University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richmond Terrace Resident Satisfaction Survey April - June 2014 Report Results and Action Plans for Richmond Terrace April-June 2014.
Advertisements

Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
EBI Statistics 101.
© 2006 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: March 21, 2006 Ethics - Held Accountable to Ethics Standards Sample comprised of 458 randomly selected HR professionals.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
Salary Findings April 25 th, 2011 Faculty Senate Budget Committee.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
Faculty Salary Equity Study University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Faculty Council Report November 1, 2002.
1 Results of the 2000 University of Michigan Student Technology Use Survey Analysis 1 April 3, 2001.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
Stanford Employee Survey. Topics Background, Purpose of Employee Satisfaction Surveys –Survey Specifics –Survey Participants, Spring and Fall 2010 Fall.
C o n f i d e n c e p e r f o r m a n c e d i s t i n c t i o n q u a l i t y Nursing Facility Family Satisfaction Survey Report Prepared for: Wiley Mission.
Findings from 2014 Staff Satisfaction Survey April 8, 2014.
©SHRM 2008SHRM Weekly Online Survey: February 13, Benchmarking Metrics Sample comprised of 423 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 423.
April 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
Fall 2008 Graduate Survey Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
2006 Employee Satisfaction Survey Prepared by: Norwood Office Park 7400 New LaGrange Rd Suite 200 Louisville, KY ph 502.
Megan Haynes, Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences & Honors College, Center for Psychosocial Health Depression in college students: Perceived.
THE 2011 VCC STUDENT CENSUS SURVEY Selected Findings for Overall Census Responses April 2012.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Use of Office Pools April 25, 2013.
Provider Member Surveys for Resident and Staff Satisfaction Presented By: Jocelyn Martin & Connie Wolfe May 10th, 2010.
Great Colleges to Work For Survey: 2013 Results
Average Percent of 1st & 2nd Year Students in Classes Under 50, by Type of University, Maclean's 2004.
The National Student Survey (NSS) Penny Jones, Strategic Planning Office Tracy Goslar and Miles Willey, Academic Standards & Partnership Wednesday 16 March.
The State of Maine Managerial Effectiveness Survey Results.
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
St. Thomas University ALUMNI SURVEY Executive Summary Undergraduate and Graduate alumni in university database from 2001 to 1991 were mailed a copy of.
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Small business owners Research April 5 – April 12, 2012 Total Respondents: 500 Research powered by:
2010 Graduating Student Survey Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Recruiting and Skill Gaps November 7, 2011.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
PHYSICAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL SPACES: WORK AND HELP IN THE ELECTRONIC WORKPLACE J.D. EVELAND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM Presented to the 1996 International.
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
Office of the Vice President for Research Infrastructure Survey Highlights Frances Lawrenz Peggy Sundermeyer Michael Reis.
Selected Results of President’s Office Survey of Alumni Graduating in 1997/98 The Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies July 15, 2003 Jennifer.
Social Networking Websites and Identifying Potential Job Candidates ©SHRM 2011 June 20, 2011 SHRM Poll: Social Networking Websites for Identifying and.
The National Student Survey (NSS) 2015 University of Edinburgh – Initial Findings Student Surveys Unit 7 th August
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
Measuring Outcomes of Doctoral Programs: Alumni and Exit Surveys at Western University CAGS October 2015.
Tracking Outcomes On Graduates of Yale University Karen Anderson Associate Provost.
Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.
Faculty Senate Financial Advisory Committee Preliminary Report April 17, 2006.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Cambodia INTRODUCTION http.:
Kapil Bawa, Ph.D., Professor of Marketing, Zicklin School of Business Micheline Blum, Director, Baruch College Survey Research, Distinguished Lecturer,
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
RCSA Web Survey Round 35 – August Executive Summary Summary  Both business confidence and expectations of growth have eased since April. Growth.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.
UKZN Employee Engagement Survey – 2013 Overall Report 1.
Usability of E-Commerce Web Sites Longwood College Taryn L. Fox.
Main Page.
Organizational Chart President President Provost Vice President,
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost
CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY SPRING 2009
ORGs at Oregon State University
2018 UNC System employee engagement survey
McPherson College, Fall 2017
For First Place Most Times Up at the Table
Administrative Review Committee
Presentation transcript:

University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.

2 Table of Contents Return Rates …………………………………………….. Demographics …………………………………………… Highest Scores …………………………………………. Lowest Scores …………………………………………. Overall Satisfaction Questions ……………………….. Highest Impact Questions ……………………………. Comparison: Faculty vs. Staff ………………………… Comparison: Males vs. Females …………………….. Internal Benchmarks Faculty Units ………………….. Internal Benchmarks Staff Units ………………………

3 Return Rates Overall  4,530 Distributed 1,777 Faculty 1,777 Faculty 2,753 Staff 2,753 Staff  2,113 Returned  46.6% Return Rate  1.45% Margin of Error 729 Faculty 729 Faculty 1,384 Staff 1,384 Staff 41.0% Faculty 41.0% Faculty 50.3% Staff 50.3% Staff 2.29% Faculty 2.29% Faculty 1.87% Staff 1.87% Staff April 17, 2000 by June 5, 2000

4 Return Rates by Unit Nursing % Speed School % Business & Public Admin % University Libraries System % Kent School % Arts & Sciences % Law % Allied Health Sciences % Medicine % Music % Education % Dentistry % University Relations % Research Administration % UCCPE % Provost’s Office % Student Affairs % President’s Office % Finance & Administration % Development & Alumni % Information Technology % Intercollegiate Athletics % Physical Plant % Staff Survey Law % University Libraries System % Allied Health Sciences % Nursing % Education % Speed School % Kent School % Dentistry % Arts & Sciences % Medicine % Music % Business & Public Admin % Faculty Survey Note: Sample / Return sizes at or below 5 have not been included Academic Unit Sent Ret. PercentUnit Sent Ret. Percent

5 Demographic Characteristics All University Respondents Totals rounded to nearest percent

6 Demographic Characteristics Full-Time Faculty Respondents (83%) Totals rounded to nearest percent

7 Demographic Characteristics Full-Time Faculty Respondents (83%) Totals rounded to nearest percent

8 Demographic Characteristics Part-Time Faculty Respondents (15%) Totals rounded to nearest percent

9 Demographic Characteristics Part-Time Faculty Respondents (15%) Totals rounded to nearest percent

10 Demographic Characteristics All Staff Respondents Totals rounded to nearest percent

11 Demographic Characteristics All Staff Respondents Totals rounded to nearest percent

12 Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores University Totals

13 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores University Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

14 Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores Full-Time Faculty Totals

15 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores Full-Time Faculty Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

16 Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores Part-Time Faculty Totals

17 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores Part-Time Faculty Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

18 Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores Staff Totals

19 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Highest Average Scores Staff Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

20 Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores University Totals

21 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores University Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

22 Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Full-Time Faculty Totals

23 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Full-Time Faculty Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

24 Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Part-Time Faculty Totals

25 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Part-Time Faculty Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

26 Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Staff Totals

27 Survey Responses Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Staff Totals SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

28 Overall Satisfaction Questions University Totals Totals rounded to nearest percent

29 Overall Satisfaction Questions All Faculty Totals Totals rounded to nearest percent

30 Overall Satisfaction Questions All Staff Totals Totals rounded to nearest percent

31 Questions with Highest Impact on Overall Satisfaction University Totals R-Square = 51.2% N = 2,113 Note: Top 10 of 13 identified factors As determined through Multiple Regression Analysis Regressed against the dependent variable: “You Like Your Job at U of L”

32 Average Scores for Key Indicators University Totals “Key Indicators” are the four Overall Satisfaction questions and the top 10 “Highest Impact” questions.

33 SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree Scores for Key Indicators University Totals

34 R-Square = 58.5% N = 729 Note: All factors shown Questions with Highest Impact on Overall Satisfaction All Faculty Totals As determined through Multiple Regression Analysis Regressed against the dependent variable: “You Like Your Job at U of L”

35 Average Scores for Key Indicators All Faculty Totals “Key Indicators” are the four Overall Satisfaction questions and the top 10 “Highest Impact” questions.

36 SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree Scores for Key Indicators All Faculty Totals

37 R-Square = 49.8% N = 1,384 Note: Top 10 of 13 identified factors Questions with Highest Impact on Overall Satisfaction All Staff Totals As determined through Multiple Regression Analysis Regressed against the dependent variable: “You Like Your Job at U of L”

38 Average Scores for Key Indicators All Staff Totals “Key Indicators” are the four Overall Satisfaction questions and the top 10 “Highest Impact” questions.

39 SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree Scores for Key Indicators All Staff Totals

40 Faculty vs. Staff Comparison Key Indicator Questions Responses shown as an average score

41 Faculty vs. Staff Comparison Key Indicator Questions

42 Males vs. Females Key Indicator Questions University Totals Responses shown as an average score

43 Males vs. Females Key Indicator Questions University Totals

44 Males vs. Females Key Indicator Questions Faculty Totals Responses shown as an average score

45 Males vs. Females Key Indicator Questions Faculty Totals

46 Males vs. Females Key Indicator Questions Staff Totals Responses shown as an average score

47 Males vs. Females Key Indicator Questions Staff Totals

48 Internal Benchmark School of Allied Health Sciences Faculty Responses shown as an average score

49 Internal Benchmark School of Allied Health Sciences Faculty

50 Internal Benchmark College of Arts & Sciences Faculty Responses shown as an average score

51 Internal Benchmark College of Arts & Sciences Faculty

52 Internal Benchmark College of Business & Public Administration Faculty Responses shown as an average score

53 Internal Benchmark College of Business & Public Administration Faculty

54 Internal Benchmark School of Dentistry Faculty Responses shown as an average score

55 Internal Benchmark School of Dentistry Faculty

56 Internal Benchmark School of Education Faculty Responses shown as an average score

57 Internal Benchmark School of Education Faculty

58 Internal Benchmark Kent School of Social Work Faculty Responses shown as an average score

59 Internal Benchmark Kent School of Social Work Faculty

60 Internal Benchmark School of Law Faculty Responses shown as an average score

61 Internal Benchmark School of Law Faculty

62 Internal Benchmark Libraries Faculty Responses shown as an average score

63 Internal Benchmark Libraries Faculty

64 Internal Benchmark School of Medicine Faculty Responses shown as an average score

65 Internal Benchmark School of Medicine Faculty

66 Internal Benchmark School of Music Faculty Responses shown as an average score

67 Internal Benchmark School of Music Faculty

68 Internal Benchmark School of Nursing Faculty Responses shown as an average score

69 Internal Benchmark School of Nursing Faculty

70 Internal Benchmark Speed Scientific School Faculty Responses shown as an average score

71 Internal Benchmark Speed Scientific School Faculty

72 Internal Benchmark College of Arts & Sciences Staff Responses shown as an average score

73 Internal Benchmark College of Arts & Sciences Staff

74 Internal Benchmark School of Business & Public Administration Staff Responses shown as an average score

75 Internal Benchmark School of Business & Public Administration Staff

76 Internal Benchmark School of Dentistry Staff Responses shown as an average score

77 Internal Benchmark School of Dentistry Staff

78 Internal Benchmark Development and Alumni Staff Responses shown as an average score

79 Internal Benchmark Development and Alumni Staff

80 Internal Benchmark School of Education Staff Responses shown as an average score

81 Internal Benchmark School of Education Staff

82 Internal Benchmark Finance and Administration Staff Responses shown as an average score

83 Internal Benchmark Finance and Administration Staff

84 Internal Benchmark Information Technology Staff Responses shown as an average score

85 Internal Benchmark Information Technology Staff

86 Internal Benchmark Intercollegiate Athletics Staff Responses shown as an average score

87 Internal Benchmark Intercollegiate Athletics Staff

88 Internal Benchmark Kent School of Social Work Staff Responses shown as an average score

89 Internal Benchmark Kent School of Social Work Staff

90 Internal Benchmark School of Law Staff Responses shown as an average score

91 Internal Benchmark School of Law Staff

92 Internal Benchmark Libraries Staff Responses shown as an average score

93 Internal Benchmark Libraries Staff

94 Internal Benchmark School of Medicine Staff Responses shown as an average score

95 Internal Benchmark School of Medicine Staff

96 Internal Benchmark School of Nursing Staff Responses shown as an average score

97 Internal Benchmark School of Nursing Staff

98 Internal Benchmark Physical Plant Staff Responses shown as an average score

99 Internal Benchmark Physical Plant Staff

100 Internal Benchmark President’s Office Staff Responses shown as an average score

101 Internal Benchmark President’s Office Staff

102 Internal Benchmark Provost’s Office Staff Responses shown as an average score

103 Internal Benchmark Provost’s Office Staff

104 Internal Benchmark Research Administration Staff Responses shown as an average score

105 Internal Benchmark Research Administration Staff

106 Internal Benchmark Speed Scientific School Staff Responses shown as an average score

107 Internal Benchmark Speed Scientific School Staff

108 Internal Benchmark Student Affairs Staff Responses shown as an average score

109 Internal Benchmark Student Affairs Staff

110 Internal Benchmark UCCPE Staff Responses shown as an average score

111 Internal Benchmark UCCPE Staff

112 Internal Benchmark University Relations Staff Responses shown as an average score

113 Internal Benchmark University Relations Staff