21 September 2007 4 th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Future QPE: Dual-Pol and Gap-Filler Radars Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma/CIMMS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRIC RADAR IMPROVEMENTS
Advertisements

Polarimetric Radar Observations of Hydrometeor Refreezing in Winter Storms Matthew R. Kumjian 1,2, Alexander V. Ryzhkov 1,2, Terry J. Schuur 1,2, and Heather.
29 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 2 I.Radar Representation of.
Page 1 Operational use of dual- polarisation: lessons learned at Météo France after 8 years of experience at all wavelengths (S / C / X) P. Tabary Météo.
MPING: Citizen Science Research Kim Elmore (NSSL/CIMMS)
Water vapor estimates using simultaneous S and Ka band radar measurements Scott Ellis, Jothiram Vivekanandan NCAR, Boulder CO, USA.
National Weather Association 31 st Annual Meeting 18 October 2006 Cleveland, Ohio Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
The use of radar data to improve rainfall estimation across the Tennessee River Valley Transitioning from the rain gauge Patrick N. Gatlin, W. Petersen,
DUAL-POLARIZATION OF WSR-88D NETWORK
Radar-Derived Rainfall Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
THE USE OF DUAL-POLARIMETRIC RADAR DATA TO IMPROVE RAINFALL ESTIMATION ACROSS THE TENNESSEE RIVER VALLEY W.A. Petersen NASA – Marshall Space Flight Center,
The WSR-88D at the National Severe Storms Laboratory, KOUN, was upgraded to add polarization diversity in KOUN transmits each EM pulse with an orientation.
Rainfall Monitioring Using Dual-polarization Radars Alexander Ryzhkov National Severe Storms Laboratory / University of Oklahoma, USA.
Rainfall Rate Relationships in WSR-88D Rainfall Estimation Algorithms Dan Berkowitz Applications Branch Radar Operations Center.
New Concepts in Utilization of Polarimetric Weather Radars Alexander Ryzhkov (CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Cabo Guasave S-Pol NAME Radar Data - Product Description & Quality Control.
Contrasting Tropical Rainfall Regimes Using TRMM and Ground-Based Polarimetric Radar by S. A. Rutledge, R. Cifelli, T. Lang and S. W. Nesbitt EGU 2009.
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre POLDIRAD Polarization Diversity Doppler Radar Martin Hagen DLR Oberpfaffenhofen.
What can Dual-Polarization Doppler Radar Do for You? Neil Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri - Columbia.
High-Resolution X-band Dual-Polarization Weather Radar: Theory and Applications Sense and Nonsense on precipitation and drop size distribution estimation.
Dual Polarization Radars
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Basic RADAR Principles Prof. Sandra Cruz-Pol, Ph.D. Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM.
49 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 3 I.Radar Representation of.
Using NPOL (the NASA S-band polarimetric radar), and a network of 2D video disdrometers for external radar calibration and rain rate estimation, and to.
NEXRAD Dual-Polarization Product Review Kevin Scharfenberg OU-CIMMS and NOAA-NSSL 2 nd Workshop on NWS Severe Weather Warning Technology July 2007.
Comparison of PPS and QPE Rainfall Estimates for Summer 2013 Heavy Precipitation Events Comparison of PPS and QPE Rainfall Estimates for Summer 2013 Heavy.
Similar in concept to JDOP, except with the goal to operationally demonstrate the value of the polarimetric upgrade of the 88D. Multi-seasonal to study.
Radar Derived Precipitation Physics: Implications for GPM S. Rutledge 1, D. Wolff 2, B. Dolan 1, P. Kennedy 1, W. Petersen 2, P. Hein 1 and V. Chandrasekar.
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
Dual Polarization Martin Hagen, Elena Saltikoff Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Introduction to the Dual-Polarized WSR-88D
Radar Polarimetric Retrievals. Anthony Illingworth University of Reading, UK.
Dan Satterfield, Chief Meteorologist WHNT-TV, Huntsville James-Paul Dice Meteorologist WHNT-TV Walt Peterson Senior Atmospheric Scientist UAH We Really.
Hydrometeorology and Polarimetric Radar How can Polarimetric radar aid in flash flood forecasting? James J. Stagliano, Jr.1, James L. Alford 1, Dean Nelson.
CARPE-DIEM 13/6/02, slide 1German Aerospace Center Microwaves and Radar Institute CARPE-DIEM Besprechung Helsinki, June 2004 Ewan.
Radar Basics and Estimating Precipitation Jon W. Zeitler Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service Austin/San Antonio Forecast Office Science.
National Weather Service Dual-Polarization Radar Technology Photo courtesy of NSSL.
Dual-Polarization Operations Assessment Status Update on Development Process Progress on RDA work Progress on RPG work Where we are with Beta and Deployment.
Dual Polarization Technology: The KICT Upgrade Paul Schlatter Warning Decision Training Branch Paul Schlatter Warning Decision Training Branch AMS/NWA.
Dual-Pol Radar Data: A Brief Primer and A Few Brief Pseudo-Operational Exercises (Courtesy of) Dan Miller Science and Operations Officer NWS/WFO Duluth,
The Role of Polarimetric Radar for Validating Cloud Models Robert Cifelli 1, Timothy Lang 1, Stephen Nesbitt 1, S.A. Rutledge 1 S. Lang 2, and W.K. Tao.
A Conceptual Model for the Hydrometeor Structure of Mesoscale Convective Systems during the MJO Active Stage Hannah C. Barnes Robert A. Houze, Jr. University.
A Conceptual Model for the Hydrometeor Structure of Mesoscale Convective Systems during the MJO Active Stage Hannah C. Barnes Robert A. Houze, Jr. University.
Dual Polarimetric Radar Walt Petersen, NASA-MSFC Take away: A versatile and useful tool for research and operations Outline: Local network in the Tennessee.
Radar Palet e Home Radar Artifacts Radar Palet e Home Radar Artifacts Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Radar Interpretation Problems Reflectivity.
The new DWD polarimetric weather radar network: a new radar data processing framework and new products Michael Frech 1, Nils Rathmann 2, Jörg Steinert.
Radar Palet e Home Dual Polarized Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Precipitation Phase – Radar Signatures Radar characteristics of precipitation types –Stratiform.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
Remote Sensing of Precipitation A Look at Radar Now and in the Future Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference 23 April 2009 Darren R. Clabo Institute.
Polarimetric radar analysis of convection in northwestern Mexico Timothy J. Lang, Angela Rowe, Steve Rutledge, Rob Cifelli Steve Nesbitt.
What to make of this new radar technology Luke Madaus, UW Atmospheric Sciences 11/2/2011.
III) CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ADDED CLUTTER RAIN MeteoSvizzera, 6605 Locarno, Switzerland Simulation.
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation by WSR-88D Radar Dan Berkowitz Applications Branch Radar Operations Center.
WSR-88D Radar Rainfall Estimation Present and Near Future Daniel S. Berkowitz Applications Branch NWS Radar Operations Center Norman, Oklahoma 1.
Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.
Radar Palet e Home Dual Polarized Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Dual Polarized Radar What is polarimetric radar Polarimetric products Uses of these ‘raw’ outputs.
Alexander Ryzhkov Weather Radar Research Meteorological Applications of Dual-polarization Radar.
Dual-Polarization Radars
National Weather Association 31 st Annual Meeting 17 October 2006 Cleveland, Ohio Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
Radar Requirements David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory 2013 Warn-on-Forecast Workshop and Technical Guidance Meetings.

Dual-pol obs in NW Environment B. Dolan and S. Rutledge OLYMPEX planning meeting Seattle, 22 January 2015.
Mark Ratzer February 26 th, 2011 WFO Chicago 2 nd Annual Aviation Weather Workshop.
NEXRAD Data Quality 25 August 2000 Briefing Boulder, CO Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joe VanAndel Don Ferraro Jeff Keeler.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Observations of Specific Differential Phase, KDP Chris Collier Acknowledgements: Lindsay Bennett, Alan Blyth and David Dufton.
Statistical Analysis of S-Pol Polarimetric Radar Data from NAME 2004 Timothy J. Lang, Robert Cifelli, Steven A. Rutledge, Angela Rowe, and Lee Nelson Colorado.
NPOL Olympex Located N/ W, 157 m ASL
Radars in Helsinki Testbed
Presentation transcript:

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Future QPE: Dual-Pol and Gap-Filler Radars Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma/CIMMS and NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma/CIMMS and NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ WSR-88D RAINFALL RATE COMPARISON [in/hr] Z [dBZ] Marshall-Palmer Z=200R 1.6 East-Cool Stratiform Z=130R 2.0 West-Cool Stratiform Z=75R D Convective Z=300R 1.4 Rosenfeld Tropical Z=250R in/hr 0.02 in/hr 0.03 in/hr <0.01 in/hr in/hr 0.04 in/hr 0.05 in/hr 0.02 in/hr in/hr 0.06 in/hr 0.08 in/hr 0.04 in/hr 0.05 in/hr in/hr 0.14 in/hr 0.09 in/hr 0.13 in/hr in/hr 0.19 in/hr 0.26 in/hr 0.21 in/hr 0.33 in/hr in/hr 0.35 in/hr 0.46 in/hr 0.48 in/hr 0.85 in/hr in/hr 0.61 in/hr 0.81 in/hr 1.10 in/hr 2.22 in/hr in/hr 1.09 in/hr 1.44 in/hr 2.50 in/hr 5.80 in/hr in/hr 1.94 in/hr 2.56 in/hr 5.68 in/hr in/hr in/hr 3.45 in/hr 4.55 in/hr in/hr in/hr Quantitative Precipitation Estimation

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Dual-polarization in one slide Current state: linear horizontal E pulses: — — — … Original WSR-88D contract specified capability for later upgrade to dual-pol After upgrade, WSR-88D will transmit simultaneous horizontal/vertical pulse (“slant 45º”): ∕ ∕ ∕ ∕ … Separate receivers will listen for horizontal and vertical backscatter Current state: linear horizontal E pulses: — — — … Original WSR-88D contract specified capability for later upgrade to dual-pol After upgrade, WSR-88D will transmit simultaneous horizontal/vertical pulse (“slant 45º”): ∕ ∕ ∕ ∕ … Separate receivers will listen for horizontal and vertical backscatter

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Early dual-pol QPE results Point Estimates Areal (basin) Estimates

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Spring hail cases Cold season stratiform rain Bias of radar areal rainfall estimates Early dual-pol QPE results

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Reflectivity (Z h )Differential reflectivity (Z dr ) Similar reflectivity – very different differential reflectivity! Northeast – Mostly large rain drops Southwest – Mostly hail

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Reflectivity (Z h )Differential reflectivity (Z dr ) Similar reflectivity – very different differential reflectivity! Northwest – relatively large number of relatively small drops Southeast – relatively small number of relatively large drops

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Warm rain case – A very unusual DSD! Warm rain case – A very unusual DSD!

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Hail case – Z-R relations break down! Hail case – Z-R relations break down!

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ ZZ DR K DP  hv RHI in stratiform rainfall RHI in stratiform rainfall Hydrometeor Classification

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Hydrometeor classification algorithm No Echo Lgt/mod rain Heavy rain Hail “Big drops” Graupel Ice crystals Dry snow Wet snow Unknown AP or Clutter Biological

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Operational strategy Where HCA detectsUse R= Ground clutter / AP / biologicals0 RainR(Z, Z dr ) Possible hail below melting layerR(K DP ) Wet snow0.6R(Z) Graupel/hail above melting layer0.8R(Z) Dry snow / ice crystals2.8R(Z) R(Z) is from standard WSR-88D R(Z) equations. Operational strategy Where HCA detectsUse R= Ground clutter / AP / biologicals0 RainR(Z, Z dr ) Possible hail below melting layerR(K DP ) Wet snow0.6R(Z) Graupel/hail above melting layer0.8R(Z) Dry snow / ice crystals2.8R(Z) R(Z) is from standard WSR-88D R(Z) equations. Dual-pol QPE Algorithm

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ NCAR SPOL radar ; From Vivekanandan et al. 1999, JTech 16, Dual-pol and partial attenuation Partial terrain blockage

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ WSR-88D coverage at 3 km AGL

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ “Gap-Filler” Boundary Layer Radars Courtesy CASA project Courtesy CASA project

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ “Gap-Filler” Boundary Layer Radars Nearest WSR-88D CASA radars

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ - Dual-pol WSR-88D upgrade - Dual-pol, low-power “gap-filler” radars - Multiple-radar data mergers incorporating NWP - Corrections for dual-pol radar QPE using rain gages - Incorporation of dual-pol base data vertical profiles - Incorporate corrections for partial beam attenuation (including partial terrain blockage!) - Dual-pol WSR-88D upgrade - Dual-pol, low-power “gap-filler” radars - Multiple-radar data mergers incorporating NWP - Corrections for dual-pol radar QPE using rain gages - Incorporation of dual-pol base data vertical profiles - Incorporate corrections for partial beam attenuation (including partial terrain blockage!) Radar-based QPE: The Future

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Questions?

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Quantitative Precipitation Estimation R(Z) on a 2 km x 2 km grid

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Dual-pol QPE on a 2 km x 2 km grid

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Increasing value  Height  * * * Hydrometeor Classification

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Operational QPE algorithm - Significant improvement over R(Z), particularly inside 150 km and in heavy rain (and possible hail) - Measurable improvement km - Measurable improvement over adjusted R(Z) using vertical Z h profiles/mean-field bias (MFB) corrections - Later work to incorporate multiple radars, corrections using MFB, vertical dual-pol profiles, beam attenuation Operational QPE algorithm - Significant improvement over R(Z), particularly inside 150 km and in heavy rain (and possible hail) - Measurable improvement km - Measurable improvement over adjusted R(Z) using vertical Z h profiles/mean-field bias (MFB) corrections - Later work to incorporate multiple radars, corrections using MFB, vertical dual-pol profiles, beam attenuation Quantitative Precipitation Estimation

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Differential Reflectivity (Z dr )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Indicates the presence of larger liquid drops Hail shafts without a lot of liquid water Differential Reflectivity (Z dr )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Differential reflectivity Z dr = 10 log (E h /E v ) = Z h - Z v [dB] The reflectivity-weighted mean axis ratio of scatterers in a sample volume Z dr > 0  Horizontally-oriented mean profile Z dr < 0  Vertically-oriented mean profile Z dr ~ 0  Near-spherical mean profile Differential reflectivity Z dr = 10 log (E h /E v ) = Z h - Z v [dB] The reflectivity-weighted mean axis ratio of scatterers in a sample volume Z dr > 0  Horizontally-oriented mean profile Z dr < 0  Vertically-oriented mean profile Z dr ~ 0  Near-spherical mean profile EhEh EvEv Differential Reflectivity (Z dr )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Differential Phase Shift  DP =  h –  v (  h,  v ≥ 0) [deg] The difference in phase between the horizontally- and vertically-polarized pulses at a given range along the propagation path. - Two-way process - Independent of partial beam blockage, attenuation - Independent of absolute radar calibration - Immune to propagation effects on calibration - Independent of system noise Differential Phase Shift  DP =  h –  v (  h,  v ≥ 0) [deg] The difference in phase between the horizontally- and vertically-polarized pulses at a given range along the propagation path. - Two-way process - Independent of partial beam blockage, attenuation - Independent of absolute radar calibration - Immune to propagation effects on calibration - Independent of system noise Differential Phase Shift (  DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Specific Differential Phase Shift  DP(r2) –  DP(r1) K DP = [deg/km] 2 (r 2 – r 1 ) The range derivative of differential phase shift - Identify areas with significantly non-spherical scatterers (usually, rain) - Can estimate rain amount in rain/hail mixture Specific Differential Phase Shift  DP(r2) –  DP(r1) K DP = [deg/km] 2 (r 2 – r 1 ) The range derivative of differential phase shift - Identify areas with significantly non-spherical scatterers (usually, rain) - Can estimate rain amount in rain/hail mixture Specific Differential Phase Shift (K DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Specific Differential Phase Shift (K DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Result: The K DP dilemma - Using a long-distance derivative for calculating K DP can oversmooth heavy rain features but reduces noise - Using a short-distance derivative for calculating K DP retains features in heavy rain but is also noisy Result: The K DP dilemma - Using a long-distance derivative for calculating K DP can oversmooth heavy rain features but reduces noise - Using a short-distance derivative for calculating K DP retains features in heavy rain but is also noisy Specific Differential Phase Shift (K DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Calculating K DP : current practice - If Z > 40 dBZ, use a K DP calculation range of 9 gates (2 km). - Otherwise, use a range derivative of 25 gates (6 km) - Filter the final K DP product at 0.9  hv Calculating K DP : current practice - If Z > 40 dBZ, use a K DP calculation range of 9 gates (2 km). - Otherwise, use a range derivative of 25 gates (6 km) - Filter the final K DP product at 0.9  hv Specific Differential Phase Shift (K DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Outline Differential phase shift (  DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Outline Specific differential phase shift (K DP )

21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Rainfall estimation using polarimetric variables R(Z, Z DR ) = Z 0.77 Z DR [mm/h] R(K DP ) = 44|K DP | sign(K DP ) [mm/h] Rainfall estimation using polarimetric variables R(Z, Z DR ) = Z 0.77 Z DR [mm/h] R(K DP ) = 44|K DP | sign(K DP ) [mm/h] Quantitative Precipitation Estimation