Writing Rationales For Program Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Welcome back! Secondary Language Arts Department Head Meeting Leon County Schools Office of Curriculum Services Tuesday, August 20, 2013.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
So, What IS a Standards-based
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Handouts for Session 4 Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics.
Effingham County Who is a Gifted Student? A student who demonstrates a high degree of intellectual and/or creative ability, exhibits an exceptionally.
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
WRITING A SLO October 17, ASSUMPTIONS IN WRITING AN SLO  Goal: Impact Student Achievement  Who to include?  Timeframe  Data for initial goal.
IGP Reflection: Evaluate Please update your tracking charts based on the implementation of the paragraph planning from last week. IGP Reflection Questions:
YOUR LOGO January 13, 2014 ALL Site Coaching Session.
Please update your tracking charts based on the implementation of the paragraph planning from last week. IGP Reflection Questions: Paragraph Planning What.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
 Student Growth Goals & Plan KASA Conference July 17, 2014.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Using Effective Performance Evaluation Practices in Support of Continuous Improvement.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Summary Rating Responses November 13, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
Blaine and Mount Vernon TWSSP Workshop September 21, 2013.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
By May of 2013 Weikel Teachers will demonstrate an understanding of Common Core writing standard 2, 7, and 8 measured by and completion of 90% completion.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Cape Cod Tech Educator Plan Presentation. Educator Plan Form Due October 15 th …. It is an extension of your Goal Setting Form It is either a 1-year or.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
PLC Analysis Westport Middle School Gavin Osborne EPP 610 Dr. Lynne Wheat.
No Teacher Left Behind D. Gerald. How would you suggest we, as a nation, provide consistent learning opportunities for teachers and ensure that they are.
2016 State Assessment Highlights
American Institutes for Research
Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics
Anderson Elementary School
Common Core State Standards
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
4. How do we support staff and monitor progress?
August 25, 2016 Dr. ScharbreniaLockhart Principal
Presentation transcript:

Writing Rationales For Program Reviews

Toulmin Model of Rationale Writing 0 Claim 0 Grounds 0 Warrant 0 Backing 0 Rebuttal/Reservation 0 Qualification

Claim 0 What we scored 0 State the following: 0 Standard 0 Demonstrator 0 Characteristics 0 The Revision: 0 For Standard 3, Professional Development and Support Services: Demonstrator 1: Opportunity, _____ School scored a proficient in all four characteristics.

Grounds 0 Why you made the claim 0 Use this sentence 0 The Revision: 0 This is based upon the rubric for the Arts/Humanities Program Review for Standard 3, Demonstrator 1: Opportunity.

Warrant 0 Chain of reasoning for the claim

The Revision 0 We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic A because the professional development plan is tied to our CSIP. The master schedule demonstrates that our CSIP supports appropriate Arts instruction. We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic B because each teacher has received embedded professional development during the Artist in Residence programs. We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic C because each lesson taught is grounded in best practices for the content and age. Artist and teachers are provided with documents and multimedia files for use with students which demonstrate best practices. We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic D because during PLC, teachers have the opportunity to collaborate and exchange ideas.

The Revision 0 We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic A because the professional development plan is tied to our CSIP. The master schedule demonstrates that our CSIP supports appropriate Arts instruction. We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic B because each teacher has received embedded professional development during the Artist in Residence programs. We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic C because each lesson taught is grounded in best practices for the content and age. Artist and teachers are provided with documents and multimedia files for use with students which demonstrate best practices. We qualify for a Proficient in characteristic D because during PLC, teachers have the opportunity to collaborate and exchange ideas.

Backing 0 Support for the warrant

The Revision 0 During this year, we have had ___ Artist in Residence. Teachers in grades ______ worked with Artist AB in jewelry making for grades ______. Artist CD worked with the ___ grades constructing _______. During all of the artist in residence time, time was provided in the schedule for each artist to meet with the PLC’s to discuss techniques and best practices and next steps for teacher to have “follow up” on her residency. Weekly PLC meetings provided an opportunity for teachers to collaborate and share ideas. Two programs that was a result of these PLC discussions was _______________ and _______________ programs.

Rebuttal/Reservation 0 Exceptions to the claim 0 Counter agreement 0 Optional – do not use if proficient or distinguished in all areas 0 The Revision: 0 Example to be shown

Qualification 0 Limits to the claim, warrant, and backing 0 The degree of conditionality or certainty 0 The Revision: 0 There is unconditional support for the designation of proficient for characteristics A, B, C, and D for the opportunity demonstrator.

Lets shine a light on another example Look at the Original rationale for Example 2 (Blue paper)

Example 2 - Revised For Standard 3, Professional Development and Support Services: Demonstrator 1: Opportunity, _______ School scored a proficient in characteristics A, C, and D and Distinguished in characteristic B. This is based upon the Writing Program Review Rubric. The school qualifies for a proficient in Characteristic A because the professional development plan is tied to our CSIP. In Characteristic C, the proficient score is based upon the professional development opportunities which demonstrate best practices and are tied to the professional growth plans. In characteristic D, PLC’s and the master schedule provide regular opportunities for collaboration and exchange of ideas. Characteristic B is scored a distinguished because of the variety of job embedded professional development opportunities which allow all teachers to continue to grow as individual educators thereby meet the all needs of all students.

Example 2 For Standard 3, Professional Development and Support Services: Demonstrator 1: Opportunity, _______ School scored a proficient in characteristics A, C, and D and Distinguished in characteristic B. This is based upon the Writing Program Review Rubric. The school qualifies for a proficient in Characteristic A because the professional development plan is tied to our CSIP. In Characteristic C, the proficient score is based upon the professional development opportunities which demonstrate best practices and are tied to the professional growth plans. In characteristic D, PLC’s and the master schedule provide regular opportunities for collaboration and exchange of ideas. Characteristic B is scored a distinguished because of the variety of job embedded professional development opportunities which allow all teachers to continue to grow as individual educators thereby meet the all needs of all students.

Example 2 For Standard 3, Professional Development and Support Services: Demonstrator 1: Opportunity, _______ School scored a proficient in characteristics A, C, and D and Distinguished in characteristic B. This is based upon the Writing Program Review Rubric. The school qualifies for a proficient in Characteristic A because the professional development plan is tied to our CSIP. In Characteristic C, the proficient score is based upon the professional development opportunities which demonstrate best practices and are tied to the professional growth plans. In characteristic D, PLC’s and the master schedule provide regular opportunities for collaboration and exchange of ideas. Characteristic B is scored a distinguished because of the variety of job embedded professional development opportunities which allow all teachers to continue to grow as individual educators thereby meet the all needs of all students.

Example 2 For Standard 3, Professional Development and Support Services: Demonstrator 1: Opportunity, _______ School scored a proficient in characteristics A, C, and D and Distinguished in characteristic B. This is based upon the Writing Program Review Rubric. The school qualifies for a proficient in Characteristic A because the professional development plan is tied to our CSIP. In Characteristic C, the proficient score is based upon the professional development opportunities which demonstrate best practices and are tied to the professional growth plans. In characteristic D, PLC’s and the master schedule provide regular opportunities for collaboration and exchange of ideas. Characteristic B is scored a distinguished because of the variety of job embedded professional development opportunities which allow all teachers to continue to grow as individual educators thereby meet the all needs of all students.

During this year, the CSIP was monitored for implementation by the principal. Writing and professional development was addressed in Goal ___ Objective __ Strategy __. # Teachers participated in district sponsored professional development provided by Angela Hilterbrand. Following the workshop, these teachers worked with all staff during PLC’s to share the information obtained. Ms. Hilterbrand also visited our school to work with all ELA teachers in grades 3 – 6. This information was shared with primary teachers in the PLC setting. Primary teachers received additional training through the Elgin Initiative. Renee Smith, ELA District Content Coach, provide regular individualized professional development. Three teachers attended the ELA Laying the Foundation training for grades 4 – 6. PLC agendas, sign-in sheets and notes provide details of the job embedded professional development and collaboration. One example of the collaboration is the incorporation of writing in other content areas, such as the science research papers. When examining the evidence and rubric traits, the score of Proficient for characteristics A, C, and D are warranted. The score of Distinguished for characteristic D is warranted.

Example 3 – (green paper) 0 For Standard 3, Professional Development and Support Services: Demonstrator 1: Opportunity, _____ School scored a proficient in characteristics B, C, and D and Limited/No Implementation in characteristic A. This is based upon the Writing Program Review Rubric. We qualify for Proficient in Characteristic B because of the variety of job embedded professional development opportunities are available to all teachers. In Characteristic C, the proficient score is based upon the professional development opportunities which demonstrate best practices and are tied to the professional growth plans. In characteristic D, PLC’s and the master schedule provide regular opportunities for collaboration and exchange of ideas. Characteristic A is scored a limited/no implementation because there is not a link between the CSIP professional development plans.

0 During this year, the CSIP was monitored for implementation by the principal. Writing and professional development was addressed in Goal ___ Objective __ Strategy __. # Teachers participated in district sponsored professional development provided by Angela Hilterbrand. Following the workshop, these teachers worked with all staff during PLC’s to share the information obtained. Ms. Hilterbrand also visited our school to work with all ELA teachers in grades 3 – 6. This information was shared with primary teachers in the PLC setting. Primary teachers received additional training through the Eligin Initiative. Renee Smith, ELA District Content Coach, provide regular individualized professional development. Three teachers attended the ELA Laying the Foundation training for grades 4 – 6. PLC agendas, sign-in sheets and notes provide details of the job embedded professional development and collaboration. One example of the collaboration is the incorporation of writing in other content areas, such as the science research papers.

Teachers did participate in writing professional development; however, this was not specifically link to the CSIP or professional growth plans. This oversight will be addressed in the upcoming SCIP and professional growth plans. When examining the evidence and rubric traits, the score of Proficient for characteristics B, C, and D are warranted. The score of Limited/No implementation for characteristic A is conditionally awarded.

Next Steps: 1) Rewrite a rationale 2) Share with your group for feedback