10 th Meeting of the Washington Group Results from the UNESCAP and the Granada Group testing Luxembourg November 3 – 5, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2/8/2014 Measuring Disability and Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … the work of the Washington Group on Disability.
Advertisements

The Washington Group Extended Set for Functioning: A Review Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA Washington Group on Disability.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Understanding the Three Child Outcomes.
The Budapest Initiative*: Measuring Population Health Status in Surveys and Censuses * The Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health.
Self-Care Question: Cognitive Testing Results 6 th Annual Mtg UN Washington Group on Disability Statistics Kampala, Uganda October 10-13, 2006.
UPPER BODY Lifting and Picking Up. Upper Body-Lifting Questions Do you have difficulty raising a 2 liter jug of water from waist to eye level? Do you.
Safe Lifting Techniques
Responding to an emergency situation. Chain of survival, moving a victim, and Heimlich maneuver.
Disability Statistics at NCHS: An Update
Purpose of Testing Census Questions on Disability Regional Meeting of UN Washington City Group on Disability Statistics Rio de Janeiro September 19,20.
VISION Results of the Cognitive and Field Tests 10 th Washington Group Meeting Luxembourg, 3-5 November 2010.
Short Set Update Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant To NCHS.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability
TRANSLATION PROTOCOL PREPARED BY ETHEL JN. BAPTISTE ADAPTED FROM EURO-REVES, NOV 2003.
Measuring Disability in a Survey or Census Context: Parallel Work Advancing the Field Barbara M. Altman, Ph.D. Disability Statistics Consultant.
Exploring the Washington Group Data from the 2011 U.S. National Health Interview Survey Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA.
Jennifer Madans Associate Director for Science
Presentation on Communication Question 6 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala,Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006.
Body Mechanics and Range of Motion
Cognitive test results and Finalization of the Module on Child Functioning and Disability Mitchell Loeb / Kristen Miller / Meredith Massey NCHS Washington,
General Disability Measures Used in Developed Countries: Question Characteristics Beth Rasch representing the collaborative work of the UN, ISTAT, and.
September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures Barbara M. Altman National Center for Health Statistics.
HEARING DOMAIN 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 B.Tserenkhand National Statistical Office of Mongolia.
For the Safe Male Circumcision Campaign By Ndizeye Simon.
Cognitive Interviewing Washington Group Extended Set Dar es Salaam, Tanzania October 7 - 9, 2009.
Report on the Budapest Initiative* *Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health Status Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics,
…from Census to Survey: a framework for the development of extended question sets for use on surveys Mitch Loeb USA Washington Group on Disability Statistics.
10/13/2015 Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … and the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Mitchell.
Chapter 3 Physical Fitness and Your Health. Physical Fitness and You.
Measuring Disability Prevalence Daniel Mont, HDNSP Disability and Development Team June 6, 2007.
Manual handling briefing The aim of this briefing is to increase awareness amongst staff of the potential risks associated with manual handling, to provide.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability: The Work of the Washington Group (continued) Daniel Mont Disability and Development Group The World Bank.
Environmental Safety Body Motions: Lifting, Pushing, and Turning Biohazardous Materials.
BDI Training. Agenda General Information about BDI Administering the BDI Scoring the BDI Watch BDI on 2 year old – score protocol.
Lab Safety Rules With help from Sponge Bob and the Bikini Bottom Gang.
Preventing Back Injury
Chapter 3 Before giving Care.
Environmental Safety Body Motions: Lifting, Pushing, and Turning Biohazardous Materials.
Washington Group Cognitive Test Kristen Miller Questionnaire Design Research Lab National Center for Health Statistics, USA 1) Purpose of cognitive test.
Presentation on Field tests Margie Schneider Dan Mont 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala, Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006.
Cognition domain Cognition domain 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 Andres Montes ESCAP Statistics Division.
FATIGUE Results of ESCAP Testing Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant Washington Group, November 3-5, 2010, Luxembourg.
Examination of Disparities Between Reponses to Short Set Questions and Extended Questions: With Emphasis on Those Reporting Unable Barbara M. Altman.
Environmental Safety Body Motions: Lifting, Pushing, and Turning.
PAIN. Pain Questions Do you have frequent pain? Do you use medication for pain? If yes: In the past 3 months, how often did you have pain? Some days,
Comments on Proposal for Development of Extended Measurement Sets Jennifer Madans For Barbara M. Altman National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Infant Growth and Development
Trends in Functional Status and Disability among the Elderly Ellen Kramarow Jennifer Akerblom NCHS Data Users Conference July 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Review of the development of the extended question set on functioning: Mitchell Loeb (U.S.A.) National Center for Health Statistics/ Washington Group on.
SPECA Meeting, Paris, June 16, 2006 Activities Related to Health and Disability Statistics in the UNECE Region and Globally Jennifer H. Madans for the.
Check, Call, Care Taking Action in Emergency Situations.
1 Task Force on Health Expectancies National Disability Survey and Sport and Physical Exercise Module Gerry Brady Central Statistics Office, Ireland Luxembourg.
Analyses of extended set questions using the U.S. National Health Interview Survey Mitchell Loeb / Jennifer Madans National Center for Health Statistics/
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
Cognitive test results and Finalization of the Module on Child Functioning and Disability Mitchell Loeb (with Kristen Miller & Meredith Massey) NCHS Washington,
Emergency and Non-Emergency Moves. One of the most dangerous threats to a seriously injured person is unnecessary movement One of the most dangerous threats.
… the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics, USA for the Washington Group on Disability.
10 steps to Safe Lifting.
 Traditional ethnographic research to help learn the perspectives held by those you are studying.
Washington Group Meeting, Kampala, Uganda, Oct Mobility Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant.
Review of the development the extended question set on functioning: An update on revisions since the 10 th meeting, and a discussion of next steps Jennifer.
STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Day 2 - Session 5 Interview guides and tips for effective strategies.
Body Mechanics Gabriela E Sousa. Why is it Important? Proper body mechanics for both staff and patient is important because it reduces the risk of injury.
Recognizing significant delays and problem solving through them
UNICEF/WG MODULE ON CHILD FUNCTIONING: TESTING and ANALYSIS
UN Washington Group Report and Next Steps
Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures
for disability data collection in Viet Nam
Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant
Presentation transcript:

10 th Meeting of the Washington Group Results from the UNESCAP and the Granada Group testing Luxembourg November 3 – 5, 2010

Upper Body (UB) and the ICF Objective of the domain: Identify individuals who report upper body difficulties Difficulties may have been present since birth or may be due to: Accident Disease Injury Degeneration of body structure/function

UB UNESCAP Cognitive Testing Aspects: Lifting and Carrying Objects Fine Hand Use Hand and Arm Use Self Care Testing goal: Do questions elicit appropriate and comparable cross country and cross culture responses? Are respondents able to easily understand questions and concepts? Can the data be meaningfully interpreted?

Questions Included (1) Do you have any difficulty with self care, such as washing all over or dressing? Do you have difficulty raising a 2 liter jug of water from waist to eye level? If NO: Go to Hands & Fingers Question Do you use any aids or equipment or receive help with lifting? If YES: What types of aids, equipment or assistance do you use? Do you have difficulty raising a 2 liter jug of water from waist to eye level even when using your aid? How old were you when the difficulty lifting began? Is your difficulty lifting due to a health problem or something else?

Questions Included (2) Does your difficulty lifting limit your ability to carry out daily activities? Does your difficulty lifting limit your ability to carry out other activities that are not part of your day-to-day life? Do you have difficulty using your hands and fingers, such as picking up small objects, for example, a button or pencil, or opening or closing containers or bottles? If NO: Go to Next Section Do you use any aids or equipment or receive help when using your hands and fingers? If YES: What types of aids, equipment, or assistance do you use?

Questions Included (3) How old were you when the difficulty using your hands or fingers began? Is your difficulty using your hands or fingers due to a health problem or something else? Does your difficulty using your hands or fingers limit your ability to carry out daily activities? Does your difficulty using your hands or fingers limit your ability to carry out other activities that are not part of your day-to-day life?

Results for the Lifting Question Responses obtained from 123 of 157 participants Most considered lifting from waist to eye level though there were some respondents who considered lifting an item from the floor. Concept of “2 liter jug of water” seemed to work well Lifting aid question not always connected to jug question Varied ideas of what to count as an “aid” When the “aid” reported was assistance from another person, the question regarding difficulty lifting “using your aid” was confusing to respondents

Results for the Hands & Fingers Question Responses obtained from 142 of 157 participants Most interpretations were as intended with some exceptions: Ability to pick items off the floor was considered Ability to pick up objects but not open lids Difficulty attributed to a vision problem

Questions Included in Field Test Do you have difficulty with self care, such as washing all over or dressing? Do you have difficulty raising a 2 liter jug of water or soda from waist to eye level? PROBE: Can you tell me how you arrived at your answer? Why did you answer [FILL WITH ANSWER]? Do you have difficulty using your hands and fingers, such as picking up small objects, for example, a button or pencil, or opening or closing containers or bottles? PROBE: In answering this last question, were you thinking about bending down to pick up an object from the floor, picking up an object from a table, or something else?

Field Test Questions cont’d How old were you when the difficulty lifting or using your hands and fingers began? How much does your difficulty using your hands and fingers limit your ability to carry out daily activities?

Results from the Field Test Across all countries at least some difficulty reported for: Self care: 5% Lifting: 7% Hands and fingers: 7% Reports of self-care difficulty increased with age: 18 – 30 years: 1 % 31 – 40 years: 2% 41 – 50 years: 6% 51 – 60 years: 12% 61 – 70 years: 18% 71 and older: 23%

Field Test Results cont’d Three tasks – self care, lifting, and hands and finger use – do not identify the same populations though there is significant overlap nor are they mutually exclusive. No single question stands out for recommendation Further research needed to determine where respondents are lifting from (floor/ground versus table) and how they are considering lifting No further question wording revisions proposed

Goals for the Granada Testing Are the lifting and hands/fingers questions tapping the same thing? What action is considered in the lifting question? Ground to waist level Waist to eye level What activities are being done in the use of fingers question? Pick up versus grasp NOTE: The self care item for Upper Body was not included in this cognitive testing

Overlap Between Items Upper Body – Hands and Fingers Upper Body - Lifting Cannot do at all A lot of difficulty Some difficulty No difficulty Missing/ Not askedTotal Cannot do at all1---1 A lot of difficulty Some difficulty No difficulty Missing/Not asked Total

Actions Considered for Lifting Range of motion: Most narratives indicated respondents were thinking about lifting from waist to eye level Waist to eye level not a common activity A small minority indicated they were thinking about bending over to lift something from the ground Item being lifted: Most thought about actual bottle of water or soda Something significantly heavier was also reported Some ambiguity created by issue of whether the action had to be done with one arm or whether both could be used

Other Findings for Lifting Item Respondents did not compare themselves to others when determining their answer If respondents indicated thinking about a specific time period, it was the “current moment”. Otherwise they chose their answer without considering any specific time period.

Results for the Fingers Question Range of motion: Respondents also thought about bending to the floor for this question; particularly those who had considered this movement in the previous question Dexterity versus Strength Picking up a button or pencil requires dexterity while twisting a jar open requires strength For several respondents this created a double-barreled question situation Respondents focused on the specific actions mentioned in the question Action of buttoning shirt versus picking button up

Final Thoughts Upper body questions work well for most respondents Possible revisions for lifting question Waist to mouth which creates a more natural and common movement Consider the action of someone handing you a 2 liter bottle which avoids the issue of bending over Possible revisions for hands and fingers question Replace button with needle if the action of buttoning is not an acceptable action Split into two items if both motions are important to capture