Good Afternoon Program Assessment Committee (PAC) Data Assessment Records and Analysis For the first three year Cycle Semesters 081-102 Dr. Hussain Al-Zaher.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Keys to Success in Engineering Study

Advertisements

For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.

Curriculum Maps Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.

Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of

University of Alabama Electrical & Computer Engineering Electrical and Computer Engineering Capstone Design Experience at The University of Alabama: Challenges,

Engaging Faculty in Prevention Efforts Ellen Bass Associate Professor.

1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.

1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.

Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.

Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.

Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.

Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 14,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.1 Guidelines on: I- Department’s Mission, PEOs and SOs II- The Preparation of.

DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.

ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.

Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)

ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.

CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.

OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.

ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.

AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.

Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.

ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.

Harmonisation in European higher education especially in BME (selected slides) Ákos Jobbágy PhD Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.

1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.

 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :

The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.

EE Program Student Advising Prof. Michael Green These slides can be found at:

ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.

EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.

1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.

Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.

Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.

CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.

Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne

Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.

HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.

CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.

UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.

CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.

Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.

ABET Accreditation Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement Direct Assessment of Learning Outcomes Dr. Abdel-Rahman Al-Qawasmi Associate Professor EE Department.

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.

1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.

UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING POLICIES THE WHAT, HOW AND WHY.

University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.

Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.

ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.

Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.

Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Assessment Dept. of Computer Engineering King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia Dept. of Computer.

 (noun) a specification of an object, manifested by an agent, intended to accomplish goals, in a particular environment, using a set of primitive components,

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.

Continuous Program Improvement

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5

What to Expect When You’re Expecting

Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017

Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas

Information Technology (IT)

Development of ABET Syllabus

Assessment and Accreditation

CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.

Presentation transcript:

Good Afternoon

Program Assessment Committee (PAC) Data Assessment Records and Analysis For the first three year Cycle Semesters Dr. Hussain Al-Zaher Dr. Hussain Al-Jamid Dr. Ibrahim El-Amin Dr. Hassan Ragheb Dr. Essam Hassan. Mr. Mohammad Tamim

Outcome Based Assessment OutcomeStatement a Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b Design and conduct electrical engineering experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c Design an electrical system, component, or process to meet desired needs. d Function on multi-disciplinary teams. e Identify, formulate, and solve electrical engineering problems. f Understand professional and ethical responsibility. g Communicate effectively. h Acquire the broad education necessary to understand the impact of electrical engineering solutions in a global and societal context. i Recognize the need for, and be able to engage in life-long learning. j Acquire knowledge of contemporary issues. k Use the techniques, skills, and modern electrical engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.. l Apply probabilistic methods and statistics to electrical engineering problems. m Use effectively information technology tools to design, develop, and implement electrical systems.

Program Outcome Assessment Plan

Rubric Based Assessment Rubric = a scoring tool for subjective assessment. A rubric contains a set of performance indicators. PI’s = A set of statements that can be used to rate students achievements. Benchmark A threshold of 2.4 out of 4 (or equivalently 60%) Outcomes score < 60 % required corrective action(s) Outcomes score > 60 % optional actions (suggestions for improvement )

Rubric Sample

Evaluation Sheet Sample

Outcome A Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RA EE EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)2.72 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 081

Outcome B Design and conduct electrical engineering experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RB EE 201 (Lab.) EE 360 (Lab.) EE 370 (Lab.) Weighted Score out of (4)2.89 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 081

Outcome C Design an electrical system, component, or process to meet desired needs. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RC EE EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)2.95 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 081

Outcome E Identify, formulate, and solve electrical engineering problems. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RE EE EE EE Groups Weighted Score out of (4)2.90 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 082

Outcome H Acquire the broad education necessary to understand the impact of electrical engineering solutions in a global and societal context. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RH EE EE EE Groups Weighted Score out of (4)2.67 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 082

Outcome D Function on multi-disciplinary teams. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RD EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)3.49 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 091

Outcome F Understand professional and ethical responsibility. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RF EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)3.55 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 091

Outcome I Recognize the need for, and be able to engage in life-long learning. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RI EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)3.07 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 092

Outcome J Acquire knowledge of contemporary issues. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RJ EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)2.94 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 092

Outcome G Communicate effectively. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RG EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)3.22 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 101

Outcome M Use effectively information technology tools to design, develop, and implement electrical systems. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RM EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)3.21 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 101

Outcome K Use the techniques, skills, and modern electrical engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RK EE EE Weighted Score out of (4)2.80 Decision (Pass/Fail)PASS Term 102

Outcome L Apply probabilistic methods and statistics to electrical engineering problems. Course Number of Sections Number of Students Evaluated RL EE Weighted Score out of (4)2.81 Decision (Pass/Fail)Pass Term 102

Weighted Scores for the full Cycle

Closing the Loop for the first three-year cycle: 1. All outcomes have passing scores. 2. The score of all outcomes are higher than 2.8/4, except for outcomes (a) and (h) (i.e and 2.67) 3. These two results are satisfactory, need some actions for improvement. 4. Due to the relatively low performance in EE340 for outcome (a) and EE380 and EE360 for outcome (h). 5. PAC asked the concerned departmental groups for feedback and suggestions.

Dr.Hussain Alzaher

Conclusion DAD initiating process of self assessment of graduate program Comments Suggestions Actions

Modifications The PAC has decided to adopt a modified score levels as follows: Scores 2.8-to-4 are Highly Satisfactory. Scores 2.4-to-2.79 are Satisfactory. Scores 2.0-to-2.39 are Marginally Satisfactory. Scores below 2.0 are Unsatisfactory.