Water Quality Benchmarks The What’s and Why’s of Their Application 2007 Western Region Pesticide Meeting May 17, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) – 1972, 1988 By, Kevin Iida The FIFRA was amended in 1996 by the Food Quality Protection Act.
Advertisements

Agricultural Engineer Water Quality Specialist
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Water Quality, Sustainability, and Sovereignty Heidi E. Mehl.
Hayward Water System Public Health Goal Report Alex Ameri, Deputy Director of Public Works Utilities Division Department of Public Works.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Technical Assistance Services for Communities 2012 Review of Preliminary Phase II Groundwater Report J. Stuart Wiswall,
EPA and Aquatic Pesticide Registration - No Unreasonable Adverse Effects on Man or the Environment Donald Stubbs.
Pesticide Labels & Safety Data Sheets Developed by Carol Black WSU Pesticide Safety Education.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
The FY Water Quality Grant Guidance: The New Three-Tiered Approach and Performance Measures Dan Helfgott, Chief Government and International.
The Nevada Department of Agriculture Water Quality Program The Nevada Department of Agriculture has been involved in groundwater protection since 1990.
Chapter 4 Environmental Policy and Regulation
GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAU WESTERN REGIONS PESTICIDE MEETING MAY 2007.
The Application of the CCME WQI as a Screening Tool to Evaluate the Suitability of Waters for Aquaculture Aquatic Toxicity Workshop October 24 th – October.
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Ohio Pesticide Applicator Training Unit 5 Special Environmental Concerns.
Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): -Adoption of.
EPA/Office of Water’s Strategy for Contaminants of Emerging Concern Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water U.S. Environmental.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
 Drinking-Water Standards  History  Key Definitions  How Standards are Developed  Current Issues Confronting Developers of Standards.
Spills/Incident Management Monitoring, Mapping and Contingency Planning Jerry Schulte, Manager Source Water Protection and Emergency Response for ORSANCO.
Debra Harrington FDEP Groundwater Protection Watershed Monitoring Meeting August, 2004 INTEGRATING GROUND WATER INTO WATERSHED MANAGEMENT and BASIN ASSESSMENTS.
Evaluating the Potential Human-Health Relevance of VOCs in Samples from Domestic & Public Wells in the U.S. Patty Toccalino, Julia Norman, Barbara Rowe.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
NorCal SETAC 2001 Seafood Contamination and Consumption.
A Comparison of Pesticide Environmental Risk Indicators for Agriculture Thomas Greitens Esther Day.
Environmental Technology Council EPA /State / DOD Region IV Environmental Conference June 2005 Joydeb “Joy” Majumder, EPA Region 4.
VI. Purpose of Water Treatment
Protecting Drinking Water The Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 17 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
Kinge of Dremes MLIS Government Information Sources.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 By: Travis Cooke.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 by: Bjorn Bookser period 2.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
Water Quality Compliance California Water Association.
Module 9: Natural Resource Assessment and Damages (NRD)
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
HazMat Response Arrangements Western Australia Ken Raine Manager Environmental Hazards Department of Environment and Conservation.
Introduction to FIFRA Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act Chapter 1 Section I of the Pest Bear & Affiliates Service Personnel Development Program.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 1972, 1988 When the FIFRA was first passed in 1947, it gave the United States Department of Agriculture.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
1 Future Strategies to Address PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Water quality challenges in the Bay Delta Estuary.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Minnesota Drinking Water Designated Use Assessment Workshop Tom Poleck EPA Region 5, Water Quality Branch May 20-21,
Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) in California and SWAMP's Statewide Strategy California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Freshwater.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
PONDERING … the Power of Water Networks Developed by: Nancy Deever, M.S. and Enviro Geek …Pojoaque Valley HS.
Update on EPA’s Pollinator Protection Activities Rick Keigwin Office of Pesticide Programs January 2016.
2007 Public Health Goals Report Public Hearing July 17, 2007 Agenda Item 9.01.
Use of Borates in Swimming Pools: Consideration of Health Effects
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
An Integrated Approach for Source Water Protection and Awareness in
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Association of State Drinking-Water Administrators,
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Interpretation of Descriptor 8
FQPA: “It’s a Good Thing” (for Kids)
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Benchmarks The What’s and Why’s of Their Application 2007 Western Region Pesticide Meeting May 17, 2007

Water Quality Benchmarks Beginning this year, states receiving federal FIFRA funds for water quality protection (surface and groundwater) must evaluate 58 pesticides (Pesticides of Interest) to determine if any are to be considered (Pesticides of Concern). Beginning this year, states receiving federal FIFRA funds for water quality protection (surface and groundwater) must evaluate 58 pesticides (Pesticides of Interest) to determine if any are to be considered (Pesticides of Concern).

Water Quality Benchmarks 58 total pesticides on the list 27 of which have established MCL’s or HAL’s

Water Quality Benchmarks Pesticide(s) of Concern: Pesticide(s) of Concern: Pesticide for which a human health or environmental reference point* is likely to be approached or exceeded in localized areas of a State or Tribe. Pesticide for which a human health or environmental reference point* is likely to be approached or exceeded in localized areas of a State or Tribe. * MCL’s and HAL’s used as reference points

Water Quality Benchmarks Example: ChlorpyrifosFederal HAL 2 ug/L 20% HAL.4 ug/L 50% HAL1 ug/L 75% HAL1.5 ug/L Various levels trigger escalating management activities

Water Quality Benchmarks How are reference points determined if no MCL or HAL exists?

Water Quality Benchmarks Health Based Screening Levels (HBSL) HBSL’s are benchmark concentrations of contaminants in water that may be of potential concern for human health, if exceeded.

Water Quality Benchmarks HBSL’s are non-enforceable benchmarks that were developed by the USGS and USEPA using USEPA methodologies for drinking-water guidelines and human-health toxicity information. HBSL’s are non-enforceable benchmarks that were developed by the USGS and USEPA using USEPA methodologies for drinking-water guidelines and human-health toxicity information.

Water Quality Benchmarks HBSL’s are calculated based on whether the pesticide is considered: HBSL’s are calculated based on whether the pesticide is considered: 1)Carcinogen 2)Possible Carcinogen 3)Non-Carcinogen

Water Quality Benchmarks Example: Azinphos-methylNo Federal MCL or HAL HBSL10 ug/L 20% HBSL 2 ug/L 20% HBSL 2 ug/L 50% HBSL 5 ug/L 50% HBSL 5 ug/L 75% HBSL7.5 ug/L 75% HBSL7.5 ug/L Trigger levels now based on uniform reference point

Water Quality Benchmarks Aquatic Life Benchmarks Water quality benchmarks (ALB’s) for aquatic life and fish-eating wildlife are estimates of concentrations above which pesticides may have adverse effects on these target groups.

Water Quality Benchmarks Aquatic life benchmarks are based on a variety of established criteria for acute and chronic effects to fish, invertebrates, aquatic vascular and non-vascular plants Aquatic life benchmarks are based on a variety of established criteria for acute and chronic effects to fish, invertebrates, aquatic vascular and non-vascular plants

Water Quality Benchmarks supporting_info.php

Water Quality Benchmarks In addition to application in evaluating “Pesticides of Concern” HBSL’s and ALB’s will approximately double the “reference point” numbers available to states in determining appropriate response to pesticide occurrences in ground and surface waters. In addition to application in evaluating “Pesticides of Concern” HBSL’s and ALB’s will approximately double the “reference point” numbers available to states in determining appropriate response to pesticide occurrences in ground and surface waters.

Water Quality Benchmarks Use as support for action under existing authority, Health Agencies? Use as support for action under existing authority, Health Agencies? If valid…move towards adoption in State (Water Quality or Drinking Water Standard) If valid…move towards adoption in State (Water Quality or Drinking Water Standard) Additional guidance (federal) to states on benchmark use? Additional guidance (federal) to states on benchmark use?

Water Quality Benchmarks For more information contact: Kirk Cook, LG, LHG Natural Resource Assessment Section Washington Department of Agriculture (360)