Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POWER TRANSMISSION Mechanical load characterization.
Advertisements

CFD Simulation: MEXICO Rotor Wake
Delft University of Technology Aeroelastic Modeling and Comparison of Advanced Active Flap Control Concepts for Load Reduction on the Upwind.
Brought to you by: Demetri Preonas Greg Unverferth
European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2010 Warsaw, Poland EWEC 2010 Warsaw April 2010 Aeroelastic Analysis of Pre-Curved Rotor Blades V.A.Riziotis,S.G.Voutsinas.
Propulsion Train & Shaft Line Components
Advances in Condition Monitoring – Linking the Input to the Output Martin Jones Insensys.
Proprietary Information ©2008 Viryd Technologies All rights reserved. Slide 1 Wind Turbine and Drive Train Development Project Presented by: Dennis Hechel.
Accelerometer’s for Wind Turbines Alternative Energy Wind turbines are a growing source of alternative clean energy sources. As individual machines, or.
Dynamic Transmission Response of a Hydrostatic Transmission Results measured on a Test Bench J. Schmitz, N. Diepeveen, N. Vatheuer
October 30, 2007 © SKF Group Slide 0. Why is there no ideal bearing concept EWEC 2012 Presented by Reiner Wagner, Application Engineering Manager Renewable.
EWEC 2009 Marseille, France Design of Wind Turbine Passive Smart Blades ©University of Bristol Department of Aerospace Engineering Slide 1 Design of Wind.
Overview of different wind generator systems and their comparisons 2-4~2-7 陳昱希.
CONTROL SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION. What ‘Control System’ mean for a Wind Turbine Yawing of nacelle Blade pitch adjustment.
When two gears make contact at the Pitch Point, the areas of contact on the face of each gear will have the same instantaneous tangential velocity Vt.
This document is the property of SAMTECH S.A. The next step in Wind Turbine Simulation.
Deep Water Offshore Wind Energy By Paul D. Sclavounos Horns Rev Wind Farm (Denmark) - Rated Power 160 MW – Water Depth 10-15m.
WEATS O&M Issues Sandy Butterfield CEO Boulder Wind Power WEATS
Coordinated Control Design for Wind Turbine Control Systems W.E. Leithead and S. Dominguez University of Strathclyde.
ACTIVE CONTROL OF WIND TURBINE ROTOR TORSIONAL VIBRATION
Importance of advanced simulations of electrical system in wind turbines April 2010.
Experimental Aerodynamics & Concepts Group Micro Renewable Energy Systems Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology Validation of.
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Where: I T = moment of inertia of turbine rotor.  T = angular shaft speed. T E = mechanical torque necessary to turn the generator. T A = aerodynamic.
1 11 A review of wind energy technologies part two. Adviser : Dr. Yuan-Kang Wu Student : Po-Kai Lin Date :
Jarred Morales and Cody Beckemeyer Advisior: Dr. Junkun Ma ET 483.
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Cody Beckemeyer Advisors: Junkun Ma Cris Koutsougeras ET 494 Fall 2013.
Dynamics.  relationship between the joint actuator torques and the motion of the structure  Derivation of dynamic model of a manipulator  Simulation.
1 Rotor Design Approaches Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999  NREL.
Wind Engineering Module 4.1 Blade Element Theory
Voltage grid support of DFIG wind turbines during grid faults
APEX Institute of Technology &Management Mr. SAURAV KUMAR (EEE # ) Mr. GAURAV KUMAR (ECE # ) B.TECH. PROJECT PRESENTATION-2012 [1]
EWEC2007 Milano, 8 May 2007 Extrapolation of extreme loads acc. to IEC Ed.3 in comparison with the physics of real turbine response Dirk Steudel,
Tim Fletcher Post-doctoral Research Assistant Richard Brown Mechan Chair of Engineering Simulating Wind Turbine Interactions using the Vorticity Transport.
EWEC 2006, AthensMartin Geyler 1 Hardware-in-the-Loop Development and Testing of New Pitch Control Algorithms EWEC 2006 Athens Martin Geyler, Jochen Giebhardt,
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
MODELING AND SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE –DOUBLY FED INDUCTION GENERATOR (WT-DFIG) IN WIND FARM USE MATLAB/SIMPOWERSYSTEM Student : TRUONG XUAN LOC.
Benchmark of bolted bearing connection models in wind turbines Athens, 1 March 2006 Marcel van Duijvendijk Alfred Kalverboer Theo de Gruiter.
Two-Gear Gear Trains Using different size gear allows change in speed
Advanced Simulation Techniques for the coupled Fatigue and NVH Optimization of Engines. K+P Software, Schönbrunngasse 24, A Graz / Austria Tel.:
WIND TURBINE CONTROL DESIGN TO REDUCE CAPITAL COSTS P. Jeff Darrow(Colorado School of Mines) Alan Wright(National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Kathryn.
Period 7.   The more curved side generates low air pressures, due to more surface area. While high pressure air, pushes on the other side of the design.
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
Aerodynamic forces on the blade, COP, Optimum blade profiles
Vehicle Dynamics Term Project Driveline Modelling
Advanced Controls Research Alan D. Wright Lee Fingersh Maureen Hand Jason Jonkman Gunjit Bir 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006.
DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRY KIM MIN-JUNG O SAE-ROM.
WORLDWIDE WIND ENERGY SOLUTIONS State-of-the-art midsize (50 to 500 kW) wind turbines reducing your energy cost. Designed for industries, farms schools,
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Simulation of the Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines under.
Chapter 8, pp (*figures from text)
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Power Electronics and Control in Wind Energy Conversion Systems
Classical Design of Wind Turbine Controllers
Wind Turbine Control System
Gear box for BWM power Generation
Product History 1932: BHS in Sonthofen was the birthplace of the Stoeckicht planetary gearbox.
Two-Gear Gear Trains Using different size gear allows change in speed
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy The best technology for your wind projects in Brazil 30 August 2017 © Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy.
Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.
Anatomy of Modern Wind Turbines-1
H. Polinder, S.W.H. de Haan, J.G. Slootweg, M.R. Dubois
ME 252 Thermal-Fluid Systems G. Kallio
Two-Gear Gear Trains Using different size gear allows change in speed
Two-Gear Gear Trains Using different size gear allows change in speed
Two-Gear Gear Trains Using different size gear allows change in speed
Exploring the limits in Individual Pitch Control S. Kanev and T
ECE 445 Wind Turbine Generator System Design and Characterization
Calculating Wind Turbine Efficiency
Motor Applications.
Presentation transcript:

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems Andreas Manjock Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH, Business Segment Wind Energy Andreas.Manjock@gl-group.com, www.gl-group.com/glwind

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

1.1 Pitch System Components Blade Bearing Gear Box Rotor Blade Drive Motor Symbol Definition JPD Moment of Inertia, Pitch Motor JRB Moment of Inertia, Rotor Blade iPD Ratio of Pitch Drive Gearbox iPB Ratio of Pitch Bearing Mesh iP Ratio of entire Pitch System iP JPD JRB iPB iPD Control Unit Pitch Controller EWEC 2007

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems Simulation Model 2.1 Load Components 2.2 System Model 2.3 Local Model for Mesh Moment 2.4 Drive Motor Characteristics 2.5 Drive Motor Limitations 2.6 Drive Control Scheme Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

Blade Root Coordinate System 2.1 Load Components αP Blade Root Coordinate System MZB Symbol Definition αP Pitch Angle MPDA Pitch Drive Actuator Torque MZB Pitch Torque Rotor Blade MR Friction Torque Blade Bearing MR MPDA MR = M0 + µbend∙ Mres+ µaxial∙ Faxial+ µradial∙ Fradial Source: GL „Guideline for the Certification of Wind Turbines“, 2003 EWEC 2007

Global Simulation Model 2.2 System Model Structural Model Global Simulation Model Source: GH Bladed 3.67 i P 2 • J PD +J RB α •M PDA M R ZB •i ** EWEC 2007

2.3 Local Model for Mesh Moment Local MM - Assumption“ α +J RB •M M R ZB J •α P ** α P P i P •M PDA M J PD •i P 2 • α ** i 2 • J P PD Mass System Pitch Drive Mass System Rotor Blade Split of Mass System provides Loads for Drive Train Components MM = MZB+ JRB ∙ αP** - MR EWEC 2007

2.4 Drive Motor Characteristics iP  P MPDA Control Unit Pitch Controller Source: OAT Osterholz Antriebstechnik GmbH EWEC 2007

2.5 Drive Motor Limitations Source: OAT Osterholz Antriebstechnik GmbH EWEC 2007

2.6 Drive Motor Control Scheme Pitch Controller EWEC 2007

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) 3.1 Identified Load Cases 3.2 Fatigue DLCs 3.3 Extreme DLCs Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

3.2 Identified Load Cases Fatigue Load Cases Extreme Load Cases DLC1.2 Turbulence State 1 2 m/s 57.0% idling 5 30.0% power production 3 7 24.9% 4 9 22.0% 11 20.2% 6 13 18.9% 15 18.0% 8 17 17.3% 19 16.7% 10 21 16.3% 23 15.9% 12 25 15.6% 28 15.2% Wind Load Case Wind Gust Type Event DLC1.5 12 m/s EOG1 Grid Loss DLC1.6 25 m/s EOG50 Active Safety Syst. DLC2.2 constant Pitch Runaway EWEC 2007

3.3 Fatigue DLCs Control Variables Load Variables EWEC 2007

3.4 Extreme DLCs Control Variables Load Variables EWEC 2007

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing 4.1 Design Driver 4.2 Loads for Drive Motor 4.3 Loads for Gearbox 4.4 Loads for Blade Bearing Mesh Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

4.1 Design Driver Pitch System Component Type of Load Drive Motor MPDA - Pitch Actuator Torque αP* - Speed of Pitch Actuator RMS(MPDA ) - Thermal Loading Gearbox LDD of MM - Mesh Torque (Load Duration Distribution) Mesh of Blade Bearing Distribution of MM vs. αP (Pitch Angle Duration Distribution) EWEC 2007

4.2.1 Loads for Drive Motor Operation States of Drive Motor, Confirmation of global Wind Turbine Simulation EWEC 2007

4.2.2 Thermal Loads for Drive Motor Standard Deviation (RMS) of pitch actuator torque for thermal impact Efficiency of gear box and has to be considered Normal bearing friction Increased bearing friction (+50%) EWEC 2007

4.3 Loads for Gearbox Load Duration Distribution counting for Mesh Torque M_M Influence of Blade Bearing Friction Level comparatively low M_M > 0 M_M < 0 EWEC 2007

4.4 Loads for Blade Bearing Mesh Load Duration Distribution counting for Mesh Torque M_M Pitch Angle Duration Distribution counting EWEC 2007

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

5 Conclusion and Outlook Aerodynamic pitch Moment MZB is not sufficient for the design of pitch systems drive train Pitch Actuator Torque is inevitable Blade bearing friction model included in the global simulation model Integration of drive control unit into the global simulation model, e.g. limitations in speed and torque of pitch drive actuator 80% damage within first 20°- 25° of blade bearing mesh Measurements on drive trains of pitch systems to validate MM-assumption EWEC 2007

Keep in Contact Andreas Manjock Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services Andreas.Manjock@gl-group.com, www.gl-group.com/glwind EWEC 2007