April 2010 Title I Equitable Services – Findings and Fixes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Services provided to Private School Students Jane Blanton Jane Blanton Suzanne Dillow
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Some slides in this presentation were excerpted from US Eds February 2009 PowerPoint presentation titled: Help! Im a New Title I Director. What Do I Need.
Documentation Transactions posted to sponsored funds Sponsored Programs Administration October 2012.
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
Equitable Services to Private Nonprofit Schools. USDE Audit Findings Consultation Eligibility Criteria Equitable Services 3 rd -party Contracts Program.
Federal and State Monitoring Title I Directors Conference September
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
1 | Weatherization Assistance Program: Use of Training &Technical Assistance and Administrative Fundseere.energy.gov 2011 Orientation for State WAP Directors.
External Auditors – Common Findings in Federal Programs Allen, Green & Williamson, LLP.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
ESEA and Private Schools’ Participation Federal Program Directors’ Conference Waterfront Place Hotel, Morgantown March 13, 2013.
October 5, 2010 Title III Services to Private Schools.
Title I Services in Non-Public Schools Equitable Services Requirements and Funding Basics.
Ensuring Equitable Services for Private Non-Profit School Children.
ARKANSAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MEETING Title I Equitable Services.
Institutional Memberships November Institutional Memberships New Operational Guideline: Memberships Paid by University Funds can be found at
Equitable Services, Part 1 Meaningful Consultation Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Budget Overview Grant Award Program (GAP) Developed to streamline processes and to allow access to important information Grant Awards – Approved Grant.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
Internal Controls New Title I Directors Title I Technical Assistance Session May 15, 2013.
1 NonPublic School Services PAFPC 2012 Karl Streckewald DFP Non Public Manager (former)
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
Consultation Meeting with Private School Partners Rochester City School District Office of Grant & Program Accountability February 6, 2008.
11 HEP/CAMP NEW DIRECTOR’S TRAINING SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 DEVELOPING A PROGRAM BUDGET BY: Dr. Maria T. Escobedo.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
LOCKPORT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Budget Presentation Expenditures: The Big Picture Presented by Michelle T. Bradley Superintendent of Schools and.
April 2010 M ARYLAND S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION T ITLE I C OORDINATORS ’ M EETING Title I Equitable Services.
FISCAL MONITORING OBJECTIVES:  To provide a clearer understanding of the monitoring process;  To provide further guidance for documentation needed for.
The Auditors are Coming (Part I) Prepare for Federal Program Fiscal Monitoring Visits July 26, 2006.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
1 Monika Lacka U.S. EPA, Region 5 Grant Management: Fiscal Information.
Title I Coordinator Training Equitable Services December 7,
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Providing Effective Equitable Title I Services to Non-Public School Students ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Title I Equitable Services for Eligible Private School Students 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 27, 2015.
Title I Coordinator Training Equitable Services January 10,
No Child Left Behind Application Title I, Part A Part 2.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Kristen Tosh Cowan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit PAFPC Conference April 5, 2011.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Title II, Part D Enhancing Education through Technology Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
1.  Understand ESEA and the purpose of Title I, Part A Programs and Services  Understand how to communicate and plan with private schools  Understand.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Private Nonprofit School Participation.
IUP Research Institute University Square 1179 Grant Street, Suite One Indiana, PA Telephone: (724) Fax: (724)
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Title I Services For Children Enrolled In Private Schools Molly Little Associate Director, Instructional Services and Federal Programs North Clackamas.
Impact Aid Training September 25, 2017.
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
SAISD Federal Programs May 3, 2012
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Presentation transcript:

April 2010 Title I Equitable Services – Findings and Fixes

Findings – Instructional Costs Title I funds used for: Whiteboards for all private school classrooms.Whiteboards for all private school classrooms. Software loaded on computers owned by private school.Software loaded on computers owned by private school. Computers. Private school staff used the computers with all children when not in use for Title I.Computers. Private school staff used the computers with all children when not in use for Title I. Computers for the private school classrooms.Computers for the private school classrooms. Library books located in the library of the private school.Library books located in the library of the private school. ALLOWABLE COSTS

Findings – Instructional Costs Title I funds used for: LEA to hire a paraprofessional to provide Title I services.LEA to hire a paraprofessional to provide Title I services. LEA to hire a CAI paraprofessional who does not provide instructional services.LEA to hire a CAI paraprofessional who does not provide instructional services. ALLOWABLE COSTS

WHY? Section (b)(2) of the Title I regulations prohibit LEAs from using Title I funds for the needs of the private school or the general needs of children in the private school. Section (c)(1) of the Title I regulations requires that any Title I funded equipment or supplies placed in the private school are used for Title I purposes only. ALLOWABLE COSTS

WHY? Section 1120(d)(1) of the ESEA requires that the LEA maintain control of the Title I funds, materials, equipment and property. ALLOWABLE COSTS

OMB Circular A-87 Test: OMB Circular A-87 Test: Reasonable and Necessary Reasonable and Necessary AllocableAllocable AuthorizedAuthorized ALLOWABLE COSTS

Fix it and going forward, sin no more …. Fix it and going forward, sin no more …. Fix it, sin no more and make it right for all the equitable services that were not provided for ____ years. ALLOWABLE COSTS

Note: Title I funds may not be used to correct a violation of Title I statute or regulation. ALLOWABLE COSTS

Findings – Professional Development Title I funds used for: Activities from an online menu. The menu included a variety of topics including math, reading, science, psychology, etc.Activities from an online menu. The menu included a variety of topics including math, reading, science, psychology, etc. Conferences sponsored by a religious organization and/or IRA, ASCD, NCTM, etc.Conferences sponsored by a religious organization and/or IRA, ASCD, NCTM, etc. Substitute teachers for private school classroom teachers attending professional development activities.Substitute teachers for private school classroom teachers attending professional development activities. Workshops on ADHD, IEPs, etc. Workshops on ADHD, IEPs, etc. ALLOWABLE COSTS

WHY? Section (b)(2) of the Title I regulations prohibit LEAs from using Title I funds for the needs of the private school or the general needs of children in the private school. Consequently, the professional development activities for the private school teachers of participating students should address how those teachers can better meet the specific needs of Title I students. ALLOWABLE COSTS

Findings – Evaluation No evaluation. No evaluation. Pre and post test. Pre and post test. Using contractor’s test because LEA is mandated by contractor to do so.Using contractor’s test because LEA is mandated by contractor to do so. Narrative analysis with no standard/benchmark.Narrative analysis with no standard/benchmark.EVALUATION

WHY? Section 1120(b)(1)(D) of the ESEA requires that LEA officials consult with private school officials on how Title I services will be academically assessed and how the results of that assessment will be used to improve services. EVALUATION

WHY? During the consultation process, LEA and private school officials must discuss what assessment(s) will be used to measure the effectiveness of the Title I program and the achievement of Title I participants against agreed-upon standards. Example: At least 80 percent of the participants will score at the 50 th percentile or better in total reading on the Terra Nova Test. EVALUATION

Findings – Contracts Findings – Contracts Contract did not require the contractor to break out specific costs for administration, instruction, professional development and parental involvement.Contract did not require the contractor to break out specific costs for administration, instruction, professional development and parental involvement. LEA did not monitor the contract.LEA did not monitor the contract. Contract provided the total amount for all Title I services.Contract provided the total amount for all Title I services. Contractor developed the professional development activities for the private school classroom teachers. No LEA approval process.Contractor developed the professional development activities for the private school classroom teachers. No LEA approval process. LEA chose the contractor with the lowest bid for services.LEA chose the contractor with the lowest bid for services.CONTRACTS

WHY? WHY? Section 9306(a) of ESEA requires that : The program will be administered in accordance with all applicable statutes and regulations; andThe program will be administered in accordance with all applicable statutes and regulations; and The subgrantee will maintain control of the program.The subgrantee will maintain control of the program.CONTRACTS

WHY? WHY? Section 443(a) of GEPA requires subrecipients to maintain records that fully disclose: How the funds were used; How the funds were used; Total cost of the activity for which the funds were used; andTotal cost of the activity for which the funds were used; and Other records that will facilitate an effective audit.Other records that will facilitate an effective audit.CONTRACTS

17 What should the LEA include in both the RFP and contract? The LEA should include definitions and uses for: Instructional; Instructional; Administrative; Administrative; Professional development; and Professional development; and Parental involvement costs. Parental involvement costs. Common Elements of Both the RFP and Contract

18 { Example} { Example} INSTRUCTIONAL COSTS For the purposes of this contract, instructional costs are defined as: For the purposes of this contract, instructional costs are defined as: Teacher and instructional aide salaries, including fringe benefits;Teacher and instructional aide salaries, including fringe benefits; Instructional materials, including such items as books, computers and software for student use, workbooks, and supplies.Instructional materials, including such items as books, computers and software for student use, workbooks, and supplies. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

19 { Example} { Example} ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS For the purposes of this contract, administrative costs are defined as: For the purposes of this contract, administrative costs are defined as: Costs the contractor incurs to administer the program, including but not limited to salaries and fringe benefits for the Director, assistants as needed, area supervisors, and support staff, office rent and utilities, office equipment and supplies, postage and mailings, telephone, travel, special capital expenses, escort time, professional development for Title I teachers and supervisors who are employees of the contractor, and the contractor’s fee (profit).Costs the contractor incurs to administer the program, including but not limited to salaries and fringe benefits for the Director, assistants as needed, area supervisors, and support staff, office rent and utilities, office equipment and supplies, postage and mailings, telephone, travel, special capital expenses, escort time, professional development for Title I teachers and supervisors who are employees of the contractor, and the contractor’s fee (profit). C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

20 { Example} { Example} PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS For the purposes of this contract, professional development costs are defined as: For the purposes of this contract, professional development costs are defined as: Costs the contractor incurs to provide professional development activities to private school teachers of participating private school children. Costs the contractor incurs to provide professional development activities to private school teachers of participating private school children. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

21 { Example} { Example} PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT COSTS For the purposes of this contract, parental involvement costs are defined as: For the purposes of this contract, parental involvement costs are defined as: Costs the contractor incurs to provide parental involvement activities to parents of participating private school children. Costs the contractor incurs to provide parental involvement activities to parents of participating private school children. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

22 The LEA should provide the standards and assessment agreed to in consultation that the LEA will use to measure the effectiveness of the Title I program provided to private school children. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

23 Both should require: That invoices have separate categories for instructional, professional development, parental involvement, and administrative costs; andThat invoices have separate categories for instructional, professional development, parental involvement, and administrative costs; and Sufficient documentation from the contractor prior to payment of the invoice.Sufficient documentation from the contractor prior to payment of the invoice. A description of the procedures for submission of invoices by the contractor including how often they are to be submitted. A description of the procedures for submission of invoices by the contractor including how often they are to be submitted.

24 Statements that should be in both: Statements that should be in both: All equipment purchased with Title I funds is the property of the LEA, not the contractor; All equipment purchased with Title I funds is the property of the LEA, not the contractor; The contractor will comply with all Title I statutory and regulatory requirements;The contractor will comply with all Title I statutory and regulatory requirements; The LEA has the right to withhold payment if any requirement is not met.The LEA has the right to withhold payment if any requirement is not met. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

25 The LEA will inform the contractor by _____________ the amount of funds available for all activities (instruction, professional development, and family involvement);The LEA will inform the contractor by _____________ the amount of funds available for all activities (instruction, professional development, and family involvement); The contract may be modified if there is a reauthorization of the ESEA during the performance period of the contract; andThe contract may be modified if there is a reauthorization of the ESEA during the performance period of the contract; and Clauses that address GEPA and ESEA requirements.Clauses that address GEPA and ESEA requirements. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

26 Both should provide information on LEA oversight: Examples Monthly unannounced visits;Monthly unannounced visits; Monthly or bimonthly reports by school of activities for children’s services, professional development and family involvement activities; andMonthly or bimonthly reports by school of activities for children’s services, professional development and family involvement activities; and Requests for more documentation to support invoices. Requests for more documentation to support invoices. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT

27 Both should contain a list of all deliverables with due dates. C OMMON E LEMENTS OF B OTH THE RFP AND C ONTRACT By the 15 th of each month

RFP The bidder’s proposal with all changes required by the LEA Other sections as required by the LEA contract office C ONTRACT The contract should contain:

29 ►Cost Reimbursement – LEA will reimburse the third-party for costs incurred as part of providing the services (e.g. salaries of teachers, materials and supplies, etc.) ►Fixed Price Plus Fee – LEA is charged a specific amount to provide services (E.g. $150,000 to provide services to 175 children). Types of Contracts

Whichever type, the contract must reflect that the contractor is required to provide information about: How the funds were used; How the funds were used; Total cost of the activity for which the funds were used; and Total cost of the activity for which the funds were used; and Other records as will facilitate an effective audit. Other records as will facilitate an effective audit. Further Clarification

31 At the end of the school year, the instructional, professional development, and family involvement costs charged on the invoices should total the amount of funds generated by poverty private school children. At the end of the school year, the instructional, professional development, and family involvement costs charged on the invoices should total the amount of funds generated by poverty private school children. F URTHER C LARIFICATION

32 Contractor’s administrative costs Must be included in the LEA’s reservation for administration (section (f)) F URTHER C LARIFICATION F URTHER C LARIFICATION

33 Ultimately, the LEA is responsible for ensuring that Title I services to eligible private school children, their teachers and families are compliant. F URTHER C LARIFICATION F URTHER C LARIFICATION

Questions Answers

Nola Cromer (202) Virginia Berg (202)