J-1 Next Steps Jordan Dentz. J-2 Assignments 1. Establish core continuous improvement team (April 21) 2. Current state value stream map (draft April 28;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

A Youth Capability Building Project- Muslim Youth Scholar Training Internship (MyStI) A Presentation by MY -FIKR (Muslim Youth Foundation of Intellectual.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Leading Teams.
The Reorganization of University Advancement Scott C. Warrington, VP for UA.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Lean Manufacturing Case Study Prototype Design-Build.
NORMA GOMEZ, MBA, MSN, RN, CNN Unique Challenges for the Nephrology Professional in Managing Change.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Club Visioning A Membership Development Tool. © International Vision Facilitation Committee 2 Go to the people. Live among the people Learn from them.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Copyright – Disaster Resistant Communities Group - Drill Overview.
1 Using TeamSTEPPS to Make Safety Improvements Tara Brown, MPH,CQIA, CQA Evaluation Specialist Georgia Medical Care Foundation The Medicare Quality Improvement.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
IN YEAR MONITORING & BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP PREPARED BY BUDGET OFFICE MAY
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Phil Cronin Anne Hill Allen Schones CIS841 Summer on Campus 1998 IN-PROCESS INSPECTIONS FOR OBJECT ORIENTED DESIGNS.
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Acquisition Strategy Under the laws of the State of Colorado Commercial acquisition practices to be utilized.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
G-1 Rapid Process Improvement Event Overview Dewey Warden.
Mentoring for Change Setting a new course for the Mentor Program.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
1 UNIT B HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 4.03 Compare employee performance evaluations.
Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi February 2007 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Selection Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi
Prepared by the (Institute of Industrial Engineers – Industry Advisory Board)
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
DCIPS Implementation Project Plan Update Army G2 Intelligence Personnel Management Office (IPMO) April 6, 2009.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Deployment Strategy Six Sigma Academy.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Accreditation; Self Assessment Viki Massey, Quality Coordinator A Joint Venture of London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph’s Health Care London.
Science Team Objectives K. Jezek and J. Richter-Menge Science Team Co-leads.
November 15, 2007 The “ABC” of Effective Field Monitoring & Supervision November 15, 2007.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework What you need to know and what you need to do.
Under construction SPANISH PRESIDENCY OF THE EU 2010 FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS ROADMAP 4-May-2010.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
Aviation Security Training Module 3 Conducting an Exercise 1.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Overview of System or Process Design and Improvement 1.
University of Wyoming Financial Reporting Initiative Update April 2016.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Post-Procedure Debriefing: Opportunities to Improve Cath Lab Communication and Patient Care Michael A. Kutcher, MD, FSCAI Henry S. Jennings, III, MD, FSCAI.
BLOCK Health Funding Arrangement Presented by __________________ FNIHB-AB June 15, 2016.
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
120 Day Action Plan FOR SENIOR MANAGER, CALL CENTER OPERATIONS
Roles and Responsibilities
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Presentation transcript:

J-1 Next Steps Jordan Dentz

J-2 Assignments 1. Establish core continuous improvement team (April 21) 2. Current state value stream map (draft April 28; final May 14) 3. Future state value stream map (draft May 19; final June 1) 4. Develop plan (June 1) 5. Schedule RPI events (June 1)

J-3 1. Establish Core Continuous Improvement Team Assignment Provide details to MHRA team contact (April 21) –Identify participants –Establish a weekly meeting schedule –Determine performance metrics to be collected (examples: rework, labor hours/floor, delays, etc.)

J-4 2. Current State Value Stream Map Assignments Preliminary draft (April 28) Revise and rework based on feedback (May 14) Conduct detailed analysis on selected processes

J-5 2. Current State Value Stream Map Share information with the MHRA team as it is collected The team will visit the plant to review progress and confer with the plant’s lean advocates Finalize current state map with MHRA team input

J-6 2. Current State Value Stream Map Identify from the value stream map specific areas of improvement In each area, conduct detailed observations, create process flow maps, and collect quantitative data

J-7 3. Future State Value Stream Map Assignment Preliminary draft (May 19) Revise and rework based on feedback (June 1)

J-8 3. Future State Value Stream Map Develop a future-state value stream map, focusing on high priority, high return lean improvements Potential improvements will likely include: –Workplace organization and standardization –Labor optimization –Better tools and equipment –Procedures –Information systems

J-9 3. Future State Value Stream Map Review and refine the future-state value stream map Identify candidate lean improvements Create a short list of candidate lean improvements that will form the basis for the RPI events

J Develop Plan Assignment Develop plan for lean improvements (June 1) –Strategy for implementing lean improvements as depicted on the future-state value stream map –Base the plan on conducting three or more RPI events

J Develop Plan Each RPI event will be carefully planned, including: –what is to be accomplished –how the event will be conducted –resources and materials are needed –plant personnel that will be involved Floor supervision and operators must be involved

J Develop Plan The advocates and the advisory team will jointly draft the plan for the first RPI event It will likely focus on workplace organization and standardization (5S), since this serves as the foundation for future lean improvements Plans for subsequent RPI events will be drafted by the advocates and reviewed by the advisory team

J RPI Events Assignment Submit requested RPI schedule dates (June 1) –Allot one week for an RPI event

J RPI Events The MHRA advisory team will work with the lean advocates in conducting three RPI events The RPI events will initially be led by the MHRA advisory team This responsibility will be shifted to the plant’s lean advocates in subsequent RPIs The goal is to transfer the expertise in facilitating the process of continual improvement to plant staff

J RPI Events One or more members of the advisory team will be in the plant for each of the three RPI events RPI events will be documented and evaluated by the advisory team with the assistance of the advocates

J RPI Events Results will be reported to plant management The evaluation will focus on: –RPI accomplishments –Factors that limited RPI success –Barriers that inhibit the development of a lean culture –Further opportunities for improvements

J RPI Events Advocates will be encouraged to conduct additional RPI events between advisory team visits The future state map can include the additional RPIs or they may be conducted as follow-ups to previous RPIs

J RPI Events 5S Evaluation Sheet RPI Event Guidelines Time Observation Sheet Process Design Analysis Sheet RPI Event Area Selection Matrix RPI Materials and Equipment Checklist RPI Event Preparation Checklist – By Activity RPI Event Preparation Checklist – By Time Frame RPI Event Schedule RPI Event Evaluation Form

J Final team meeting After completion of all RPI events, the lean advocates from all plants and the MHRA advisory team will convene for a one- day de-briefing where participants will share experiences

J-20 Thank You and good luck.