Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Ib Ia Teachers lead in their classroom. Take responsibility for all students’ learning Communicate vision to students Use data to organize, plan, and set.
Ia Teachers lead in their classrooms. Teachers demonstrate leadership by taking responsibility for the progress of all students to ensure that they graduate.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
School Social Workers Evaluation Process Training
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Overview Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
NC Educator Evaluation System Training for New Administrators Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
NCDPI Observation Calibration Training Pilot: Introduction & Demo November 2014.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
NC Educator Evaluation System Inter-rater Reliability Carteret County Schools Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s strengths and weaknesses  Provide for growth and improvement  Assist staff member in becoming more effective  Lead to better educational services

Personnel Evaluation Process  The HPEC Personnel Evaluation Process is based on the Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL) teacher evaluation system.  The process is largely online and can be found at the following website: =OA =OA001287

8 Major Steps in Process  Training and Orientation  Teacher Self-Assessment  Fall Visits and Professional Development Plans  Formal Observations  Teacher Evaluation Rubrics  Spring Visits and Review of Professional Development Plans  Teacher Evaluation Summary

Examples Standard 1 Teachers Demonstrate Leadership  In the classroom  In the school  Lead in the teaching profession  Advocate for schools and students  Demonstrate high ethical standards Standard 2 Teachers Establish a Respectful Environment for a Diverse Population  Provide a positive and nurturing environment  Embrace diversity  Treat students as individuals  Adapt your teaching  Work collaboratively with families and others

Examples Standard 3 Teachers Know The Content They Teach  Align instruction with state standards  Know the content appropriate to your area  Recognize the interconnectedness of content areas  Make instruction relevant to students Standard 4 Teachers Facilitate Learning For Their Students  Know your students and how they learn best and differentiate accordingly  Plan appropriate instruction for your students  Use a variety of instructional methods  Utilize technology  Help students develop critical thinking skills  Help students work in teams  Communicate effectively  Use a variety of methods to assess what students have learned

Fall Visits and Professional Development Plans HPEC Administrators will visit with each professional staff member each fall to review the Teacher Evaluation Rubric Self Assessment and collaboratively complete the Professional Development Plan using the standards and indicators from the Teacher Evaluation Rubric.

Professional Development Plans  Located on the McRel Website  Select 2-3 standards and elements to be addressed  Identify a goal, a list of activities, expected outcomes, resources needed and a timeline for each standard/element  Visit mid-year with HPEC administrator about goal progress  Save Progress allows you to return at a later date to complete  Add artifacts by uploading items to the library on main page  Teacher and administrator sign off on each action electronically

Formal Observations Beginning Teachers (years 1 and 2)  Formal Observations will be conducted by November 1 st and by February 15 th  HPEC administrator will take the lead with local building principal’s support  Observe staff actively performing duties (teaching, evaluating, participating in staffings, providing inservices etc.) Teachers in years 3 and 4 and those on a 3-year rotation cycle (years 7, 10, 13, etc)  Formal Observations will be conducted by February 15 th  HPEC administrator will take the lead with local building principal’s support  Observe staff actively performing duties (teaching, evaluating, participating in staffings, providing inservices etc.)

Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Spring Visits and Review of Professional Development Plans HPEC Administrators will visit with each professional staff member each spring to review the Professional Development Plan using the standards and indicators from the Teacher Evaluation Rubric. At this time, professional staff will share any artifacts they have included throughout the year to demonstrate accomplishment of items on their Professional Development Plans.

Teacher Evaluation Summary  HPEC administrator will conference with the teacher  Discuss self-assessment, the teacher’s most recent Professional Development Plan, the components of McRel’s Teacher Evaluation System during the year, the classroom observation and artifacts submitted during the evaluation  HPEC administrator will complete the Teacher Summary Form and share with the teacher

Roles in the Evaluation Process Staff Member  Be an active participant in the conference.  Gather data, artifacts, and/or evidence to support performance  Develop and implement strategies to improve personal performance/attain goals  Meet with HPEC admin to review all process by due dates Administrator  Supervise the process and ensure that all steps are conducted according to McREL’s Teacher Evaluation System both in terms of quality and appropriate time frames  Identify the teacher’s strengths and areas for improvement and make recommendations for improving performance.  Collaboratively work with building administrators