Determining the Validity and Reliability of Key Assessments and Other Questions Regarding Key Assessments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fairness, Accuracy, & Consistency in Assessment
Advertisements

Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Angie Gant, Ed.D. Truett-McConnell College 1.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Outcome 4 Alignment of Content, Instruction and Assessment.
Standard 4 Diversity. Presented By: Facilitator: Shirley L. Barnes, Ph.D.,Chairperson Diversity Committee: Esenc Balam, Ph.D. Necoal Driver, Ph.D. Daniel.
Becoming one with the SLO The Zen Of Assessment of SLOs And Rubric Writing.
Susan Malone Mercer University.  “The unit has taken effective steps to eliminate bias in assessments and is working to establish the fairness, accuracy,
International Outcomes Assessment Dr. Barbara Wheeling Montana State University Billings Coordinator for Institutional Assessment College of Business Director.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Consistency of Assessment
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Planning and Teaching Chapter 1-4.
Maine Course Pathways Maine School Superintendents’ Conference June 24 – 25, 2010.
Aligning Course Competencies using Text Analytics
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Authentic Assessment Principles & Methods
TPA OVERVIEW AND EXPANSION What is TPA? TEACHER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SCALE teaching performance assessments (TPAs) have several features.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
EdTPA: BUILDING A STRONG FOUNDATION FOR THE TEACHING CAREER Beverly Falk Long Island CICU Meeting, Hofstra University September 20, 2013.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Using edTPA Data for Program Design and Curriculum Mapping Mary Ariail, Georgia State University Kristy Brown, Shorter University Judith Emerson, Georgia.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Professional Education Unit Assessment System Model Operationalizing the Conceptual Framework Operationalizing.
IB Business Management
Response to Intervention Problem Solving Process –Florida’s Model Evaluate Did the plan work? Problem Analysis Why is it occurring?
The School Effectiveness Framework
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
July 8, 2015 UMI Exemplars Fence Painting o Suggested Grade Span – Grades 3-5 o Grade(s) in Which Task was Piloted – Grade 4 Problem Solving.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Laura Frizzell Coastal Plains RESA 1.
Overview of Types of Measures Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Reviewing Syllabi to Document Teaching Culture and Inform Decisions Claudia J. Stanny Director, Center for University Teaching, Learning, & Assessment.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Identify learner profile Determine course length Produce Sequence of delivery Determine learning outcomes Determine Required resources Initiate trial.
Do not FEAR! Developing a Field Experience Assessment Rubric that really works! Michelle Goodwin, Ed.D. Esther Alcindor, M.Ed. Liberty University School.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
A Deeper Dive: Building Rubrics that Align and Inform
Helping students know what they know
Assessing the Common Core Standards
Competency 007: E.
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Determining the Validity and Reliability of Key Assessments and Other Questions Regarding Key Assessments

 Assessments are fair when they assess what has been taught.  Candidates should be exposed to the knowledge, skills, and dispositions which are measured in the assessments.

 Curriculum mapping  (e.g., a chart that shows where in the curriculum candidates have the opportunity to learn and practice what is specified in the standards).

 Candidates should be given information on how the assessments are scored and how they count toward completion of programs

 Piloting assessments,  Developing benchmarks,  Ratings assessments, and a  Analyzing the extent to which the assessments were successful in measuring targeted candidate knowledge, skills, and dispositions.”

 Problems with assessments include missing or vague instructions, poorly worded questions, and poorly reproduced copies that make reading difficult.

 The assessments are free of racial and ethnic stereotypes, poorly conceived language and task situations, and other forms of cultural insensitivity that might interfere with candidate performance and unintentionally favor some candidates over others.  Further, the elimination of bias includes consistent scoring of assessments and vigilant efforts not to discriminate against groups of candidates.

 Units evaluate assessments and assessment conditions and eliminate as many sources of bias as possible.

 Through collaboration between faculty and lead instructors, key assessments and rubrics are developed and reviewed annually.  Training of faculty and adjunct faculty to consistently and accurately utilize rubrics is ongoing.  Training occurs annually prior to fall semester during faculty meetings and adjunct orientation.  Rubrics are reviewed regularly to eliminate vague or weak scoring instructions.

 An alignment matrix for all courses in the College of Education was developed to show how course objectives are aligned with unit outcomes, program outcomes and the conceptual framework, as well as state and national standards.  Each course syllabus includes the unit and program outcomes addressed and how the assignments and assessments are aligned with the outcomes. 