Taylor & Sasha. What was the purpose?  Muzafer and his wife, Carolyn, conducted a study on the origin of prejudice.  The experiment focused heavily.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination Social Context of Prejudice.
Advertisements

Sherif Boys Camp Studies Participants and basic procedure? year old boys Naturally formed groups (e.g., friendships developed) Boys separated into.
PERSONAL FITNESS 20 Sport Psychology 2 REC Confidence/Belief & Performance  Factors that detract  Personal  Factors experienced by an individual.
Communication Skills Personal Commitment Programs or Services Interaction Processes Context.
Student Action Teams: Research 1 Part B: Student Action Teams: The Research Evidence Victorian State Program: Phase 2 Commissioned by VicHealth Designed.
The Humanistic and Socio- Cultural Approach Rachel, Olivia, Claire, Max, Nohelia, Julia.
ALFRED ADLER Man is a ___________ being. Freud Jung Adler.
Quick Review of Terms Stereotypes are usually false generalizations: assumption that people of shared religious, ethnic, cultural, or other characteristics.
Factors contributing to the development of prejudice Factors that may reduce prejudice.
Group Dynamics in Organizations Group Dynamics Synergy through Groups Formal and Informal Groups Group Behaviour Required and emergent behaviour Activities,
Chapter 8 Communicating in Groups. List the characteristics and types of groups and explain how groups develop Understand how group size affects communication.
Intergroup Relations: Prejudice and Discrimination
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination Part 2: Sept. 28, 2011.
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination Part 2: Sept. 27, 2010.
Conflict. Conflict may be understood as collision or disagreement. Conflict arises when individuals or groups encounter goals that both parties cannot.
Attitudes Chapter 8 Pages
Behaviour in Groups: Working in a group Brainstorming Social loafing Group Cohesion Competition.
Humanistic Psychology
Tajfel & Turner’s intergroup discrimination experiments
Summarize Intelligence Math Achievement Self Gender and Gender boundaries Peer Relationships Friendships Developing group Norms Sherif & Sherif Robber’s.
Social cognition Explanations of Prejudice. Learning Objectives To understand what psychologists mean by the term prejudice. To know and understand 3.
Part 2 of Family Life & Sexulaity
Social Psychology “Someone once said, ‘All the world’s a stage, and we all must play a part.’” Elvis.
No, this is not a guide on how to get a date..  Persuasion  Obedience  Group dynamics  Prejudice  Culture Formation  Stereotyping.
By: Mrs. Brown ‘10. Society- page 126 in your text book. Social groups- Chapter 5 in other text book Institution – Chapter 5 in other text book.
TEAMWORK AND TEAM BUILDING KEYS TO GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY.
HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH This approach supports the idea that an important function of the school is to help students learn to live harmoniously in an.
Sherif Robbers Cave Experiment By Anthony Boyle, Jay Williams, Jose Ibarra, and Corey Fillers.
Realistic Conflict Theory Mustafer Sherif Social Psychology.
Intergroup Processes November 11th, 2009 : Lecture 18.
Chapter 7 Prejudice: Foundations, Causes, Effects & Remedies.
Realistic Group (Theory) Experiment Conflict And Prejudice
Ms. Eberhard HGD – Spring What is teamwork? A joint action by a group of people, in which each person subordinates his or her individual interests.
HSB4M.  Social Science: broad field of study that looks at human behaviour  Three disciplines: anthropology, psychology and sociology  Typically social.
Intergroup Relations Theory and Research: An overview.
Subjective Perception: Attribution theory and Prejudice.
Group Dynamics Stages of Team Development. Group Dynamics Phenomenon that occurs in groups based upon their interactions and relations. The term group.
Available at: – Compete on a Competitive VEX Team Compete on a Competitive VEX Team.
Tasks for Teams. Who is the leader? T – trust among group members E – encouragement A – accountability for accomplishing goals M – meaningful work through.
Groups, Cliques and Social Behaviour
Assimilation Processes
Prejudice  What is prejudice?  Why are people prejudiced?  Individual view  Intergroup view  Can prejudice be reduced? psychlotron.org.uk.
+ Social Theories Functionalism. Functionalists believe that everything and everybody in society has a ROLE (a function) that makes society to run smoothly.
Chapter 6. Group: consists of at least 2 or more people who share one or more goals and think, feel & behave in similar ways -in regular contact -take.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Notes
Social Psychology 2.
COMMUNITY INTERVENTIONS 2 3 rd December Icebreaker: Story Telling 2. Reviewing last week’s topic 3. Course overview 4. How Groups Work 5. Facilitation.
Nature of Motivation Perceptions Personality
Leadership & Team Work. Team Cohesion An effective team has cohesion, the team members work well together and share similar goals Cohesion is influenced.
STEREOTYPES & PREJUDICE.
Is there prejudice and discrimination between groups?
Social Identity Theory
Prejudice. An unjustifiable attitude toward a group and its members Based on the exaggerated notion that members of other social groups are very different.
INTERGROUP RELATIONS Social psychologists study in-groups vs. out-groups, ethnocentrism, and the difference between prejudice and discrimination.
Social Thinking: Attitudes & Prejudice. What is an attitude? Predisposition to evaluate some people, groups, or issues in a particular way Can be negative.
Prejudice & Discrimination Heuristics to Hate. Social CategoriesStereotypesPrejudice Discrimination Prejudice & Discrimination COGNITIVEAFFECTIVEBEHAVIORAL.
Sherif et al. (1961) The Robbers’ Cave Study By Maddy and Michelle.
Cross-Cultural Psychology
Tuckman’s Five Stages of Group Development
Unit 13 Leadership in sport
Psychological factors in leading sports activities
Social Psychology.
Self-Awareness “Becoming a person means that the individual moves
Cross-Cultural Psychology
Explanations of Prejudice
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination
Chalalai taesilapasathit Faculty of liberal arts, Thammasat university
The Group kundi.
Presentation transcript:

Taylor & Sasha

What was the purpose?  Muzafer and his wife, Carolyn, conducted a study on the origin of prejudice.  The experiment focused heavily on the concept of a ‘group’ and what a perception of belonging to a group can actually do to the relationships of members within it and their relationships with people outside their group.

Who was involved?  Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn Sherif- psychologists that came up with the experiment.  22 boys between the ages of 11 and 12.  Researchers were disguised as camp leaders.

What happened in this experiment?  There were 3 phases of this experiment.  1. In-Group Formation  2. Friction Phase  3. Integration Phase.

Phase 1. (In-group Formation)  Twenty-two eleven year-old boys of middle-class socioeconomic standing, and who are not school or social failures and who have similar educational level.  These boys were taken into a summer camp in Robbers Cave State Park in Oklahoma where they were divided into two groups of eleven.  The two groups created national flags creating a sense of belonging. They also bonded with each other and created group names.  The groups must not be aware of the existence of the other group If the groups had met before, it would alter the results because they would likely be less hostile towards the other group later on in the experiment.

Phase 2. Friction Phase  During this phase, the two groups were allowed to find out about the existence of the other group.  Teams were forced to compete against each other in a number of camp activities. Such as, canoeing, camp fire building, and wood chopping, etc.  The winning team, scoring the highest overall number of points, won a trophy.  Greatly increased the antagonism between the two groups.  Later on, name calling and fighting started and the singing of offending songs were also observed.  After refusal of being in the same room, the researchers decided to end the second phase before further outbursts occurred.

Phase 3- Integration Phase.  This stage constitutes the most crucial and significant aspect of the study.  The researchers forced groups together to cooperate and achieve a common goal.  Both groups were taken to a new location and were told to fix their drinking water supply which had been damaged by “vandals”.  The two teams worked together because a water supply shortage affected both groups immensely.  The second activity the boys were told to watch a movie together. They successfully agreed upon one, and later ate dinner together without dispute.

What was discovered?  During the first phase, the researchers discovered that when you place a group of strangers together, they take on specific roles within the group. Such as leaders, followers, etc. They bond together and become close friends (like a family).  Second Phase- because of the bonding in group one, they had a sense of pride towards that team. When forced to fight against each other they found themselves in a battle. Each group believed their group was superior in all aspects.  Third Phase- When two conflicting groups are brought together to achieve a goal that can only be accomplished by both groups working together. They work together flawlessly.

How did this change psychology?  Realistic conflict theory - intergroup conflicts arise between groups as they compete over the same limited resources. Thought to cause discrimination and prejudices in society  Sports Therapy

Bibliography   sherifs.php sherifs.php 