Tribal Issues & Project Delivery Case Studies & Lessons Learned Federal Highway Administration Washington Division FHWA Environmental Meeting, June 29,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 16, Where have we been???? Economic downturn… Stimulus Program… Todays Program Packed agenda Lunch program… Ask questions… Thank you!
Advertisements

Environmental Commitments Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Ecological Survey Reports The level of ESR Report is determined by the type of project and its probable level of impacts.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
Jennifer Horn, Preservation Pennsylvania. Who is Preservation Pennsylvania? Pennsylvania’s only private, non-profit, statewide organization dedicated.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
ODOT – FHWA Environmental Performance Measures February 2012.
Local Government Environmental Training: Archaeology April 2, 2009.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
NEPA ASSUMPTION SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DELIVERY PROGRAM.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Surface Transportation project delivery program
Section 4(f) Training May 2005 Presented by: Sharon P. Love, P.E. Environmental Program Manager FHWA Washington Division.
Oregon Jobs and Transportation Act Section 18 CETAS Director’s Meeting Action Items.
Review of Port Angeles Graving Dock Project Preliminary Report Valerie Whitener, JLARC Analyst Keenan Konopaski, JLARC Audit Coordinator Curtis Hudak,
Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
An Overview of Transportation Planning and TTP Program.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
Colorado: Planning and Environmental Linkages Integrated Planning Work Group Peer Exchange Washington, DC – January 27, 2009.
Overview of Environmental Permitting for Transportation Projects Preliminary Report Steve Lerch, JLARC Analyst Gary Walvatne, TechLaw Inc. December 17,
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Joint Urban Roadway Standards Workshop April 27, 2006.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
1 Federal Register Notice “Public Transportation on Indian Reservations” Office of Program Management Tribal Transit Outreach Meetings April 2006.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Roles & Responsibilities Project Biologist.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Welcome to Oregon’s Programmatic ESA.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
ODOT’s Local Agency Certification Program Jill Pearson Certification Program Manager March 12, 2010.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Scoping Meetings July 7 and 8, 2010.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Army BRAC Historic Preservation Opportunities and Challenges.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Federal Lands Highway Commitment to Excellence Environmental Concerns with Estimating TEA/TUG Conference Portland, Maine October 2006 Jack Van Dop Eastern.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
LPA Program Federal-aid Issues for Local Agencies Mike Morrow – December 10, 2010.
Raising the Bar: Improving the Roles of the State, MPO, and FHWA in Tribal Consultation Tribal Transportation Planning, Partnering and Consultation James.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Programmatic Agreements
ACA Conference - September 2017
CILA 16th Annual Conference Viejas Resort & Casino October 14, 2016
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
American Indian Rights and Claims Course Sequence Flowchart
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
© Paul Graham Washington Department of Transportation © Paul Graham
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
2013 Preconstruction Managers Meeting
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

Tribal Issues & Project Delivery Case Studies & Lessons Learned Federal Highway Administration Washington Division FHWA Environmental Meeting, June 29, 2004 Sharon P. Love, P.E. Environmental Program Manager, FHWA WA Division Eloise Best, Colville

Tribal Issues and Project Delivery Some Project-Specific Examples: –Traditional Cultural Properties – Upriver Drive in Spokane County – Delayed 4 years, Mitigation Cost $40,000 –Treaty Rights – Edmonds Crossing – Delayed 3 years Mitigation Cost $5 million + –Archaeology – Hood Canal Bridge – Delayed 1 year Mitigation cost $4.5 million FHWA $3.4 million WSDOT, Delay claim – as much as $30 million

Spokane County Upriver Drive Coyote Rocks – TCP

Spokane County Upriver Drive Coyote’s Rocks – TCP Minor project – sidewalks and shoulder widening. Documented CE County lead. TCP listed on the National Register of Historic Places missed in early review and on DCE.

Upriver Drive, Spokane County Coyote’s Rocks Lessons Learned/Results Education of Local Agencies – ensure National Register is checked. Early involvement with Tribes. Importance of Government-to-Government relationship at the Federal level. Revisions to checklist used for Documented Categorical Exclusions.

Edmonds Crossing Tribal Fishing Area New Alternative

Edmonds Crossing Lessons Learned Possible impacts on Tribal treaty rights need to be addressed early. Tribal input can greatly improve a project – even more so if it is received early (ideally before the Draft EIS is circulated). There is more to tribal coordination in NEPA than Section 106.

Port Angeles Graving Dock Hood Canal Bridge

Late Discovery of Archaeology Choices: –Terminate contract, further delaying HCB replacement –Figure out a way through the Section 106 process

Hood Canal Bridge Port Angeles Graving Dock Lessons Learned Importance of FHWA and WSDOT involvement with the Tribe early in NEPA. A good monitoring plan is essential – it worked well in this case. Face-to-face meetings.

What are we doing to improve coordination with Tribes in WA? Early notice of projects (during planning) Annual Meetings with SHPO and Tribes Review of Metropolitan Planning Organizations to ensure Tribal projects and issues are addressed in their plans.

What are we doing to improve coordination with Tribes in WA? Programmatic Agreements on Section 106 Consultation Government-Government Training WSDOT’s Tribal Liaison Office presents training for transportation employees on Section 106 and TERO. WSDOT is training 250 of their staff each year.

For further information: Sharon Love FHWA Washington Division website: Washington State DOT website: