Power to the Edge “Net Work” Network Science Issues of Interest Dr. David S Alberts Director, Research OASD(NII) October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Organizational Behavior?
Advertisements

Working Across Cultures Mary P. Andrews, Director International Extension Programs Michigan State University Extension.
1 C2 Maturity Model Experimental Validation Statistical Analyses of ELICIT Experimentation Data Dr. David S. Alberts.
Chapter 19: Social Factors Human Factors EXP 4250 Dr. Steve Presentation by Laura Shaver.
What is Software Design?. Systems Development Life- Cycle Planning Analysis Design Implementation Design.
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
Chapter Learning Objectives
ELICIT Experimental Laboratory for Investigating Collaboration, Information-sharing, and Trust.
The International Technology Alliance in Network and Information Sciences ITA Annual Fall Meeting September 2014 Socially-Distributed Cognition and Cognitive.
Chapter 6 Groups and Teams. Copyright © 2006 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Purpose and Overview Purpose –To understand effective.
Chapter 8 Communicating in Groups. List the characteristics and types of groups and explain how groups develop Understand how group size affects communication.
Understanding Users: Designing for Collaboration & Communication Dr. Dania Bilal IS 588 Spring 2008.
Presented to ISMORS September 2009 Dr. David S. Alberts Director, Research OASD/NII – DoD CIO Redefining the “M” in MOR st Century OR Challenges.
© 2006 Carnegie Mellon University Establishing a Network Centric Capability: Implications for Acquisition and Engineering Dennis Smith Complex System Symposium.
A Framework for Effective, Interoperable Collaboration Christine O. Salamacha H. Bennett Teates June 17-19, th ICCRTS.
Laboratory Overview MIT Humans and Automation Lab February 2006.
Siva Banda Director, Control Science Center of Excellence Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Behavior of Systems with Humans and Unmanned Vehicles MURI.
Mary (Missy) Cummings Humans & Automation Lab
18 October 2007 Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity and Network Sciences Workshop Results.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N.
Mink Spaans What are the problems that need to be solved What is hard.
ADM Leadership Lecture 11 – Team Leadership.
© 2005 Prentice-Hall 8-1 Understanding Work Teams Chapter 8 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 8/e Stephen P. Robbins.
Copyright c 2006 Oxford University Press 1 Chapter 4 Group Tasks and Activities Wide variety of synonyms and metaphors for groups and teams Crosses context.
Power, Conflict and Politics Ashley Crnic Steffany Flook Roxanne Tian.
KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports lessons learned,
Geography What is it?. Geography is: “The study of people, places, and the environment.” “A science that deals with the description, distribution, and.
Monica Hutchins LDR-601 Dr. M. Parsons “Teams are organizational groups composed of members who are interdependent, who share common goals, and who.
Introduction to Organizational Behavior
Interagency Climate Education Frank Niepold NOAA Climate Program Office (UCAR) Jill Karsten NSF Directorate for Geosciences.
Multicultural Teams & Groups. Class Discussion Discuss experiences in lego block exercise in terms of Cultural Intelligence concepts –Meta cognitive –Cognitive.
OB = Organisational Behaviour (meaning: behaviour within organisations): focuses on the description & explanation of the causes and effects of individual.
Equipment Capability Customer RIGHT KIT, RIGHT PRICE, RIGHT TIME The role of OA in experimentation? Dave Ferbrache Director Analysis, Experimentation &
16 October 2007 Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity Science List of Candidate Topics Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity Sciences.
NC-BSI: 3.3 Data Fusion for Decision Support Problem Statement/Objectives: Problem - Accurate situation awareness requires rapid integration of heterogeneous.
Responding to the Unexpected Yigal Arens Paul Rosenbloom Information Sciences Institute University of Southern California.
CHAPTER 3: THEORY OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT “Keeping together is progress; Working together is success.” Henry Ford.
Understanding Groups & Teams Ch 15. Understanding Groups Group Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular.
Why Have Teams Become So Popular?
Crisis “Management”: A Way Forward David S. Alberts presented to Crisis Management 3.0: Social Media and Governance in Times of Transition.
Understanding Work Teams
Assessing the Military Benefits of NEC Using a Generic Kill-Chain Approach David Nevell QinetiQ Malvern 21 ISMOR September 2004.
1 The Way Ahead Dr. Ed Smith Boeing Effects-Based Operations: The “how to”
Distributed Models for Decision Support Jose Cuena & Sascha Ossowski Pesented by: Gal Moshitch & Rica Gonen.
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Prepared by Kadir Gul EMU CSIT 362 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Lecturer HUSEYIN GURSEV.
Chapter3: Foundations of Group Behavior. Definition of a Group A group is defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have.
Lim Sei cK.  Team ◦ A group whose members work intensely with each other to achieve a specific, common goal or objective. ◦ All teams are groups.
New ELICIT Software Platform Capabilities and Campaign 13 th ICCRTS, I-079, June 2008 Mary Ruddy Mark Nissen
NATO NEC C2 Maturity Model Overview. C2 Maturity and NEC Capability Five levels of C2 maturity have been defined. These five levels and their relationship.
Network Centric Planning ---- Campaign of Experimentation Program of Research IAMWG Dr. David S. Alberts September 2005.
1 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command ARL-CISD Social Network Analysis Team Leader Visual Analytics Consortium,
Working Together Collaboration of CS4760, HU4642, CS5760 Wei Zhang PhD candidate, Applied Cognitive Science and Human Factors 1.
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
TEAM MANAGEMENT AND CONFLICT
Enabling Team Supervisory Control for Teams of Unmanned Vehicles
Towards Organizational Intelligence
Chapter 10 Understanding Work Teams
Organization and Knowledge Management
The Agility Imperative: Agile C2 for Complex Endeavors
Information Age C2 Concepts
INTRODUCTION CR ATTENDACE POLICY.
Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change
Overview of Collaboration in the Online Classroom
United States Joint Forces Command
Organizational Behavior (OB)
C2 Maturity Model Experimental Validation
Key Dimensions of Command and Control Approach
James Moffat, Dstl Note: This is joint work with Walter Perry, RAND.
Understanding Work Teams
Presentation transcript:

Power to the Edge “Net Work” Network Science Issues of Interest Dr. David S Alberts Director, Research OASD(NII) October 2008

21 st Missions Complex Endeavors are now the business of DoD Complex Effects Space –More than just military effects –Interactions in effects space significant –Lack of understanding of cross-domain cause-effects –Inability to predict Operating in a Network-Centric Environment –Many v. Few –Unfamiliar v. Familiar Complex “Self” –“Self” is composed of large number of heterogeneous entities –Different objectives, values, constraints –No single entity in charge –Entities have significantly different perceptions

21 st Missions Effects Network Networked Self Complex Endeavors are now the business of DoD Complex Effects Space –More than just military effects –Interactions in effects space significant –Lack of understanding of cross-domain cause-effects –Inability to predict Operating in a Network-Centric Environment –Many v. Few –Unfamiliar v. Familiar Complex “Self” –“Self” is composed of large number of heterogeneous entities –Different objectives, values, constraints –No single entity in charge –Entities have significantly different perceptions

Net

Work Net Entity Cluster Task Cluster

21 st Missions Effects Network Networked Self Complex Endeavors are now the business of DoD Complex Effects Space –More than just military effects –Interactions in effects space significant –Lack of understanding of cross-domain cause-effects –Inability to predict Operating in a Network-Centric Environment –Many v. Few –Unfamiliar v. Familiar Complex “Self” –“Self” is composed of large number of heterogeneous entities –Different objectives, values, constraints –No single entity in charge –Entities have significantly different perceptions “Net” “Work”

Conflicted C2 De-Conflicted C2 C2 Approaches Coordinated C2 Collaborative C2 Edge C2 Allocation of Decision Rights to the Collective Patterns of Interaction Among Entities Distribution of Information Among Participants

Conflicted C2 Entity Cluster

De-conflicted C2 Entity Cluster

Coordinated C2 Entity Cluster Task Cluster

Collaborative C2 Entity Cluster Task Cluster

Edge C2 Entity Cluster Task Cluster

Collaboration Robustly Networked Force Information Sharing Mission Effectiveness Shared Awareness Self- Synchronization Quality of Information Information Domain Cognitive Domain Physical Domain Social Domain Network-Centric Value Chain Awareness

Demands C2 Approaches and Cognitive Demands As the network centric nature of C2 increases, the cognitive demands on individuals and collectives increases because there is a requirement to: –share information more extensively and more frequently –involve more sources of information –interact (collaborate) with great numbers and more diverse people and organizations –accept external values and constraints –accept more interdependence

Variables of Interest Info Sharing & Collaborative Behaviors Shared Information Quality of Information Shared Awareness Quality of Awareness Shared Understanding Quality of Understanding Task Performance Task Difficulty Measures of Merit Network Characteristics & Performance Individual & Team Characteristics Culture Allocation of Decision Rights Quality of Information Sources Patterns of Interaction Distribution of Information C2 Maturity Level Partially Controllable Controllable Legend

What is ELICIT? ELICIT = Experimental Laboratory for Investigating Collaboration, Information-sharing, and Trust U.S. DoD (OASD/NII) Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) sponsored the design and development of the ELICIT platform for experimentation focused on information, cognitive, and social domain phenomena Web-based version for person-in-the-loop experiments and abELICIT, an agent-based version Purpose of ELICIT-related Experimentation and Analysis is to investigate the cognitive and social impacts of C2 approach and organizational structure (e.g. information sharing, trust, shared awareness, and task performance) see for more informationwww.dodccrp.org