Fatigue of Offshore Structures: Applications and Research Issues Steve Winterstein

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 -Classification: Internal Uncertainty in petroleum reservoirs.

Advertisements

The Simple Linear Regression Model Specification and Estimation Hill et al Chs 3 and 4.

Igor Rychlik and Mao Wengang (Anastassia, Anders, Cedric, Gauthe, Jonas, Krys, Pierre, Sofia, Richard) University of Gothenburg Chalmers Institute of Technology.

1 1 Symposium Bjørn Gjevik 70 år Harald E. Krogstad, Department of Mathematical Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim and work in progress with Karsten Trulsen, Department.

BY S.Nallayarasu, S.Goswami, J.S.Manral, R.M.Kotresh

The role of resonant wave interactions in the evolution of extreme wave events R. Gibson and C. Swan Imperial College London.

1 – Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures Gao & Moan – Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures Frequency-domain.

1 Lecture 8 Regression: Relationships between continuous variables Slides available from Statistics & SPSS page of Social.

Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.

Nazarenko, Warwick Dec Wave turbulence beyond spectra Sergey Nazarenko, Warwick, UK Collaborators: L. Biven, Y. Choi, Y. Lvov, A.C. Newell, M. Onorato,

Fatigue damage estimation along vessel ’ s voyages Chalmers University of Technology Wengang Mao Igor Rychlik.

Workshop A12-1 Fatigue: Stress-Life.

Workshop A12 Fatigue.

Juan Carlos Ortiz Royero Ph.D.

Forecasting Ocean Waves Problem: Given observed or expected weather, what will be the sea state? Ships are sunk not by winds, but by waves!

RBI Intro & some activities at DNV

Chain out of plane bending fatigue

On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.

Fatigue in Concrete Structures Raquib Ahsan, Ph.D. Professor Department of Civil Engineering BUET.

ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.

Alignment and Beam Stability

Michel Olagnon RAINFLOW COUNTS and composite signals.

Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.

Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)

Two computations concerning fatigue damage and the Power Spectral Density Frank Sherratt.

Freak Waves: A Suggested Definition and Possible Consequences for Marine Structures 1. What is the target safety level of offshore structures? 2. Are rogue.

Earthquakes (Chapter 13). Lecture Outline What is an earthquake? Seismic waves Epicenter location Earthquake magnitude Tectonic setting Hazards.

1 Virginia Tech Vortex-Induced Vibrations Project A. H. Nayfeh, M.R. Hajj, and S. A. Ragab Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic.

Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications for Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Analysis Zhikun Hou Worcester Polytechnic Institute and Mohammad.

Chapter 7 Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading

Statistical Post-Processing of General Time Series Data - With Wind Turbine Applications LeRoy Fitzwater, Lance Manuel, Steven Winterstein.

Institute for Steel Construction – Leibniz University of Hannover 2. PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe October 4th and 5th 2006 at Risø National Laboratory,

Fatigue life estimation from bi-modal and tri-modal PSDs Frank Sherratt.

Classification: Internal Status: Draft Predicting characteristic loads for jackets and jack-ups Shallow water location – quasi-static approach Problem.

Stochastic Analysis of Nonlinear Wave Effects

Semi-active Management of Structures Subjected to High Frequency Ground Excitation C.M. Ewing, R.P. Dhakal, J.G. Chase and J.B. Mander 19 th ACMSM, Christchurch,

Answer the following questions based on the following figure.

Why Model? Make predictions or forecasts where we don’t have data.

Turbulent properties: - vary chaotically in time around a mean value - exhibit a wide, continuous range of scale variations - cascade energy from large.

Chalmers University of Technology Department of Mathematical Sciences Göteborg, Sweden Effect of whipping on ship fatigue- Gaussian VS non-Gaussian modelling.

FRACTURE MECHANICS AND FATIGUE DESIGN HANS MF PANJAITAN Marinteknisk Senter Otto Nielsens Veg Trondheim Norway Mobile:

Uncertainty on Fatigue Damage Accumulation for Composite Materials Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard Sørensen,

ﴀﴀﴀ OGP Workshop on Lifetime extension – Pau – June 11 & 12, 2007 Wave data for fatigue analysis; Multi-modal wave & response spectra Valérie QUINIOU-RAMUS,

MARINTEK 1 Statistical Properties of Wave Kinematics and Related Forces Carl Trygve Stansberg MARINTEK/CeSOS, Trondheim, Norway CeSOS Workshop on Research.

Zakoua Guédé & Michel Olagnon RAINFLOW COUNTS First results.

Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines

FAST SPECTRAL RAINFLOW FATIGUE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT UNDER WIDEBAND MULTIPEAK LOADING Michel OLAGNON & Zakoua GUÉDÉ IFREMER, Brest (France) Fatigue Workshop.

1) What is the variability in eddy currents and the resulting impact on global climate and weather? Resolving meso-scale and sub- meso-scale ocean dynamics.

Fatigue under Bimodal Loads

Teaching Modules for Steel Instruction

Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.

What can we learn about dynamic triggering in the the lab? Lockner and Beeler, 1999.

Goes with Activity: Measuring Ocean Waves

HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.

Special Lecture Stand Structural Diversity

Michel Olagnon RAINFLOW COUNTS and composite signals.

Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping

RAINFLOW COUNTS and composite signals Michel Olagnon.

Structural validation of off-highway vehicles using service data Colin J Dodds Dodds and Associates 20th May 20151Dodds and Associates Website:

(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.

Rainflow, zero-crossing, bandwidth, etc.

Structural design and dynamic analysis of a tension leg platform wind turbine, considering elasticity in the hull NTNU supervisor: Erin Bachynski TUD.

Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation

Random Heading Angle in Reliability Analyses

Application of Aeolus Winds

Safety of maritime operations - loads and responses.

Numerical Simulation of East China Sea Tsunami by Boussinesq Equation

Homework 2 Let us simulate the savings experiment of Kojima et al. (2004) assuming that the learner models the hidden state of the world with a 3x1 vector.

Wind Turbine Broadband + Deterministic Fatigue

Shipping Support Post Analysis

Presentation transcript:

Fatigue of Offshore Structures: Applications and Research Issues Steve Winterstein

Fatigue Under Random Loads Mean Damage Rate: where S = stress range; c and m material properties Welded steels: m = 2 - 4; Composites: m =

Fatigue Under Random Loads Mean Damage Rate: where S = stress range; c and m material properties Welded steels: m = 2 - 4; Composites: m =

Fatigue Under Random Loads Mean Damage Rate: where S = stress range; c and m material properties Welded steels: m = 2 - 4; Composites: m = Assumes: Stresses Gaussian, narrow-band

Fatigue Under Random Loads Mean Damage Rate: where S = stress range; c and m material properties Welded steels: m = 2 - 4; Composites: m = Assumes: Stresses Gaussian, narrow-band Common errors: Assume Gaussian, narrow-band

Bandwidth & Non-Gaussian Effects Damage Rate: E[D T ] = C BW * C NG * E[D T | Rayleigh] C BW, C NG = corrections for bandwidth, non-Gaussian effects

Bandwidth & Non-Gaussian Effects Damage Rate: E[D T ] = C BW * C NG * E[D T | Rayleigh] C BW, C NG = corrections for bandwidth, non-Gaussian effects Bandwidth Corrections: Unimodal spectra: Wirsching (1980s) Bimodal spectra: Jiao and Moan (1990s) Arbitrary spectra: Simulation (2000s: becoming cheaper)

Bandwidth & Non-Gaussian Effects Damage Rate: E[D T ] = C BW * C NG * E[D T | Rayleigh] C BW, C NG = corrections for bandwidth, non-Gaussian effects Bandwidth Corrections: Unimodal spectra: Wirsching (1980s) Bimodal spectra: Jiao and Moan (1990s) Arbitrary spectra: Simulation (2000s: becoming cheaper) Typically: C BW < 1

Bandwidth & Non-Gaussian Effects Damage Rate: E[D T ] = C BW * C NG * E[D T | Rayleigh] C BW, C NG = corrections for bandwidth, non-Gaussian effects Bandwidth Corrections: Unimodal spectra: Wirsching (1980s) Bimodal spectra: Jiao and Moan (1990s) Arbitrary spectra: Simulation (2000s: becoming cheaper) Typically: C BW < 1 Non-Gaussian Corrections: Nonlinear transfer functions from hydrodynamics Moment-based models (Hermite) & simulation or closed-form estimates of C NG

Bandwidth & Non-Gaussian Effects Damage Rate: E[D T ] = C BW * C NG * E[D T | Rayleigh] C BW, C NG = corrections for bandwidth, non-Gaussian effects Bandwidth Corrections: Unimodal spectra: Wirsching (1980s) Bimodal spectra: Jiao and Moan (1990s) Arbitrary spectra: Simulation (2000s: becoming cheaper) Typically: C BW < 1 Non-Gaussian Corrections: Nonlinear transfer functions from hydrodynamics Moment-based models (Hermite) & simulation or closed-form estimates of C NG Typically: C NG > 1

Can We Even Predict RMS stresses? Container Ships: Yes (Without Springing)

Can We Even Predict RMS stresses? Container Ships: Yes (Without Springing) TLP Tendons: Yes (With Springing)

Can We Even Predict RMS stresses? Container Ships: Yes (Without Springing) TLP Tendons: Yes (With Springing) VIV of Risers: No

Can We Even Predict RMS stresses? Container Ships: Yes (Without Springing) TLP Tendons: Yes (With Springing) VIV of Risers: No FPSOs: ??

Ship Fatigue: Theory vs Data Observed Damage (horizontal scale): predicted from measured strains by inferring stresses, fatigue damage. Predicted Damage (vertical scale): linear model based on observed H S Ref: W. Mao et al, “The Effect of Whipping/Springing on Fatigue Damage and Extreme Response of Ship Structures,” Paper 20124, OMAE 2010, Shanghai.

TLP Tendon Fatigue: 1 st -order vs Combined Loads Water Depth: 300m One of earliest TLPs (installed 1992) Ref: “Volterra Models of Ocean Structures: Extremes and Fatigue Reliability,” J.Eng.Mech.,1994

TLP Tendon Fatigue: 1 st -order vs Combined Loads Damage contribution of various Tp Large damage at Tp = 7s due to frequency of seastates Large damage at Tp = 12s due to geometry of platform Larger non-Gauss effects if T PITCH = 3.5s (resonance when Tp = 7s) Ref: “Volterra Models of Ocean Structures: Extremes and Fatigue Reliability,” J.Eng.Mech.,1994

VIV: Theory (Shear7) vs Data Ref: M. Tognarelli et al, “Reliability-Based Factors of Safety for VIV Fatigue Using Field Measurements,” Paper 21001, OMAE 2010, Shanghai.

VIV Factor: m=3.3, s=1.4 Median:  50 =27

LRFD Fatigue Design

Finally: Combined Damage on an FPSO High-cycle (low amplitude) loads due to waves… D FAST Low-cycle (high amplitude) loads due to other source (e.g., FPSO loading/unloading) --> D SLOW How to combine D FAST and D SLOW ?

SRSS: Largest safe region; least conservative

Proposed Combination “Rules” D TOT = [ D SLOW K + D FAST K ] 1/K K = 1/m Lotsberg (2005): Effectively adds stress amplitudes K= 2/m: Random vibration approach; adds variances K = 1: “Linear” damage accumulation K = 2: SRSS applied to damage (not rms levels) Notes: Less conservative rule as K increases; m = S-N slope: Damage = c S m ; D 1/m = c’ S

Combined Fatigue: DNV Approach

Merci beaucoup! Extra background slides follow…

The Snorre Tension-Leg Platform Water depth: 300m One of earliest TLPs (installed 1992)

How important are T N =2.5s cycles? Important when T WAVE = 2.5s … but this condition has small wave heights Important when T WAVE = 5.0s … due to second-order nonlinearity (springing) Non-Gaussian effects when T WAVE = 5.0s:

Answer: The Fatiguing Bookkeeping Likelihood of various (Hs,Tp)

Answer: The Fatiguing Bookkeeping Likelihood of various (Hs,Tp) Damage contribution of various (Hs,Tp)

Answer: The Fatiguing Bookkeeping Likelihood of various (Hs,Tp) Damage contribution of various Tp

Results: Damage contribution of various Tp Large damage at Tp = 7s due to frequency of seastates Large damage at Tp = 12s due to geometry of platform Larger non-Gauss effects if T PITCH = 3.5s (resonance when Tp = 7s)