RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Advertisements

Team Ramrod Final Presentation Dan Armel, Michaela Cui, Andrew Grimaldi, Kyle Kemble, Silvia Peckham, Chris Sawyer & Kelsey Whitesell 6 th December 2007.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR WVU Rocketeers 2012 Conceptual Design Review John Hailer, Ben Province, Justin Yorick Advisors: Dimitris Vassiliadis, Marc Gramlich.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
RockSat-C 2012 PDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Preliminary Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2012 PDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Comprehensive Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
2012 CoDR Nitric Oxide and Piezo Dust Detector Probe Conceptual Design Review Virginia Tech Presented by Stephen Noel November 18,
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Zero Tilt Frostburg State University Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz, Sean Hughes, Jared Hughes, Andrew.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Minnesota Sound Wreckers University of Minnesota 2/13/12 1 Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
TESLA Rocket Project Lecture #3 10/28/15
Haripriya Head, Integration Team Pratham, IIT Bombay 19 th June, 2010.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
2016 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
Advised by Professor Baird Soules
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Presentation transcript:

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 9/29/2011 1

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR CoDR Presentation Contents 2 Section 1: Mission Overview –Mission Overview –Theory and Concepts –Mission Requirements (brief, upper level) –Concept of Operations –Expected Results Section 2: Design Overview –Design Overview –Functional Block Diagrams –Payload Layout –RockSat-C 2012 User’s Guide Compliance

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR CoDR Presentation Contents Section 3: Management –Team Organization –Schedule –Budget –Mentors (Faculty, industry) Section 4: Conclusions 3

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Mission Overview The purpose of this project is to develop a mechanical and electrical design for removing rocket noise that gets transferred to the test chamber. The method to be used is active noise cancellation with mechanical isolation of the system. 4

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Mission Overview Our hypothesis is that active noise cancellation will reduce rocket engine noise by at least 90%. It is possible that experiments done on sounding rockets will be noise sensitive and would greatly benefit from noise cancellation. 5

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Mission Overview: Theory and Concepts Noise cancellation requires some knowledge of acoustic wave propagation and also signal processing techniques. We need to measure the signal and invert it, while amplifying our output such that we can cancel the signal but not create a larger problem. What other research has been performed in the past? –Results? 6

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Mission Overview: Mission Requirements We want to cancel the noise and prove that our system works –We measure the input signal in the experimental chamber and process that in order to output the inverse into the same chamber –We take input data in the control chamber –Afterwards, we compare the input at the microphone of the control and experimental chambers Minimum success criteria –Take data on input of the experimental chamber –Output a signal from the speaker in an attempt to cancel the noise –Structure maintains full integrity for the duration of the flight 7 crestock.com

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Expected Flight Time t ≈ 1.3 min Altitude: 75 km t ≈ 15 min Splash Down t ≈ 1.7 min Altitude: 95 km -All systems on -Begin data collection t = 0 min t ≈ 4.0 min Altitude: 95 km Apogee t ≈ 2.8 min Altitude: ≈115 km End of Orion Burn t ≈ 0.6 min Altitude: 52 km t ≈ 4.5 min Altitude: 75 km Altitude t ≈ 5.5 min Chute Deploys

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Noise Cancellation TimeLine 9 1. Launch Data collection begins The system begins to cancel all noise 2. Initial Thrust Completed We expect to see our best results from this point on 3. Landing At the landing, our circuit is still functioning We don’t want to overwrite any data collected during flight.

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Mission Overview: Expected Results 10 We expect to be successful reducing the overall power of the wavelength spectra between about 50Hz and 20kHz This means a reduction in amplitude at most of the frequencies within this range. –We are planning on using a middle range speaker, and thus will maybe see more response from 1kHz to 10kHz.

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Design Overview 11 We hope to use the power supply and data logger from our previous flights –We may need to put more batteries in the power supply in order to get enough amplification in the speaker We need a microphone, speaker and DSP capable of doing all this –The microphone needs to be small and capable of taking the force of the initial launch. –Same goes for our speaker, which will hopefully be efficient enough that we can drive it fully with our power supply.

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Functional Body Diagram 12 Power Data Power Data

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Example FBD – mechanical/system (rough diagram) 13 plate Electronics – controlling sensor (mounted to plate) Mounts to base of canister Mounts to lid of canister Control chamber Test chamber powerpower powerpower Electronics- Data recording Electronics- Data recording speaker Dummy speaker microphones

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Design Overview: Payload Layout The structure will contain two sealed chambers as well as an area to mount the electronics and power supply 14 classymommy.com

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Design Overview: RockSat-C 2012 User’s Guide Compliance 15 Predicted mass- we expect the electronics to weigh about 2 lbs. and the structure made out of aluminum should weigh about 10 lbs. the entire canister without balancing weights should weigh approximately 19 lbs. the last pound will be weights attached within the structure to ensure a center of gravity within the requirements The experiment will employ use of the entire can. All systems activate upon connection with the rocket using the rocket activation wire

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Management 16 Team leader: Jacob Schultz Aerospace Team: Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel Electrical Team: Alexander Richman, Will Thorson Faculty Advisors: Professor Ted Higman, ECE, University of Minnesota Professor William L. Garrard, AEM, University of Minnesota

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Management 17 September-Oct 15 th –Research requirements and preliminary design –Look up what components need to be purchased Oct 15 th -Nov 15 th –Work final design including solid works drawings and electronics drawings –Ensure no issues with design Nov 15 th -Nov29th –Prepare CDR make sure everything checked multiple times and ready for submission

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Our Mission is to employ active noise cancellation onboard a rocket From this point we plan on looking at the exact components necessary and dimensions in order to make a more finalized design –We are going to further investigate how to implement noise cancellation best and ways to configure the electronics onboard –We are ready to start looking at subsystems and lower level designs at this point Conclusion 18