Professional Performance Process OPD 863 – Using the Rubric Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Analyzing Student Work
Parkland School Division
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Leading Australian Curriculum: Science Day 4. Australian Curriculum PURPOSE Curriculum leaders develop capacity to lead change and support schools and.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
E-asTTle Writing All you ever wanted to know……. “Launched in November 2007, the Revised New Zealand Curriculum sets the direction for teaching and learning.
Through Instructional Rounds
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.
Professional Learning Team Conference June Each participant will leave the session knowledgeable about inter-rater reliability  What it is  Why.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.
Preparing for the Data Team Process 1.  Know the rationale for “Step A” with respect to the data team process.  Experience Step A as a tool to help.
Consistency of Assessment
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Last time, we asked you to... Bring an ‘live’ issue or concern for which you would like some coaching! Could also be an issue sensitively presented in.
Triple C Competency-based Curriculum: Implications for Family Medicine Residency Programs.
Principles of Assessment
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
1 Professional Teacher Evaluation Program. 2 What is the PTEP? Assessment program designed to determine the quality of teacher performance in relation.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Professional Performance Process School Leadership Team Training June 24-25, 2010 Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
21st Century Skills – The 4 C’s
How can school districts support the development of healthy school communities? Facilitated by: Rhonda Patton, Alberta Health Services Dr. Steve Manske,
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Performance and Professional Growth Systems Non-Instructional Staff For use by Supervisors, Managers, Directors, Principals, and Superintendents Who Supervise.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Alternative Assessment
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Rubric Assessment On the path to Common Writing Assessments.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The School Effectiveness Framework
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Chapter 10 Evaluating and Reporting Sarah Chrobot, Leigh Tremblay, Jessica Gent, Emma Weighill, Jewel Springer “The process of assessing children’s learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
New London Debriefing Roles Chuck listens GPAEA team coaches Network members Stay in descriptive voice Stick to the evidence “Everyone speaks once before.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
August 5-12, 2011 EDUCATOR EVALUATION PILOT. Overview The “Big Picture” – Where are we headed? – Where have we been? – How will we get there? Previewing.
Evaluation Of and For Learning
CEA Case Study Marianne Farrugia.
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Assessing Pupil Progress in Science (APP) Department CPD session Spring 2009 Slide 0.1.
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Professional Performance Process OPD 863 – Using the Rubric Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation

2 Today’s Outcomes Participants will: Be able to describe a professional educator who does not meet a standard, meets, and exceeds a standard using the rubric.

3 Meets vs. Exceeds Count off at your table 1 – 6 Move to the corresponding chart –Ones go to I. Knowledge of Students charts Half of the group brainstorms and records on the “Meets Standard” chart what a professional educator looks/sounds like when he/she meets the standard. The other half brainstorms and records on the “Exceeds Standard” chart what a professional educator looks/sounds like when he/she exceeds the standard.

4 Evaluation Component of the PPP Mid-Year Report and Conference (Role Play)

5 Professional Educator Performance Process – Overall Evaluation Rubric Using the Rubric Dialogue About Ratings Does Not Meet Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard

6 Discussion questions: How have you used rubrics? Why should there be a rubric as part of the PPP? Rubric is used to describe levels of performance and to provide a consistent form of reference for evaluating performance, both formally and informally. Context: Why have a rubric?

7 Discussion tool –Describes what it looks like to meet or exceed standards for particular group of employees –Summarizes performance for each standard based on the evidence collected for each standard and key element using the collection of evidence record Evaluation tool –Ratings for each standard to be recorded on evaluation reports –Can also serve as a self-evaluation tool for employees Context: What is the purpose of the rubric?

8 The Rubric Development Process 1.Development of the standards 2.Determination of number of levels 3.Use key elements from standards to craft language for “Meets Standards” 4.Develop counter-examples for “Does Not Meet Standards” 5.Develop extensions for “Exceeds Standards”

9 Structure for the Rubric Levels of Performance –Start with “Meets Standards” and use the key elements of the standard as basis for description –Includes two other levels: “Does Not Meet Standards” and “Exceeds Standards” Threads of content across the levels to show development and growth opportunities

10 Defining “Does Not Meet Standards” Covers a wide range of performance Possible to be in “Does Not Meet Standards” in a given area at the beginning of the year but progress to “Meets Standards” Thought Question: How is “Does Not Meet Standards” different from “Unsatisfactory”?

11 Defining “Exceeds Standards” What does it mean to exceed standards? In order to exceed a standard, someone must first meet the standard – so “meets standards” is a prerequisite Thought Question: Is it possible in all cases to exceed standards?

12 Why is consensus so important? –Discussion of reliability and validity –Diving analogies –How do we get to consensus? What the pilot has taught us –Variability across schools Using the Rubric: Working Toward Consensus

13 Focus on the standard indicated on the handout. Task: At your table, discuss how you would rate the teacher on the identified standard from the description. Discussion Questions: –What additional evidence would you need to see to make your rating? –What evidence would demonstrate “does not meet”, “meets,” or “exceeds” for this standard? –What suggestions would you give this teacher in terms of this standard? Activity: Testing Out the Evaluation Rubric

14 Review your ratings the day after you make them –Would you still make the same judgments? –Are you consistent in your expectations across staff members? Discuss/share ratings as a team to get different perspectives –Periodically review your expectations as a group –Review your patterns to see how consistent you are Phone a friend! –Discuss any sticking points with someone else outside the situation (without identifying information) to see how they would handle it Using the Rubric: Tips for Ensuring Consistency

15 Your Next Steps What essential knowledge and skills do staff members need to participate in PPP? What will you do next with your faculty to help them be ready for the PPP next year?

16 Belief Questions on the PPP Responder System Questions

17 Thank You! Please complete feedback forms and leave them on your tables.