Course overview and structure Dates: May 23-June 20, no class May 28 Times: 5:30-8:30pm ET + team meetings What to do if missing all or part of class?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation
Advertisements

Program Update and Site Redesign Program Update and Site Redesign | Aug 2013.
GAMIFYING HEALTH DATA COLLECTION Mariko Wakabayashi & RJ Kunde Department of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Collaborators:
Dalton Jacobs Brian Sebastian Nidheesh Sharma 26 May 2011.
1 User-Centered Design CSSE 376, Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology April 17, 2007.
Usability Process for eBP at Intel Eric Townsend, Intel.
 Why should it be mobile?  What content should I make mobile?  What need do I serve by making my content available to mobile users?  What value does.
Part 2c: Requirements Chapter 2: How to Gather Requirements: Some Techniques to Use Chapter 3: Finding Out about the Users and the Domain Chapter 4: Finding.
Web Strategies for Health Communication: Introduction, Goals, and SWOT Lisa Gualtieri, PhD, ScM, Course Director Tufts University School of Medicine July.
1 Types of Evaluation Decide on the Purpose: Formative - improve and inform Summative- identify value/effect.
Energy Information Administration Usability Testing Colleen Blessing.
PowerPoint Presentation for Dennis, Wixom & Tegarden Systems Analysis and Design Copyright 2001 © John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 1.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
User testing New Technology for Supporting Students.
HCI revision lecture. Main points Understanding Applying knowledge Knowing key points Knowing relationship between things If you’ve done the group project.
Olli Kulkki Markus Lappalainen Ville Lehtinen Reijo Lindroos Ilari Pulkkinen Helsinki University of Technology S Acceptability and Quality.
User Centered Design April 1-3, 2009 Joshua Ganderson Laura Baalman Jay Trimble.
Course overview and structure Dates: May 23-June 20, no class May 28 Times: 5:30-8:30pm ET + team meetings What to do if missing all or part of class?
Web Design Process CMPT 281. Outline How do we know good sites from bad sites? Web design process Class design exercise.
DiscoverU Plan. Discover. Share. dartmouth ∙ digital arts ∙ computer science ∙ native american program.
1. Learning Outcomes At the end of this lecture, you should be able to: –Define the term “Usability Engineering” –Describe the various steps involved.
Internet Marketing “The right choice” BUSIP Program – 1 June 2005 Fred Pursell.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
Mobile Health Design. Let’s Discuss Schedule Class list Google Hangouts and Google Docs for team work, time during class in breakouts Assignments: 2 for.
Mobile Advantage: Context and Immediacy in Health Information Seeking Lisa Gualtieri, PhD, ScM Assistant Professor Dept. of Public Health and Community.
UMedCT University Medical Clinical Tracking Eric Cox Thesis Project INFO-I 680/681 TCO IU School of Informatics.
DESIGNING FOR MOBILE Lunch & Learn Series | February 20, 2014.
This Lesson Introduction to the ADDIE model Needs Analysis
Requirements-definition User analysis
Comprehensive user education to successfully navigate the Internet Part 1 - Introduction Course developed by University Library of Debrecen.
ACTIVITY. THE BRIEF You need to provide solid proof to your stakeholders that your mobile website meets the needs of your audience. You have two websites.
1 Usability of Digital Libraries Sanda Erdelez & Borchuluun Yadamsuren Information Experience Laboratory University of Missouri – Columbia USA Libraries.
Department of Informatics, UC Irvine SDCL Collaboration Laboratory Software Design and sdcl.ics.uci.edu 1 Informatics 121 Software Design I Lecture 12.
Computer –the machine the program runs on –often split between clients & servers Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Human –the end-user of a program –the.
May11, Introduction: Project Team Agenda Introduction Performance Analysis LATIST Framework Usage Centered Design Process LATIST Development Usability.
S556 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN Week 11. Creating a Vision (Solution) SLIS S556 2  Visioning:  Encourages you to think more systemically about your redesign.
Project 3 Cookie Cutters Kevin Huynh Sean Tsusaki Jordaniel Wolk.
Designing Quality Prevention Tools Caitlin Blood, MPH, CHES Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
User Interface Structure Design Chapter 11. Key Definitions The user interface defines how the system will interact with external entities The system.
Slide 1 Chapter 11 User Interface Structure Design Chapter 11 Alan Dennis, Barbara Wixom, and David Tegarden John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Slides by Fred Niederman.
Usability testing: A reality check for Plain Talk A brief overview October 7, 2008 Dana Howard Botka Manager, Customer Communications, L&I Plain Talk Coordinator,
1 ISE 412 Usability Testing Purpose of usability testing:  evaluate users’ experience with the interface  identify specific problems in the interface.
Shaping User Experience Electronic Resources and Libraries 2012 Tara Carlisle, University of North Texas Libraries Kate Crane, Texas Tech University Ana.
V v USABILITY 30 April UX Team of One Basic question: who are your core audience, what do they need, and what do they want to accomplish? Share.
EXtension Evaluation Community of Practice Plan of Work.
Audience Analysis & Usability. The Writing Process Focusing and Planning Drafting Assessing & Evaluating Assessing & Editing Publishing and Evaluating.
Chapter 12: Introducing Evaluation. The aims To illustrate how observation, interviews and questionnaires that you encountered in Chapters 7 and 8 are.
CS2003 Usability Engineering Human-Centred Design Dr Steve Love.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Chapter 12: Introducing Evaluation. The aims To illustrate how observation, interviews and questionnaires that you encountered in Chapters 7 and 8 are.
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Design Process … and some design inspiration. Course ReCap To make you notice interfaces, good and bad – You’ll never look at doors the same way again.
1 ITM 734 Introduction to Human Factors in Information Systems Cindy Corritore This material has been developed by Georgia Tech HCI faculty,
OSU Libraries presented by the u-team.
CS5714 Usability Engineering Usability Inspection Copyright © 2003 H. Rex Hartson and Deborah Hix.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
Able to transfer and adapt their skills Able to understand the consequences of their actions Able to use software and devices efficiently Responsible.
Mobile Strategy. Simple question – What is your mobile strategy?
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
Introduction to System Evaluation IS 588 Dania Bilal & Lorraine Normore Spring 2007.
1 Design and evaluation methods: Objectives n Design life cycle: HF input and neglect n Levels of system design: Going beyond the interface n Sources of.
KIMBERLY BABCOCK MASHEK INFORMATION LITERACY LIBRARIAN WARTBURG COLLEGE Library Technology Conference March 17 th, 2010 Getting Your Library Users Involved.
Top Web Design Dublin Company in Dublin Ireland
User-Centered Design Services for MSU Web Teams Sarah J. Swierenga, Director Usability & Accessibility Center MSU Webmasters 402 Computer Center February.
Informatics 121 Software Design I
10 Rules of Good UI Design to Follow On Every Web Design Project
Evaluation.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics, and Models
Presentation transcript:

Course overview and structure Dates: May 23-June 20, no class May 28 Times: 5:30-8:30pm ET + team meetings What to do if missing all or part of class? Meet in person: for class session, separately, or not at all? Twitter and other social media Social media survey Online course feedback: you are not guinea pigs! Questions: cell: cell Digital Strategies for Health Communication Evaluation Lisa Gualtieri, PhD, ScM Tufts University School of Medicine July 24, 2014

Mobile First Designing for mobile first instead of retrofitting existing practices into mobile format 2

Base: 2,116 US online adults who own a mobile phone; Base: 549 US online adults who own a tablet Source: North American Technographics Telecom And Devices Online Recontact Survey, Q (US) Where are mobile phones and tablets used?

Search to apps 4

What do mobile devices provide health seekers? Immediacy and access Affinity Multiple methods of input/output Context

Top 10 health searches 2011 Web 1. Cancer 2. Diabetes 3. Symptom 4. Pain 5. Weight 6. Infection 7. Virus 8. Diet 9. Thyroid 10. Sleep Healthline Networks Mobile 1. Chlamydia 2. Bipolar disorder 3. Depression 4. Smoking/quit smoking 5. Herpes 6. Gout 7. Scabies 8. Multiple Sclerosis 9. Pregnancy 10. Vitamin A

How to develop an evaluation plan Evaluate to increase success at achieving your goals Evaluate as often as possible from conception to launch Gather data post-launch Techniques to evaluate – Expert reviews, heuristic evaluation, and formative evaluation The stages at which you will conduct evaluations and what will happen For each evaluation: – What are your goals pertaining to appeal, usability, and effectiveness – The number and demographics of the people you will test and how you will recruit and compensate them – Questions to ask 7

Expert reviews Expert reviews are conducted by “experts” from multiple perspectives and focus on the site using the knowledge of the expert in a domain Who are experts? 8

Heuristic evaluations Heuristic evaluations use a set of heuristics or a checklist – Does the site meet certain usability criteria – Does the site meet the stated purpose 9

10 Formative evaluation Formative evaluation is a type of usability evaluation that helps to "form" the design for a product or service Purpose of formative evaluation is to obtain user feedback during the design and development stages of a project Feedback is generally in three areas: appeal, usability, and effectiveness at accomplishing a task Formative evaluation can be conducted on concepts, paper prototypes, screen mock-ups, a working prototype, or an alpha release, with the goal of using the feedback to improve the design at the earliest possible stages when the cost of making changes is lower

Formative evaluation: receive feedback early when easier to change Use incentivized subjects close to target audience Guide through scripted tasks using a think aloud protocol – What do you expect…? – What are your first impressions when you see the screen? – Where do you want to start and what do you expect to happen? Hardest to provide context and measure effectiveness at achieving goal Formative evaluation process start Script sessions Conduct sessions Compile results Review and prioritize Redesign Issues detected Develop

Context Real or simulated context – Environmental – interruptions, movement, noise, multitasking, etc. – Psychological—motivation, emotional barriers, level of engagement – Usability—appealing, easy to accomplish tasks, develop new ones Techniques – Field tests – Participatory design – Market response 12