Presented by Gary Bradbury, CSP, CEA, ALCM
Worker’s compensation claims for nine K-12 California school districts: 177 claims for Food Service Employees + $2 million in incurred costs 11% of all claims and 12% of the total incurred cost for the districts
% of all claims for Food Service Employees Cut Using Knife6% Burns, Contact w/ Hot Surface7% Repetitive Strain11% Falls (T/F and S/F)19% Material Handling(Lifting or Carrying)23%
The injury Imbalance Model JOB DEMANDS WORKER CAPABILITY ERGONOMIC CONTROLS AGE GENDER BUILD PHYSICAL CONDITION Demand exceeds capacity: work performance and health suffer
Major risk factors for acute and chronic strain injuries: Force Awkward Posture Repetition
Lifting Holding Tool Operation Push/Pull
Bending Reaching Twisting
Medium Low High FORCE REPETITION Injury Potential
Essential Functions Job Analysis Ergonomic Job Assessment Detailed Professional Ergonomic Analysis
This analysis is needed to provide an accurate and detailed description of the physical demands of a job. It provides a basic understanding of the risk factors in terms of force, awkward postures, and repetition. It is not an ergonomic analysis in the sense that it seeks to control risk factors.
Example of an EFJA section
Use ergonomic principles and guidelines Observe work practice Interview employees Identify risk factors Apply standard interventions to reduce force, improve postures, and reduce repetition.
Professional ergonomic assistance is recommended when: Developing an ergonomic program or organizational strategy Seeking a macro ergonomic evaluation of the organization or system Standard interventions have failed to remedy a problem
Facility Design Equipment Selection and Maintenance Material Selection and Placement People Selection and Training
Work Height Work Space Work Flow & Travel Distance Floor Surface
48 in
Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare (OHSAH) in British Columbia
Need adequate space for the safe and efficient movement of people and equipment.
Flow of Materials and Personnel: The relationship among the various storage, preparation, cooking, serving, and cleaning functions must be carefully studied to provide maximum flow and efficiency. Travel distances should be kept short and there should be minimal crossover of circulation paths Open sight lines should be maintained as much as possible The movement of food through the facility should follow a logical sequence beginning with receiving and ending with waste disposal.
Loading dockFreezerCooler Dry Goods Paper Goods Food Service Lines Wash Cooking Cold Food Preparation 120 ft
Select Equipment to improve efficiency by reducing the risk factors of force, awkward posture, and repetition
Size Considerations for kitchen carts Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare (OHSAH) in British Columbia
OR Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare (OHSAH) in British Columbia
Selection Lighter Smaller Easy to open Pre Processed (cut, cooked, mixed) Single serving containers Placement Heavier/Frequently used items between knees and shoulder height (~22 – 48 inches) Heaviest items at about 30 inches Easy access Labels are visible
9” 29” 49” 69” ~5lbs 20lbs
The injury Imbalance Model JOB DEMANDS WORKER CAPABILITY ERGONOMIC CONTROLS AGE GENDER BUILD PHYSICAL CONDITION Demand exceeds capacity: work performance and health suffer
CONTENT Risks and Injury Wellness Equipment Use Lifting Techniques Transferring Techniques Reporting Issues First Aid for Strains METHOD Persuasive – Must motivate the employee to modify their behavior Realistic – Train with the equipment and items to be handled. Demonstrate and practice Simple – Easy to understand, apply and remember
The Supervisory Involvement that is needed: Model the behavior Mentor the behavior Monitor the behavior
Conclusion Questions? Contact Information: Gary Bradbury Phone: (310) X