SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Game Theory. I What is Game theory? The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern (1944). Especially one institution:

Advertisements

The Basics of Game Theory

Introduction to Game Theory

SBS Model— Substance and Relationships Matter

Game Theory S-1.

3. Basic Topics in Game Theory. Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1 What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the.

Chapter 13 Conflict & Negotiation

APPENDIX An Alternative View of the Payoff Matrix n Assume total maximum profits of all oligopolists is constant at 200 units. n Alternative policies.

Anne Suryani Dani Vardiansyah Novita Damayanti Universitas Multimedia Nusantara

1 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game SCIT1003 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game Prof. Tsang.

An Introduction to... Evolutionary Game Theory

AP Economics Mr. Bernstein Module 65: Game Theory December 10, 2014.

Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework

Social Penetration Theory

Sociology 545 Fall, 2005 Professor Schutte. Exchange Theory Definition: “The process of actors rationally calculating mutual outcomes such that the equilibrium.

Human Resource Management Lecture-36. Summary of Lecture-35.

Habit 4 – Think “Win- Win”

Interdependence. Social Exchange  Premise: We seek interactions with others that provide maximum reward at minimum cost and we only stay with those who.

Game Theory The study of rational behavior among interdependent agents Agents have a common interest to make the pie as large as possible, but Agents have.

Game Theory Part 5: Nash’s Theorem.

Fundamentals of Political Science Dr. Sujian Guo Professor of Political Science San Francisco State Unversity

5/16/20151 Game Theory Game theory was developed by John Von Neumann and Oscar Morgenstern in Economists! One of the fundamental principles of.

Chapter 10 Managing Conflict. Conflict The process that results when one person or a group of people perceives that another person or group is frustrating,

Rational Choice Sociology Lecture 5 Game theory I: the concept and classification of games.

GAME THEORY By Ben Cutting & Rohit Venkat. Game Theory: General Definition  Mathematical decision making tool  Used to analyze a competitive situation.

Slide 1 of 13 So... What’s Game Theory? Game theory refers to a branch of applied math that deals with the strategic interactions between various ‘agents’,

A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.

A Crash Course in Game Theory Werner Raub Workshop on Social Theory, Trust, Social Networks, and Social Capital II National Chengchi University – NCCU.

Negotiation & Conflict Management Class 1 John D. Blair, PhD

Games as Systems Administrative Stuff Exercise today Meet at Erik Stemme

Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: Oct. 24, Reducing Groupthink Solutions focused on leadership – Solutions focused on decision making – Solutions focused.

QR 38, 2/6/07 Overview of game theory I. Strategic interaction II. Game theory and international relations III. Deterrence.

Von Neumann & the Bomb Strategy is not concerned with the efficient application of force but with the exploitation of potential force (T. Schelling, 1960,

Introduction to Game Theory Yale Braunstein Spring 2007.

To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management,9e by Render/Stair/Hanna M4-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Module 4 Game.

Group Formation Chapter 4. What Factors Determine When a Group Will Form? People Joining with others in a group depends on individuals' personal qualities,

Unions and Collective Bargaining Topic 4 Part I. Topic Outline Bargaining Models under Complete Information Applied to Collective Bargaining Nash’s Cooperative.

Standard and Extended Form Games A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor, SIUC.

Game Theory Robin Burke GAM 224 Spring Outline Admin Game Theory Utility theory Zero-sum and non-zero sum games Decision Trees Degenerate strategies.

Social Theories Social Exchange Theory

A Little Game Theory1 A LITTLE GAME THEORY Mike Bailey MSIM 852.

Game theory & Linear Programming Steve Gu Mar 28, 2008.

Chapter 9 Pay-for-Performance: The Evidence

Introduction Negotiation is something that everyone does, almost daily 1-1.

Conflict within Groups. Outline Conflict Competition and Conflict Class Activity Mixed Motive Situations Social Dilemmas Class Activity Threats and.

CHAPTER 15 Oligopoly PowerPoint® Slides by Can Erbil © 2004 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved.

1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.

How to Analyse Social Network? : Part 2 Game Theory Thank you for all referred contexts and figures.

Social Exchange Theory Presented by: Seyedreza Mousavi February 2012.

Copyright © 2013, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Social Exchange Theory Professor Tamara S. Arrington University of Kentucky Bluegrass Community and Technical College.

THE GUIDE TO ECONOMIC THINKING

Fundamental of International Business Negotiation

Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework Salacuse 1991.

Pay for Performance: The Evidence

Norberto Orozco Portales III Group Dynamics Report.

Uncertainty Reduction Theory Berger (1979). Assumptions to URD We don’t like uncertainty We want to predict behavior We are motivated to seek information.

By: Donté Howell Game Theory in Sports. What is Game Theory? It is a tool used to analyze strategic behavior and trying to maximize his/her payoff of.

Conflict and negotiation. Conflict 14–1 Conflict Defined Is a process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected,

Game Theory By Ben Cutting & Rohit Venkat.

Social Penetration Theory

Rational Choice Sociology

11b Game Theory Must Know / Outcomes:

Introduction to Game Theory

Social Exchange Theory

11b – Game Theory This web quiz may appear as two pages on tablets and laptops. I recommend that you view it as one page by clicking on the open book icon.

CONFLICT RESOLUTION PIXAR – For the Birds and Mike’s New Car.

Conflict Resolution.

Conflict Management Lecture 04 MS (HR), PHR –USA, AICCI-USA

Game Theory: The Nash Equilibrium

Presentation transcript:

SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley

TRIBUTARIES John von Neumann- games and economic/social behavior: parallel or opposite interest, perfect or imperfect information, rational decision or chance influence. ‘Strategy of anticipation’, or need to take the other actor/s into account. Win lose situations, or the zero-sum game.

Cont. John Nash- games are not always zero-sum; interactions include the possibility of mixed motive games. The minimax principle- people seek to maximize benefits and minimize costs.

Interdependence Theory of Thibaut and Kelley

Premises and Assumptions Relational outcomes are linked with the actions of others. Members of the dyad can accurately predict outcomes and will choose the best. Not necessarily win/lose; interdependence implies that we negotiate our moves based on anticipation of the actions of others.

PRISONER’S DILEMMA Potential for gain at the others expense. Also potential for win/win or lose/lose outcome. Both parties want optimum outcome.

RESULTS Outcome- rewards minus costs represented by a single number. Comparison Level (CL)- satisfaction depends on expectation; the threshold above which an outcome seems attractive. Comparison level of alternatives (CLalt)- the worst outcome one will accept and stay in the relationship.

Some predictions…. Outcome>CLalt>CL = satisfying, stable, nondependent. CL>CLalt>Outcome = not satisfying, break relationship, continue unhappy. CL>Outcome>CLalt = highly unsatisfying, can’t break away, dependent and unhappy…the Prisoner’s Dilemma.

Dependence and Control Outcomes > CLalt = high dependence. Outcomes < CLalt = low dependence. T and K identify three types of control: reflexive, fate and behavior. These forms are juggled in interdependent relationships. The relationship is not evaluated in an evaluative sense.

Collective and Ind Outcomes Why do people often act in ways that appear contrary to their own interests, even with knowledge of outcome values? T and K see this as evidence of collective, social behavior.

Anxiety- reframing the conflict to relieve tension; mentally altering the numbers by redefining the situation. Normative element- turning to collective principle for action when a situation is confusing. Temporal element- focus on future rewards.