Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division."— Presentation transcript:

1 Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division

2 Nutrient Criteria - Background Clean Water Action Plan: Restoring and Protecting America’s Waters (February, 1998) National Strategy for the Development of Regional Nutrient Criteria (USEPA Office of Water / Office of Science & Technology; June, 1998)

3 Key Elements of the National Nutrient Strategy 1. Ecoregional and waterbody-type specific. 2. Technical guidance by waterbody-type. 3. Regional Technical Advisory Groups (RTAG) and National Nutrient Team. 4. Ecoregional nutrient criteria for nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a and turbidity (i.e. causal & response variables). 5. Nutrient criteria development plans submitted by States/Tribes by December 31, 2004.

4 Technical Advisory Groups National Nutrient Workgroup –USEPA Headquarters (Dr. Amy Parker), USEPA Regions, States, Universities Region 7 Regional Technical Advisory Group (RTAG) –Federal, States, Tribes, Universities Central Plains Center for BioAssessment –Kansas Biological Survey (University of Kansas) –Facilitate/Field Work/Data Base/Data Analysis Assist States/Tribes in Criteria Development

5 Regional Technical Advisory Group (RTAG) - Region 7 - Missouri Department of Natural Resources Iowa Department of Natural Resources Kansas Department of Health & Environment Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians University of Missouri Iowa State University University of Kansas Kansas State University University of Nebraska Natural Resources Conservation Service US Geological Survey US Environmental Protection Agency Central Plains Center for BioAssessment

6

7 Regional Databases (Region 7 RTAG) Nutrient database –Raw records (>54,000) of chemistry parameters –Includes TN, TP, Chlorophyll-a, secchi, periphyton, phytoplankton Biological database –Macroinvertebrate and fish data

8 RTAG Mission Statement The mission of the Region 7 Nutrient Workgroup is to develop scientifically defensible numeric nutrient benchmarks for lakes/reservoirs, streams/rivers and wetlands in the Central Great Plains (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri & Nebraska).

9 RTAG Ground Rules Nutrient benchmarks are to protect Streams & Rivers and down stream receiving waters against adverse impacts of cultural eutrophication (excess nutrient levels above natural or minimally impaired conditions). Nutrient benchmarks are to be protective of aquatic life - Economics, technology, attainability, social values are not part of the benchmark development process. Benchmarks developed by the RTAG are by group consensus and are developed for the purpose of assisting and providing guidance to States and Tribes in the development of their own nutrient criteria.

10 ‘Need to Protect the Use’ Waters in which naturally occurring water quality and habitat conditions allow the maintenance of a wide variety of warm-water biota…

11 Region 7 RTAG Lake Benchmark Development Approach –Classification variables –Nutrient values –Benchmarks

12 Lake Classification Variables Assessed by RTAG included: Ecoregions (Levels II, III, IV) Lake type –Glacial, ox bows, sandpits, reservoirs, Sand Hills, etc.) Depth Turbidity Surface Area Retention time

13 Lake & Reservoir Nutrient Values & RTAG Benchmarks Reference Lakes Trisection Method Literature Values RTAG Benchmarks Chl-a (ug/l)7.46.888 TP (ug/l)31.535 TN (ug/l)755610650700

14 Kansas Reference Values (Lake & Wetland Monitoring Report. KDHE. January 2001) ER 25/26ER 27ER 28ER 40ER 47StatewideRTAG Benchmarks Chl-a (ug/l) 6.56.65.86.710.36.58 TP (ug/l) 21351619262135 TN (ug/l) 474648176407646405700 ER 25/26 = High Plains & SW Tablelands Ecoregion ER 27 = Central Great Plains Ecoregion ER 28 = Flint Hills ER 40 = Central Irregular Plains Ecoregion ER 47 = Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion

15 USEPA Ambient Water Quality Recommendations for Lakes and Reservoirs (Ecoregions that overlap Region 7) ER IVER VER VIER VIIER IXER XER XIRTAG Benchmarks Chl-a (ug/l) 3.42.38.62.64.9NA2.88 TP (ug/l) 203337.514.820NA835 TN (ug/l) 400560780660360NA460700 ER IV = Great Plains Grass & Shrublands (Sand Hills & Flint Hills) ER V = South Central Cultivated Great Plains (Western KS & NE) ER VI = Corn Belt & Northern Great Plains (IA; Eastern NE; Northeast KS; Northwest MO) ER VII = Glacial Dairy (Northeastern IA) ER IX = SE Temperate Forested Plains & Hills (Northern MO & Eastern KS) ER X = Texas-Louisiana Coastal & Miss. Alluvial Plains (Southeastern Missouri) ER XI = Central & Eastern Forested Uplands (Ozarks)

16 RTAG Next Steps... Stream & Rivers data analysis Biological impairment –convergence of nutrients & biological regional data sets Draft streams benchmarks Lakes Document Streams Document Wetlands –inventory, classification, reference selection process, monitoring

17 Website and Contact Information USEPA website: http://epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient N-STEPS website: http://n-steps.tetratech-ffx.com Gary Welker, USEPA Region 7 Nutrient Coordinator welker.gary@epa.gov 913-551-7177 Center for BioAssessment Website –www.cpcb.ku.edu


Download ppt "Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google