Lessons learned - Interim reporting - EU-com:s evaluation of the Swedish PoM Ann-Karin Thorén.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Advertisements

Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 2: Water Framework Directive.
1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS- SANITATION INPUTS ON NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 29 MAY 2012 By Mandisa Mangqalaza.
Ingo Heinz University of Dortmund, Germany Nature and Economy: An Application to the Rural Countryside Wageningen, 31 May – 2 June 2007 Workshop The EU.
National IWRM plans; links with Water Supply and Sanitation Palle Lindgaard Jørgensen Technical Secretariat Yerevan, 13 December 2006.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
IWRM in EECCA countries Palle Lindgaard Jørgensen Technical Secretariat Helsinki, May 2007.
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 3: The Local Authority - What’s happening? Castle Lake,
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials Conference on Initiatives related to the EIP on Raw Materials, 19 April 2013 Work Package 3 Improving.
This project is funded by the European Union ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATION FOR THE BLACK SEA GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA and UKRAINE Euroconsult This project.
Water Framework Directive Programme of Measures River Basin Management Plans Milan Matuška Ministry of the Environment Slovak Republic Water Protection.
Report on the current legal structure and resources available to the environmental protection agencies and inspectorates in Croatia 1st BERCEN Exchange.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
Why can voluntary agreements between water companies, farmers and authorities help to implement the European WFD and CAP reforms? Ingo Heinz University.
TWReferenceNet Management and Sustainable Development of Protected Transitional Waters in Bulgaria Liliana Maslarova, PhD Nomos + Physis.
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
CSC 6 February 2008 The Don Catchment as an Opportunity Facilitating Answers to ICM Dr. Jonathan Hillman.
Joint European Commission – IMPEL Seminar on Environmental Inspections Wednesday 17 November 2010 Hotel Le Meredien, Brussels 1.
Information and transboundary cooperation – challenges and responses Francesca Bernardini United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
1 EU Water legislation PEIP National Workshop – Montenegro Budva, May 2008 Dagmar Kaljarikova Policy Officer for Turkey, Montenegro, NGOs and REC.
Measures to address agricultural pressures Ministry for the Environment and Ministry of Agriculture Spain.
Integrated Water Management Valentina Pryazhinskaya Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Problems and Challenges: Conflicting interests.
Issues on China Water Law and Water Resources Management LIU Heng Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
Date/event: Water accounts and economics workshop, 7-8/10/2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Cost recovery study for the Seine Normandie RBMP.
Water.europa.eu 3) a. Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Water Directors’ meeting Budapest, 26 & 27 May 2011 Nicolas ROUYER European Commission.
1 Administrative structure of water management, implementation of EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and River Basin Management Approach in France Arnaud.
French financing system for water management : 6 Water Agencies, from taxes to subsidies.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
Regulating Nitrate Pollution – European Approaches Helle Tegner Anker Faculty of Life Sciences Copenhagen University.
Peter Wihlborg Director PoM Workgroup Swedish Programme of Measures 2015 Interaction for new Policy Instrument Measures.
Strategies to manage human activity in deserts 11.
Framework for Water Management – challenges at national/local and trans-boundary scale Water Framework Directive implementation Gordana Kozhuharova, REC,
Under 4.7 Habitat of the MTDS, Working Group 2 deals with:
From data collection to reporting - experiences and boundary conditions for an aggregating reporting system Michael Nagy Umweltbundesamt Wien Experience.
Environmental policies in Europe
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016
The role of IMPEL in promoting the implementation and enforcement of European environmental law Giuseppe Sgorbati & Michael Nicholson IMPEL
Review of guidance number 16, SE Groundwater in drinking water protected areas Lessons learnt from the 1st RBMP period Lotta Lewin Pihlblad & Jenny McCarthy.
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
The EU WATER POLICY.
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Thomas Dworak Ecologic Institute
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Assessment of the Implementation of the Programmes of Measures
Meeting of the Water Directors - Athens, 17/18 June 2003
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
8-c) Expert Group & River Basin Network on WFD & Agriculture
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES IN PRACTICE
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG ENV + AGRI Taskforce on water agriculture nexus
Point 6 - CAP reform elements for discussion
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
AAdopted Rural Development Programmes – implications for second RBMPs
Toitototototoot Strengthening consistency, coordination & cooperation between nature, biodiversity, water & marine policy Some feedback from France.
Presentation transcript:

Lessons learned - Interim reporting - EU-com:s evaluation of the Swedish PoM Ann-Karin Thorén

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library 2 Swedish PoM /38 measures concerning public authorities and municipalities Environmental Proetction Agency, Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (nr 2-8) Swedish Geological Survey (nr 9-12) Swedish Transport Administration (nr 13, 27) Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning (nr 14) Swedish Board of Agriculture (nr 15-17) Kammarkollegiet (nr 18 Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap (nr 19) Riksantikvarieämbetet (nr 20) Skogsstyrelsen (nr 21) Statens Livsmedelsverk (nr 22) Statistiska Centralbyrån (nr 23) Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (nr 24-26) County administrative boards (21) (nr 28-31) Municipalities (290) (nr 32-37)  New rules and instructions  Planning, strategies, priorities  Investigations  New permits and licenses  Improve monitoring  Consulting/advise

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” EU-commission examine Swedish PoM:s The general scope of the application of measures is divided between a national scale (agencies etc), on RBD level and on water body level. The main authorities responsible for the implementation are authorities at the national level, and a big role is played by regions and the municipalities. It should be noted, that a large number of institutions are involved, making the administrative set-up difficult to overview and to some extend not transparent Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library3

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Interim reporting of Basic measures 11.3.a (Urban Waste Water, Nitrate directive, Seveso, Habitat etc) 11.3 b-l (Efficient water use, Controls on abstractions and impoundments, Controls on point sources discharges) Not always agreed upon how to implement these regulations among the responisble authorities Not always clear for the responisble authorities that these measures are supposed to be included in WFD PoM:s Not clear in PoM:s which WB:s are ”suffering” from pressures these directive are aiming at Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library4

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” How to handle in PoM ? Swedish PoM:s will still concern public authorities and municipalities National council of measures for WFD (aiming at streamlining with MSFD, BSAP etc) Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library5

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” EU-commission examine Swedish PoM:s Sweden needs to improve its programme of measures to be more explicit on the specific measures that are being planned, to enable a transparent planning tool showing how the environmental objectives can be met in a coordinated manner across the RBDs. Meaningful information regarding the scope, the timing and the funding of the measures should be included in the programme of measures so the approach to achieve the objectives is clear Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library6

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” EU-commission examine Swedish PoM:s There is no clear link between status assessment and the need for pressure reduction (nutrients, chemical pollutants and hydromorphology) and measures. Many of the measures are "administrative" (new investigations, monitoring etc) Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library7

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” How to handle in PoM ? Swedish PoM:s will still be mainly administrative and based upon law enforcement Clearify linkages status assesment/pressure reduction/measure/instrument Communication between responsible authorities aiming at agreements upon efficient implementation Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library8

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library9 Status/ Impact PressureMeasure BM = Basic measure SM = Supplementary measure Instrument, Responsibility Finance description Poor ecological status/nutrient enrichment Point-UWWT_15000Technical improvements, BM Legal, New permit Regulatory authority Operator/Polluter/User fees Poor ecological status/nutrient enrichment 2.2 Diffuse - AgricultureReduction of fertilizer usage, BM Legal, Cross compliance, regulatory authority Operator/Polluter Poor chemical status/contami natio by priority substances 2.2 Diffuse - AgricultureReduction of pesticide usage, BM Legal, cross compliance, regulatory authority Poor status/Altered habitats 3.1 Abstraction - Agriculture Water metering and fees, SM? Financial, regulatory authority Poor status/Altered habitats 4.2 FlowMorph - Hydroelectrical dam Installation of fishladder, BM? Poor status/Altered habitats 4.3 FlowMorph – Water supply reservoir

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Technical measures Basic 11.3 a Basic 11.3 b-l Supplementa ry Reduction/modification of fertiliser application xx Nitrate Reduction/modification of pesticide application Plant protection Change to low-input farming (e.g. organic farming practices) ? Rural Development Funds Hydromorphological measures leading to changes in farming practices x xxx Measures against soil erosion xxx x ? Multi-objective measures (e.g. crop rotation, creation of enhanced buffer zones/wetlands or floodplain management) xx x NitrateWFD7 Economic instruments Compensation for land cover ?? Co-operative agreements Water pricing specifications for irrigators Nutrient trading Fertiliser taxation Non-technical measures Additions regarding the implementation and enforcement of existing EU legislation Institutional changes Codes of agricultural practice x xxx Farm advice and training xxxxx Measures to increase knowledge for improved decision-making xxx Certification schemes Zoning (e.g. designating land use based on GIS maps) Land use planning Technical standards Specific projects related to agriculture Environmental permitting and licensing 10

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library11

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Easier to identify supplementary measures The environmental code Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library12

To change/update/remove ”Presentation title” and ”Name” in the footer, go to ”Insert – Header & Footer” Additional measures in protected areas The RBMP does not clearly identify the protected areas, which will not reach the more stringent objectives according to other directives.. On the other hand, it is stated in the RBMPs, that the PoM should also cover the needs for improvement in protected areas – indicating that the measures to be taken should also ensure the fulfilment of the more stringent objectives related to other directives. In SE 5 it is stated that the favourable conservation status for NATURA 2000 areas have not been used as a more stringent objective in the RBMP’s, as the status assessment regarding NATURA 2000 areas has not yet been quality assured. It is mentioned, that the line between good and poor ecological status according to the RBMP usually is a good indicator for a favourable conservation status too. Regarding the protection of drinking water, a number of administrative measures to support the basic measures are mentioned in the RBMP’s, but not defined as supplementary or additional. Examples are collection and storage of information, monitoring, planning, statistics etc Nordic/Irish workshop on measure library13