Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
Advertisements

15th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Copper Mountain, Colorado Low Energy Interplanetary Transfers Using the Halo Orbit Hopping Method with STK/Astrogator.
Space Engineering I – Part I
Russian Vehicle Automated Rendezvous and Docking C. Scott Merkle NASA Johnson Space Center Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division 5/22-23/2002, AR&C.
AGC and Manual Control of the Saturn V Booster Infoage Science/History Learning Center AGC and Manual Control of the Saturn V Booster Frank O’Brien Infoage.
ATMOSPHERIC REENTRY TRAJECTORY MODELING AND SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE MISSION (Progress Seminar Presentation - 2) K. Sivan (Roll.
Pre-Solo Training Program
1 Winter Launch Block Modeling and Results MMS Flight Dynamics Team MIWG 8 Feb. 20, 2014.
Development of Guidance and Control System for Parafoil-Payload System VVR Subbarao, Sc ‘C’ Flight Mechanics & Control Engineering ADE.
07/07/2005 Coupling with PF2012: No existing PF “as is” able to accommodate Karin On going study in France to develop a new generation of PF product line.
Rocket Trajectories By Jan-Erik Rønningen Norwegian Rocket Technology [ [ ]
Chapter 7 Rotational Motion and The Law of Gravity.
Attitude Determination and Control
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
Chapter 6: Maneuvering in Space By: Antonio Batiste.
Chandelles.
INSTITUTO DE SISTEMAS E ROBÓTICA 1/31 Optimal Trajectory Planning of Formation Flying Spacecraft Dan Dumitriu Formation Estimation Methodologies for Distributed.
Hypersonic Reentry Dynamics Faculty Advisors Professor Mease (UC Irvine) Dr. Helen Boussalis (CSULA) Student Assistants Katie Demko Shing Chi Chan 7/12/2015NASA.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Virulent SophtWear Virul-Glider V1.0 Josh Smallman Mjumbe Poe Zach Clegg.
SNAP Spacecraft Orbit Design Stanford University Matthew Peet.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
AVAT11001: Course Outline Aircraft and Terminology
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Multiple UAV Collision Avoidance with Realistic UAV Models Joel George and Debasish Ghose Guidance, Control, and Decision Systems Laboratory (GCDSL) Department.
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
Orbital Maneuvering System and Reaction Control System
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
Modelling and Open Loop Simulation of Reentry Trajectory for RLV Missions Ashok Joshi and K. Sivan Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute.
Introduction to Control / Performance Flight.
Coming Home. De-orbit burn The craft spins itself 180 degrees so that it is facing backward with respect to its velocity The engine is fired, decelerating.
Orbital Mechanics Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Orbital Mechanics Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
Problem A shuttle is to rendezvous with a space station which is in a circular orbit at an altitude of 250 mi above the surface of the earth. The.
Goddard Space Flight Center High Earth Orbit GPS Flight Experiment AMSAT-OSCAR 40 (AO-40) Frank H. Bauer NASA Goddard Space Flight Center November 1, 2001.
Presented by:- Suman Kumar. INTRODUCTION : Quad-rotor helicopters are emerging as a popular unmanned aerial vehicle configuration because of their simple.
Orbital Operations SP 210. Orbital Operations Orbiting spacecraft follow 2-body (Keplerian) orbits The orbit is centered on the exact center of the Earth.
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
STARDUST 20 Nov 2003CERR - Shyam Bhaskaran1 of 10 STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER Autonomous Nucleus Tracking.
Go For Lunar Conference
1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002
Spinning. What are we trying to achieve: raise awareness of the seriousness of both Stalling and Spinning to investigate the effect of different modes.
Categories of Satellites
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Goppert, 1 James Goppert Week 8: March 8 th, 2007 Aerodynamics: Reentry Optimization Dynamics and Control: Communication.
Non Linear Motion.
Fuzzy Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control CHIN-HSING CHENG SHENG-LI SHU Dept. of Electrical Engineering Feng-Chia University IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
COMP322/S2000/L81 Direct Kinematics- Link Coordinates Questions: How do we assign frames? At the Joints? At the Links? Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) Representation.
CubeSat Re-Entry Experimental System Testbed C.R.E.S.T. STK 11 This software is an orbital simulator that allows the user to examine the flight path of.
Private Pilot Ground School
1 MAAC Precision Aerobatics JUDGES TRAINING PRESENTATION 2016 MAAC Precision Aerobatics JUDGES TRAINING PRESENTATION 2016.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
00:00:00 Standby 3.0L.
Lunar Trajectories.
Kinematics 1D Motion Problem Set.
Forces on an Aircraft Four forces on an aircraft in flight:
Four Forces of Flight Lift Weight Thrust Drag
Rockets AND PROJECTILE MOTION.
Future In-Space Operations (FISO) Telecon Colloquium
Introduction to Astronautics
Development and Principles of Rocketry
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Grab their Attention with Active Learning!
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
3. Motion in 2- & 3-D Vectors Velocity & Acceleration Vectors
Presentation transcript:

Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations

Rendezvous & Proximity Operations A rotating frame is used for planning and executing a rendezvous operation because of the fixed relative position of the target with respect to the chase spacecraft For the following charts will use the International Space Station as the fixed target, and the Space Shuttle will be used as the chase craft Reference frame is rotating at the ISS orbital period of 91.3 min, 345 km circular orbital altitude

Rendezvous & Proximity Operations Rotating reference frame with target centered showing relative motion of chase vehicle for higher and lower circular orbits Eccentric orbits for chase spacecraft shown in next slide

Orbital Ops

Rendezvous & Proximity Operations A rendezvous sequence begins with the chase craft in a lower catch-up orbit to close the phase angle with the target Repositioning burns bring the spacecraft to a one-orbit closure maneuver carefully planned with an apogee at the target orbit semimajor axis A Terminal Initiation (Ti) burn is made at this point for a final rendezvous exactly one orbit later Final approach brings the chase craft to the target craft just as it reaches the target’s position

Rendezvous & Proximity Operations Small midcourse corrections are made to bring the chase craft to the exact point of rendezvous Two types of rendezvous maneuvers are available V-bar (along velocity vector, the line of flight) R-bar (along the vertical axis pointing to Earth’s center R-bar and V-bar approaches follow relative motion sequences shown in earlier slide

Orbital Ops

Orbital Ops

Orbital Ops

Orbital Ops

Rendezvous Operations Rendezvous and Proximity Operations Program (RPOP) is a recent guidance and navigational piloting-aid software addition RPOP runs on a laptop computer onboard the Space Shuttle Orbiter Provides information to make flying an efficient trajectory easier for the Orbiter crew Provides the crew with situational awareness during the rendezvous and proximity operations phases of flight A 360-degree Orbiter pitch maneuver has been developed to allow ISS-based photography of the Orbiter’s underside and wing leading edge during its approach to the International Space Station This maneuver is called the R-Bar pitch maneuver (RPM) RPM requires the pilot to meet strict relative position and velocity requirements prior to initiation of the pitch maneuver to avoid potential collision with ISS and overabundance of propellant usage

Rendezvous Operations Rendezvous and Proximity Operations Program Several new guidance and navigation capabilities were developed and implemented in RPOP to support the RPM The new guidance capabilities include algorithms to provide the pilot with translational hand controller (THC) recommendations to efficiently acquire the R-Bar, set-up and initiate the RPM, and recover from the RPM and initiate the twice orbital rate R-Bar to V-Bar approach (TORVA) maneuver The Trajectory Control Sensor (TCS) Kalman filter was enhanced to provide better navigation performance during the RPM when the sensor is no longer tracking ISS These new capabilities in RPOP increase the piloting efficiency by reducing trajectory dispersions and propellant usage leading up to and recovering from the RPM

STS-117 RPM

Deorbit and Landing

Hydraulic and flight systems are tested under OPS Mode 3 software Deorbit Deorbit procedures for the Orbiter begin with systems checkout before deorbit burn Hydraulic and flight systems are tested under OPS Mode 3 software Orbiter is commanded to rotate 180o from the direction of flight by the RCS Digital Auto Pilot (DAP) controls

Orbiter's reentry characteristics are based on Deorbit Deorbit Δ V burn is approximately 2.5 min duration and 220 fps in velocity Orbiter is again rotated around the yaw axis 180o along with a 40o pitch up attitude in preparation for atmospheric reentry Orbiter's reentry characteristics are based on Maximum load Temperature limits Dynamical (flight) stability factors

Deorbit Historical reentry parameters

Deorbit Reentry limit boundaries

Deorbit Entry Phase Description Reentry Attitude hold prior to entry.  Phi (roll angle) = 00, alpha (pitch) = 400. Temperature control Drag level commanded to meet thermal constraints.  Phi varies, alpha = 400. Equilibrium glide Transition between temperature control and constant drag phase. Also optimum for high/low energy case.  Phi varies, alpha = 400. Constant drag Drag constant.  Phi varies, alpha = 400 to 370. Transition Transition to TAEM interface.  Phi varies, alpha = 370 to 130.

Deorbit Reentry limit boundaries

Deorbit Reentry limit boundaries