SCAQMD Modeling Parameters for Developing Localized Significance Thresholds March 5, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Advertisements

1 Atmospheric models for damage costs TRADD, part 2 Ari Rabl, ARMINES/Ecole des Mines de Paris, November 2013 There are many different models for atmospheric.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
A Study of Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury Concentrations in Windsor, Ontario, Canada Xiaohong (Iris) Xu, Umme Akhtar, Kyle Clark,
ANALYSIS OF TRACER DATA FROM URBAN DISPERSION EXPERIMENTS Akula Venkatram and Vlad Isakov  Motivation for Field Experiments  Field Studies Conducted.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Dependence of PM on Elevation Background and Rationale Influence of the Seasonal Variation in Mixing Heights on the PM Elevation Dependence Vertical Profile.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part 1) Rachel Melton and Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
Modelling urban pollution within the UK scale integrated assessment model, UKIAM Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Module 9 Atmospheric Stability Photochemistry Dispersion Modeling.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Air Quality Modeling.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
September 12, SW Colorado PSD Increment Study Southwest Colorado Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO 2 ) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
SITES SOFTWARE APPLICATION SEMINAR __________________________ SITES INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS 5 Point.
CONCEPTUAL MODELING PROTOCOL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.
Session 5, Unit 9 Modeling in the Presence of Stable Layers.
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Photochemical Modeling For Regulatory Applications Jim Boylan – GA EPD Praveen Amar – NESCAUM CMAS Users Forum Meeting October 14, 2010.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Department of the Environment Near Road NO2 Monitoring Update MWAQC Technical Advisory Committee January 10, 2012.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
HF Modeling Task Mike Williams November 19, 2013.
Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
Template Application of SCICHEM-2012 for 1-Hour NO 2 Concentration Assessments Prakash Karamchandani, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood, Bart Brashers, S.-Y.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
SOURCES emissions Atmospheric dispersion RECEPTORS exposure Abatement options & costs Exceedance of criteria for protection Integrated Assessment of effective.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Consequence Analysis Robert Wu South Coast Air Quality Management District.
1 Near-field NO 2 Impacts due to PM Traps for Diesel Engines Tony Servin, P.E. Atmospheric Modeling and Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Meteorological Site Representativeness and AERSURFACE Issues
Ozone Exceedances and Elevated PM2.5 Connecticut June 11, 2015
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
XOQDOQ Calculation Method, Tools and Pitfalls
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Jeopardy Final Jeopardy Polaris Profiles Latitude/long $100 $100 $100
Dispersion Models Dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere Models
Institute for Nature Management, Minsk, Belarus
Presentation transcript:

SCAQMD Modeling Parameters for Developing Localized Significance Thresholds March 5, 2003

Localized Significance Thresholds – Modeling Parameters ISCST meteorology used Meteorological data from one of 35 sites nearest SRA or site specific data if available Plume depletion due to dry removal mechanisms

Localized Significance Thresholds – Modeling Parameters (Cont.) Source H Stationary source approach H Developed for 1, 2, and 5 acre sites H Side by side elevated gaseous volume sources H Area source for PM H Emissions over 8-hr period (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) H Uniform emissions from area/volume sources H 5 meter gaseous /1 meter PM release height

Localized Significance Thresholds – Modeling Parameters Receptors H Developed from 10 degree increments H 25, 50, 100, 200, 500 meter criteria pollutant receptor distances from source/site boundary H Receptors at breathing height H Flat terrain

Localized Significance Thresholds – Modeling Parameters Conservative H Background based on a rolling 3-year highest concentration observed at gaseous criteria pollutant monitoring sites

Localized Significance Thresholds – Modeling Parameters Uncertainties H ISCST3 - Gaussian probability distribution H Model based on uniform emission across site H Model based on 8-hour working day between 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. H Release height assumes day time conditions H Assumed all sources were stationary H Gradual NOx to NO 2 conversion H DRI PM decay factor