highway and bridge reconstruction projects.

Implementation Plan, Con’t  Any new or revised hardware or device under development at the time the new procedures are adopted, may continue testing under the NCHRP 350 criteria. However, FHWA will not issue acceptance letters for any new or revised hardware or devices under NCHRP 350 criteria after 24 months following adoption by AASHTO of the new criteria.

TCRS Schedule for Adoption May 15 & 16, Spring meeting in Woods Hole, MA to review final document from NCHRP 22-14(02) panel May 15 & 16, Spring meeting in Woods Hole, MA to review final document from NCHRP 22-14(02) panel Finalize Draft Implementation Plan with FHWA Finalize Draft Implementation Plan with FHWA Ballot TCRS results completed by September , 2007 meeting in Seattle, Wash. Ballot TCRS results completed by September , 2007 meeting in Seattle, Wash. Ballot SCOD in Fall of 2007 Ballot SCOD in Fall of 2007 Ballot SCOH in Winter of 2007/08 Ballot SCOH in Winter of 2007/08 Complete NCHRP 22-14(03) with additional full scale crash testing of non-proprietary devices using the new criteria (Completion in 2008/09) Complete NCHRP 22-14(03) with additional full scale crash testing of non-proprietary devices using the new criteria (Completion in 2008/09)

CONTACT INFORMATION Keith A. Cota, Chairman AASHTO – Technical Committee on Roadside Safety New Hampshire DOT Hazen Drive, PO Box 483 Concord, NH Tel: