HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori1 HB TB2002 Some Results Shuichi Kunori Jordan Damgov 05-Nov-2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HCAL RBX PRR Overview Jim Freeman RBX PRR March 1-2, 2001.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
CMS Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO) Project Naba K Mondal Tata Institute, Mumbai, India.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
Simulation Workshop on CMS Calorimetry, Ooty, Feb 18 – 20, HCAL Status CMS HCAL Status Jim Freeman.
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
Drew Baden, UMD Nov HCAL Trigger/Readout CMS/Tridas November 2000 Drew Baden, Tullio Grassi University of Maryland.
Data Acquisition Software for CMS HCAL Testbeams Jeremiah Mans Princeton University CHEP2003 San Diego, CA.
Reports from DESY Satoru Uozumi (Staying at DESY during Nov 11 – 25) Nov-21 GLDCAL Japan-Korea meeting.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
1 HCAL Upgrade TP simulation studies Jane Nachtman (Iowa) – for the HCAL group Trigger Upgrade meeting April 28, 2010.
C. Seez Imperial College November 28th, 2002 ECAL testbeam Workshop 1 Pulse Reconstruction Worth considering the experience of other experiments using.
CALOR2006 June 7, Julie Whitmore Fermilab Overview of the CMS Hadron Calorimeter.
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
Toward the FNAL Beam Test S. Uozumi (Kobe) May Japan-Korea meeting.
CMS Upgrade Workshop – Nov 20, H C A L Upgrade Workshop CMS HCAL Working Group FE Electronics: New QIE Nov 20, 2007 People interested in QIE10 development:
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
1234 Dec Jan Feb 2007 Delivery of 500 MPPCs MPPC numbering Mass check MPPC soldering WLSF megastrip source scan ACFA Shipping Feb-14.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Ideas for in-situ calibration for the EMC S.Paganis, K.Loureiro ( Wisconsin ) input from+discussions with T.Carli, F.Djama, G.Unal, D.Zerwas, M.Boonekamp,
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
US CMS UC Riverside, 18-May-2001, S.Kunori1 Status of JetsMET Shuichi Kunori U. of Maryland 18-May-2001 PRS: Physics Reconstruction and Selection.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay, France and CERN Olivier Callot 18 March 2003 Online Data Format and Condition Database Proposed data format.
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.
CALO Meeting–September 2 nd 2015 Calorimeter Upgrade Electronics: June 2015 Test Beam E. Picatoste Universitat de Barcelona, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
JetsMET - CERN, 26-Sep-2001, S.Kunori1 JetsMET - Overview Shuichi Kunori U. of Maryland 26-Sep-2001 PRS: Physics Reconstruction and Selection.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
FNAL beam test data analysis A Hands-on session at CMS Upgrade School Aiwu Zhang Florida Institute of Technology On behalf of the CMS GEM collaboration.
HCAL1 Status 2004 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance in 2004 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Stability in 2003 Led.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad for HO group India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
11 june 2002 CMS ECAL : Patrick Jarry ( Saclay) 1 Pulse shape reconstruction : CMS ECAL Introduction –the problem –the tools –experimental pulse shape.
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
Preparation for CERN test beam
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
HCAL Commissioning and Related Activities
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
HCAL Configuration Issues
Synchronization Policy: HCAL will follow ECAL as much as possible
HCAL – SiPM upgrade requirements
BESIII EMC electronics
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori1 HB TB2002 Some Results Shuichi Kunori Jordan Damgov 05-Nov-2002

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori2 HB Testbeam 2002 Dates: June 26-July 1 “ECAL” // July 24-July 31 HF // Aug. 01- Sep. 18 HB Goals (HB): Demonstrate 144ch working Demonstrate DCS going Source data vs GeV/ADC (beam: e /  /  / p) Muon signal in HO for muon trigger Eta dependence (attenuation) Eta dependence (timing) Pulse shape (needs TDC) Weight in Layer 0  start construction of Calibration Database Additional Goals (left over from 1999TB) Crack between wedges e/pi (resolution and linearity) Cerenkov light in clear fibers

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori3 HCAL+”ECAL” Layout Calibrate 4 wedges ’02. Check HO response as tail catcher and as muon trigger element. In ’03 use PPP to study 40 MHz beam and HE/HB transition region.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori4 Testbeam Layout H2 beam ECAL (49 crystals) HB Wedges (2) (144 channels) HO (16 channels) Moving Table

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori5 “ECAL”“ECAL” Have a 7 x 7 crystal array in front of HCAL which can be moved for eta scan. Online get a usable resolution of 2.3 %.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori6 HB 2 Wedges - 16  x 8  300GeV  -

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori7 Prototype HTR, DCC

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori8 Test Beam Results: Data  - 225GeV e - 100, 20,30,50GeV  - 300, 20,30,50GeV

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori9 Data and Software Data Files ROOT format All files (~300GB) are in the tape robots at CERN and Fermilab. Software for Analyses HTBDAQ_data Provides data access methods to DAQ root files Simple C++/root scripts to analyze data. e.g. wire source analysis H2Reco Reads DAQ root file using HTBDAQ_data. Construct higher level objects, e.g. 1x1, 3x3, 5x5 ECAL or HCAL clusters in addition to raw ECAL and HCAL data, etc. Writes output root files V11 was used for quick data validation during September runs. Many data sets have been processed through v11d at Fermilab. V12 will be released soon. It includes calibration constants from the wire source data for September data runs.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori10 Pedestals

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori11 Noise Level Pedestal RMS distribution In ADC count

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori12 Wire Source Scan Source scan uses QIE at 25 nsec to sum up to a D.C. current. Signal to noise is good (3 mCu). Assignment of calibration constant to tile is simple.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori13 Source Histograms by HTR a bad case ADC count (in 3x mode)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori14 Wire Source Some channels are noisier than others.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori15 Gaussian Fit to y projection Fitted values are less sensitive to pedestal width.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori16 Source vs Beam Data 5% e-e- -- Some muon points in  =3 were bad. Besides the bad points, the muon data show better agreement with the source data.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori17 ADC  GeV

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori18 7 bits ADC ADC Codes (0 - 20GeV) ( GeV) ( GeV) ( GeV)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori19 Dynamic Range Original Requirement: Jets: 15-20GeV for top reconstruction/rejection >3TeV for compositness & QCD Readout: Et Threshold 500MeV Max. E = 3TeV Noise < 200MeV/time slice ( <0.66 LSB) QIE(ADC): 7 bits (128 integer codes in non-linear scale ) counts equivalent in linear scale. 300MeV LSB 3TeV at the max scale Pedestal: Higher statistics for better mean value  before/after physics runs.  during abort gaps. Energy extraction:  Optical sum of layer 0 signal with others.  1 or 2 time slices for signal extraction. Resolution Energy offset Occupancy 0.9 LSB (TB2002)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori20 Effect of Threshold on low E T jet and MET Electronics noise and occupancy define the threshold. >> aim at 10E34 Lower threshold is better! (S.Nikitenko) 20GeV parton 10E34MET (I.Vardanian) (SK Dec 2001)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori21 MET for Signal Events with Pile-up and Tower Threshold RMS 35 GeV 37 GeV 42 GeV 44 GeV >.5 GeV > 1 GeV > 2 GeV > 3 GeV 36 GeV > 1GeV With 17.3 min-bias events No min-bias Tower = Ecal+Hcal GeV >> Not much pile-up effect with this resolution! >> Resolution gets worse as threshold increase. (SK June 2000)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori22 E in single HCAL readout >3TeV jets 2.9fb  290 events/year at 10E34. Fraction of events above E threshold (%) QCD binsMC evts 1.5TeV2.0TeV2.5TeV3.0TeV3.5TeV4.0TeV Need to cover up to 3TeV? YES. (J.Damgov)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori23 Signal in Time Slices 20 time slices at TB. (5~10 at CMS) No synchronization between beam arrival time and QIE clock at TB. (Rohf)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori24 GeV/ADCGeV/ADC 60MeV ~ 240MeV / 1 ADC count  0.6TeV ~ 2.4TeV / Full range (1 time slice)  1.2TeV ~ 4.8TeV / Full range (2 time slices)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori25 HPD Quantum Efficiency x x x xx HPD QE520

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori26 Adjust HPD Gain For 3TeV 1 time slice : 300MeV/ADC, noise=270MeV 2 time slices: 150MeV/ADC, noise=212MeV Change HV 2.Lower gain HPD in HE

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori27 Eta dependence attenuation

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori28 Variation in eta Eta 1/attenuation TeV ….. 1.8TeV 3.0TeV ….. 2.2TeV 4.1TeV ….. 3.0TeV

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori29 Pulse Shape

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori30 Pulse Shape Simulation (S.Abdullin)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori31 Scope Measurement (Elias/Rohf)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori32  225 E i /E all t i -t ave  300  20 e100 e20 Need correction for 25ns/30ns! (Damgov)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori33 Eta dependence timing Coming soon.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori34 HO for Muon Trigger Analysis in progress at Tata.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori35 Layer 0

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori36 Layer 0 Goal: 1.Overweight 1.5 or 3.0? 2.Demonstrate how to implement. Wt ~ 1.0 Implemented! (de Barbaro) TB 1996 and MC indicated ~1.5! Need real ECAL super module to determine final weight.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori37 Crack Scan (between wedges)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori38 Wire Chamber Wire chamber data useful after Run (R.Vidal)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori39 W1-W2W1-W2 xx yy  ~ 0.6mm  ~ 0.5mm Ready for gap study!

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori40 Crack/Tower Scans for HCAL

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori41 ConclusionConclusion QIE dynamic range. Not much head room for different input (HPD) gain. Need to control input gian by changing HPD HV? QIE calibration Need to calibrate pedestal and gain (full range) for each CapID. Source calibration Need to calculate constants for each CapID (and then average over 4 CapID) May require higher statistics (because of 4 caps and noise). TB data analysis. Extract results for all defined goals. Finish by March 2003, and publish. TB 2003 New goals are suggested.

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori42 Additional

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori43 Wire Source Data

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori44 Peds R Sep02  mean = mean(4)-mean(cap) rms (cap) mean(4)  = (J.Dagmov)

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori45 Peds R806 9Aug02

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori46 Source/LED-Laser/BeamSource/LED-Laser/Beam

HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori47 HB TB 2003 (my suggestion / PRS) Goal: Local synchronization. (time in all channels.) Operation of full calibration system, including laser. Emulation of pedestal estimates (4 caps) in the LHC environment. 1) Before and after physics runs. 2) During abort gaps. Remote monitoring and analysis. Preparation: (addition to tasks obvious to get the goal) Before the TB period HPD calibration (all) – QE QIE calibration (all) – gain in full range for each CapID Source calibration E-log book.