Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria. Connected to:  Beginning teacher evaluation  Experienced teacher evaluation  Induction / Mentoring  Professional.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Academy School District 20

Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process which defines competency, builds trust, leads to meaningful professional growth and contributes to maximizing student learning.

 Background of New Procedures/Materials  Purposes of Evaluation  Procedures (Probationary & Non-Probationary)  Evaluation Timeline  Performance Standards & Criteria  Professional Growth Plan  Mid-Year Conference/Evaluation  End-of-Year Conference/Evaluation  Data Sources  Completed Documents  Who is Your Primary Evaluator?  Observation and Conference Format  Q&A

 Improvement of instruction  Enhancement of the implementation of programs of curriculum  Measurement of the professional growth and development of personnel  Measurement of the level of performance of all licensed personnel  Determination of satisfactory performance for individual licensed personnel according to performance standards  Documentation for an unsatisfactory performance dismissal proceeding

1. Principal/supervisor reviews performance standards and criteria with probationary teachers 2. Principal/supervisor meets with first year teachers and verifies mentor support (year 1 only) 3. Principal/supervisor schedules a Professional Growth Plan Conference to establish a goal(s) (years 2-3 only) 4. Ongoing informal observations (per principal/supervisor) 5. #1 Formal observation (w/pre- and post-conference) 6. Mid-year conference (w/optional written mid-year evaluation) 7. #2 Formal observation (w/pre- and post-conference) 8. End-of-year conference (w/written end-of-year evaluation) 9. Additional formal observations, if necessary (per principal/supervisor)

1. Principal/supervisor reviews performance standards and criteria with teachers 2. Principal/supervisor schedules a Professional Growth Plan Conference to establish a goal(s) 3. Ongoing informal observations (per principal/supervisor) 4. Mid-year conference (w/optional written mid-year evaluation) 5. #1 Formal observation (w/pre- and post-conference) 6. End-of-year conference 7. Written end-of-year evaluation for ALL non-probationary teachers (NEW THIS YEAR, per CO law & SB 191) 8. Additional formal observations, if necessary (per principal/supervisor)

 September 30 th  Orientation and review of performance standards & criteria with all teachers  Verify mentor support (1 st year probationary teachers only)  End of First Quarter  Professional growth plan conference with all teachers (except 1 st year probationary teachers)  End of First Semester  1 st formal observation (w/pre- and post-conference) with all probationary teachers  Mid-year conference (w/optional written evaluation) with all teachers  Spring Break  2 nd formal observation (w/pre- and post-conference) with all probationary teachers  End of Second Semester  1st formal observation (w/pre- and post-conference) with all non-probationary teachers  End-of-year conference with all teachers  End-of-year written evaluation for ALL teachers (NEW THIS YEAR)  Ongoing (All Year)  Informal observations and other data sources

 Performance Standard 1: Planning & Preparation  Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy  Demonstrating Knowledge of Students  Setting Instructional Goals  Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources  Designing Coherent Instruction  Designing Student Assessments

 Performance Standard 2: The Classroom Environment  Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport  Establishing a Culture for Learning  Managing Classroom Procedures  Managing Student Behavior  Organizing Physical Space

 Performance Standard 3: Instruction  Communicating with Students  Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques  Engaging Students in Learning  Using Assessment in Instruction  Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

 Performance Standard 4: Professional Responsibilities  Reflecting on Teaching  Maintaining Accurate Records  Communicating with Families  Participating in a Professional Community  Growing and Developing Professionally  Showing Professionalism

 Purpose/Four Performance Standards (p.1)  Four Levels of Performance (p.2)  Teacher Use (Self-Assessment; pp.3-25)  Principal/Supervisor Use (Formative Assessment; pp.3-25)  Specialists  Counselor  Instructional Specialist  Library/Media Specialist  Nurse  Psychologist/Social Worker  Therapeutic Specialist

“The hardest goal for some teachers is coming up with a meaningful goal.” Removing Barriers to Professional Development Daniel Duke, Professor at the University of Virginia and nationally recognized expert on educational change and reform, school leadership and accountability policy  Appendix A – Key questions to focus my goal(s) (pp. 3-5) A. Self-assessment on performance standards B. Assessment of my students’ learning C. Consideration of school-wide goals/initiatives/site plans

 Tied to performance standards and criteria  S.M.A.R.T. goal format (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-Oriented, and Time-Bound)  Research-based instructional/behavioral practices  Evidence to demonstrate progress of goal  Impact on student learning/behavior  Action steps to complete goal  Anticipated completion date  Resources/supports needed  Individual and/or team goal(s)?  Multi-year goal(s)?

 Form C – Mid-Year Conference Summary (probationary teachers)  Form D – Mid-Year Conference Summary (non-probationary teachers)  Form E – Mid-Year Evaluation (optional, written)

 Form F – End-of-Year Professional Growth Plan Review  1 st year probationary teachers are not required to complete Form F  All 2 nd and 3 rd year probationary teachers complete Form F  Form G – End-of Year Evaluation  All probationary teachers will have a completed, written end-of-year evaluation (Form G) placed in their site file and the original placed in their personnel file

 Form F – End-of-Year Professional Growth Plan Review  All non-probationary teachers complete Form F  A copy of Form F will be placed in any non-probationary teacher’s site file  Form G – End-of Year Evaluation  ALL non-probationary teachers will have a completed, written end-of-year evaluation (Form G) placed in their site file and the original placed in their personnel file (NEW THIS YEAR)

 Formal and informal observations  Conferences  Peer input  Parent and community input  Student input  Student growth and achievement data  Self-assessment  Documents and other artifacts  Other

 Throughout the year, evaluators will discuss strengths and areas for improvement on an ongoing basis  End of year data sources may be used when the information has already been shared with the employee

 Teacher  A copy of any/all materials placed into their site file and/or personnel file  Site File (school)  A signed copy of the written Professional Growth Plan (Form B)  A signed copy of the written (optional) Mid-Year Evaluation (Form E)  A signed copy of the written End-of-Year Professional Growth Plan (Form F)  A signed copy of the written End-of Year Evaluation (Form G)  Personnel File (human resources)  A signed original of the written (optional) Mid-Year Evaluation (Form E)  A signed original of the written End-of-Year Evaluation (Form G)