What can be nullified? The federal usurpations that are susceptible to state-led nullification Austin Constitution Meetup August 23, 2010 Led by Jon Roland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4: Federalism.
Advertisements

Unit A: Basics of the Law Objective 01.01
Chapter 4 The Federal System.
FEDERALISM. Federalism  The division of power between the National and State levels of government NATIONAL GOVERNMENT STATE GOVERNMENT STATE CHARTERS.
Constitutional Law Part 2: The Federal Legislative Power Lecture 5: Tenth Amendment Limitations on Commerce Power.
Section 1: Constitution
Chapter 11: Powers of Congress Section 1
Jackson’s Administration Civil Service Reform Civil Service = those branches of public service concerned with all governmental administrative.
Types of Laws GOALS Lesson 1-2
Chapter 6 Section 2: The Powers of Congress
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Business Law Unit 1 Law, Justice, and You
Introduction: The Role of Agencies
The role of government in the United States economy How does the United States government promote and regulate competition?
Chapter 11 – Congressional Powers
Administrative Agencies Chapter 4. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Identify executive-branch agencies. Explain that administrative.
5 Basic principles of the u.s. constitution
Federalism. Federalism How does power flow through our federal system of government? Essential Question How does power flow through our federal system.
1. Popular Sovereignty 2. Limited Government 3. Separation of powers 4. Checks and balances 5. Federalism 6. Judicial Review.
Government Chapter 4. Section 1 Federalism Federalism: system of government in which governmental powers are divided between the national and state governments.
Chapter 4 Federalism. 3 types of governments Different Systems of Government Unitary System –Form of government in which the highest level of government.
Legal Challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act How Will the Outcome of the Supreme Court Case Affect the Internal Revenue Service?
Whistleblowers BOH4M. What is a Whistleblower? A person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities occurring.
Federalism National Government Vs. State Government.
National Govt. State Government Local Government Powers of government are divided between a National, state and local governments. Powers of government.
FEDERALISM. Federalism – a political system where power is shared between state and federal governments. Federalism.
Chapter 3: Federalism. Matching: Federalism Types FEDERALISM, COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM, FISCAL FEDERALISM, DUAL FEDERALISM, NEW FEDERALISM 1. National and.
FEDERALISM Introduction. What is Federalism? Federalism Central feature of the American political system Central feature of the American political system.
FEDERALISM CHAPTER 4. FEDERALISM V. UNITARY SYSTEM Unitary System: all power is held by a strong central authority. -Why was a unitary system out of the.
Federalism Chapter 3. What is Federalism?  A way to organize a nation so that 2 or more levels of government have formal authority over the same land.
Constitutional Law Part 2: The Federal Legislative Power
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND FEDERALISM UNIT 3.
Chapter 4 Federalism. Federalism is a system in which a written constitution divides the powers of government on a territorial basis between a national.
Unit 3, Lesson 4 Shared Powers
  A political system where the powers of government are divided between a national government and regional (state and local) governments  Every level.
Chapter 12 Section 1 The Federal System. I. Constitutional Basis for Federalism  Federalism  The Federal System  The sharing of power between the central.
Unit 1: Law, Justice, and You
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND REGULATORY AGENCIES © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as.
The Federal Government and the State Governments Chapter 3 Section 1.
Federal and State Relations Chapter 4.  The constitution grants 3 types of power to the national gov’t: expressed, implied, and inherent  These 3 powers.
Law, Justice, & You Unit 1.
Chapter 4: Federalism “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States.
Origins of American Federalism Federalism: Constitutional division of power between the national gov’t and state gov’ts. Both get powers from Constitution.
Popular Sovereignty, Judicial Review and Federal vs State Powers Objective: Analyze Popular Sovereignty, Judicial Review and Federal vs State Powers.
Chapter 6.2 The Powers of Congress. Legislative Powers  Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution lists Congress’s specific or expressed powers. Clause.
FEDERALISM: DIVIDING THE POWER Chapter 4 Section 1.
ARTICLE 1 – The Legislative Branch
The powers of national and state governments.  The U.S. Constitution establishes a government based on "federalism”  Federalism: the sharing of power.
LESSON 1.3 Structure of American Government. government-belinda-stutzman
Expressed Powers – written in the Constitution. The Power to Tax Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 – “to lay and collect taxes, duties…” Tax – charge charged.
FEDERALISM THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND THE 50 STATES.
Federalism The Division of Power and the Relation to the 50 States.
Federalism: Chapter 3. The Structure of Federalism Both NATIONAL and REGIONAL governments exist Each must be reasonably INDEPENDENT of each other Decisions.
Evolution of Federalism?. Learning Objectives: What four things have expanded federal power? Define the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Define the Privileges.
Types of Laws Chapter 1-2. Sources of Law What’s Your Verdict? (pg. 10) The federal constitution guarantees the citizens of the U.S. many rights. These.
Ch. 3: ____________ Federalism Erin Brinig Mr. Baier AP Government, Period 2 08 September 2008.
Federalism The Division of Power between Who has the power?
5 Basic principles of the u.s. constitution
The Nullification Crisis
Chapter 3: Federalism.
Unit A: Basics of the Law Objective 01.01
Unit A: Basics of the Law Objective 01.01
National and State Governments SELECTED CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS
Journal #1 Your parents have made decisions about your schooling, friends, or work, name 3 decisions have they made you that you have promised to never.
Journal #1 Your parents have made decisions about your schooling, friends, or work, name 3 decisions have they made you that you have promised to never.
ECO 481: Public Choice Theory
Federalism Goals: Students will define the system of federalism.
Chapter 11: Powers of Congress Section 1
Chapter 1 Test Review.
FEDERALISM.
Presentation transcript:

What can be nullified? The federal usurpations that are susceptible to state-led nullification Austin Constitution Meetup August 23, 2010 Led by Jon Roland

Analytic outline Usurpation Alleged authority for usurpation Impact on people Co-operation at state level required Intervention points available with and without Nullification Commission (NC) Likely scenarios

Some historical examples Alien and Sedition Acts 1798 South Carolina v. Tariff 1832 Fugitive Slave Acts ~ Resistance to Prohibition RealID (current) Medical marijuana (MM) (current)

RealID Act Requires states to issue driver licenses and state ID that conform to federal requirements for centralized identification, without funding Alleged authority is to withhold entry into federal facilities and onto commercial aircraft to those not having the ID Alleged authority to control aircraft based on Commerce, Necessary & Proper, Wickard.

Resistance to RealID Many states refusing to fund compliance, but some are complying Feds hinting at withholding funds to states for other purposes unless they comply, taking advantage of economic distress But lawsuits blocked by lack of standing Act still on books but too many states blocking compliance, so it is in legal limbo

RealID if had NC Citizen could have complained to NC before RealID Act passed. NC would not find Act null if not passed yet, but could conduct hearings, call witnesses. Proponents would have to confront opponents in NC hearing in different way than in stacked committee hearings of Congress. Faced with likely nullification, Act would likely have been withdrawn.

Medical Marijuana (MM) Illegal under federal acts, based on Commerce, Necessary & Proper, Wickard. Some states legalized under their own laws. When feds prosecuted for what state authorized, juries refused to convict. Feds decided to stop prosecuting in those states, but still can. NC would have gotten that result faster.

Health Care Act (HCA) Mandates people get health insurance or pay fine. Some proposed state legislation blocking collection of the fines. But IRS may not file liens or take collection actions for fines, so fines to block. However, IRS can deduct fines first, then charge people for not paying taxes. So is state going to block income tax collection?

Income Tax & the NC Citizen could complain Federal Income Tax on Labor (FITL) unconstitutional. NC could hear issues in ways Congress and the courts refuse to, and find it unconstitutional. IRS files liens with state court clerks, which NC could block. State agencies and contractors withhold taxes, which NC could block.

FITL continued IRS attaches money from bank accounts, but NC could have state bank charters suspended. NC could encourage juries not to convict, but IRS still has civil actions. IRS gets your money, then makes you sue them to get it back, with a jury possible but blocked. Without NC, cannot afford the cost of suit, but NC could authorize paying attorneys for that.

Choosing battles The FITL is not one of the first usurpations the NC should tackle. It could hold hearings, but defer the finding, putting pressure on Congress to replace the FITL. Hearings would provoke public discussion, and lead juries to refuse to convict even without the finding. Without criminal convictions, collections would fade.

Federal education funds Mandates depend on accepting federal funds. State standards higher than federal in areas like civics. NC could find federal funding only valid for militia. Teacher unions could decide whether they want to train warriors and enforcers of the Constitution.

Environmental protection Feds and state differ on standards. Fed EPA based on Commerce, Necessary & Proper, Wickard. NC would make businesses choose between State and EPA, line up their support for State. Most federal enforcement administrative, so juries don't get to decide, except for criminal cases.

Gun control 1 Alleged authority for NFA 1934 was Tax Clause, for GCA 1968 was Commerce, Necessary & Proper, Wickard. Some states have advanced legislation to exclude intrastate firearms from federal regulation, but feds can just ignore that and prosecute in their courts. States could refuse to disable RKBA for convicts, but feds don't recognize that as standard.

Gun control 2 States could license intrastate firearms dealers, not required to be federal dealers, setting up conflict like that for MM. NC could find lack of militia unconstitutional, and all noncriminal citizens law enforcement agents, which would make them all “peace officer” exceptions to federal statutes. NC could encourage juries not to convict.

Money 1 Citizen complaint to NC could bring finding that only gold & silver are legal tender within State. State would then have to tax and spend only in gold and silver, not in Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs). Civilians would then start demanding debts be paid in gold or silver. Feds would become isolated into a FRN zone while the rest of the country abandons FRNs.

Money 2 But taking on entire monetary system at once would backfire. Better to take up complaint from one citizen that Federal Reserve Bank won't redeem a $1 bill for silver, threaten to withhold cooperation on something, until fed relents. Then do it for a $10 bill, etc., with much fanfare, until politicians begin to see where it is going.

Summary Not all federal usurpations are readily susceptible to state-led nullification. The most susceptible are those that require the cooperation of state agents. State-led jury nullification can work for some, but not all federal actions submitted to juries. For some usurpations, the best that can be done is declaratory, throwing the issue to the people of other states and the political process.