ICAO Multi-pilot Licence Extracts from a presentation given by Richard McFarlane, ICAO FCLTP Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Competency-Based Training Solutions in a non-standardized world APATS September 2009 Capt. Kris Van den Bergh Vice-President Pilot Provisioning.
Advertisements

Introduction to the Concept of Continuing Airworthiness
05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
A4 FORMAT Please don’t change page set up to A3, print to A3 paper and fit to scale 1 An Airline View of MPL Brian Watt Head of Crew Training Flybe.
Licensing of Aircraft Maintenance Engineers
Pilot Schools Subpart A General
Multi Crew Pilot’s Licence (MPL) in Europe Anthony Petteford.
A New Way to the Cockpit CANDIDATES PRE-SELECTION HIGH STANDARDS TRAINING TRAINING COST FUNDING CREW RESOURCING SERVICES A T P - A e r o J O B T r a i.
The Canadian Federal Pilots Association Presentation to Conciliation Board Ottawa, ON - May 30 - June 2, 2002.
Training Footprint Curriculums – New Challenges and Solutions Captain Mark Sawyer - Aerosim Technologies (aka TBD)
FAR Part 61.
IAOPA Europe Regional Meeting Athens, 27. September 2014 GA Roadmap Update.
1. Instrument Rating Requirements §61.65(a) 1.Hold at least a Private Pilot Certificate 2.Be able to read, speak, write and understand English 3.Receive.
Ujaval Patel General Regulatory Requirements Flight Crew Regulations Flight Crew Scheduling.
Oslo – November The Future of Instrument Qualifications for GA Pilots in Europe Paul Sherry Chairman – PPLIR Europe.
Part 61 Subpart B Aircraft Ratings and Pilot Authorizations And so it goes.
You Can Fly! WELCOME TO MIT!  Instructors: Sameera Ponda and Kostas Speridakos.
LIVERPOOL JOHN LENNON AIRPORT Ravenair Business Aviation Centre is located on the General Aviation Apron. Ravenair Air Charter, Flying.
AABI Industry/Educator Forum Educator Response MPL Around the World (United States) Dr. Guy M. Smith.
“From Zero to ATPL” – ZILINA Sept 2010 Ab initio Training: From zero to ATPL.
AIR LAW for PPL(A)s.
Juin 2009 HOW ARE ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY HELPING AIRLINE PILOT TRAINING?
Downloaded from PILOT EXAMINER ’ S HANDBOOK ORDER B SEPTEMBER 28, 1994 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 15, 1994 Recurrent Course.
Federal Aviation Regulations
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
MPL Global Status Report EATS Prague Capt. D.Harms Prague, 10th November
European Aviation Safety Agency
ENDORSEMENTS.
WORKSHOP LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION March 2010 Rome - Italy REGULATORY ISSUES ON TESTING Eleonora Italia Enac Personnel Licensing.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: AABI Forum / FAA Academia Symposium By: John Allen - Director, FAA Flight Standards Date: 14 July 2011 Federal.
First Office Training Program Content
Parts Part 1 – Definitions/Abbreviations Part 21 – Certification Procedures for Products/Parts Part 43 – Maintenance, Preventative Maintenance, Rebuilding,
Tailwinds Flying Club Winter Safety Session – 2011 Log Books Plane and Pilot.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office Practical Test Standards Review North Florida FSDO.
EATS 2009 Evolving European Regulatory Environment Prague November 2009 Jean-Marc Cluzeau EASA Rulemaking Directorate.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
Working WITH an airline and the regulator to produce a FANTASTIC new Multi Pilot’s Licence (MPL) course Anthony Petteford.
“Hiring and Training Perspectives” Atlantic Southeast Airlines.
Presented to: Central Florida Pilots By: FAASTeam Date: 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from FAASTeam Presentation The Flight.
Update on European Rulemaking for ETOPS-LROPS Global ETOPS/LROPS Implementation: Timetables and Approaches Yves Morier, St Petersburg, 4 June.
Presented to: CFI Workshops By: FAASTeam Date: April 1, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration CFI Workshop 7 Core Topic 14 Flight Review.
14 CFR PART 61 CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND INSTRUCTORS 01/20/2004.
14 CFR Part 61 Certification of: Pilots, Flight Instructors and Ground Instructors.
K.Nieruch Introduction of an ”ab initio“ training according to JAR- FCL (MPL) by means of Lufthansa German Airlines.
FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES SPORT PILOT PROGRAM.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) What are the categories of aircraft for which a pilot may be rated? 2) What.
Arrow Operations Bob Carpenter FMFA Chief Flight Instructor.
FAA sUAS ARC Support Documentation © ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. The Unmanned Aircraft System Initiative F38 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
Training Standards & Guidelines Moscow September 2004
Integrated Training Course
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Loss of Control In-Flight
Aeroplane terrain awareness/mountain flight instruction and assessment Flight Examiner Seminar – Hamilton
NPA Loss of control preventation and recovery training.
Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR February 10, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR C-384 Presentation.
IFALPA MPL Best practice recommendation Kuala Lumpur IFALPA HUPER committee Nov 2007.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
AvSport of Lock Haven Reviewing the Flight Review Presentation Copyright © 2016 How To Get The Most from your 24 Calendar Month Flight Review Prof. H.
Phare Project Europe Aid/115886/D/SV/EE “Training for licensing of aviation personnel in Estonia” First Training Session, September 6th -10th 2004, Tallinn.
Part 61 Subpart B Aircraft Ratings and Pilot Authorizations “It takes many deeds to build a good reputation” “And only one bad one to lose it” Benjamin.
Phare Project Europe Aid/115886/D/SV/EE “Training for licensing of aviation personnel in Estonia” First Training Session, September 6th -10th 2004, Tallinn.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
SET Commercial Transport Training - Oysterair
Helicopter B1 and B2 Technician Continuation Training
EASA European Aviation Safety Agency
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Aeromedical Decision Making
Workshop for Licensing and Operations
EASA’s MDM.032 WG Regulation of aircraft other than complex motor powered aircraft when used in non-commercial activities UK CAA Presentation 18/19.
Motion Cueing Standards for Commercial Flight Simulation
Presentation transcript:

ICAO Multi-pilot Licence Extracts from a presentation given by Richard McFarlane, ICAO FCLTP Chair

Historical Applications Origins Cardboard Mock-up Procedural Training e.g. pre-flight checks Still used today Cambridge Cockpit World War II Sir Frederick Bartlett Research Other Applications Link Trainer Niche market in history 20 hrs IFR time

Historical Applications Low end of market  PC Based Flight Sims Virtual airlines CBT  Procedural Trainers Frasca 141 IFR Time  Adv. Tng. Devices HPT F242 with visuals Dual Controls Multi-crew cockpit

Historical Applications High end of market  Fixed Base Simulators Coupled with CBT Initial type rating 4-10 x 4 hr sessions  Full Flight Simulators x 4 hr sessions Up to ZFT i.e. AKL to CGK first time with full pax load

Safety We can practise profiles in a simulator environment that we would not be prepared to do in the aircraft. Efficiency We can use simulators 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week when a/c availability and wx considerations would prevent us from using the a/c Economy Simulators are generally cheaper and cheaper to run than a/c

Historical Applications Summary Simulation and simulator based training have been an important part of the aviation industry for many years now. Have proven to be a most effective and efficient means of transferring critical flight task methodology from one pilot to another as well as a safe and reliable platform for the practise of flight skills. We now rely on them.

Catalysts for Change  Prediction that we will be unable to produce the number of pilots needed to service the transport industry using current methods  Airline observations that graduates from training organisations are not meeting their needs  Cockpit task evolution from an emphasis on stick and rudder skills to management principles  Regulatory recognition that our ‘apprenticeship’ model hadn’t moved on in 50 years Global Pilot Shortages and Cockpit Task Changes

Catalysts for Change cont’d Simulator Capabilities  Zero Flight Time Simulators at the top end of the market  Affordable motion for major training organisations  Advanced Procedural Trainers for all training organisations  Microsoft Flight Sim or similar in everyone's lounge room

Catalysts for Change cont’d Research  Differentiation between task fidelity and instructional fidelity  Development of ‘Horses for Courses’ trainers  Demonstrated transfer of learning  Task analyses and needs analyses on the changed roles of pilots in the modern cockpit

The FCLTP Proposals General  Proposal for a multi-crew pilot licence (MPL)  Proposed development of a PANS-TRG document  Development of additional guidance material  Input to the ANC’s action on the ‘Age 60 Rule’  Approval of training organisations

The FCLTP Proposals cont’d General cont’d  Proposal for the establishment of airship and powered- lift aircraft categories  Proposed new structure of Pilot licences  A comprehensive review and updating of all existing flight crew licensing and training requirements  Proposed new system for the award of training credits

The Proposals cont’d Specific – The Multicrew Pilot Licence MPL

CATEGORY Category Specific Standards:  Experience  Flight instruction PILOT LICENCE Privileges Pilot Licence Standards:  Age  Medical  Knowledge  Skill GLIDER CPLATPL INSTRUCTOR RATING Aeroplane Helicopter Airship Powered- lift FREE BALLOON PPL Airship Powered- lift Helicopter Aeroplane Helicopter Aeroplane Helicopter Powered- lift MPL Aeroplane I/R Powered-lift Airship

MPL Training Scheme Minimum 240 hours of training including PF and PNF CBT E-learning Part Task Trainer Classroom Advanced Type Rating training within an airline orientated environment CRM Landing training All WX scenarios LOFT Abnormal procedures Normal procedures Aeroplane: Turbine Multi-engine Multi-crew certified FSTD Type IV 12 take-offs and landings as PF(*) PF/ PNF FSTD Type IV PF/ PNF Intermediate Application of multi-crew operations in a high performance multi-engine turbine aeroplane CRM LOFT Abnormal procedures Normal procedures Multi-crew Instrument flight FSTD Type III PF/ PNF Basic Introduction of multi-crew operations and instrument flight CRM PF/PNF complement IFR Cross-country Upset recovery Night flight Instrument flight Aeroplane: Single or multi- engine FSTD Type II PF/ PNF Core Flying Skills Specific basic single pilot training CRM VFR Cross-country Solo flight Basic instrument flight Principles of flight Cockpit procedures Aeroplane: Single or multi- engine FSTD Type I PF Phase of TrainingTraining Items Flight and simulated flight training media - Minimum level requirement Ground Training Media Integrated TEM principles

The Proposals cont’d Specific – Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD)  2.1.6The use of a FSTD for acquiring the experience or performing any manoeuvre required for the demonstration of skill for the issue of a licence or rating shall be approved by the Licensing Authority, which shall ensure that the FSTD used is appropriate to the task  A Contracting State shall not permit a person to carry out instruction on an FSTD required for the issue of a licence or rating unless such a person holds or has held an appropriate licence or has appropriate flight training and experience and has received proper authorisation from such Contracting State.

The Proposals cont’d FSTD Type 1  E-Training and part tasking devices approved by the Licensing Authority that have the following characteristics: Involve accessories beyond those normally associated with desktop computers, such as functional replicas of a throttle quadrant, a sidestick controller, or an FMS keypad; and Involve psychomotor activity with appropriate application of force and timing of responses.

The Proposals cont’d FSTD Type 2  A flight simulation training device that represents a generic turbine powered aeroplane. This requirement can be met by a flight simulation training device equipped with a daylight visual system and otherwise meeting at a minimum the specifications equivalent to FAA FTD Level 5, or JAA FNPT II, MCC.

The Proposals cont’d FSTD Type 3  A flight simulation training device that represents a multi-engine turbine powered aeroplane certificated for a crew of two pilots with enhanced daylight visual system and equipped with an autopilot. This requirement can be met by a flight simulation training device equipped with a daylight visual system and otherwise meeting at a minimum the specifications for a Level B simulator as defined in JAR STD 1A, as amended; and in FAA AC B. (Some previously evaluated Level A Full flight simulators that have been approved for training and checking required manoeuvres may be used.)

The Proposals cont’d FSTD Type 4  Fully equivalent to a Level D Flight Simulator or to a Level C Flight Simulator with an enhanced daylight visual system. Specifications for Level C and Level D simulator are defined in JAR STD 1A, as amended; and in FAA AC B, as amended, including Alternate Means of Compliance (AMOC), as permitted in AC B.

The proposals cont’d Training Credits Appendix 2 3. Training Programmes 3.1 A Licensing Authority may approve a training programme for a private pilot licence, commercial pilot licence or instrument rating that allows an alternative means of compliance with the experience requirements established by Annex 1, provided that the approved training organization demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Licensing Authority that the training provides a level of competency at least equal to the minimum experience requirements for personnel not receiving such approved training.

FCLTP Proposals cont’d Which means………….. NAAs may approve Any course of training Proposed by a certificated flight training organisation That meets an equivalent competency standard For licensing purposes Competency is the NEW WAY Experience is the OLD WAY