OCM BOCES Day 6 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Advertisements

Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
OASYS TRAINING COLLECTING & SUBMITTING EVIDENCE. APPR 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures Knowledge of Students & Student.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Teacher Effectiveness
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
OCM BOCES Day 5 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
Lead Evaluator Training
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
OCM BOCES Day 4 Principal Evaluator Training 1. 2 Nine Components.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
NYS Middle Level Liaisons Network As representatives of statewide middle level education, our purpose is to advocate for middle level needs, inform SED.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Day 3. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
OCM BOCES Day 8 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Taking Care of Business.
Introduction to Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Presentation: Introduce SEC to Educators [Enter place and date]
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Worthington Teacher Evaluation System Dr. Trent Bowers.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Curriculum and Instruction Council May, Welcome and Introductions.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
January 2016 Slides updated Emergency Action At their December 2015 meeting, the Board of Regents [again] took emergency action Introduced APPR.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
Day 7. Agenda What’s the Buzz “Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of ELLs and students with disabilities” Mini-Lesson:
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
APPR Update School Year.
Middle School Course Selection
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
APPR Update School Year.
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Implementing Race to the Top
Northwest ISD Elementary Education District Effectiveness Report
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

OCM BOCES Day 6 Principal Evaluator Training

2 Nine Components

3 Nine Components

4 Day Five Agenda

5 Resources

The Regulations 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures

The Regulations 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures ISLLC 2008 Standards Multiple schools visits Unannounced visit Other sources “two?” Remaining points (if any): goals Feedback gathering w/ approved tools only Teacher Effectiveness Growth for Now Value-Added Sooner or Later SLOs Required Moment in time or growth Can use state tests In different ways Can use teacher local measures SLOs Optional School- wide measure

The Regulations 20% Student Growth Growth for Now Value-Added Sooner or Later SLOs Required  State growth scores for now (4-8)  Value Added (sooner than we thought)?  SLOs for a few?

The Regulations 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures Moment in time or growth Can use state tests In different ways Can use teacher local measures SLOs Optional School- wide measure  Re-purpose state data  Emphasis on graduation for HS principals (or graduation-related measures)  Other exams could be used  SLOs process can be employed

The Regulations 20% Student Growth 60% Multiple Measures ISLLC 2008 Standards Multiple schools visits Unannounced visit Other sources “two?” Remaining points (if any): goals Feedback gathering w/ approved tools only Teacher Effectiveness  At least 31/60 – still recommend 60/60  School visits  Structured feedback  Independent observer?  Review of documents  Contribution to teacher effectiveness  Other academic results or learning environment  All standards every year (some rubrics might need more)

Who matters more? Research & Evidence PRINCIPAL TEACHER

Who matters more? Research & Evidence

Who matters more? Research & Evidence A B C D E

A Year in the Life  Updated map with regulation changes 14 Principal Supervision

Research

Principal Evaluators have to:  Know what the principal has to do, including  ›Standards (CCLS)  ›Data (Common Formative and Interim Assessment)  ›Professional Practice (APPR)  ›Culture (PLC)  Everything else they have always had to do  ›Help the principal do all of the above  ›Help find the time in which to do all of the above Job Description

Principal Evaluators have to:  Help principal to choose and define the right initiative/goal for item listed above  ›Understand how to use ISLLC (and maybe a rubric) to guide the initiative/goal  ›Collect evidence along the way  ›Provide growth-producing feedback  ›Use APPR system for evaluation and identification of appropriate professional development  ›Implement improvement plan (if necessary) Job Description

Research

At your table, read through the Douglass Middle School case study. Review ISLLC Standard 1 Tables answer questions the follow Compare to MPPR Rubric. How would you rate the evidence from this case study? What other evidence might you collect? 19 Case Study

Research

The 20%s  How might the 20% play out in your districts? 20% + 20% Teaching Assignment Is there a State-Provided Growth Score (or is there a state assessment that must be used)? What (if any) SLOs would have to be employed? Kindergarten Common Branch First Grade Common Branch Third Grade Common Branch Fourth Grade Common Branch Fifth Grade Math Sixth Grade Social Studies Seventh Grade Science 8 th Grade ELA and Social Studies teacher with 100 students  Class One: ELA with 35 students  Class Two: ELA with 20 students  Class Three: SS with 30 students  Class Four: SS with 15 students Science teacher with 110 total students across five sections  Two Living Environment (Regents) sections with 20 students each  Two Living Environment (non-Regents) with 25 students each  One Forensic Science elective with 20 students 7 th grade Math and Science teacher with 130 students across 5 sections  Two 7 th grade Math sections with 30 students each  Two 7 th grade Science sections with 25 students each  One Advances 7 th grade Science section with 20 students Middle school PE teacher with 5 sections and 140 students total  2 sections of 6 th grade PE (60 students total)  2 sections of 7 th grade PE (50 students total)  Section of 8 th grade PE (sop students) High school resource teacher with a total of 25 students  2 groups of 9 th grade students  2 groups of 10 th grade students  1 group of 11 th /12 th grade students K-6 art teacher with a total of 480 students  4 sections of K (80 students)  4 sections of 1 st grade (100 students)  4 sections of 2 nd grade (100 student)  3 sections of 3 rd grade (90 students)  4 sections of 4 th grade (110 students) 5 th and 6 th grade AIS/reading teacher with a total of 80 students  6 groups of 5 th grade students who meet every other day (35 students total)  6 groups of 6 th grade students (45 students total) 11 th grade special education teacher  2 sections of co-taught ELA (class size 20 each with 6 SWD in each)  3 sections of 11 th grade resource room (total of 15 students) K-6 instrumental music teacher  4 th grade lessons (30 students who meet once per week in lessons of 3 students each)  5 th grade band (35 students who meet every other day)  5 th grade lessons (35 students who meet once per week in lessons of 5 students each)  6 th grade band (35 students who meet every other day)  6 th grade lessons (35 students who meet once per week in lessons of 5 students each) Middle-level library/media specialist (600 students in school)  5 th grade classes (150 students attend library class once per week in 6 groups of 25)  6 th – 8 th grade students use library as needed or as scheduled in conjunction with teachers.

Research

Aligning School Visits to ISLLC and RTTT 23 Evidence Collection  What have you tried to do differently this year?  How’s it going?  What’s next?

School Visit: Mini-observations 24 Evidence Collection  Go on a “mini” together  Three part role play: 1. Teacher 2. Principal 3. Evaluator/Supervisor

Day Five Agenda