Lecture Two: Major Figures and Today’s Debates April 1, 2008 Professor Timothy C. Lim Cal State Los Angeles POLS/ECON.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Groups Terms and Titles….
Advertisements

IR2501 Theories of International Relations
The Great Globalization Debate PS 314 Spring 2006.
Constitutions, Law and Judiciary
International Relations Theory
The Nation-State and Globalisation. Objectives of Lecture Critically explore the relationship between the development of the nation- state and capitalism.
Development Studies THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF ZANZIBAR (SUZA)
IR 501 Lecture Notes (1) A Retrospective of IR & Theories
Cohen Chapter 2 Sovereignty.  The purpose is to review the origins and meanings of the political concepts and institutions central to the debates over.
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics What Makes a Terrorist? Structural Perspective March 10, 2008 Professor Timothy C. Lim California State University,
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
Chapter 16, Social Change and social Movements Key Terms.
Understanding Politics, Laws, and Economics
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics
Neo-Gramscian Perspective
Lecture Three: Understanding Power
Neorealist Assumptions
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
Fundamentals of Political Science
Dynamics of Comparison Comparing Political Systems.
1 Important Note WARNING! These slides are formatted specifically for Mac computers. Due to formatting incompatibilities some slides may be unreadable.
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics What Makes a Democracy? February 27-March 1, 2007 Professor Timothy Lim California State University, Los Angeles.
European Integration Lecture Nine Sovereignty—what is it? why does it matter?
The Corporation and Its Stakeholders
Institutions and Environmental Cooperation. Today Types of global environmental problems The role of international institutions (regimes): realist vs.
POLS 374 Foundations of Global Politics People Matter.
Leonard Seabrooke Theories and Issues in International Political Economy.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
Lecture 1: Concepts September 28, Theoretical Framework From Connelly et al:  “A framework is a system of ideas or conceptual structures that help.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved
The role of international law in the organizations of international relations -As a matter of fact, International Law place an important role in the organizations.
The Modern State Chapter 3.
Vocabulary- the key to understanding this stuff. Correlation An apparent association between certain factors or variables An apparent association between.
Three perspectives on international politics IR theories: Constructivism.
Comparing Political Systems
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
Fundamentals of Political Science Dr. Sujian Guo Professor of Political Science San Francisco State Unversity
1 Duschl, R & Osborne, J ”Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education” in Studies in Science Education, 38, Ingeborg.
Liberalism Michael Doyle Lecture 3 Kaisa Ellandi.
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
IR 501 Lecture Notes Marxist theories of IR
POSC 2200 – The State, Decision Making and Foreign Policy Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
Lesson 12 Functionalism and Conflict Theory Robert Wonser SOC 368 – Classical Sociological Theory Spring 2014.
Chapter 14, Politics and Government in Global Perspective Key Terms.
What is Political Economy? First, political economy is “political” in that it involves the use of state power to make decisions about who gets what, when,
LECTURE III Social structure and social institutions.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR  Delving in detail into newer forms of liberalism: 1.“English school”. 2.Liberal Interdependence. 3.Neoliberal.
Sovereignty, Authority, and Power Elements of Political Geography.
What Is International Relations (IR) Theory? Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
International Relations Theory A New Introduction
The Frontier of IPE: the Evolution of Ideas Stephan Haggard Taiwan National University June 5, 2004.
THE GOOD (DEMOCRATS) THE BAD (AUTHORITARIANS) THE UGLY (TOTALITARIANS)
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The principle of integration and its dilemmas Hans Chr. Bugge Professor of Environmental Law University of Oslo.
1 Regional Integration theory II - Transactionalism I Kim Jae Yeon.
International System International Relations. Basic concepts What is IR? Who are the actors/players in IR? Why they behave in a certain way? What quality.
Cultural Marxism The Theory of Hegemony.
International Politics- meaning, nature and scope According to Hans Morgenthau International Politics is the struggle for power between states in the international.
WEEK 3 THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Vocabulary Focus Positivism is a philosophic system which considers that truth can be verified only by facts.
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Realism
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
In your notebooks: 1.) Write down the following names: 1. Auguste Comte 2. Harriet Martineau 3. Herbert Spencer 4. Emile Durkeim 5. Max Weber 6. Karl Marx.
Presented by Yu Seunghee & Zhang Luan
Theories about integration and enlargement Lecture 2.
THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF SECURITY IN WAR AND PEACE Introduction to SAMPOL 208 Spring 2015
The Corporation and Its Stakeholders
The Great Globalization Debate
Comparing Political Systems
Security Theory And Peak Oil Theory.
Presentation transcript:

Lecture Two: Major Figures and Today’s Debates April 1, 2008 Professor Timothy C. Lim Cal State Los Angeles POLS/ECON 426 International Political Economy

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates The chapter discusses three scholars … Susan Strange, “Unorthodox Realist” Robert Keohane, “Liberal Institutionalist” Robert Cox, “Historical Materialist” Major Figures and Debates in international political economy Why talk about these three figures?

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Susan Strange Key Points  A bit of an economic nationalist: understood states as central actors and took (state) power seriously  A bit unorthodox: state important, but not alone; power key, but not necessarily concentrated in states  A bit of rationalist: told us that political economic analysis should always begin with the question … _________________ ? Major Figures and Debates in international political economy What is a state?state What is a state?state Who benefits

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Susan Strange A little more on “power”  To Strange, power has both relational and structural dimensions; it was Strange’s focus on structural power that led her to argue that state power is never unchallenged  To Strange, structural power was an absolutely central aspect of the global political economy; as with power itself, structural power has several dimensions: security, production, finance and knowledge Major Figures and Debates in international political economy We will talk much more about power later Structural power is the ability to shape the rules of game in a particular area

Major Figures and Debates in international political economy click for more detailed discussion Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Robert Keohane Key Point  Focuses on “institutions”; believes that institutions are key components of the international political economy What is an institution?  “Sets of rules and norms” that shape the behavior and actions of states (and other actors)  Institutions include formal international organizations (e.g., the UN, the WTO), international regimes or conventions (on human rights, for example), and customs or common practices

Major Figures and Debates in international political economy Liberal refers to the emphasis on particular types of institutions, those that are based on liberal concepts of cooperation, interdependence, democracy, and peaceful and humane governance Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Robert Keohane What’s a “liberal” institutionalist? What’s a “liberal” institution?

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: A Few More Points  Keohane argues that, in a world of increasing interdependence, states have more reason to cooperate because cooperation is often necessary to achieve national goals  The creation of international institutions is almost always based on self-interest, but once created, international institutions and regimes may continue to operate even when national interests change  Regimes, once created, can lead to even strong cooperative behavior among states Major Figures and Debates in international political economy

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Robert Cox Key Point  Adopts “historical materialism” as his primary framework of analysis What is Historical Materialism?  To understand the term, begin by breaking it down to its two core elements, “historical” and “materialism”: What do these two terms suggest? Major Figures and Debates in international political economy

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Robert Cox Historical Materialism  The historical part recognizes that there are distinct historical eras, each of which operates according to a particular set of principles, rules, sensibilities, and understandings  The materialist part recognizes that the world we live in is fundamentally shaped by the ways in which production is organized; the organization of production, in other words, determines what type of social relations exist, what type of state exists, what type of educational system we have, and so on Major Figures and Debates in international political economy More on historical materialism later

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: A Few More Points  While Cox labels himself an historical materialist, he also believes that ideas/ideology play a key role in shaping the world; this sets him apart from mainstream Marxists Cox argued that all theories are, in an important sense, ideologies; encapsulated in his famous statement: “Theory is always for someone and for some purpose”  Cox also began to recognize that gender and environmental issues require separate analytical attention  Cox interested in using theory to achieve a better social order; theory must embrace and espouse emancipatory strategies Major Figures and Debates in international political economy

Three Major Figures in Contemporary Debates: Summing Up  This brief discussion gives us a taste of the different approaches that are used in IPE or GPE  The field continues to evolve and develop  There are no easy answers and there is no consensus; still, “certain kinds of explanation are more powerful than other forms” (36) and the three scholars profiled in the chapter provide powerful insights and ways of better understanding the global political economy  Both students and scholars (as well as others) must be aware of the major debates and modes of analysis; an open mind is critical Major Figures and Debates in international political economy

One Last Point The authors correctly tell us that any understanding of IPE/GPE requires is guided by a set of theoretical and methodological assumptions; yet, no one framework is generally accepted as the best and no framework can be completely “objective” With this in mind, they adopt a particular framework of analysis for their book based on six key elements Major Figures and Debates in international political economy 1. Historical Change2. Structure-Agency Dynamics 3. Integration of Political- Economic Processes 4. Cognitive Structures 5. Institutionalism 6. Salience of Domestic Structures It is important to understand each of these elements!

What is a State? A “Wiki” Definition A state is a political association with effective sovereignty over a geographic areaarea. These may be nation states or sub-national statesstates. A state usually includes the set of institutions that claim the authority to make the rules that govern the exercise of coercive violence for the people of the society in that territory, though its status as a state often depends in part on being recognized by a number of other states as having internal and external sovereignty over it. In sociologysociology, the state is normally identified with these institutions: in Max WeberWeber's influential definition, it is that organization that has a "monopoly monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory," which may include the armed forcesforces, civil service or state bureaucracybureaucracy, courtscourts, and policepolice. Major Figures and Debates in international political economy Click here for source