ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EIDE System Requirements and Specification Documents
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation Model
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 Release 5 and 6 Friday Market Updates Aug 08, 2008.
Profiling Working Group March 13, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 13, 2007.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting November 6, 2007.
November 2009 Network Disaster Recovery October 2014.
11/08/2005 Ken Donohoo How Does NMMS meet the Nodal Protocol Requirements John Adams 3/23/2006.
ERCOT’S COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT and ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM March 23, 2005.
03/22/07 TPTF meeting ICCP Quality Codes Bill Blevins/Frank Kendall.
814_20 – Substation ID updates Background and Proposed Action Plan TX SET – 10/25/07.
1 Market Trials Outage Scheduling Weekly Update July 23, 2010.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
TEXAS NODAL Board Review and Approval August 19, 2003.
Events of March 7th John Adams ROS – May 12, 2005.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Market Trials and Data Verification ROS Meeting By Steve Grendel, ERCOT Thursday, 01/11/2007.
SO – CART Project Status Protocol Revision Subcommittee Update 2/23/06.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
1 ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements. 2 Protocol References Telemetry TAC will establish TASK force and approve a telemetry criteria.
MP Failover DNS Option 1 for API Failover The same DNS structure that allows ERCOT to fail over services between sites can also be used to allow MPs to.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Release 3 – WebEx Conference July 10, 2007.
State Estimator & Telemetry. Imagine a student measuring current on an electrical circuit.59 With on meter, he measures.59 A. Being a cautious type, he.
Network Model Management System (NMMS)
1 Performance Standards. 2 This presentation provides a summary of the performance standards proposed for the operation of the FiReControl network. These.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal ICCP Business Case By Jeyant Tamby, ERCOT.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Release 3 – Workshop August 16, 2007.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Managing of Limits during Loss of Analysis Tools/ EMS April 23, 2014.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary LLs Published in September 2015.
Price Correction Process Resmi Surendran QMWG 04/10/2015.
1 State Estimator performance. 2 State of Technology Many metrics have been proposed for measuring State Estimator performance.. PI = min Σ( Z – h i (x))^
1 Readiness Scorecard – May ‘10 NATF Brandon McElfresh Nodal Readiness and Transition May 4, 2010.
Data Coordinators Conference – 2014 Laura Marroquin CASEWORKER/JCMS Specialist Everything New Data Coordinators Should Know.
ERCOT Guideline for Interim Updates to the Network Operations Model Excerpted from the “Modeling Expectations” whitepaper D.W. Rickerson.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
Business Continuity Planning for OPEN OPEN Development Conference September 18, 2008 Ravi Rajaram IT Development Manager.
EDS 1 Early Delivery Systems EDS 1 Update Jonathan Pulcini - Project Manager August 13, 2007.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
Model load frequency Discussion John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Current Telemetry Dashboards NDSWG March 24, 2009.
Telemetry and State Estimator Standards Network Data Support Working Group June 16, 2006.
EDS 1 Early Delivery Systems EDS 1 Update for Workshop Jonathan Pulcini - Project Manager August 17, 2007.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Nodal ICCP Availability Report Ken McIntyre. Presentation Recap ICCP Availability Requirement ERCOT Reports to be posted.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS Market Trials Approach Wednesday, November 29, 2006.
1 Compliance Update April Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting December 3, 2007.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
01/21/2009 Telemetry Process & Progress ERCOT State Estimator & LFC Team Operations Advanced Network Applications Support.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Approval of Important Station Voltages for State Estimator Reporting Review of SE and Telemetry Standards Alex Sills Advanced Network Applications 10/13/11.
August 11, 2008 TPTF Early Delivery Systems Status Daryl Cote.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Market Trials Open Market Participant Call
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Compliance Report to ERCOT TAC February 2007
TOP-010-1(i) Implementation
What is the UL QFCP? FCIA Webinar Presenters:
Presentation transcript:

ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements Proposal

Telemetry Proposal 100% of switches/breakers status telemetered to ERCOT (protocol) Accuracy of telemetry is identified to ERCOT: PT Accuracy CT accuracy Transducer accuracy A/D converter accuracy For 100% of analog measurements. QSE/TSP provides ERCOT with a calibration plan which either guarantees calibration every 2 years (minimum) or provides an analysis which guarantees less than 1% of analogs will move outside the specified accuracy range each year. QSE/TSP re-calibrates telemetry identified by ERCOT as suspect within 2 working days; or respond with analysis of how the user has established it remains accurate without calibration to ERCOT satisfaction. QSE/TSP documents to ERCOT the analog and quality codes associated with each RTU, and documents for ERCOT the logic used to convert that data and quality code into ICCP data provided to ERCOT.

Telemetry Proposal Status & analogs telemetered to ERCOT will be identified with the following status codes: Valid – represents analog or status less then 10 seconds old, received from field Manual – represents a analog or status entered manually at the market participant (not received from the field electronically) Stale – Represents a analog or status received electronically from the field which is over 10 seconds old; but less than 10 minutes old. Suspect - Represents a analog or status received electronically from the field which is over 10 minutes old. Invalid – Represents a analog or status which the market participant has identified as out of reasonability limits. Com_fail – informs ERCOT that due to communications failure, the analog or status provided ERCOT is not valid. The market participant will document to ERCOT of what status combinations are valid TSP telemetries analogs will be available and valid at ERCOT 99% of time on a monthly basis. ERCOT will produce monthly report. Each individual TSP telemetry analog will be available and valid at ERCOT 80% of time on a monthly basis.

Proposal -Metrics QSE/TSP performance Metrics Status of 99.95% of switches/breakers identified as ICCP points – Measured by number of ICCP status points divided by the number of switches/breakers modeled in ERCOT database. Example: TSP_A has 6,000 switches and breakers status telemetered to ERCOT. The ERCOT model has 6,030 switches and breakers modeled and identified as belonging to that TSP. TSP_A has 6000/6030 = .99502 or 99.502% of switches and breakers status telemetered to ERCOT and fails this metric.

Proposal -Metrics QSE/TSP performance Metrics Analogs defined as available to ERCOT in database are valid or manual to ERCOT 99% of time in each month – Measured by summing 5 minute samples valid (by QSE/TSP) divided by number defined (by QSE/TSP) Example: QSE_B has 500 telemetered analog measurements. During a month, these 500 telemetered analogs were sampled for state estimator (5 minute sample) 8640 times each; during which 431,856 had a quality code of “valid” or “manual”. The performance is 431,856/(500*8640) = 431,856/432,000=.99966. The QSE passes this metric.

Proposal -Metrics TSP performance Metrics 99.8% of individual analogs defined as available to ERCOT in database is valid at ERCOT >80% of time in a month – measured by number of points with valid >80% of 5 minute samples in a month divided by total number of analogs defined on 1st day of month. Example: During a month TSP_C has 13,000 valid analog measurements on the 1st day of the month. During the month 8640 samples are used by state estimator. 183 analog measurements have over 1728 samples taken during which there status was not valid. TSP_C has (13,000-183)/13,000 = 98.59% analogs available; which fails this metric.

Proposal -Metrics QSE/TSP performance Metrics TSP has 2 independent ICCP data links to ERCOT with hot standby and automatic failover available at least 95% of the time. If a backup fails the provider has 24 hours to respond to the failure. If both the primary and backup fail the provider is obligated to have technical personnel responding to the failure within 2 hours. TSP has responded to telemetry calibration requests within 2 work days 90% of time with calibration results. – Measured by ERCOT report quantifying number of requests responded to within 2 work days divided by total number of requests made in a 3 month period.

Key Points ERCOT – Notify TSP recalibration required whenever residual > 5% of line rating over 25% of time for any given week. (i.e. 504 violations any given week – 7 days) use SE procedure of monitoring of accuracy classes by SE TSP response (i.e. calibration) required within 48 working hours (i.e. 2 work days)

ERCOT Obligation TSP Obligation Logic   Provide telemetry to ERCOT on the status of all breakers and switches Identify expected accuracy of telemetry supplied to ERCOT. Needed to properly assign weighting factors to telemetry Service telemetry and provide written report to ERCOT on re-calibration within 2 working days. Required to achieve SE telemetry standard Install ERCOT required telemetry within 12 months or provide written plea to PUCT that the request is unreasonable. Identify to ERCOT the value and quality codes supplied by each RTU, and document the processes converting that data and quality coding into ICCP data provided to ERCOT TSP has a plan to calibrate telemetry on an annual basis or an alternate plan that guarantees < 1% out of calibration Identify Telemetry suspected of operating outside expected accuracy range through state estimator Identify additional telemetry required to meet State Estimator observability or redundancy standard Perform monthly analysis of Telemetry performance by TSP and provide to TSP & post Notify Compliance of repeated failure of TSP to meet telemetry obligations after 3 months. ERCOT shall implement monitor programs to identify failure of market participant telemetry systems.

Objections