DR Discontinuation of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors CML and MPDs UK national meeting Newcastle, March 1 st, 2013 Dr Delphine Rea Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr N M Butt Consultant Haematologist
Advertisements

Imatinib Resistance Geoffrey L. Uy, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Oncology.
The National CML Society 2012 CML UPDATE “What’s New? What’s Coming?” Luke Akard MD Co-Director Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Success and Milestones
Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
OHSU Updates in Hematology and Breast Cancer Conference CML ASH Update Michael J. Mauro, MD.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Stopping TKI treatment in CML: Who and when
Marty O’Neill II Carmen Banea
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
1 Rea D et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 811.
Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Elias Jabbour, MD University of Texas – M. D. Anderson Cancer Center CML and Imatinib Resistance: Which TKI and When?
Treatment of CML Transplant or Imatinib? Mark B Juckett MD Section of Hematology/BMT University of Wisconsin.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
CML in China Qian Jiang, MD Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Here are some CML slides that may be helpful for your presentation.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
David Marin, Imperial College London Early molecular prediction of response to TKI.
Current use of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia Michael O’Dwyer Haematologica March 2003.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Prospects for stopping treatment : Should this be in a clinical trial? CML patient & carer meeting 2015 Hammersmith Hospital, 14 th November 2015 Richard.
Long-term Outcome after hyper-CVAD and Imatinib for De Novo or Minimally Treated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph-ALL)
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Dr Nauman Butt – Royal Liverpool University Hospital CML Patient Seminar - 14 th November 2015 What is CML? How do we treat it? Get up to speed…
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Case report Sudden blastic transformation in patient with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate Mehrdad Payandeh,MD Hematology, Medical.
Future of CML treatments – Are they getting us closer to cure? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany.
Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective,
Working Groups in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Choice of First-line Therapy This program is supported by an educational grant from.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Update on Approved TKIs Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas.
Resistance to Targeted Therapy in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Andreas Hochhaus, Philipp Erben, Thomas Ernst, and Martin C. Mueller Seminars in Hematology.
Strategies of pregnancy management need further experience accumulation. Surely the most safe time for pregnancy in CML females is a period of stable CMR.
The Challenge of Monitoring CML When Resources Are Limited Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML & AML Section Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
HOW TO TREAT FIRST LINE FAILURE?
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Soverini S et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 346.
Raafat R. Abdel-Malek, MD, FRCR Ass. Prof Clinical Oncology
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC Clinical Focus: Options for Treatment-Resistant or Treatment-Intolerant.
Great Debates and Updates in Hematologic Malignancies 2014
Ellen K. Ritchie Clinical Director, Richard T. Silver MPN Center
The Nurse View Key Insights Along the CML Continuum
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Resistant CML: Understanding the Science to Change Outcomes
Monitoring Milestones in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Imatinib – where are we now. What about generic imatinib
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Diagnosis and Treatment
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia by Multidisciplinary Teams
Great Debates-CML Omacetaxine succinate
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Presentation transcript:

DR Discontinuation of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors CML and MPDs UK national meeting Newcastle, March 1 st, 2013 Dr Delphine Rea Service des Maladies du Sang Hôpital Saint-Louis Paris, France Fi-LMC (France Intergroupe-Leucémies Myéloïdes Chroniques)

DR Current goals of TKI therapy CP-CML at Diagnosis M3M6M12M18 CHR, Minor CyR PCyR CCyR MMR Stable or improving MMR > M18 PFSEFS Time on TKI therapy Leukemic burden Treatment change upon lack or loss of an optimal response, progression or unacceptable side effects Near-normal life expectancy Baccarani et al. JCO 2009; 27: Björkholm et al. JCO 2011: Gambacorti-Passerini et al. JNCI 2011; 103: « Induction » phase « Lifelong maintenance »

DR Evidence that TKIs may not be curative Primitive CD34 + CD38 - BCR-ABL + cells are insensitive to imatinib-, dasatinib-, nilotinib- and bosutinib-induced cell death in vitro 1-4 CD34 + CD38 - BCR-ABL + cells escape from TKI-induced cell death is independent from BCR-ABL in vitro 5 CD34 + CD38 - BCR-ABL + residual cells in optimal responders to imatinib survive independently from BCR- ABL and possess in vivo repopulating capacities in mice 6 1 Graham et al. Blood 2002; 99: Copland et al. Blood 2006; 107: Jorgensen et al. Blood 2007; 109: Konig et al. Blood 2008; 111: Corbin et al. JCI 2011; 121: Hamilton et al. Blood 2012; 119:

DR Median BCR-ABL (IS) transcript levels over 84 months in the IRIS trial Hughes et al. Blood 2010; 116: % 0.004%

DR STIM: Stopping imatinib is feasible Mahon et al. Blood (ASH) 2011; 118: Abstract 603 Survival without molecular relapse Months since discontinuation of imatinib Median follow-up: 34 months (9-50) Molecular relapses: n=61 Survival without molecular relapse: 39% (95% CI: 29-48) at 24 and 36 months Undetectable BCR-ABL: at least copies of the ABL control gene Molecular relapse: defined by 2 positive RQ-PCR results over 1 month showing a significant rise in BCR-ABL transcripts; triggers imatinib resumption. CP-CML Imatinib ≥ 3 years Undetectable BCR-ABL ≥ 2 years

DR Factors potentially associated with outcome StudyFactors French prospective STIM study 1 Sokal risk group Imatinib treatment duration Australian prospective CML8 study 2 Sokal risk group IFN treatment duration prior to imatinib therapy Japanese survey 3 Imatinib treatment duration Duration of undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts Imatinib dose intensity Prior exposure to IFN Korean retrospective study 4 Sokal risk group Time to undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts Imatinib treatment duration 1 Mahon et al. Blood (ASH) 2011; 118: Abstract Ross et al. Haematologica 2012; abstract Takahashi et al. Haematologica 2012; 97: Yhim et al. Leukemia Research 2012; 36:

DR Rationale for 2G-TKI discontinuation Dasatinib and nilotinib display increased potency in vitro against BCR-ABL compared with imatinib 1 Dasatinib and nilotinib are efficient salvage therapies in patients with intolerance or resistance to imatinib 2,3 Frontline dasatinib and nilotinib induce higher rates of deep molecular responses than imatinib 4,5 Case reports on dasatinib cessation in 4 patients with imatinib-resistant CML with very low or undetectable BCR- ABL transcripts 6,7 4 Saglio et al. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: Kantarjian et al. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: Rea et al. Leukemia 2009; 23: Ross et al. Haematologica 2011; 96: O’Hare et al. Cancer Res 2005; 65: Shah et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26; Kantarjian et al. Blood 2007; 110:

DR STOP 2G-TKI: study design Primary endpoint: survival without loss of MMR Molecular relapse: loss of MMR Loss of MMR triggered treatment resumption M12M60D1 STOP 2G-TKI Undetectable BCR-ABL* ≥ 24 months *Molecular monitoring performed in local laboratories filling international standardization requirements. * copies of ABL at least. RQ-PCR monthly RQ-PCR Every 3-6 months CP-CML TKI therapy ≥ 3 years 2G-TKI frontline or after imatinib intolerance or resistance Year 1Year 2Year 3-5 RQ-PCR Every 2-3 months M24M36M48

DR Baseline characteristics Data, as of November 30, 2012 Patients with a min. follow-up of 6 months (median 17: 7-38), n=39 Median age58 years (34-81) GenderMale n= 15 (38.5%), Female n=24 (61.5%) CML phase at diagnosis Sokal risk group Low / Intermediate / High / Unknown CP 100% 21 (54%) / 9 (23%) / 6 (15%) / 3 (8%) Prior IFN (+/- AraC)12 (33%) Prior TKI Dasatinib or nilotinib only Imatinib + dasatinib or nilotinib Imatinib + dasatinib and nilotinib 2 (5%) 31 (79%) 6 (16%) Reason for 2G-TKI Upfront Intolerance to imatinib Suboptimal response/resistance to imatinib* 2 (5%) 27 (69%) 10 (26%) TKI discontinuation Dasatinib / nilotinib20 (51%) / 19 (49%) Median time since diagnosis Median time since first TKI Median time since 2G-TKI Median duration of undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts 84 months (31-218) 78 months (30-133) 37 months (19-72) 27 months (19-58) *ELN 2006 definition Rea et al. Blood (ASH) 2012; 120: Abstract 916

DR Survival without MMR loss Median follow-up was 17 months (7-38) –16/39 patients lost MMR –Median time to MMR loss was 3 months (1-25) STOP 2G-TKI Survival without MMR loss % Months since 2G-TKI discontinuation Month 12: 61.1% (95% CI: ) KM analysis Rea et al. Blood (ASH) 2012; 120: Abstract 916

DR Outcome after MMR loss Median BCR-ABL transcript level at MMR loss: –0.35% IS ( ) TKI therapy resumption in 15/16 patients –Median time between MMR loss and therapy resumption: 1 month (0-4) –Same 2G-TKI used prior to discontinuation in all patients but 1 No loss of CHR or progression to AP/BP With a median follow-up of 7 (1-35) months after therapy resumption: –MMR regained in14 patients, median time to MMR 2 (1-6) months –Undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts in 14 patients after a median time of 4 months (3-10) STOP 2G-TKI Rea et al. Blood (ASH) 2012; 120: Abstract 916

DR Responsiveness to 2G-TKI upon therapy resumption: patient case Months since dasatinib-induced undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts BCR-ABL/ABL % IS Detectable BCR-ABL Undetectable BCR-ABL with at least copies of ABL DASATINIB RESUMPTION STOP 2G-TKI Dr D Rea, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris STOP DASATINIB MMR MR4.5

DR Factors associated with outcome Factors Estimated survival without MMR loss at 12 months (%, 95% CI) p value Age: ≤ 58 years vs > % ( ) vs 52.6 % ( )0.219 Gender: Female vs male61.3 % ( ) vs 66.7 % ( )0.901 Sokal risk group: Low vs others66.7 % ( ) vs 52.1 % ( )0.31 Prior IFN exposure: no vs yes56.8 % ( ) vs 69.2 % ( )0.581 Reason for 2G-TKI: Frontline/imatinib intolerance Suboptimal response/resistance to imatinib 68.2 % ( ) 40 % ( ) Type of 2G-TKI: Dasatinib vs nilotinib60 % ( ) vs 62.7 % ( )0.599 Time since diagnosis: ≤ 84 months vs > 84 months63.6 % ( ) vs 57.9 % ( )0.599 Time since first TKI: ≤ 78 months vs > 78 months63.6 % ( ) vs 57.9 % ( ) G-TKI duration: ≤ 37 months vs > 37 months62.2 % ( ) vs 66.7 % ( )0.949 UMRD duration: ≤ 27 months vs > 27 months70 % ( ) vs 52.1 % (-74.8)0.310 STOP 2G-TKI KM analysis, two-tailed logrank test Rea et al. Blood (ASH) 2012; 120: Abstract 916

DR BCR-ABL transcripts in patients remaining in MMR Patients in MMR without therapy (median follow-up 17 months: 7-37) n=23 Always undetectable7/23 (30.4%) Occasionally detectable on 1 test8/23 (34.8%) Occasionally detectable on ≥ 2 consecutive tests8/23 (34.8%) STOP 2G-TKI

DR Different outcomes of persistent LSC Self renewal Survival TKI + BCR-ABL+ LSC Mat Pre Pro CML disease relapse STOP TKI STOP TKI Mat Pre Pro Ph+ LSC- driven hematopoiesis Inhibited Ph+ LSC- driven hematopoiesis No CML disease relapse Deep and sustained Molecular response Why ? CML-related factors? Therapy-related factors? Host-related factors?

DR

DR Conclusions Discontinuation of 2G-TKI in patients with deep and sustained molecular responses is possible without jeopardizing short-term outcome, under strict monitoring conditions. TKI discontinuation may not be a realistic goal for all patients but the increasing use of 2G-TKI may broaden access to treatment discontinuation attempts. Patients who successfully stop TKI may not be definitively cured, likely because of LSC persistence. Unknown long-term risk of relapse, acquired resistance and progression to AP/BP after TKI discontinuation. Targeting residual LSC with specific compounds may offer a chance for a definitive cure.