Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Overview Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Presented by: Adam Spector Congressional Affairs Specialist Office of Communications, Office.
1 Juvenile Drug Court Dependency Drug Court Family Drug Court Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Juvenile Treatment Court.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors Presented by Mike Loeffler and Liesl Nelson.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
Introductions Agenda 10:00- 10:20am Introductions and Today’s Agenda 10:20- 10:40am Project Overview (large group) 10:40- 11:30am Definitions 11:30-
NATIONAL AMERICAN INDIAN COURT JUDGES ASSOCIATION’S 43RD ANNUAL MEETING > THE JUDGES’ ROLE IN TRIBAL HEALING TO WELLNESS COURTS Presenters: Joseph Thomas.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Mission The Mission of OJP is to increase public safety and improve the fair administration of justice across America through innovative leadership and.
SAMHSA / CSAP PREVENTION STRATEGIES THE CENTER FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION (CSAP) HAS DEVELOPED & RECOGNIZES SIX PREVENTION STRATEGIES *A comprehensive.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
EFFECTIVE TRANSITION THROUGH SYSTEMS OF CARE: COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY SUPPORTS AS A MEANS TO SUCCESS FOR SYSTEM – INVOLVED YOUTH Simon Gonsoulin, Reyhan.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Tammy Westcott, Assistant District Attorney Director of Alternative Courts Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
OffendingChargeCustodyCourtMeasures It was recognised that the revolving door of offending, charges, court and reoffending wasn’t having an impact on.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
1 1 Bureau of Justice Assistance: Resources for Tribal Justice Systems October 19, 2012.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Justice Grants Administration GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Executive Office of the Mayor 1 Edward “Smitty” Smith, Director.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Counseling Practice in Schools The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 3 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use and can.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Evidence Based Practices for Adults NAMHPAC Technical Assistance to West Virginia Planning Council October 13, 2005 Wheeling, WV Jerry Goessel.
LEAs as Service Providers and Collaborators in the Federal Framework to End Youth Homelessness: Youth Intervention Model NAEHCY Conference October 27,
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
1 Helping Foster Parents & Child Care Workers Prevent and Reduce Adolescent Violence.
Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A Partnership Plan to Improve the Health of the Public A Report of the State Health Plan Committee October 12, 2007.
Juvenile Delinquency Professor Brown. Unit 7: The History of Juvenile Justice and Police Work with Juveniles Unit Overview-This unit examines the history.
Tailoring Your Juvenile Drug Court Program to the Brain Development of Participants Michigan Association of Drug Court Professionals: 15 th Annual Conference.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
Educating Youth in Foster Care Shanna McBride and Angela Griffin, M.Ed.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
MODELS FOR SUCCESS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR JUVENILE DRUG COURT Reclaiming Futures/Juvenile Drug Court Evaluation Southwest Institute for Research on.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
Fresno Countywide Gang Prevention Assessment. OJJDP Assessment Guide Why Focus on Gangs and Not Juvenile Delinquency? Initial and continuous problem assessment.
Roles in JDTC Discipline Specific Breakout Session.
Overview: Evidence-based Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs.
Early Lessons from the States in Comprehensive Youth Development Thomas MacLellan National Governors Association December 10, 2002.
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
AspireMN Member Meeting
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors
BY: Honorable Robert S. Anchondo
Presentation transcript:

Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts Tribal Law & Policy Institute 4/15/2017

History of Juvenile Drug Courts War on drugs in 1980s strained justice systems nationwide & created revolving door of offenders in and out of system Philosophical shift to courts that can heal Innovative partnerships between courts and treatment By 2000, more that 1,000 drug courts established and planned nationwide – most were for adults By 2000, CDC reported increases in and alarmingly high rates of juvenile smoking, drinking, and other illicit drug use Strong evidence of association between alcohol and drug use and delinquent behavior Mid-1990’s state courts started innovative juvenile drug court dockets Between 1995 and 2001, more than 140 juvenile drug courts established and more than 125 planned nationwide -Drug Court movement emerged in response to crack cocaine epidemic in 1980’s – nation-wide war on drugs strained court systems and resulted in revolving door syndrome that cycled drug offenders in and out of justice system -Philosophical shift in field toward “therapeutic jurisprudence” – courts that can heal 4/15/2017

How a Juvenile Drug Court Works Identified use of alcohol and/or drugs Charged with “delinquent act” or “status offense” Referral or ordered from Juvenile Court to Drug Court* Drug Court Judge holds ~weekly Drug Court status hearings (attended by all participants, family members, & Drug Court Team members) Drug Court Judges lead and work with Drug Court Team Drug Court Team determines how best to address substance use and related problems (using a phased treatment plan and the application of incentives and sanctions –many administered in Drug Court status hearings) *Some jurisdictions may conflate the work of their juvenile court and drug court dockets into one Youth are identified as having problems with alcohol and/or drug use AND Youth “charged” with having committed “delinquent acts” or “status offenses” Youth may be processed through the regular juvenile court docket and be referred or order to a drug court docket* Juvenile Drug Court judge maintains close oversight of each case through frequent (usually weekly) status hearings Juvenile Drug Court judge both leads and works as a member of a Drug Court Team Drug Court Team determines how best to address substance use and related problems 4/15/2017

Tribal Juvenile Court Process 4/15/2017

Tribal Juvenile Wellness Court Process 4/15/2017

How Juvenile Drug Courts Are Different From Adult Drug Courts Youth are seldom addicted to alcohol and drugs but they use Youth use for vastly different reasons than do adults Youth are still developing cognitive, social, and emotional skills Family members, peers, schools, and community relationships significantly influence development Juvenile Drug Courts must shift focus from a single participant to the entire family Youth are required to abide by laws specific to them (e.g., school attendance) Juvenile Drug Courts will need to … Develop motivational strategies specific to adolescents Counteract negative influence of peers, gangs, and family members Address the needs of the family Comply with confidentiality requirements while sharing information Respond to developmental challenges that occur while juveniles are under the court’s jurisdiction 4/15/2017

Sample Phased Treatment Plan 4/15/2017

Goal-Oriented Incentives & Sanctions (I&Ss) Behavior modification strategies that promote each youth’s ability to account for his or her own actions Judge plays central role in administering in presence of other youth & families Successful I&S’s … have a specific goal for their use (to motivate or deter what?) are tailored to each individual youth (what will motivate or deter him or her?) build youth competencies & skills are appropriate for the youth’s developmental level and are graduated as the youth progresses are therapeutically sound (not changes in treatment responses unless treatment provider recommends) 4/15/2017

Integrating Culture, Customs, & Traditions 4/15/2017

Planning & Launching A Juvenile Wellness Court Engage in Collaborative Planning & Design Identify Stakeholders Identify KEY stakeholders and include them in all process development Empower Individual Team Members Ensure that each individual feels empowered to participate in the process and has an active voice in development, process, and problem-solving strategies Build Bridges Across Agencies Build trust between agencies – emphasize common goals Be willing to share strengths and be willing to compromise and to adjust traditional strategies 4/15/2017

Composition of the Planning Team Include representatives of all tribal and local community-based agencies that can provide support or that will be affected Judge Court Administrator Prosecutor or Presenting Officer Public Defender or Defense Counsel/Advocate Evaluator and/or MIS Specialist Probation Representatives School Representatives Social Services Representatives Law Enforcement Representatives Treatment Providers’ Representatives Representatives from other Community-based Organizations 4/15/2017

Composition of the Operational Team Select team members who will work in the juvenile wellness court on a daily basis Wellness Court Judge Assigned Prosecutor or Presenting Officer Assigned Public Defender or Private Attorney/Advocate Wellness Court Coordinator Wellness Probation Officer Wellness Case Manager Wellness Treatment Provider Assigned Law Enforcement Officer Assigned Education Program Provider 4/15/2017

Funding Sources for Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts USDOJ, OJP, BJA – Adult Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program USDOJ, OJP, OJJDP – Juvenile Drug Courts/Reclaiming Futures Discretionary Grant Program USDOJ, OJP, ODDJP – Family Drug Court Programs Discretionary Grant Program DHHS, SAMHSA, Grants to Expand Substance Abuse Treatment Capacity in Adult, Juvenile, and Family Drug Courts Discretionary Grant Program USDOJ, Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation 4/15/2017

16 Strategies of Successful Juvenile Wellness Courts 16 Strategies of Successful Juvenile Wellness Courts* (used in addition to “Key Components” for Juvenile Drug Courts) Collaborative Planning Teamwork Clearly Defined Target Population & Eligibility Criteria Judicial Involvement & Supervision Monitoring & Evaluation Community Partnership Comprehensive Treatment Planning Developmentally Appropriate Services Gender-Appropriate Services Cultural Competence Focus on Strengths Family Engagement Educational Linkages Drug Testing Goal-Oriented Incentives & Sanctions Confidentiality *Taken from “Juvenile Drug Courts: Strategies in Practice,” US DOJ BJA publication, NCJ 197866 (March 2003) Collaborative Planning - Engage all stakeholders in creating interdisciplinary, coordinated, and systemic approach to working with youth and their families. Teamwork – Develop and maintain an interdisciplinary, nonadversarial work team. Target Pop./Eligibility Criteria – Define a target population and eligibility criteria that are aligned with the program’s goals and objectives. Judicial Involvement/Supervision – Schedule frequent judicial reviews and be sensitive to the effect that court proceedings can have on youth and their families Monitoring/Evaluation – Establish a system for program monitoring and evaluation to maintain quality of service, assess program impact, and contribute to knowledge in the field. Community Partnerships – Build partnerships with community organizations to expand the range of opportunities available to youth and their families. Treatment Planning – Tailor interventions to the complex and varied needs of youth and their families. Developmentally Appropriate Services - Tailor treatment to the developmental needs of adolescents. Gender-Appropriate Services – Design treatment to address the unique needs of each gender. Cultural Competence – Create policies and procedures that are responsive to cultural differences and train personnel to be culturally competent. Focus on Strengths – Maintain a focus on the strengths of youth and their families during program planning and in every interaction between the court and those it serves. Family Engagement – Recognize and engage the family as a valued partner in all components of the program. Educational Linkages – Coordinate with the school system to ensure that each participant enrolls. Drug Testing – Design drug testing to be frequent, random, and observed. Goal Oriented Incentives & Sanctions – Respond to compliance and noncompliance with incentives and sanctions that are designed to reinforce or modify the behavior of youth and their families. Confidentiality – Establish a confidentiality policy and procedures that guard the privacy of the youth while allowing the drug court team to access key information. 4/15/2017

Resources Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts: The Key Components, Tribal Law & Policy Institute, www.tlpi.org Exploring the Evidence: The Value of Juvenile Drug Courts, Wormer & Lutze, Juvenile Justice & Family Justice Today, Summer 2011 Juvenile Drug Courts: Strategies in Practice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, NCJ197866 Managing and Sustaining Your Juvenile Drug Court, OJJDP, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Ensuring Fidelity to the Juvenile Drug Courts Strategies in Practice – A Program Component Scale, OJJDP, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Identifying Strengths as Fuel for Change: A Conceptual and Theoretical Framework for the Youth Competency Assessment, Burney-Nissen, Mackin, Weller, & Tarte, Juvenile and Family Court Journal, Winter 2005 4/15/2017