Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
U.S. Pretrial Services and Probation Office Northern District of Ohio.
1 Proposed Rule: Amendments to the Protocol Gas Verification Program and Minimum Competency Requirements for Air Emission Testing Presented at May 12,
August 21, 2012 Western Regional Gas Conference Paul Gustilo Southwest Gas Corporation.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
FQHC Look-Alike Change in Scope Module for Implementation of Electronic Information Systems August 5, 2010 Esther Paul, Public Health Analyst Anil Bommakanti,
Groundwater Protection Initiative Status George Oliver RETS/REMP Conference June 25-27, 2007.
Contractor Safety Management
AGA Perspectives on Current Pipeline Safety Regulations August 2014.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals –Is there a need for change? Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations Interstate Natural.
Overview of Key Rule Features
Post Approval Monitoring Program Presented by Carolyn Malinowski Manager, Quality Assurance and Training.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA Update Kenneth Y. Lee Engineering & Research Division
Stress Corrosion Cracking Overview & Introduction David Johnson December 2, 2003.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
Shop-Fabricated Tank Inspection Chris Bashor Minnesota Pollution Control Agency June, 2001.
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
SHRIMP: Model Distribution Integrity Management Plan Development Tool John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 25, 2009 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) & SHRIMP.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Chapter 5 Contract review Contract review process and stages
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
Post Award Grantee Technical Assistance Call: FY 2012 Supplemental Funding for Quality Improvement in Health Centers U.S. Department of Health and Human.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UPDATES.
Distribution Integrity Management – What To Expect John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association Western Regional Gas Conference.
GRANT MANAGEMENT SEMINARS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
Office of Pipeline Safety Qualifications of Individuals: Protocol Review Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Approvals and Permits Division Isreal Mallard Transportation Specialist,
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Pipeline Safety: How the Mayor’s Council On Pipeline Safety Can Help Presentation to: Mayor’s Council on Pipeline Safety Conference Name: Christopher A.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOUR MAOP? REAUTHORIZATION, SAN BRUNO, AND PHMSA’S ADVISORY BULLETIN.
2015 SAFETY SEMINAR HIGHLIGHTS OF 2014 Rick Moses Chief, Bureau of Safety Florida.
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
OPS Observations, Expectations, and Concerns Zach Barrett (OPS) Direct Assessment Workshop November 4, 2003.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, LA November 20, 2008 Elizabeth Komiskey, P.E. PHMSA/Office of.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Distribution Integrity Management Program
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
Enforcement of Integrity Management Rule Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Chris Hoidal, Director OPS Western Region.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
Slide 1 POA Seminar 02 March 2016 Personnel Competence Including Certifying Staff and Release to Service Andy Swift / Michael Greer.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
REUs: Technical Issues and Funding Sources
Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Americas Aerospace Quality Group Registration Management Committee
Distribution Integrity
Open Letter - Summary of Responses
Presentation transcript:

Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007

IMP Special Permit Criteria Process Criteria –The operator must have an acceptable IM program Personnel Criteria –The operator personnel administering and performing the IM program must be qualified Technical Criteria –The pipeline segments must satisfy the technical criteria during the baseline inspection period and subsequent reassessment periods

Information needed by PHMSA to Satisfy IMP-SP IMP-SP Plan, Process and Criteria (Joint) Results of PHMSA audited company program –Process Audit (PHMSA) –Personnel Audit (PHMSA) Proposed Plan for IMP Segments to be included –Technical proposal (Operator) –Reporting proposal (Operator)

IMP-SP Permit Process Timeline Applicant notifies PHMSA of intent to enter program (Letter of Intent) The timeline for the initial submission, processing and approval of a Letter of Intent and subsequent information is as follows: –During the month of February, the operator will submit their Letter of Intent (Operator, PHMSA ID, Contact information) –During the month of March and within 30 days of a company’s submission of a company’s Letter of Intent, PHMSA will review the Letter of Intent and notify the operator of tentative approval or rejection –During the period of March 11 through March 31 the company will submit information concerning specific segments for which they intend to include and retain in the special permit for the upcoming year (IMP- SP Application) –During the period of March 11 through June 30 and within 90 days of a companies submission of specific segments, PHMSA will review the specific segment information and notify the operator of approval or rejection This timeline will allow operators to have approval or rejection prior to the budget process which typically begins in July for the following year’s projects

Initial IMP-SP Application (filed after pipeline company receives approval to enter the IMP-SP program from PHMSA based on submittal of Letter of Intent) Operator Name and Address PHMSA User ID Contact information Description of Segment(s) Date of last integrity assessment(s) by segment Date of next integrity assessment(s) by segment Justification Statement to enter IMP-SP Program signed by operating company officer

Applicant IMP-SP Process Criteria Operator must have an implemented Integrity Management Program Operator must have an implemented Operations and Maintenance program Operator must have an implemented Drug and Alcohol program Operator must have an implemented Public Awareness Program Operator records must demonstrate appropriate management of the pipeline system

PHMSA Criteria For IMP-SP (Process Acceptance) At least one PHMSA Audit conducted concerning their IMP program –The IMP Audit must be complete and all identified issues communicated to the operator –Unresolved NOPVs as result of the completed IMP audit must be documented by PHMSA and Applicant; good faith effort for addressing unresolved NOPVs will be considered –Unresolved NOAs as a result of the completed IMP audit must be documented by PHMSA and Applicant; good faith effort for addressing unresolved NOAs will be considered PHMSA accepts or denies applicant’s process performance as result of completed IMP audit(s)

Applicant Personnel Criteria Operator must have personnel that are qualified per company’s Operator Qualification Plan and Drug and Alcohol program Operator must have a management structure which supports operations, maintenance and integrity management with demonstrated commitment to pipeline safety Operator must have a technical staff or access to experts to determine the technical aspects of the integrity management program and the special permit

PHMSA Criteria for IMP-SP (Personnel Acceptance) At Least One PHMSA Audit Conducted concerning their Operation and Maintenance (O&M), Operator Qualification (OQ) and Drug and Alcohol (D&A) Plan program –The PHMSA I&M and OQ Audit must be complete and all identified issues communicated to the operator. Operator must certify they have a D&A Plan in conformance with Parts 199 and 40. –Unresolved NOPVs as result of the completed audits must be documented by PHMSA and Applicant; good faith effort for addressing unresolved NOPVs will be considered –Unresolved NOAs as a result of completed audits must be documented by PHMSA and Applicant; good faith effort for addressing unresolved NOAs will be considered PHMSA accepts or denies applicant’s process performance as result of these filed audits

Applicant IMP-SP (Technical Criteria) Inline Inspection (ILI) or pressure test (PT) must have been conducted as the IMP assessment technique on a segment at least one time Predicted pipeline corrosion rates for a segment must be forecasted and deemed appropriate for proposed extended interval Post IMP assessment repairs must be documented and analysis performed to determining segment is in satisfactory condition Segment must not have experienced an incident or leak caused by corrosion; subsequent to an IMP assessment of segment Pipeline Segments with special conditions (e.g. MIC, SSC, SCC, or non-tariff spec gas) require specific analysis to address the special conditions

PHMSA Criteria for IMP-SP (Technical Acceptance) Documentation provided by applicant should describe the segment and clarify if the segment meets the following criteria –No bare steel pipe –No pipe with ineffective coating systems –No pipe with ineffective cathodic protection –No pipe that was assessed by other than ILI or hydrostatic pressure test for the IMP program –For pipe with known history of MIC, SSC, or SCC, the IMP must contain provisions for addressing and managing the threat –For pipe never hydrostatically pressure tested plan must justify why lack of pressure test does contribute to corrosion threat PHMSA accepts or denies applicant’s process performance as result of filed technical information

Yearly Report & Application for Additional Segments by IMP-SP Participants Companies will submit an annual report during March of each year. The annual report will include the following: –Confirmation of the company’s Initial IMP-SP Application information –Status of the segments previously approved as part of the IMP-SP –Addition or deletion of any segments to the special permit –Status on the completion of scheduled or unscheduled repairs on the segments