STAR 3 : An Overview Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Grant Project for the WS/FCS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Purposes of the Act Develop challenging academic and technical standards and related challenging, integrated instruction Increase opportunities for individuals.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
WSFCS Parent Advisory Committee Meeting: Elementary Gifted Services Overview November 20, 2012.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
2013 Spring Meeting Size-Alike Session “Supporting Principals as Leaders of Learning”
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
1 Title III Access to Core Instructional Coach AMEEL NOOS Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch.
Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.
Fiscal Year  Dothan City Schools – Proration has resulted in a loss of : $5,378, for FY09 $3,500, for FY10 $8,878, Lost due to.
RtI-MTSS District Leadership Team: Where to Begin LaChawn Smith, NHCS, Director of Instruction Cynthia Shields, NHCS, ELA Lead Teacher.
A Team Effort To Develop A Successful Program For English Language Learners Irene Jiménez Director of Bilingual/ESL Programs Hays CISD
Bloom-Vernon Schools OHIO TIF Bloom-Vernon’s TIF Award Model Overview.
LCSD Professional Development Plan The Lansing School Community will work to educate and motivate all students to achieve their personal best in.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
2006 Broad Prize for Urban Education Finalist. The Jersey City Public School District is strongly committed to high expectations for achievement by all.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
Reorganization of Curriculum Department 2008 – 2009 School Year.
MISSION POSSIBLE EXPANSION PROJECT MPIII District Launch January 7, 2011.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Administrative Budget Recommendation March 14, 2012.
 Overview of Upper Darby School District  District Goals  RtII – Behavior  RtII - Academic.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Klein Independent School District Technology Integration Mentor Program Moving from learning to use technology...to using technology to learn Ann McMullan,
What Happens When You Finally Get A Teaching Job A generic look at what awaits you when you get to work at a school for PAY! Leo Wells, Ed. D. © 2004.
The Three Buckets. #1 Classroom Teachers #2 Principals #3 Nonteaching Professional Employees.
IDAHO STATE TEACHER ADVANCEMENT AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM.
Update on Magnet Schools Dr. Kim Morrison-Director for Federal Programs and Strategic Planning- October 18, 2011.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
Grant Writer’s Workshop Oregon Reading First Overview of Request for Proposals January 7, 2003 Holiday Inn Portland Airport The Oregon Department of Education:
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
BELPRE CITY SCHOOLS TIF PROGRAM Presented by: Strategic Compensation Committee August 2011 [insert district logo]
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
SCHOOL BUDGET PRESENTATION K – 8 Education 1 Paul Perzanoski March 21, 2012.
Company LOGO Professional Development Teams (PDTs) School Improvement Zone.
MEYER ELEMENTARY SPRING ISD LORETTA DAVENPORT Campus Improvement Project III Teacher Mentoring Program.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Take One! ™ Jumpstarting Your National Board Teaching Certification Process.
Coolville Middle School Ashley McCray, Louise Cline, and Steven Cox.
EDF 2005 Chapter 2 Becoming a Professional Educator.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP & COMPENSATION IN THE WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FEBRUARY 2015.
Network to Transform Teaching Supporting Educator Effectiveness Development Presentation to the Board of Directors The National Board Unpacking The Problem.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
Budget Overview March 27, K – 3 Elementary Maintains small class sizes (19-22 students per class) Maintains current level of teaching assistants.
Hamilton County Department of Education
Dedham Public Schools proposed FY14 operating budget
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Principal Evaluation Update
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Professional Development
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

STAR 3 : An Overview Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Grant Project for the WS/FCS

Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Federal grant money provided through a competitive grant application process WS/FCS was awarded a grant of nearly 20 million dollars over a five year period. The grant integrates already existing programs in the district. The grant mandates an incentive pay process. (Details in ensuing slides.)

Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Grant The Grant Writing Team Dr. Kim Morrison Dr. Marty Ward Dr. Judy Penny Dr. Wayne Foster (Project Director) Ms. Alex Hoskins Special Thanks: Dr. Donald Martin, Superintendent Ms. Lynne Jennings

The Grant Team’s Rationale for Writing the Grant What if we could ‘package’ an educational/instructional model based on: Data from what is working in various schools throughout WS/FCS Single School Culture/PLC Process Processes that are working for the Magnet Schools Learning Focused Information from around the U.S. Response to Instruction (RtI) Effective use of data for targeted support AND enrichment What if we could tie it all together in a logical, coherent model? This became the basis for the educational model in the TIF proposal.

TIF Project: STAR 3 School Transformation by Actively Recruiting, Retaining and Rewarding

STAR 3 : The major components of the project Implementation of the educational model and support for that implementation Funds to recruit highly effective teachers into hard to fill positions Funds to reward staff for student growth Support for teachers through a personalized professional development and personal growth program Improve teacher retention by creating a school environment that is rewarding at all levels.

STAR 3 : Grant Support for All Schools Teacher Evaluation Targeted and Highly Personalized PDP Wide-Ranging Professional Development Training on all components of the educational model Instructional Coaches Response to Instruction (mRtI) software

STAR 3 : Your Part Teacher Evaluation Process Targeted teacher/principal development based on the new NCTEP/NCPEP Standards Understanding EVAAS Training in Learning Focused, Single School Culture, and mRtI Continuous Improvement of Instruction

The Schools Elementary SchoolsMiddle Schools Ashley Kimberley Park Diggs-Latham Konnoak Easton Middle Fork Forest Park North Hills Griffith Old Town Hall-Woodward South Fork Hill Philo Mineral Springs Wiley

TIF: Design 16 schools: 8 matched pairs 12 elementary, 4 middle Incentive Pay Recruitment Money Classroom Level Grade Level School Level Leadership Activity Stipend 1% Across-the- Board Bonus Recruitment Money Leadership Activity Stipend Matched Pairs of Schools The Study Design A B

STAR 3 : Incentive Pay Plan (Elementary) Step AdministratorsInstructional Staff Teacher/ Student Support Staff e Admin & Operatio ns Support Staff f Principal Assistan t Principal Core Teacher a Core TA b Non- Core Teacher c Non- Core TA d Step 1 – Whole School Performance Campus composite using EVAAS (Grades K-5) $500 Step2 – Grade-Level Performance Grade-level composite using EVAAS (Grades K-5) $750 per Grade $500 per Grade $1,500$750 $250 per Grade $125 per Grade Step 3 – Teacher-Level Performance Teacher composite using EVAAS (Grades K-5) plus teacher observations $2,000$1,000 Step 4 – Leadership Roles Effective teachers in roles of mentors, master teachers, or tutors $500 Total Potential Payout Per Employee $5,000$3,500$4,500$2,250$2,000$1,250$500 Note: See TIF pay definitions slide for further information.

STAR 3 : Incentive Pay Plan (Middle) Step AdministratorsInstructional Staff Teacher/ Student Support Staff d Admin & Operation Support Staff e Principal Assistant Principal Core Teacher a Non-Core Teachers b TA c Step 1 – Whole School Performance Campus composite using EVAAS (Grades K-5) $500 Step2 – Grade-Level Performance Grade-level composite using EVAAS (Grades K-5) $1,500 per Grade $1,000 per Grade $1,500 $500 per Grade $250 per Grade Step 3 – Teacher-Level Performance Teacher composite using EVAAS (Grades K-5) plus teacher observations $2,000 Step 4 – Leadership Roles Effective teachers in roles of mentors, master teachers, or tutors $500 Total Potential Payout Per Employee $5,000$3,500$4,500$2,000$1,250$500 Note: See TIF pay definitions slide for further information.

TIF: Pay Definitions a Core Teacher: includes Middle School Math, Science, and Language Arts teachers, and ESL or EC teachers in self-contained classrooms teaching core subjects or in co-teaching classrooms. b Non-Core Teacher: includes all non-core teachers and media coordinators. c TA: includes all teacher assistants. d Teacher/Student Support staff: includes curriculum coordinators, school- based instructional coaches, guidance counselors, social workers, nurses, speech therapists, home-school coordinators, psychologists, media assistants, and technology coordinators. e Administrative & Operations Support Staff: includes administrative assistants, secretaries, NCWISE managers, custodial staff, cafeteria managers, and cafeteria workers.

Implementation Teams for STAR 3 District STAR 3 Team: Includes representatives from Central Office and Schools School-Level STAR 3 Team – This team will make implementation decisions at the school.

STAR 3 Teams: Main Points Some aspects of the project are ‘set-in-stone’ (e.g., incentive pay amounts) but many are not (e.g., What defines a leadership activity in a school.) The grant proposal purposefully left many details open so that the teams can have a say in how the project operates. No two schools are the same. The school- based STAR 3 team will have a strong voice in how the program is implemented at the school.

TIF: What is the purpose? 1. U.S. Department of Education: Does incentive pay increase student outcomes? 2. WS/FCS: Does our educational model make a difference? Does incentive pay increase outcomes in addition to the model?

Steps in the STAR 3 Project: 1. Provide principals with an overview. (October 5, 2010) 2. Principals meet with school staff to give an overview of the project. 3. District Level STAR 3 administrators will meet with the staff at each school to provide details and answer questions. 4. District- and School-level STAR 3 teams created. Planning meetings to begin.

Steps in the STAR 3 Project 5. Coaches hired and materials purchased for the project. 6. Trainings for staff committed for the school year to begin by the end of the school year. 7. Full implementation of the STAR 3 project begins for schools during the school year.