Supplemental Educational Service (SES) Proposers Conference June 25, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements


WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
Title I: Supplemental Educational Services Regional Technical Assistance Sessions May,2009.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
NCLB Monitoring Cycle 1 Policies and Procedures. Letter  Explains monitoring process  Lists required documentation  Lists activities  Directions for.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
21 st CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS 2008 BIDDER’S Workshops.
U.S. Pretrial Services and Probation Office Northern District of Ohio.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Title I Services in Non-Public Schools Equitable Services Requirements and Funding Basics.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION Laboratory School and Model Early Childhood Learning Grant
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
U.S. Department of Education Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Becoming a Supplemental Services Provider.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Karl Streckewald: SES Program Manager Dr. Jack Clark Allentown School District Implementing SES in the LEA PAFPC Conference 2011.
1 Erin Oberdorf, SES Program Manager Dr. Jack Clark, Allentown School District Implementing an Effective SES Program PAFPC 2013.
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Data Collection Process: Roles and Responsibilities of LEAs GaDOE Data Collections Conference August 17, 2011 Athens,
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Westminster School District Supplemental Educational Services Provider Meeting 2013/2014.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
ANNUAL EVALUATION PLAN Schoolwide Programs. Annual Evaluation Plan.
ALSDE SES Application Technical Assistance February 25, 2011 Please use these instructions to view the ALSDE Federal Programs webinar titled: “Supplemental.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
SES Overview Supplemental Education Services. What is SES? Additional academic instruction that is provided outside of the regular school day Designed.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
Statewide Monitoring Tool Approved Effective July 1, 2015 Early Learning Coalition of Orange County 1.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
New Title I Designee Training September 17,
Planning for Flexible Instruction Proposed integration of FID requirements into CP process Advisory Mtg.
SES Provider Application Overview School Year >
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
1 Choice Provisions in No Child Left Behind Cheri Pierson Yecke, Ph.D. Director of Teacher Quality and Public School Choice Laura O. Lazo Education Program.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
TITLE X, PART C MCKINNEY-VENTO ACT The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Grant Application FY Office of Federal Programs March 9 th, 2016.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Data Collections Conference September 2010 Lou Ferretti & Jim Milliman
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
State Purchasing & Trade Show May 17 & 18, 2006
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Monitoring Children’s Progress
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
by LA County CCS Department of Public Health
Presentation transcript:

Supplemental Educational Service (SES) Proposers Conference June 25, 2007

Agenda  Supplemental Educational Services (SES)  Louisiana’s SES Model  Overview of the Application Process  Questions & Answers

SES Background Info  SES authorized in Title I, Part A of No Child Left Behind (ESEA)  Low-income students attending schools that do not make Adequate Yearly Progress for three consecutive years (SI3 and above) may receive SES

What are Supplemental Educational Services?  Tutoring,  Targeted remediation, and  Academic interventions;  Designed to increase student academic achievement in English/language arts, reading, and/or math;  Must be provided outside the regular school day (Before school, After school, or in the Summer).

Louisiana’s SES Model  Diagnostic Assessment or an appropriate process to identify student weaknesses and achievement gaps. (This is a MUST!)  Targeted Remediation/Instruction aimed at addressing the individual skill gaps revealed during the assessment and based upon an individual learning plan;  Post Assessment to see if student gains occurred.

Eligible Providers of SES Non-ProfitsFor-ProfitsLocal Education Agencies Higher Ed Institutions Faith-Based Organizations After-school Centers Public and Private Schools (Not in Corrective Action) Individuals and/or Groups (If organized as non- profit or for-profit) Cooperative Educational Service Agency

Two Levels of Approval  Applicants who receive Fully Approved Status Meet all requirements; Have demonstrated evidence of effectiveness; Are ready to provide services immediately; Have operated an SES-type program for 2 or more years and can show a strong level of effectiveness; No maximum limit on students served.

Two Levels of Approval  Applicants who receive New and Emerging Status Must meet the same minimum score as other providers; May receive a requirement to serve only up to 200 students during initial year; Will be categorized as New and Emerging in district correspondence to parents; Will be required to participate in specially designed technical assistance during Year One; May maintain designation for up to two years.

SES Provider Responsibilities  Follow Louisiana’s SES model.  Consult with parents when setting specific achievement goals for the students.  Provide a description of how student progress will be monitored & regularly inform parents of progress.  Establish a timetable for improving student achievement.  Agree to terminate services if student progress is not achieved.  Agree not to disclose student identity to public.

SES Provider Responsibilities  Agree to use the Student Tracking and Reporting System (STARS), state’s web- based reporting system.  Agree to all state and district monitoring and reporting requirements.

SES Provider Responsibilities  Failure to  Follow state and district implementation guidelines.  Deliver SES model described in application.  Provide criminal background checks on employees.  Use the STARS database. Providers can be removed from the state list for  Compensation of district employees for purposes other than instructional;  Disclose provision of financial incentives to students/parents;  Enrollment of students already participating in another SES program;  Willing violation of any assurance or aspect of the application approved by the Department of Education.

SES Participating Districts  Concordia  Ascension  East Baton Rouge  Pointe Coupee  St. Landry  Tangipahoa  Caddo  Rapides  City of Monroe  East Carroll  Franklin  Madison  Richland  St. Helena  Morehouse  St. Mary

Provider Application Cycle  SES Applications will be accepted by: 2:00 p.m. July 31, 2007 Office of Management and Finance LA Dept of Education 5 th Floor, Cube 5-264

Application: Part I – Program Info  Provides information for Department purposes and to distribute to districts and parents;  Indicates whether you are seeking Full Approval or Approval as a New and Emerging Program. (Note: The Department may designate a program for the category that it deems appropriate)  Designates the “Contact Person” who should be the organization’s representative and can answer questions about the program.

Part I: Basic Program Information  Service Area: Must be clearly delineated – the actual district(s) and the school(s) to be served!  Transportation- Clearly indicate whether transportation will be provided – must have made contact with the district and resolved this issue prior to contract.  Maximum # of Students Served – Please indicate this BY DISTRICT(S).

Part I: Basic Program Information  Provider Fee Structure Application requires a cost per unit of time per student. Applicant must define cost per district(s), if it will differ. Applicant must clearly delineate how many hours of instruction are included in total program for the cost stated. Applicant must disclose any types of incentives or rewards that will be offered to students/parents and rationale.

Part II:Program Overview  Narrative Description (2 page limit) IMPORTANT to cover both items requested with direct responses: How will you meet LA’s SES model? Are you fully describing the program to be provided?

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Program Accessibility (2 page limit, 5 points)  How will you accommodate a lack of transportation?  How will you accommodate working parents and guardians?  If proposing to utilize a school, must provide letter of support or agreement from district after selection.

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Evidence of Effectiveness (2 page limit, 20 points) (Applicants applying for Fully Approved Status should address the following): Evidence on independent, valid, reliable test such as Norm-Referenced Tests and State Criterion- Referenced Tests (cite any research studies) Norm-Referenced Criterion- Referenced Tests Program impact using tests, student grades, other assessments Client testimonials, including contact info, school names, time frames (in the past two years) Additional evidence of improved academic outcomes (cite available research studies)

Evidence of Effectiveness, cont.  Evidence of Effectiveness (2 page limit, 20 points) (Applicants applying for New and Emerging status should address the following): Tell us the extent to which your proposed program is designed to impact the needs of Title I students. How will you collect the evidence of effectiveness cited in questions 1 – 4? Include answers to questions 5 and 6. Cite data to support the major areas of academic need your program will address, including an analysis of SES school test data.

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Links to Scientifically based Research (2 page limit, 15 points) What scientific research supports the instructional model proposed? (early literacy and K-3 reading programs must be aligned with state-approved reading list) Explain theoretical and empirical rationale behind major elements of program. In this section, research references need to be attached and cited.

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Connection to State and Local Standards (2 page limit, 10 points)  Describe the following: How is your program aligned with State academic and achievement standards?State What is your program’s connection with LEA’s instructional program? Cite specific district program and alignment/connection.

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Assessment and Student Progress (1 page limit, 10 points)  Describe the following: Diagnostic process you intend to use to determine individual student needs. Program specific process you intend to use for tracking student progress on a continuous basis.  Include how you will use Individual Student Learning Plans to help students achieve. Measurable Goals based on LA Content Standards Services Planned each period Evaluation/Assessment Tools

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Communication with Schools and Districts (1 page limit, 5 points)  How will you connect your instructional program with what student is experiencing at school?  How will you communicate with schools and districts?

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Communication with Parents/Families (1 page limit, 5 points)  What procedures will you use to report student progress to parents? How often?  How will parents be involved with program? Be specific.  How do you train staff to work with parents?

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Qualifications of Instructional Staff (2 page limit, 10 points)  How is staff highly qualified to offer SES?  Describe staff experience with Title I students.  What is your professional development plan?  Describe how tutors are supervised and reviewed for performance by highly qualified educators. (If fewer than 5 staff, provide resumes for all)

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Financial Capacity (2 page limit, plus attachments, 10 points)  Submit evidence that organization is financially sound  Other evidence: Organizational chart (sound management) Resources, business plans Copies of business license or formal documentation of legal Status as business or legal entity Proof of liability insurance Audited Financial Statements

Part III: Indicators of Quality  1. Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Health and Safety Standards (1/2 page limit, 5 point limit for both sections) Criminal background checks Copy of health/safety certifications Describe safety record and safety procedures Compliance with IDEA and ADA

Part III: Indicators of Quality  2. Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Civil Rights (1/2 page limit) How does your organization comply with federal, state, and local civil rights protections?

Part III: Indicators of Quality  Other Considerations (1/2 page limit, 5 points)  What, additionally, makes your organization qualified to provide Supplemental Educational Services in Louisiana?  This section is optional!

For Additional Information or Questions and Answers LDOE Website: Questions or Information contact: Kartina Roberts Section Administrator School Support (225)

SES Applications are due by: 2:00 p.m. July 31, 2007 Office of Management and Finance LA Dept of Education 5 th Floor, Cube 5-264