The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

How to Develop an Assessment Plan to Measure Effectiveness in Administrative and Academic Support Units Ann Boudinot-Amin Director of Planning and Assessment.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MARCH 18, 2011 PRESENTED BY DR. JUDY C. MINER PRESIDENT, FOOTHILL COLLEGE EMBRACE.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Departmental Assessment Process.  The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
OPENING DAY 2012 THE “ONE MORE” CAMPAIGN. BACKGROUND Goal 1: Increasing student success and academic excellence through student-centered instruction,
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Presenters: Bonnie Ann Dowd, CBO San Diego Community College District Chris Hill, Grossmont College Aimee Myers, Sierra College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida,
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Western Carolina University Office of Assessment A Division of the Office of the Provost.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Standard III Resources Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC At-large.
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Mission and Goals Annual Update Plan
Standard III Resources
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Highline Community College Assessment Training
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’19
Presentation transcript:

The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment Outcomes facilitator

Outline What are AUOs? Why do we need to have AUOs? Sample AUOs Guidelines on developing AUOs and brainstorming worksheet

What are AUOs? Administrative Unit Outcomes are concise statements which describe what a client will experience, receive, or understand as a result of a given service. Clients include ELAC staff, faculty, students, and the general community which ELAC serves. Services refer to non-instructional areas which may directly or indirectly improve student success.

What are AUOs? (cont’d) AUOs may address the following question: “Are clients satisfied with a specific service that my unit provided?” AUOs will ultimately provide data and evidence that positive-client reaction has occurred as a result of receiving your service. Just like SLOs, which are faculty-driven, AUOs are entirely decided by you and your team. – You and your unit will decide: what specific service(s) do we consider to be the most valuable? – How should we assess our clients after we have serviced them? – What does the data tell us: how can we improve positive-reaction among clients, efficiency, or efficacy?

Why do we need to have AUOs? MISSION STATEMENT: East Los Angeles College empowers students to achieve their educational goals, to expand their individual potential, and to successfully pursue their aspirations for a better future for themselves, their community and the world. In order to fulfill this College Mission, the college has developed four goals. These goals serve as the broad planning objectives through which all other college planning documents and departmental plans will be based. Together these goals provide a foundation for building a true agenda of student success. Goal 1: Increasing student success and academic excellence through student-centered instruction, student- centered support services, and dynamic technologies. Goal 2: Increasing equity in successful outcomes by analyzing gaps in student achievement and using this to identify and implement effective models and programming to remedy these gaps. Goal 3: Sustaining community-centered access, participation, and preparation that improves the college's presence in the community, maximizes access to higher education and provides outlets for artistic, civic, cultural, scientific and social expression as well as environmental awareness. Goal 4: Ensuring institutional effectiveness and accountability through data-driven decision-making as well as evaluation and improvement of all college programs and governance structures.

Why AUOs? (cont’d) The Standards “ The institutional mission provides the impetus for achieving student learning and other goals that the institution endeavors to accomplish. The institution provides the means for students to learn, assesses how well learning is occurring, and strives to improve that learning through ongoing, systematic, and integrated planning (Standard I). Instructional programs, student support services, and library and learning support services facilitate the achievement of the institution’s stated student learning outcomes (Standard II). Human, physical, technology, and financial resources enable these programs and services to function and improve (Standard III). Ethical and effective leadership throughout the organization guides the accomplishment of the mission and supports institutional effectiveness and improvement (Standard IV).” “A college-wide dialogue that integrates the elements of the Standards provides the complete view of the institution that is needed to verify integrity and to promote quality and improvement.” Standard III: Resources “The institution effectively uses its human, physical, technology, and financial resources to achieve its broad educational purposes, including stated student learning outcomes, and to improve institutional effectiveness. – Human Resources: includes maintaining a sufficient number of qualified personnel, professional dev. – Physical Resources: includes facilities, equipment, land, and other assets – Technology Resources: learning, teaching, college-wide communication, research, operations – Financial Resources: distribution of resources supports the development, maintenance, and enhancement of programs and services Accreditation Reference Handbook, ACCJC/WASC, July 2011.

Why do we need AUOs? (cont’d) AUOs are directly connected to Planning and Institutional Effectiveness!!! AUO  Assessment  Analysis  Improvement (only 1 cycle is shown) From the data, decisions can be made to allocate resources to improve service, including: new hiring, software upgrades, process optimization, and technological/equipment purchases. AUOs can aid you and your unit to run more efficiently and effectively.

Sample AUOs (Chaffey and Mt. SAC) College Information Services: The CIS department will provide education and training for our employees. Library & Learning Resources Division Office: Improve communication between the Division office and departments within Division. Mailroom: The Mail Services unit will provide timely and accurate mail services campus-wide. Reprographics: Faculty will experience improved access to Printing Services by making it easy to submit print jobs via the web

Guidelines for developing AUOs 1.Choose what key service(s) your unit provides to the ELAC community. The service should be a fundamental function of your unit and what you deem to be the most valuable. No more than 2-4 services should be considered. 2.Once you have chosen your service(s), it is time to start constructing the actual statement…

Guidelines (cont’d) In one sentence, describe what your client will receive, experience, or understand as a result of your service. – You should have (1) AUO statement per service. Here are just a few examples of how to begin the AUO statement: – Faculty and staff will receive… – The campus will receive… – Faculty and staff will be satisfied with… – (My unit) will provide satisfactory service to… Be sure that the AUO can be tested/assessed…

Guidelines (cont’d) 3. Now that you have at least one AUO, it’s time to consider developing an assessment. Here are a few items to be aware of when considering an appropriate AUO assessment: – What will clients have to do in order to demonstrate that you have serviced them effectively? – Don’t reinvent the wheel! Do you currently have some type of in-house service check which could aid in assessing the AUO?

AUO and assessment example Information Technology: System Availability and Uptime The student information system will be available 99% of the time during normal business hours (7:30 – 4:30 Monday – Friday) as measured in academic year by the system administrators collecting system availability statistics. Evaluation will occur at the end of the academic year, June 30, From Mt. San Antonio College