The theory and the reality NEA Conference 2009 Dr Sue Armstrong.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Performance audit and evaluation: common ground with Internal Audit ? The UK National Audit Office experience Jeremy Lonsdale.
Advertisements

The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Martin Hart Assistant Director Education Case study on accreditation: the GMC’s perspective.
Credentialing, Accreditation, Certification, Registration, and Licensure: What does it all mean? Donna Nowakowski, MS, RN Associate Executive Director.
9 th Annual Public Health Finance Roundtable November 3, 2012 Boston, MA Peggy Honoré.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Performance management guidance
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
Launch of Quality Management System
Regulating the engineering profession 1 EC UK Experience in Accreditation of Engineering Programmes Professor Ian Freeston University of Sheffield, UK.
ACCREDITATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS,THEIR PROGRAMMES AND COURSES 1.
 Increasing concerns about the nursing profession in the U.K.  Concern from NMC over the number of new registrants reported for fitness for practice.
Session 4: Good Governance: How SAIs influence Good Governance in Public Administration Zahira Ravat 27 & 28 May 2014.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
1 Simon Bradstreet: SRN Allison Alexander: NHS Education for Scotland/SRN Scottish Recovery Indicator.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide.
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
Nursing education and training Systemic planning implications of nursing reform NEA presentation 30 September 2009.
Shaping Society APMR Briefing Zulkefli Bin Mansor Pusat Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Program Akademik Bahagian Hal Ehwal Akademik.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
Accreditation in the higher education
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND PATIENT SAFETY. WHAT IS QUALITY ?
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
Consistency of Assessment (Validation) Webinar – Part 1 Renae Guthridge WA Training Institute (WATI)
Building and keeping a revalidation portfolio
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Auditing of Performance A conceptual discussion. Auditing of performance To demonstrate and discuss the differences between auditing of performance information.
Assessment Validation. MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) New National Regulator ASQA as of 1 July, 2011.
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
The National Quality Standard The National Quality Standard (NQS) is a key aspect of the NQF and sets a national benchmark for early childhood education.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Documentation Requirements for Hospital Accreditation -By Global Manager Group.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Southwestern Community College May 18, 2016.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
S TANDARDS, CERTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT C HAPTER 23 Dr. Ahmad F. Shubita.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion The HEQC Audit 23 January 2006.
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
Higher Education Quality Committee
Quality and Standards An introduction.
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
CHE ACCREDITATION OF NURSING PROGRAMMES
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Reflection on OAC Manual Quality Audit- Learning By Sharing
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Co-Curricular Assessment
Presentation transcript:

The theory and the reality NEA Conference 2009 Dr Sue Armstrong

THE THEORY THE REALITY  A measurable variable (or characteristic) that can be used to determine the degree of adherence to a standard or the level of quality achieved. QAP  Norms, criteria, standards, and other direct qualitative and quantitative measures used in determining the quality of (health care) a product or service. Medicalwebends

STANDARDS (Performance that is expected) CRITERIA (Items or variables which enable the achievement of a standard and the evaluation of whether it has been achieved or not.) INDICATORS (Qualitative or quantitative measures – see, feel, touch, hear)

THE THEORYTHE REALITY  To improve the quality of the organization  State what the ideal is and measure development towards compliance  To comply to requirements to operate  May be licensing, accreditation, certification  “Voluntary” or required  Organization has no say

THE DECISION MAKERS:  HEQC  UMALUSI  SANC  PROVINCIAL GVT

1. APPLICATION FOR ACCREDITATION OF A NURSING EDUCATION INSTITUTION  Conditions for application for accreditation as a nursing education institution  Requirements for accreditation as a nursing education institution  Requirements for the Institutional Portfolio  Standards for Approval as a Nursing education Institution

2. PROCESS OF ACCREDITATION OF INSTITUTIONS  Pre-audit preparation  The Audit visit  The auditors  The audit report  The appeals process  Types of accreditation  Accreditation certificates  Re-accreditation and the accreditation cycle  Withdrawal of accreditation  Application for extension of scope of accreditation

 The institutional mission and focus  Governance framework for the institution  Proof of financial viability  Links between planning, resource allocation and quality management  The education programmes to be offered  Arrangements for ensuring quality theoretical and practical teaching and learning  Arrangements for creating and applying knowledge  Community engagement and service

 Structure Standards including human resources, material resources, financial resources, technology, theoretical and practical learning facilities  Process standards including leadership and management of the institution, management of educational programmes, relationships and record keeping and reporting  Outcomes standards including quality of graduates, organizational development, and community outreach.

 A panel of auditors is appointed, based on their knowledge, experience and skills in terms of nursing education and quality assessment  They will need to be trained on the auditing process.  The audit team for a particular visit is selected on a rotational basis  The size of the team of auditors will be determined by the complexity of the institution.  Each team is accompanied by at least one audit officer and an audit administrator from the accreditation body staff  The chairperson of the audit team should have acknowledged credibility and authority who commands respect in the nursing education sector.

 Probationary accreditation which enables an nursing education institution applying for accreditation for the first time to offer nursing education for a period not exceeding three years whilst completing requirements for full accreditation.  Provisional accreditation which enables a nursing education institution which has previously been accredited but which complies with most but not all of the required standards to operate for a period not exceeding one year whilst it addresses the areas of concern.  Full accreditation which indicates that the institution complies with all the required standards and may operate for a period of five years before applying for re- accreditation.

 Failure to maintain the requirements  Continuous failure to maintain standards after accreditation  Evidence that the institution has contravened the Act and its regulations  Evidence that submission for accreditation was made fraudulently or contained false or misleading information  Failure to inform the Council, in the event of a move  On request for voluntary de-accreditation from the head of the nursing education institution.

THEORYREALITY  The process of systematic examination of a quality system by internal or external auditors  Important part of organization’s quality management system  True when referring to internal audits  Reality is that most organizations only do a self-audit as a requirement preceding an external audit  They are time consuming but very useful if done regularly

THEORYREALITY  Standards should reflect best practices benchmarked on the best in the industry  Should be chosen on high risk, high cost, high volume issues  Reality is they usually reflect best equivalent provider standards  Also reflect values of licensing body  Licensing bodies have to be sure they will not shut down the entire industry!

THEORYREALITY  The outputs of any programme are the most important aspect for assessing quality of education  Tool should be developed so no assessor bias is possible  In reality they are the most difficult to assess and most audit tools have fewer standards & criteria on this aspect than any other  Unless tools are extremely detailed assessors need to exercise some judgement

AREARELEVANT ASPECTS INPUT Programme design Student recruitment, admission & selection Staffing Teaching & learning strategy Student assessment policies Infrastructure & library resources Programme administrative services Postgraduate policies, regulations & procedures

AREARELEVANT ASPECTS PROCESS Programme coordination Academic development for student success Teaching & learning interactions Student assessment practices Coordination or work-based learning Delivery of post-graduate programmes OUTPUT & IMPACT Student retention and throughput rates Programme impact

DOMAIN: PATIENT RIGHTS SUB-DOMAINS:  1.1 Respect and dignity  1.2 Information to patients  1.3 Physical access  1.4 Continuity of care  1.5 Reducing delays in care  1.6. Emergency care  1.7 Access to a package of services  1.8. Complaints management

SUB-DOMAIN: RESPECT & DIGNITY STANDARDS: 1. Patients are treated in a way that shows respect and maintains patient dignity 2. Results of patient satisfaction surveys are used to inform quality improvement in the establishment 3. Establishments provide hotel services that meet the patients’ expectations

STANDARD: Establishments provide hotel services that meet the patients’ expectations CRITERIA:  The cleanliness and hygiene of the facility contribute towards patient satisfaction.  The linen services contribute to patient satisfaction.  The food services contribute to patient satisfaction

CRITERIA: The food services contribute to patient satisfaction MEASURES / INDICATORS:  5 randomly selected patients in the ward indicate they are satisfied with the temperature of the food served in the ward  5 randomly selected patients in the ward indicate they are satisfied with the quality and quantity of the food served in the ward

CRITERION: The food services contribute to patient satisfaction WEIGHTPLACE ASSESSED TYPE ASSESS MENT 5 randomly selected patients in the ward indicate they are satisfied with the temperature of the food served in the ward 15%In-patient units Patient interviews 5 randomly selected patients in the ward indicate they are satisfied with the quality and quantity of the food served in the ward 15%In-patient units Patient interviews

 Patient interviews  Staff Interviews  Document reviews  Document analysis  Patient record reviews  Patient record audits  Observation with checklist

Pass Rate per subject Ratios 1 tutor to x students

Pass rate per subject Difficulty index of exams

 Need to be accredited by both HEQC and SANC  In theory SANC may be used as agent for HEQC  Nurses needed to evaluate nursing aspects especially clinical areas  System of licensing health establishments coming – implications for NEI’s?  Nothing to lose if we do internal quality audits meantime

THE THEORYTHE REALITY “Aim at the sun, and you may not reach it; But your arrow will fly higher than if you aimed at an object on a level with yourself” J Howse